CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03247868SPRIntUpdated Aug 14, 2017

A Multimodal Approach to Cervical Dystonia Treatment With Association of Botulinum Toxin and Motor Learning Techniques

An interventional study of Botulinum Toxin+SPRInt in Cervical Dystonia,Primary, sponsored by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-14.

Sponsored by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

the aim of this study protocol is to describe, using a longitudinal study, a multimodal approach of treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin (BoNTA) and a new rehabilitation protocol named SPRInt (Sensory-motor perceptive rehabilitation integrated) approach based on motor learning techniques and spatial rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

Longitudinal study utilizing a multimodal treatment protocol developing in six months time:

Phase 1 : BoNTA injections localized in dystonic cervical muscles with EMG/US guides performed after polygraphy and kinematic analysis of cervical region Times: T0: pre treatment; T1: 6 weeks after T0 considered BoNTA pharmacological peak effect; T2: 12 weeks after T0 considered from guidelines and pharmaceutical data sheet the lowest BoNTA effect.

Phase 2: BoNTA performed in the same way of Phase 1 associated to SPRInt protocol Times: T2: before combination of BoNTA and rehabilitation treatment (18 sessions of 45 minutes three times a week); T3: 6 weeks after T2 considered BoNTA pharmacological peak effect and the end of SPRInt protocol; T4: 12 weeks after T2 considered from guidelines and pharmaceutical data sheet the lowest BoNTA effect and follow up of SPRInt-consolidation.

The SPRInt approach aims are to improve body perception, posture and movement quality and to restore body axis by using specific sensory feedbacks, both intrinsic (IFB) and extrinsic (EFB), and motor exercises (ME) with specific rhythmic temporal structure.The ME can be focused on different body parts (eyes, head, neck, trunk, arm) and involve different spatial planes (frontal, sagittal, horizontal, multiplanar).

The exercises can be performed with eyes closed and with an external passive motor leading in order to improve proprioception and facilitate sensory integration by excluding visual or verbal information that can be misleading for the patient. The ability to perceive and integrate intrinsic feedback is the fundamental element to create mental image that define body scheme and motor behaviour.

The extrinsic feedback can be continuous or discontinuous (on-off timing) and gives the patient information about the performance or result by positive or negative reinforcement; this process can be important to motivate and empower the patient in reaching new skills.

The final goal for the patient is to reinforce and retain the informations collected with working memory and then stored with the consolidation process which ends in learning new skills (ie rescue postural axis) and improving motor tasks (ie move the head in the opposite position).

At each time point these test are performed:

  • CLINICAL SCALES i. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)

    1. Severity
    2. Disability
    3. Pain ii. Quality of life iii. Depression Beck Scale iv. Zung Self Rating Anxiety Scale v. Rey Test to test visuo spatial abilities
  • MOVEMENT ANALYSIS and KINEMATIC AND EMG MAPPING of cervical region ( head and neck)
  • FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE BRAIN STUDY to perform brain measurements of functional connectivity (resting state-Default Mode Network), morphometry (volume, area, cortical thickness, cortical curvature, node degree) and tractography.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Dystonia,Primary
03

In context

Dystonia

319 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystonia; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 32 across 181 interventional studies indexed under Dystonia.

Browse Dystonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus is the lead sponsor of 146 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • more than 18 yo
  • diagnosis of idiopathic cervical dystonia
  • disease duration more than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of secondary dystonia on previously performed neuroimaging data (ie structural lesion of cervical spine, vascular or traumatic brain injuries)
  • history of neuroleptic drug treatment (antidopaminergic drugs)
  • associated neurological illness
  • botulinum toxin treatment in the 3 previous months before recruitment
  • head tremor without dystonic posturing
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Botulinum toxin+SPRInt protocol

    patients affected by cervical dystonia receive botulinum toxin treatment (EMG-US guided injections in dystonic muscles) for two times at T0 and T2; after T2 patients are treated also with SPRInt rehabilitation protocol based on motor learning techniques.

    Combination Product: Botulinum Toxin+SPRInt

Interventions

  • Combination productBotulinum Toxin+SPRInt

    Botulinum toxin injections in association with rehabilitative approach to cervical dystonia (SPRInt)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dystonia phenomenology improvement

    a clinical assessment of dystonia will be conducted at each study visit using TWSTRS

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

Secondary outcomes

  1. quality of life

    a clinical assessment of dystonia severity will be conducted at each study visit using quality of life scale (EQ5D5L)

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

  2. brain plasticity

    study of functional connectivity using functional magnetic resonance

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

  3. depression

    depression scale (BECK)

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

  4. anxiety

    anxiety scale (ZUNG)

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

  5. structural grey matter plasticity

    brain study of morphometry using functional magnetic resonance

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

  6. structural white matter plasticity

    tractography of brain areas using functional magnetic resonance

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

  7. kinematic assessment of dystonia severity

    visit with optoelectronic system

    Time frame: every six weeks during six months time

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi
    Milano, MI 20148, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Jinnah HA, Klein C, Lang AE, Mink JW, Teller JK. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. Epub 2013 May 6. PubMed 23649720 ↗
  • Boccagni C, Carpaneto J, Micera S, Bagnato S, Galardi G. Motion analysis in cervical dystonia. Neurol Sci. 2008 Dec;29(6):375-81. doi: 10.1007/s10072-008-1033-z. Epub 2008 Nov 29. PubMed 19043661 ↗
  • Walter U, Dressler D. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injections in neurology: technique, indications and future perspectives. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014 Aug;14(8):923-36. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2014.936387. Epub 2014 Jul 21. PubMed 25046267 ↗
  • Prudente CN, Hess EJ, Jinnah HA. Dystonia as a network disorder: what is the role of the cerebellum? Neuroscience. 2014 Feb 28;260:23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.062. Epub 2013 Dec 11. PubMed 24333801 ↗
  • Delnooz CC, Pasman JW, van de Warrenburg BP. Dynamic cortical gray matter volume changes after botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia. Neurobiol Dis. 2015 Jan;73:327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 28. PubMed 25447226 ↗
  • Delnooz CC, Pasman JW, Beckmann CF, van de Warrenburg BP. Task-free functional MRI in cervical dystonia reveals multi-network changes that partially normalize with botulinum toxin. PLoS One. 2013 May 1;8(5):e62877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062877. Print 2013. PubMed 23650536 ↗
  • De Pauw J, Van der Velden K, Meirte J, Van Daele U, Truijen S, Cras P, Mercelis R, De Hertogh W. The effectiveness of physiotherapy for cervical dystonia: a systematic literature review. J Neurol. 2014 Oct;261(10):1857-65. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7220-8. Epub 2014 Jan 12. PubMed 24413637 ↗
  • van den Dool J, Visser B, Koelman JH, Engelbert RH, Tijssen MA. Cervical dystonia: effectiveness of a standardized physical therapy program; study design and protocol of a single blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2013 Jul 15;13:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-85. PubMed 23855591 ↗
  • Simpson DM, Hallett M, Ashman EJ, Comella CL, Green MW, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ, Gloss D, Potrebic S, Jankovic J, Karp BP, Naumann M, So YT, Yablon SA. Practice guideline update summary: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2016 May 10;86(19):1818-26. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002560. Epub 2016 Apr 18. PubMed 27164716 ↗
  • Curra A, Trompetto C, Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A. Central effects of botulinum toxin type A: evidence and supposition. Mov Disord. 2004 Mar;19 Suppl 8:S60-4. doi: 10.1002/mds.20011. PubMed 15027056 ↗
  • Kitago T, Krakauer JW. Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;110:93-103. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00008-3. PubMed 23312633 ↗
  • Castagna A, Caronni A, Crippa A, Sciume L, Giacobbi G, Corrini C, Montesano A, Ramella M. Sensorimotor Perceptive Rehabilitation Integrated (SPRInt) program: exercises with augmented movement feedback associated to botulinum neurotoxin in idiopathic cervical dystonia-an observational study. Neurol Sci. 2020 Jan;41(1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04061-5. Epub 2019 Sep 2. PubMed 31478151 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03247868
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 14, 2017
Start date
Mar 16, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 28, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 14, 2017

Study contacts

Anna Castagna, MD
Contact
acastagna@dongnocchi.it
+39 02 40308075
Anna Castagna, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion