ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06915896PRE-CBPUpdated Apr 8, 2025

Predictive Variables of Outcome in Subjects With Chronic Rachialgia Referred to Different Pathways of Physiotherapy.

An observational study in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain and Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, sponsored by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-08.

Sponsored by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive value of various biopsychosocial variables on the outcomes of subjects with chronic spinal pain undergoing public health rehabilitation pathways. Secondly, the study aims to assess the reliability of certain questionnaires, classified as Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), which are frequently used in the evaluation of spinal pain but whose metric properties have not yet been established. These objectives will be pursued through two comprehensive assessment sessions (before and after rehabilitation), a re-test session immediately before rehabilitation (to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaires in stable subjects), and two follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 months after discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
  • Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 100 across 481 observational studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus is the lead sponsor of 146 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with nonspecific spinal pain waiting for rehabilitation in public health pathways.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age of majority;
  • Medical diagnosis of nonspecific low back pain or nonspecific neck pain;
  • Chronic symptoms, present for at least 6 months;
  • Waiting for rehabilitation in a public health pathways
  • Signature of to participate in the study and processing of personal data.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with cognitive impairment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Chronic spinal pain patients attending public health rehabilitation pathways
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability Index

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire that helps assess how neck pain affects a person's daily life. It consists of 10 sections, each exploring a specific aspect, such as the intensity of pain, the ability to dress and bathe, lift weights, read, concentrate, work, drive, sleep, and engage in leisure activities. For each section, the patient must choose one answer from six options, with a score ranging from 0 to 5. The lowest score indicates no difficulty, while the highest indicates pain so severe that it makes it impossible to perform the activity. In the end, by adding up the scores from all sections, a maximum score of 50 points is obtained. The higher the score, the greater the disability related to neck pain. (only on neck pain patients)

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  2. Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is used to assess low back pain. It consists of 24 questions directed at the patient regarding their ability or limitation in performing the 24 activities listed, which are typically difficult for a patient with low back pain to carry out. Additionally, the phrase "Due to the back..." has been added to the questions to distinguish limitations caused by lower back pain from those caused by other factors. The administration time is about 5 minutes. For each activity, the patient must give a score of 0 if the activity is not limited, or 1 if they have difficulty due to back pain. The total score ranges from 0 to 24. (only on low back pain patients)

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  3. Neck Disability Index

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire that helps assess how neck pain affects a person's daily life. It consists of 10 sections, each exploring a specific aspect, such as the intensity of pain, the ability to dress and bathe, lift weights, read, concentrate, work, drive, sleep, and engage in leisure activities. For each section, the patient must choose one answer from six options, with a score ranging from 0 to 5. The lowest score indicates no difficulty, while the highest indicates pain so severe that it makes it impossible to perform the activity. In the end, by adding up the scores from all sections, a maximum score of 50 points is obtained. The higher the score, the greater the disability related to neck pain. (only on neck pain patients)

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  4. Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is used to assess low back pain. It consists of 24 questions directed at the patient regarding their ability or limitation in performing the 24 activities listed, which are typically difficult for a patient with low back pain to carry out. Additionally, the phrase "Due to the back..." has been added to the questions to distinguish limitations caused by lower back pain from those caused by other factors. The administration time is about 5 minutes. For each activity, the patient must give a score of 0 if the activity is not limited, or 1 if they have difficulty due to back pain. The total score ranges from 0 to 24. (only on low back pain patients)

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  5. Neck Disability Index

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire that helps assess how neck pain affects a person's daily life. It consists of 10 sections, each exploring a specific aspect, such as the intensity of pain, the ability to dress and bathe, lift weights, read, concentrate, work, drive, sleep, and engage in leisure activities. For each section, the patient must choose one answer from six options, with a score ranging from 0 to 5. The lowest score indicates no difficulty, while the highest indicates pain so severe that it makes it impossible to perform the activity. In the end, by adding up the scores from all sections, a maximum score of 50 points is obtained. The higher the score, the greater the disability related to neck pain. (only on neck pain patients)

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  6. Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is used to assess low back pain. It consists of 24 questions directed at the patient regarding their ability or limitation in performing the 24 activities listed, which are typically difficult for a patient with low back pain to carry out. Additionally, the phrase "Due to the back..." has been added to the questions to distinguish limitations caused by lower back pain from those caused by other factors. The administration time is about 5 minutes. For each activity, the patient must give a score of 0 if the activity is not limited, or 1 if they have difficulty due to back pain. The total score ranges from 0 to 24. (only on low back pain patients)

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  7. TAMPA SCALE of KINESIOPHOBIA

    test-retest relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) of TAMPA SCALE of KINESIOPHOBIA (only on neck pain patients). It's a self-report questionnaire designed to assess pain beliefs and pain-related fear of movement in subjects with musculoskeletal disorders

    Time frame: re-test at baseline

  8. PAIN AWARENESS AND VIGILANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

    test-retest relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) of PAIN AWARENESS AND VIGILANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (only on neck pain patients). It is a self-report questionnaire to measure attention to pain

    Time frame: re-test at baseline

  9. PITTSBURGH SLEEP QUALITY INDEX

    test-retest relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) of PITTSBURGH SLEEP QUALITY INDEX (only on neck pain patients). It is a rating scale developed for the purpose of providing a reliable, valid and standardized measure of sleep quality.

    Time frame: re-test at baseline

  10. TAMPA SCALE of KINESIOPHOBIA

    test-retest absolute reliability (minimal detectable change (mdc) 95) of TAMPA SCALE of KINESIOPHOBIA (only on neck pain patients). It's a self-report questionnaire designed to assess pain beliefs and pain-related fear of movement in subjects with musculoskeletal disorders.

    Time frame: re-test at baseline

  11. PAIN AWARENESS AND VIGILANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

    test-retest absolute reliability (minimal detectable change (mdc) 95) of PAIN AWARENESS AND VIGILANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (only on neck pain patients). It is a self-report questionnaire to measure attention to pain

    Time frame: re-test at baseline

  12. PITTSBURGH SLEEP QUALITY INDEX

    test-retest absolute reliability (minimal detectable change (mdc) 95) of PITTSBURGH SLEEP QUALITY INDEX (only on neck pain patients). It is a rating scale developed for the purpose of providing a reliable, valid and standardized measure of sleep quality.

    Time frame: re-test at baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Numeric Pain Raiting scale 0-10

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  2. Pain Intensity

    Numeric Pain Raiting scale 0-10

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  3. Pain Intensity

    Numeric Pain Raiting scale 0-10

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  4. Health Related Quality of Life

    Short-Form 12 (SF12)

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  5. Self-reported change

    Global rating of Change Scale

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  6. Self-reported change

    Global rating of Change Scale

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  7. Self-reported change

    Global rating of Change Scale

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  8. Medication Use

    yes/no

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  9. Medication Use

    yes/no

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  10. Medication Use

    yes/no

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  11. Pain Frequency

    0-7 in a week

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  12. Pain Frequency

    0-7 in a week

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  13. Pain Frequency

    0-7 in a week

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  14. Health Related Quality of Life

    Short-Form 12 (SF12)

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

  15. Health Related Quality of Life

    Short-Form 12 (SF12)

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  16. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a measurement scale based on a 13-item self-completion questionnaire designed to assess catastrophizing pain-related thoughts in adults with or without chronic pain. (only for patients with cervicalgia)

    Time frame: T0, at the enrollment

  17. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a measurement scale based on a 13-item self-completion questionnaire designed to assess catastrophizing pain-related thoughts in adults with or without chronic pain. (only for patients with cervicalgia)

    Time frame: Second sessions (T1), after 3 month from enrollment

  18. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a measurement scale based on a 13-item self-completion questionnaire designed to assess catastrophizing pain-related thoughts in adults with or without chronic pain. (only for patients with cervicalgia)

    Time frame: Third session (T2), after 6 months from enrollment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 27 months after the start.

Of 175 non-industry observational studies under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 185 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2025
First posted
Apr 8, 2025
StartActual
Oct 30, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2026
Last update
Apr 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06915896
Responsible party
Francesca Cecchi (Professor, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2025
Start date
Oct 30, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2025

Study contacts

Francesca Cecchi
Contact
fcecchi@dongnocchi.it
+39 05573931

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion