CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03229642Updated Sep 16, 2020

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Opioid Use Disorders

An interventional study of Active rTMS and Sham rTMS in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Heroin Dependence, sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-16.

Sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is prevalent and causes substantial health and social burdens. Although evidence have showed the effectiveness of opioid agonist maintenance therapy in OUD, high drop-out rate and the requirement of continuing use of opioid agonists are the major problems. Therefore, to develop novel treatment for OUD is important.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of brain stimulation used to treat a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. Recent studies showed that there may be potential therapeutic effects in rTMS for addictive disorder, including reducing craving and substance use severity. The underlying mechanisms of rTMS in treating addictions may involve increased dopamine function in corticomesolimbic brain circuits and modulation of neural activity in brain circuits that relevant to addiction. However, the treatment results of rTMS in OUD were lacked, and the analysis in functional brain imaging study, neuropsychological tests and other potential biomarkers under rTMS treatment were limited, too.

Thus, the investigators will conduct the add-on double-blinded, sham-controlled study rTMS treatment in 40-60 patients with OUD under methadone maintenance therapy. Patients will be allocated to active and sham rTMS in a 1 : 1 ratio, and participants will receive rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (15 Hz frequency, 4 seconds per train, inter-train interval of 26 seconds, 40 trains per session, total 11 sessions in 4 weeks). The treatment response, urine drug tests, craving scales and side effects to evaluate the therapeutic effects of rTMS will be examined. Neuropsychological assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and tests for potential biomarkers of immune parameters will also be measured during 12-weeks follow up. The study results will provide the important data in whether rTMS add-on methadone maintenance therapy is able to 1) reduce heroin use; 2) reduce craving for heroin; 3) be an effective treatment for OUD, and 4) be associated with improvement in fMRI, biological markers and psychological tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Heroin Dependence

Keywords

  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • opioid use disorder
  • craving
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • neuropsychological tests
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed informed consent by patient or legal representative.
  2. Male or female patient aged ≧20 and ≦65 years.
  3. A diagnosis of OUD according to DSM criteria made by a specialist in psychiatry.
  4. Patient or a reliable caregiver can be expected to ensure acceptable compliance and visit attendance for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women of childbearing potential, not using adequate contraception as per investigator judgment or not willing to comply with contraception for the duration of the study.
  2. Females who are pregnant or lactation.
  3. Current evidence of an uncontrolled and/or clinically significant medical condition, e.g.,cardiac, hepatic and renal failure that would compromise patient safety or preclude study participation.
  4. History of seizure or epilepsy.
  5. History of neurological diseases or traumatic brain injury.
  6. Suicidal attempts or risks during screen or study period.
  7. Presence of devices, e.g. pace-makers, cochlear prosthesis, neuro-stimulators, magnetic cochlear prosthesis, intraocular metallic fragments.
  8. Patient has received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within 4 weeks prior to the first intervention of the double-blinded treatment.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active rTMS treatment

    The rTMS parameters were as follows: 15Hz frequency, pulse intensity 100% of the rMT, 60 pulses per train, inter train pause of 26 sec, 40 stimulation trains, and 2400 total pulses for a total duration of 20 min. The patients received one rTMS session per day during the first five days of treatment, and then twice a week for the following three weeks, for a total of 11 rTMS sessions.

    Device: Active rTMS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS treatment

    The rTMS parameters were as follows: 15Hz frequency, pulse intensity 100% of the rMT, 60 pulses per train, inter train pause of 26 sec, 40 stimulation trains, and 2400 total pulses for a total duration of 20 min, with a figure-of-eight sham coil. The patients received one rTMS session per day during the first five days of treatment, and then twice a week for the following three weeks, for a total of 11 rTMS sessions.

    Device: Sham rTMS

Interventions

  • DeviceActive rTMS

    The stimulator device was a Magstim super rapid magnetic stimulator (Magstim Company, Ltd., Wales, United Kingdom) with 4 booster modules equipped with a 70-mm air-cooled figure-eight-shaped coil. We performed rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).The TMS parameters were as follows: 15Hz frequency, pulse intensity 100% of the rMT, 60 pulses per train, inter train pause of 26 sec, 40 stimulation trains, and 2400 total pulses for a total duration of 20 min. The patients received one rTMS session per day during the first five days of treatment, and then twice a week for the following three weeks, for a total of 11 rTMS sessions. The sham group was administered rTMS with the same parameters, but using a figure-of-eight sham coil.

  • DeviceSham rTMS

    The stimulator device was a Magstim super rapid magnetic stimulator (Magstim Company, Ltd., Wales, United Kingdom) with 4 booster modules equipped with a 70-mm air-cooled figure-eight-shaped coil. We performed rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).The TMS parameters were as follows: 15Hz frequency, pulse intensity 100% of the rMT, 60 pulses per train, inter train pause of 26 sec, 40 stimulation trains, and 2400 total pulses for a total duration of 20 min. The patients received one rTMS session per day during the first five days of treatment, and then twice a week for the following three weeks, for a total of 11 rTMS sessions. The sham group was administered rTMS with the same parameters, but using a figure-of-eight sham coil.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The treatment retention rate

    To compare the treatment retention rate between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. The treatment attendance rate

    To compare the treatment attendance rate between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Urinary assessment

    Urinary morphine examinations will be measured at every visit. The rate of positive urinary morphine tests will be compared between active and sham rTMS groups in 12 weeks of follow up.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. fMRI

    The fMRI scan will be done at initial screen and at week 5 (after rTMS treatment) with resting-state fMRI and task activation fMRI with an IGT.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. Immunological markers

    Twenty milliliters of blood will be drawn from each participant. Plasma will be isolated from the whole blood after it has been centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min at 4℃, and the will be immediately stored at -80℃. Cytokine and BDNF levels will be quantified using an antibody pair assay system (Flexia; BioSource Intl., Camarillo, CA). Sample processing and data analysis will be done according to the manufacturer's instructions. The immunological parameters that we intend to analyze will include TNF-α, CRP, TGF-β1, IL-8, Il-10 and BDNF. The immunological markers will be measured from baseline to endpoint (week 12) in each patient group.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Wechsler Memory Scale - third edition(WMS-III)

    WMS-III will be tested at initial screen and at the end of study (week 12) and compared between the active and sham rTMS groups.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test(WCST)

    WCST will be tested at initial screen and at the end of study (week 12) and compared between the active and sham rTMS groups.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Continuous performance tests(CPT)

    CPT will be tested at initial screen and at the end of study (week 12) and compared between the active and sham rTMS groups.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Side effect checklist

    To compare the side effect profiles using side effect checklist between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Assessment of craving

    To compare the severity of craving between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

    To compare the mood symptoms between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. World Health Organization's Quality of Life Assessment-Brief of Taiwan (WHOQOL-BREF TW)

    To compare the life quality (using WHOQOL-BREF TW) between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Family APGAR index

    To compare the level of family support (using family APGAR index) between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. The Opiate Treatment Index (OTI)

    To compare the OTI tween the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  12. Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)

    To compare the CGI tween the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  13. Barratt Impulsiveness Scale(BIS)

    To compare the BIS tween the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, Taiwan
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Tsai TY, Wang TY, Liu YC, Lee PW, Chang WH, Lu TH, Tseng HH, Lee SY, Chang YH, Yang Y, Chen PS, Chen KC, Yang YK, Lu RB. Add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with opioid use disorder undergoing methadone maintenance therapy. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):330-343. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1849247. Epub 2021 Jan 10. PubMed 33426970 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03229642
Lead sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Responsible party
Tzu-Yun Wang (Doctor, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 25, 2017
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2020

Study contacts

Tzu-Yun Wang
Contact
tzuyun0105@hotmail.com
+886-6-2353535 ext. 5940
Tzu-Yun Wang
principal investigator · National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion