ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07772700Updated Aug 20, 2026

Potassium-competitive Acid Blocker Versus Double Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in High High-risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

An interventional study of Vonoprazon and Esomeprazole in Bleeding, sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial will enroll patients at National Cheng Kung University Hospital who have upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding, have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, and have a Rockall score of 6 or higher.

A total of 108 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: Standard-treatment group: 54 patients, Experimental group: 54 patients.

Both groups will receive standard endoscopic hemostasis and 72 hours of intravenous PPI therapy. Thereafter, patients in the standard-treatment group will receive double-dose PPI therapy, whereas patients in the experimental group will receive a P-CAB per day. All patients will be followed for 28 days to assess the occurrence of rebleeding.

Read the detailed description

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common clinical condition associated with a substantial risk of mortality, with ulcer bleeding accounting for the majority of cases. Current standard treatment consists of pharmacological therapy combined with endoscopic hemostasis. Pharmacological therapy suppresses gastric acid secretion, reduces clot dissolution, and creates an environment conducive to mucosal healing.

Various scoring systems are used clinically to assess disease severity and prognosis in patients with ulcer bleeding. The Rockall score is one of the most commonly used systems. Patients with a Rockall score of 6 or higher have a higher risk of rebleeding and mortality. Therefore, high-risk patients are generally treated with twice-daily oral proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, twice-daily dosing may reduce medication adherence.

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged in recent years and offer several potential advantages, including rapid onset of action, potent acid suppression, stability in an acidic environment, and a long half-life. They may represent a new treatment option for peptic-ulcer disease. This study will therefore compare the efficacy of PPI and P-CAB therapy in preventing recurrent bleeding among patients with upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding and a Rockall score of 6 or higher.

This randomized clinical trial will enroll patients at National Cheng Kung University Hospital who have upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding, have undergone endoscopic hemostasis, and have a Rockall score of 6 or higher.

A total of 108 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: Standard-treatment group: 54 patients, Experimental group: 54 patients.

Both groups will receive standard endoscopic hemostasis and 72 hours of intravenous PPI therapy. Thereafter, patients in the standard-treatment group will receive double-dose PPI therapy, whereas patients in the experimental group will receive a P-CAB per day. All patients will be followed for 28 days to assess the occurrence of rebleeding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bleeding

Keywords

  • PCAB
  • PPI
  • peptic ulcer bleeding
  • Rockall score
  • rebleeding
03

In context

Hemorrhage

1,383 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 244 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 108 is close to the median of 102 across 926 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 277 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hospitalized patients > 18 years with upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding, a Rockall score of 6 or higher, and treatment with endoscopic hemostasis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of to PPIs or P-CABs.
  • non-ulcer-related bleeding, such as variceal bleeding, angiodysplasia, diverticular bleeding, diffuse mucosal bleeding, or tumor bleeding.
  • severe hepatic or renal impairment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
108 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    After 72 hours continuous intravenous PPI, patients in the intervention group will receive vonoprazon 20mg per day for 28 days.

    Drug: Vonoprazon

  • Active comparator
    Standard group

    After 72 hours continuous intravenous PPI, patients in the intervention group will receive esomeprazole 40mg twice a day for 28 days.

    Drug: Esomeprazole

Interventions

  • DrugVonoprazon

    After 72 hours continuous intravenous PPI, patients in the intervention group will receive vonoprazon 20mg per day for 28 days.

  • After 72 hours continuous intravenous PPI, patients in the intervention group will receive esomeprazole 40mg twice a day for 28 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrent bleeding

    If melena or hematochezia occurs during follow-up, endoscopy will be performed to determine whether recurrent bleeding originates from the original bleeding lesion.

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Requirement for transcatheter arterial embolization or surgical hemostasis because of recurrent bleeding

    Requirement for transcatheter arterial embolization or surgical hemostasis because of recurrent bleeding

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. Mortality

    All cause mortality within 28 days

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cheng HC, Wu CT, Chang WL, Cheng WC, Chen WY, Sheu BS. Double oral esomeprazole after a 3-day intravenous esomeprazole infusion reduces recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding in high-risk patients: a randomised controlled study. Gut. 2014 Dec;63(12):1864-72. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306531. Epub 2014 Mar 21. PubMed 24658598 ↗
  • Yang EH, Wu CT, Kuo HY, Chen WY, Sheu BS, Cheng HC. The recurrent bleeding risk of a Forrest IIc lesion at the second-look endoscopy can be indicated by high Rockall scores >/= 6. Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1592-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06919-3. Epub 2019 Jun 20. PubMed 31222633 ↗
  • Yang EH, Cheng HC, Wu CT, Chen WY, Lin MY, Sheu BS. Peptic ulcer bleeding patients with Rockall scores >/=6 are at risk of long-term ulcer rebleeding: A 3.5-year prospective longitudinal study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;33(1):156-163. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13822. PubMed 28497645 ↗
  • Kyaw MH, Lau JYW. High Rate of Mortality More Than 30 Days After Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15(12):1858-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 10. No abstract available. PubMed 28804035 ↗
  • Laine L. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Due to a Peptic Ulcer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1198. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1609017. No abstract available. PubMed 27653581 ↗
  • Jang Y, Park J, Kang D, Kim JH, Choi HS, Jeon HL, Lee H. Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Compared With Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Jan;41(1):28-40. doi: 10.1111/jgh.70178. Epub 2025 Dec 2. PubMed 41330871 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After publication, the patients' data can be shared by readers' demand

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 15 months later.

Of 191 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hemorrhage, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 226 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 14, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Aug 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07772700
Responsible party
Hsueh-Chien Chiang (Attending Physician, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Meng-Hsuan Lu, MD
Contact
cyes40327@gmail.com
8862353535
Hsueh-Chien Chiang, MD
Contact
scion456scion@gmail.com
8862353535 ext. 9118
Hsueh-Chien Chiang, MD
principal investigator · National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion