CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03202641Updated Dec 19, 2025

Open Lung Strategy, Gas Distribution and Right Heart Function in ARDS Patients

An interventional study of PEEP ARDSnet and PEEP LRM in ARDS, Human, Lung Injury, Acute and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-19.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
COVID pandemic
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this interventional crossover study, in intubated and mechanically ventilated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients, is to compare two positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration techniques regarding: respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, changes in aeration, ventilation/perfusion matching its impact on cardiac function, especially the right heart (RH). The PEEP titration techniques are: PEEP selection based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table ("PEEPARDSnet") and lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) plus PEEPdec titration based on the best compliance of the respiratory system("PEEPLRM").

Read the detailed description

A recent large observational study published on JAMA showed that Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality and developed in 10.4% of 29,144 patients admitted to the intensive care unit from 50 countries across 5 continents. Mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone for lung treatment during ARDS. Lung protective ventilation improved ARDS outcome significantly. However, it is still unclear what method should be used to select levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

In the current study proposal, the investigators hypothesized that, when ARDS lungs are recruitable, a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) and PEEP titration ("PEEPLRM") improve ventilation/perfusion matching and decreased right heart workload when compared to the actual standard of care PEEP selection based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table ("PEEPARDSnet").

The investigators will test this hypothesis in an interventional crossover study.

50 patients with ARDS will be enrolled in a physiological and lung and heart imaging study.

The protocol is divided in the following phases:

A) "PEEPARDSnet": setting PEEP according to the ARDSnet table (low PEEP/ high FiO2)

B) Recruitability assessment sequence:

P-V curve tool (Hamilton ventilator): evaluate patient recruitability, among three criteria, two must be positive to consider a subject recruitable: (1) Presence of a lower inflection point (2) Linear compliance measured more than 2 times higher than the dynamic compliance (3) Increase in volume of more than 300mL during the descendant limb of the PV curve at a same given pressure (20 cmH2O)(Hysteresis property).

C)"PEEPLRM": LRM plus PEEP decremental trial guided by best compliance. Lung and heart response to "PEEPLRM": we will compare the driving pressure (DP) value (DP = Plateau pressure - PEEP) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the values at PEEPARDSnet. In the advent of an increased DP and/or new onset of abnormal values at the TTE, we will resume the PEEPARDSnet settings during the 48h follow-up phase.

Before and after the lung recruitment maneuver and decremental PEEP trial, we will collect:

  1. Respiratory system mechanics
  2. Lung volumes
  3. Gas exchange
  4. Hemodynamic parameters
  5. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) ventilation and perfusion data
  6. Transthoracic echocardiographic indices of RH function

Follow-up phase:

In 24 and 48 hours, if the subject did not present a negative response to "PEEPLRM" as described above , we will repeat the recruitment maneuver and the decremental PEEP trial and and we will collect:

  1. Respiratory system mechanics (i.e. driving pressure)
  2. Lung volumes
  3. Gas exchange
  4. Hemodynamic parameters
  5. EIT ventilation and perfusion data
  6. Transthoracic echocardiographic indices of RH function

before and after the aforementioned intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • ARDS, Human
  • Lung Injury, Acute
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication
  • Alveolar Edema
  • Right Heart Failure
  • Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

  • ARDS
  • PEEP titration
  • Open Lung Strategy
  • Right heart function
  • Lung recruitment maneuver
  • Esophageal Pressure
  • Respiratory system compliance
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ARDS diagnosis within 72h after intubation
  • Severe to moderate ARDS (PaO2 / FiO2 \< 200 mmHg) with PEEP>5 cmH2O
  • Presence of an arterial line
  • Between 18 and 85 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg and/or >180 mmHg despite the use of vasopressor or vasodilators
  • Increment in vasopressors over the past two hour just before enrollment of: more than 15 mcg/min for norepinephrine and dopamine, more than 10 mcg/min in epinephrine; and more than 50 mcg/ min for phenylephrine.
  • Advanced lung disease confirmed by computed tomography findings
  • Presence or history of pneumothorax
  • Severe coagulopathy (INR ≥ 4)
  • Severe thrombocytopenia (Platelets count ≤ 5,000/mm3)
  • Usage of any devices with electric current generation such as pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator
  • Recent esophageal trauma or surgery
  • Known presence of esophageal varices
  • Pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEEP_titration

    There is no randomization in this interventional, crossover, physiological study. All participants will receive the same procedures in the same order. The investigators will compare two PEEPs ("PEEPARDSnet" vs. "PEEPLRM"). Interventions: 1. PEEP ARDSnet: we will select the PEEP based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table (ARDSnet). 2. PEEP LRM: we will perform a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) and select PEEP based on transpulmonary pressure.

    Procedure: PEEP ARDSnet · Procedure: PEEP LRM

Interventions

  • ProcedurePEEP ARDSnet

    PEEP settings based on the low PEEP/high FiO2 table

  • ProcedurePEEP LRM

    A lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) followed by PEEP guided by transpulmonary pressure.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Driving Pressure (cmH2O)

    The primary endpoint of this study is to describe the airways driving pressures (defined as Plateau Pressure minus PEEP) during "PEEP ARDSnet" and "PEEP LRM".

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet") and 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM") after the beginning of the study procedures

Other outcomes

  1. Chest wall and lung elastances (cmH2O/L)

    This exploratory outcome represents the respiratory system elastance. The respiratory system elastance (ERS = EL + ECW) is the sum of lung elastance (EL) and chest wall (ECW) elastance. In order to measure ERS, we will need airway pressure (measured by connecting the endotracheal tube with a pressure transducer) and pleural pressure (measured by placing an esophageal balloon connected to a pressure transducer, the esophageal pressure is a surrogate of the pleural pressure).

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures

  2. Dead space (%)

    This exploratory outcome is the volume (as a percent) of a breath that does not participate in gas exchange.The measure will be made using infrared absorption technology by a mainstream analyzer positioned distally to the Y piece and connected to a capnogram.

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures

  3. Right heart function (Transthoracic Echocardiography)

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures

  4. Gas distribution, gas content, end-expiratory lung volume (using Electrical Impedance Tomography)

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures

  5. Ventilation/perfusion matching (using Electrical Impedance Tomography)

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures

  6. Blood arterial and central venous pressures

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures

  7. Days free of mechanical ventilation

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 28 days

  8. ICU length of stay

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 28 days

  9. Hospital length of stay

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 28 days

  10. Mortality

    Exploratory outcome

    Time frame: 28 days

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachussets General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967 Aug 12;2(7511):319-23. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90168-7. No abstract available. PubMed 4143721 ↗
  • ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. PubMed 22797452 ↗
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. PubMed 10793162 ↗
  • Lachmann B. Open Lung in ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 Sep;68(9):637-42; discussion 640, 643. No abstract available. PubMed 12370679 ↗
  • Kacmarek RM, Villar J, Sulemanji D, Montiel R, Ferrando C, Blanco J, Koh Y, Soler JA, Martinez D, Hernandez M, Tucci M, Borges JB, Lubillo S, Santos A, Araujo JB, Amato MB, Suarez-Sipmann F; Open Lung Approach Network. Open Lung Approach for the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001383. PubMed 26672923 ↗
  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. PubMed 26903337 ↗
  • Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):980. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1400293. No abstract available. PubMed 24597883 ↗
  • Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Caramez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, Souza CE, Victorino JA, Kacmarek RM, Barbas CS, Carvalho CR, Amato MB. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug 1;174(3):268-78. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-976OC. Epub 2006 May 11. PubMed 16690982 ↗
  • de Matos GF, Stanzani F, Passos RH, Fontana MF, Albaladejo R, Caserta RE, Santos DC, Borges JB, Amato MB, Barbas CS. How large is the lung recruitability in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective case series of patients monitored by computed tomography. Crit Care. 2012 Jan 8;16(1):R4. doi: 10.1186/cc10602. PubMed 22226331 ↗
  • Pirrone M, Fisher D, Chipman D, Imber DA, Corona J, Mietto C, Kacmarek RM, Berra L. Recruitment Maneuvers and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration in Morbidly Obese ICU Patients. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):300-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001387. PubMed 26584196 ↗
  • Fumagalli J, Berra L, Zhang C, Pirrone M, Santiago RRS, Gomes S, Magni F, Dos Santos GAB, Bennett D, Torsani V, Fisher D, Morais C, Amato MBP, Kacmarek RM. Transpulmonary Pressure Describes Lung Morphology During Decremental Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Trials in Obesity. Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;45(8):1374-1381. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002460. PubMed 28708679 ↗
  • Pinsky MR. My paper 20 years later: Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):935-41. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3294-8. Epub 2014 Apr 24. PubMed 24760121 ↗
  • Lansdorp B, Hofhuizen C, van Lavieren M, van Swieten H, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Mechanical ventilation-induced intrathoracic pressure distribution and heart-lung interactions*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):1983-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000345. PubMed 24743042 ↗
  • Matamis D, Lemaire F, Harf A, Brun-Buisson C, Ansquer JC, Atlan G. Total respiratory pressure-volume curves in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest. 1984 Jul;86(1):58-66. doi: 10.1378/chest.86.1.58. PubMed 6734293 ↗
  • Demory D, Arnal JM, Wysocki M, Donati S, Granier I, Corno G, Durand-Gasselin J. Recruitability of the lung estimated by the pressure volume curve hysteresis in ARDS patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Nov;34(11):2019-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1167-8. Epub 2008 Jun 25. PubMed 18575846 ↗
  • Maggiore SM, Jonson B, Richard JC, Jaber S, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Alveolar derecruitment at decremental positive end-expiratory pressure levels in acute lung injury: comparison with the lower inflection point, oxygenation, and compliance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep 1;164(5):795-801. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2006071. PubMed 11549535 ↗
  • Costa EL, Lima RG, Amato MB. Electrical impedance tomography. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Feb;15(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283220e8c. PubMed 19186406 ↗
  • Frerichs I, Amato MB, van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, Zhao Z, Grychtol B, Bodenstein M, Gagnon H, Bohm SH, Teschner E, Stenqvist O, Mauri T, Torsani V, Camporota L, Schibler A, Wolf GK, Gommers D, Leonhardt S, Adler A; TREND study group. Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group. Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):83-93. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208357. Epub 2016 Sep 5. PubMed 27596161 ↗
  • Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2095-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638. Epub 2008 Nov 11. PubMed 19001507 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03202641
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Responsible party
Lorenzo Berra, MD (MD, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 28, 2017
Start date
Jun 19, 2019
Primary completion
May 12, 2020
Completion
May 12, 2020
Last update
Dec 19, 2025

Study contacts

Robert Kacmarek, RRT, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital
Lorenzo Berra, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital
Roberta De Santis Santiago, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion