ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04221737Updated Sep 17, 2026

Early Use of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) in ARDS

An interventional study of APRV. General Electric Healthcare Engstrom ventilator system and Conventional. General Electric Healthcare Engstrom ventilator system in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Hospital Civil de Guadalajara · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2017, registered Jan 2020).
  • Started Jul 2017; still recruiting 9 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a time-cycled, pressure controlled, intermittent mandatory ventilation mode with extreme inverse I:E ratios. Currently it is considered as a non-conventional ventilatory mode. The investigators aim to compare APRV with conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Read the detailed description

Despite the advances in technology and ventilatory modes, mortality of ARDS is still around 40%. Besides prone positioning, the best approach of management is low tidal volume ventilation (LTV). This 'protective ventilation' strategy is not aways effective to improve oxygenation and is associated with an increased requirement of sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents, which increase length of stay and morbidity. APRV is a ventilatory mode based on relatively high and sustained continuous positive pressure, combined with a short phase of release to allow carbon dioxide removal. It also allows unrestricted spontaneous breathing throughout respiration, independent of the ventilator cycle. Providing sustained inflation while limiting duration and frequency of release phase permits limiting volume loss, resulting in progressive and improved alveolar recruitment, an increased alveolar surface area available for gas exchange and improved ventilation-perfusion matching.

In this multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open trial, the investigators aim to compare the effects and safety of the early application of time-controlled adaptive method of APRV and conventional ventilation with LTV strategy in patients with severe to moderate ARDS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Acute Lung Injury
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • APRV
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,387 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 60 across 822 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Civil de Guadalajara is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome, according to the Berlin definition of ARDS, with adjusted pO2/FiO2 for altitude \<300, and less than 48 h of endotracheal mechanical ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Less than 18 years-old
  • Expected duration of mechanical ventilation less than 48 h
  • Preexisting conditions with an expected 3-month mortality exceeding 50%
  • Concurrent chemotherapy
  • Confirmed intracranial hypertension
  • Catastrophic cranial trauma or neuromuscular disorders that are known to prolong mechanical ventilation
  • Pneumothorax at enrollment (resolved or not)
  • Do-not-resuscitate order
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional ventilation

    Protective lung conventional strategy with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) mode, with low tidal volume and adequate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) level.

    Device: Conventional. General Electric Healthcare Engstrom ventilator system

  • Experimental
    Time-controlled adaptive APRV

    Airway Pressure Release Ventilation with Time-controlled adaptive ventilation method. Allowing for spontaneous breathing.

    Device: APRV. General Electric Healthcare Engstrom ventilator system

Interventions

  • DeviceAPRV. General Electric Healthcare Engstrom ventilator system

    APRV consist of an extended time at plateau pressure (a continuous positive airway pressure phase) comprising about 90% of the respiratory cycle, while providing very brief releases to enhance carbon dioxide removal. Time-controlled adaptive method requires interpretation of the expiratory flow curve to assess changes in lung elastance and, therefore, set the Time low to optimize carbon dioxide removal, but not at the expense of alveolar derecruitment and instability.

  • DeviceConventional. General Electric Healthcare Engstrom ventilator system

    Lung protective ventilation consist of delivery of low tidal volumes (4-6 ml/kg PBW), high PEEP enough to avoid de-recruitment, titrated according to ARDSNet PEEP/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) table, while avoiding excessive transpulmonary pressure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mechanical ventilation free days

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. All causes mortality

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. ICU length of stay

    Time frame: 28 days

  3. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: 60 days

  4. Mean airway pressure, peak airway pressure, maximum P high

    Measured in cmH20

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Average expiratory time

    Measured in seconds

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Minute ventilation

    Time frame: 7 days

  7. oxygen partial pressure (pO2)

    Time frame: 7 days

  8. pCO2 (carbon dioxide partial pressure)

    Time frame: 7 days

  9. Mean arterial pressure

    Time frame: 7 days

  10. Maximum dosage of vasopressors requirement

    Time frame: 7 days

  11. Richmond Sedation-Agitation Scale

    Range from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative)

    Time frame: 7 days

  12. Average dose of propofol use

    Time frame: 7 days

  13. Rate of neuromuscular blocking agents utilization

    Time frame: 7 days

  14. Prone position rate

    Time frame: 7 days

  15. Average of prone position sessions

    Time frame: 7 days

  16. Rate of recruitment maneuvers

    Time frame: 7 days

  17. Tracheostomy rate

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lopez Saubidet I, Maskin LP, Rodriguez PO, Bonelli I, Setten M, Valentini R. Mortality in patients with respiratory distress syndrome. Med Intensiva. 2016 Aug-Sep;40(6):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 31. English, Spanish. PubMed 26746127 ↗
  • Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20. PubMed 23688302 ↗
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. PubMed 10793162 ↗
  • Albert S, Kubiak BD, Vieau CJ, Roy SK, DiRocco J, Gatto LA, Young JL, Tripathi S, Trikha G, Lopez C, Nieman GF. Comparison of "open lung" modes with low tidal volumes in a porcine lung injury model. J Surg Res. 2011 Mar;166(1):e71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.022. Epub 2010 Nov 12. PubMed 21195426 ↗
  • Sydow M, Burchardi H, Ephraim E, Zielmann S, Crozier TA. Long-term effects of two different ventilatory modes on oxygenation in acute lung injury. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation and volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jun;149(6):1550-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.6.8004312. PubMed 8004312 ↗
  • Ibarra-Estrada MA, Garcia-Salas Y, Mireles-Cabodevila E, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Chavez-Pena Q, Garcia-Salcido R, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Aguirre-Avalos G. Use of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: Results of a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):586-594. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005312. PubMed 34593706 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 112 months after the start.

Of 263 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 112 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 270 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 5, 2020
First posted
Jan 9, 2020
StartActual
Jul 15, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04221737
Lead sponsor
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
Responsible party
Miguel Á Ibarra-Estrada (Principal investigator, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2020
Start date
Jul 15, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Dr
Contact
drmiguelibarra@hotmail.com
3317593502
Guadalupe Aguirre-Avalos, Dr
Contact
guadalupe.aavalos@academicos.udg.mx
Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Dr
principal investigator · Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion