ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03099421Updated Dec 19, 2018

Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Obstruction

An interventional study of Prostatic Artery Embolization in Hyperplasia Prostatic, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Prostatic Diseases, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-19.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for patients who refuse or are not eligible for surgery with moderate-severe lower urinary tract symptoms or indwelling catheter secondary to benign prostate obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective study investigating the safety and efficacy of PAE for patients who refuse or are not eligible for surgery and who suffers from moderate-severe lower urinary tract symptoms or indwelling catheter secondary to benign prostatic obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. It may form the grounding for further research in the shape of a larger randomised clinical trial.

Our hypothesis is that PAE will eliminate the need for indwelling catheter and improve IPSS 6 months post-procedure.

1, and 6 months follow-up.

Main outcome Ability to void after removal of indwelling catheter

Secondary outcomes International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Prostate volume Peak void flow (Qmax) Post-void residual (PVR) Classify complications according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines for reporting Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperplasia Prostatic
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
  • Prostatic Diseases
  • Urological Manifestations

Keywords

  • Benign prostatic obstruction
  • benign prostatic enlargement
  • benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • prostatic artery embolization
  • Quality of Life
  • IPSS
  • DAN-PSS
  • Complications
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

827 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 179 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 92 across 626 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Indwelling catheter secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or
  • Moderate-severe Obstructive LUTS secondary to BPH to medical treatment
  • Unsuitable for TURP or refuse surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bladder dysfunction(and known neurological conditions affecting bladder function)
  • Urethral strictures
  • Bladder neck contracture
  • Known sphincter anomalies
  • Big bladder diverticulum or stones
  • Kidney insufficiency ( \< 45)
  • Coagulation disturbances
  • Severe atheromatous or tortuosity of arteries
  • Allergy to contrast medium
  • Unable to undergo MR imaging
  • Urological
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prostatic Artery Embolization

    Embolization of the prostatic arteries to induce necrosis and a reduction of the prostate volume.

    Procedure: Prostatic Artery Embolization

Interventions

  • ProcedureProstatic Artery Embolization

    The procedure is performed with the patient under local anaesthetic and if necessary sedation. We will be using a percutaneous transfemoral approach, super-selective catheterisation of small prostatic arteries is carried out using microcatheters. Embolisation will be done using microspherical embolic material.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ability to void spontaneously

    Patient demonstrate the ability to void spontanously after the removal of the indwelling catheter at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. IPSS

    International Prostate Symptom Score from 0-35, 35 is most severe symptoms

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

  2. QoL

    Quality of Life scored from 0-6, 6 is worst

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

  3. IIEF

    International Index of Erectile Function scored from 0-25, where higher scores represents better erectile function

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

  4. PV

    Prostate Volume measured by MRI

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

  5. PVR

    Post-void residual

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

  6. Qmax

    Peak void flow

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

  7. PSA

    Prostate-specific antigen

    Time frame: 1, 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rigshospitalet
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 20 months.

Of 152 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Prostatic Hyperplasia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 203 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 28, 2017
First posted
Apr 4, 2017
StartActual
Mar 22, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 14, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 14, 2018
Last update
Dec 19, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03099421
Responsible party
Brian Malling (MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 4, 2017
Start date
Mar 22, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2018
Completion
Dec 14, 2018
Last update
Dec 19, 2018

Study contacts

Lars Lönn, Professor
study chair · Radiologisk Klinik, Rigshospitalet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion