ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07890103Updated Oct 22, 2026

Learning Curve of Tri-lobar HoLEP Versus En-bloc HoLEP

An interventional study of Tri-lobar HoLEP and En-bloc HoLEP in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow Obstruction, sponsored by Tanta University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Several HoLEP techniques have been developed, with the conventional tri-lobar and the en-bloc approaches being the most commonly practiced. Although both techniques achieve comparable functional outcomes and safety profiles, they differ in surgical dissection strategy and anatomical orientation. Some authors suggest that the en-bloc technique may facilitate maintenance of the correct surgical plane, whereas others consider the tri-lobar approach easier for surgeons familiar with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). However, evidence comparing their learning characteristics remains limited.

Most published studies evaluating the HoLEP learning curve have investigated a single surgical technique or assessed a second technique after surgeons had already gained substantial HoLEP experience. Such study designs introduce significant bias because increasing surgical experience inevitably influences subsequent performance.

A prospective alternating design, in which a HoLEP-naïve surgeon performs consecutive tri-lobar and en-bloc procedures, may provide a more balanced comparison by exposing both techniques to similar levels of cumulative surgical experience while minimizing temporal bias.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow Obstruction
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 987 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • BPH requiring HoLEP
  • Prostate 80-150 cc
  • Performed by surgeons with no previous independent experience in the evaluated techniques

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous prostate surgery
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Prostate cancer
  • Simultaneous bladder surgery
  • Extremely large prostates (>150 cc)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Tri-lobar HoLEP

    Procedure: Tri-lobar HoLEP

  • Experimental
    En-bloc HoLEP

    Procedure: En-bloc HoLEP

Interventions

  • ProcedureTri-lobar HoLEP

    endoscopic, retro-grade dissection and liberation of the entire transition zone of the prostate (the hyperplastic adenoma) from the surrounding surgical capsule as 3 specimens (median lobe and 2 lateral lobes) using a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser

  • ProcedureEn-bloc HoLEP

    endoscopic, retro-grade dissection and liberation of the entire transition zone of the prostate (the hyperplastic adenoma) from the surrounding surgical capsule as a single, intact specimen using a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of cases required to achieve procedural proficiency

    Number of cases required to achieve procedural proficiency, defined by a sustained plateau in enucleation efficiency (enucleated weight in gm/operative time in min) determined using RA-CUSUM. Risk-adjusted CUSUM adjusts for: * Prostate size * Operative time (Enucleation time + Morcellation time) * Enucleated weight

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Enucleation time

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Morcellation time

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Enucleated weight

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University
    Tanta, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2026, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2026
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07890103
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Mahmoud Elrefaey (Principal Investigator, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion