An observational study in Heart Failure, sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-11.
Sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure · Observational
The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of AAIR (Atrial-paced Atrial-sensed Inhibitory Rate-Modulated) pacing treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with chronotropic incompetence (CI) in terms of exercise tolerance and quality of life. Specifically, the study will assess the changes in cardiac function associated with changes of physical exercise intensity and heart rate in AAIR pacing mode compared with AAI pacing mode.
CI is the inability of the heart to increase its rate in response to increased physical activity or metabolic demand, leading to exercise intolerance and poor quality of life. Studies have demonstrated that patients with CI have a high risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Recent studies further demonstrate a high incidence of CI in patients with heart failure, which is also confirmed by CI in Heart Failure Study Phase I. However, clinical attention is often paid to heart failure symptoms instead CI-related symptom. Thus, patients with heart failure are often not tested for CI, even though the CI incidence is high in these patients. Moreover, such patients could gain significant improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life once they get diagnosed followed by effective therapy for CI and long-term management.
This study is designed to establish clinical evidence that AAIR pacing is beneficial to treat CI-caused symptoms in heart failure patients, which will improve the life quality of such patients and further support the expansion of Brady therapy indications to the population of HF with CI in existing markets and also potential markets.
CI is rarely seen and has different definition among various animal species. It is impossible to use animals to get wanted data for AAIR pacing treatment to CI. Thus, a human clinical study is necessary. Furthermore, exercise testings, such as 6 minutes hall walk (6MHW) and treadmill, allow objective evaluation of exercise capacity and exertional symptoms, which have been suggested as other investigations for HF in "ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012". Therefore, exercise testings will be applied upon physicians' need or judgment.
Firstly, this study is to assess the effect of AAIR pacing treatment for HF patients with CI in terms of exercise tolerance and quality of life. Specifically, the study will assess the changes in cardiac function associated with changes of physical exercise intensity and heart rate in AAIR pacing mode compared with AAI pacing mode. Secondly, the study will look at clinical outcomes in terms of NYHA class, 6MHW, blood BNP, Echo measurements following pacemaker therapy for 1 year. 6MHW and treadmill tests have been suggested as other investigations for HF in "ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012" and will be performed upon physicians' need or judgment.
The study will enroll up to 30 subjects that meet the indication for pacing therapy. Consented subjects will receive pacing therapy and two follow-ups in the following one year.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 200 across 1,679 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (89%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
In the study, total 30 heart failure patients with chronotropic incompetence who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria would be enrolled from the ourtpatients in Fuwai Hospital.
Exclusion Criteria:
The treadmill walk duration change
Time frame: The treadmill walk duration change from 3-6 months to 6-12 months post pacemaker implantation
The 6 minutes hall walk distance change
Time frame: 3-6 months and 6-12 months post pacemaker implantation
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure