ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03067142PH1Updated Jun 12, 2019

Proteomics of Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1

An observational study in Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1, sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-12.

Sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
93
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to identify unique urine protein markers of Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) compared to healthy controls. Urine protein markers can be identified by "proteomic" analyses in which proteins are processed in a lab to break them down into smaller building blocks. Using analytical chemistry techniques and specialized equipment many proteins can be identified and measured. Most proteins are found in healthy living cells while subtle changes in these proteins or the presence of different markers reflect abnormal processes and patterns of disease. When identified in disease, protein biomarkers can help to determine if a disease responds to new types of therapies. In this study, changes in urine proteomic patterns over time, their association with change in estimated (calculated) kidney filtering function, and the relative risk for progression of PH1 will be determined. Additionally, as part of the study, the investigators will measure urinary proteins and peptides that are markers of kidney tissue protection (for healthy healing of the kidneys from ongoing damage from high urine oxalate levels, oxalate crystals and stones) to establish if and when these markers are prospectively decreased in PH1 urine. Longitudinal studies of urine "proteomics" may assist in identifying the mechanisms behind PH1-related progression of kidney failure and might contribute important information towards future identification and development of effective therapies to slow or prevent kidney failure in PH1.

Read the detailed description

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare genetically inherited disorder seen in 1:100,000-150,000 people and is often underdiagnosed in children. PH1 is characterized by abnormally high levels of oxalate in the blood and urine, crystals in the urine, frequent formation of kidney stones, and hardening (calcification) of the kidneys called "nephrocalcinosis." Identification and evaluation of proteins and peptides (biomarkers) in the urine of PH1 patients may provide insight into the process of kidney damage that occurs over time in PH1 by evaluating these markers at some point after diagnosis and over long-term. By studying biomarker patterns in the urine of PH1 patients that are collected over the course of their disease, information about changes in biomarker patterns over time may provide important clues about those patients at a higher risk for faster progression to end stage kidney failure and may serve as important outcomes for new therapies in the future, too.

Primary study objective: Identify the unique urine proteomic markers of PH1 versus healthy intra-familial sibling controls of PHI patient specimens at one point in time (cross-sectionally).

Secondary study objective: Determine change over time in urine proteomic patterns, their association with change in estimated (calculated) kidney filtering function, and the relative risk for progression of PH1 and kidney disease progression.

Tertiary study objective: Establish if and when, in the course of PH1, the protective effects of the body (and kidneys) for normal kidney tissue healing are decreased/ lost as evidenced by the long-term change in biomarker patterns.

The primary endpoints of this study include standard clinical endpoints (data that a kidney doctor would look at as a PH1 patient would be followed over time in the clinic), as they best reflect PH1 disease progression: (a) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), known as kidney filtering function; (b) urine oxalate; and (c) plasma oxalate (when eGFR \< 40 ml/min/1.73 m2, which is when kidney function is significantly decreased).

The goal of the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium (RKSC) is to advance understanding and treatment of severe, rare forms of nephrolithiasis that cause marked excretion of insoluble minerals important in stone formation in which patients experience recurring stones from childhood onward and are at risk for chronic kidney disease. End state renal disease is common in PH1. Importantly, these conditions are rare enough that there has been minimal sharing of information and expertise among clinicians and scientists, a situation that has slowed progress toward effective treatments. Over the last 6 years, RKSC has formed secure, web-based registries and tissue banks open for collaborative projects.

About this Study: This is a pilot investigation using previously collected and archived (1) cross-sectional 24 hr. urine samples from PH1 patients (n=20) and healthy sibling controls (n=18) and (2) longitudinally collected 24 hr. urine samples from patients with PH1 enrolled in the RKSC registry bank (n=55). No new samples will be collected.

Additional information that will be collected (or provided with the urine specimens) as part of this study: De-identified data from each patient's health history, medications and supplements taken; history of kidney stones (and their chemical make-up); gender, current age, height, weight; old measurements of urine acidity, and blood oxalate, urine oxalate, calcium, citrate, and creatinine (from muscle breakdown) concentrations, and urine super saturation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1
03

In context

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Primary hyperoxaluria type 1; 8 are open to participants now.

Browse Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  1. Patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 (PH1) OR
  2. Healthy siblings of those PH1 patients (to serve as "controls)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a previously collected 24 hour urine sample from the Mayo Clinic's Rare Kidney Stone Consortium (RKSC) biobank or previously stored at Lurie Children's Hospital (Chicago, IL), a portion of which has been archived (frozen) for future research because you are a patient who has been diagnosed with Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) that is documented by one of the following: (1) PH1 mutation confirmed and/or (2) liver confirmed; OR
  • Have a previously collected 24 hour urine sample, a portion of which has been archived (frozen) for future research, because you are a healthy sibling of a PH1 patient, as described above.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a previously collected 24 hour urine sample because you are a hyperoxaluric patient due to other causes (including secondary hyperoxaluria);
  • Have PH1 and have had a 24 hour sample collected but a portion of that specimen has not been archived (frozen) for future research;
  • Do not have PH1.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
93 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort 1 (Phase 1): PH1

    Cross-Sectional/Observational

    Other: Observational

  • Cohort 2 (Phase 1): Controls

    Cross-Sectional/Observational

    Other: Observational

  • Cohort 3 (Phase 2): PH1

    Longitudinal/Observational

    Other: Observational

Interventions

  • OtherObservational

    Not an interventional study. Analyses of previously collected urine specimens and data on estimated kidney filtering function.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1: Urine proteomic markers.

    (1) Quantitative Mass Spectrometry analyses will be completed on previously collected, de-identified, and archived urine specimens (collected at only one time point) from patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) and from healthy controls to determine unique protein markers in the urine of PH1 patients, taking into account archived data collected about: (a) known genetic PH1 mutations; (b) concomitant estimated kidney filtering function; (c) urine and plasma oxalate concentrations (using the measure of plasma oxalate when kidney function is low) (d) the level of kidney function (called a "stage"); and (e) any medications and supplements \& their dose and frequency taken for differences in disease (PH1) versus a healthy state. To accomplish this, urine specimens and data which were previously collected, de-identified, and archived will be provided by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) and Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago (Chicago, IL).

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 2: Urine proteomic marker patterns and their change over time related to progression of chronic kidney disease in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1).

    Quantitative Mass Spectrometry analyses of previously collected, archived, and de-identified serial urine specimens (collected in up to/more than 5 years of follow-up) from patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) will be completed to determine if a change occurs in: (1) urine proteomic patterns (proteins and peptides) over time using previously collected data on: (a) estimated kidney filtering function declines (indicating kidney disease progression) and (b) oxalate concentrations in the urine (or plasma) continue to rise. Statistical analyses will determine the relationship between the urine protein/peptide pattern changes over time to kidney disease progression in PH1. All previously collected, de-identified, and archived data and urine specimens will be provided by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN).

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Phase 2: Establish by urine proteome pattern changes if & when normal healing processes of the kidneys are lost, which reflect progressive kidney damage.

    Establish if and when, in the 5 year serial follow-up of Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) urine specimens, normal kidney tissue healing is decreased/lost (down regulated) and pathologic kidney tissue damage increases (upregulated). This will be evidenced by the long-term change in biomarker patterns and progressive loss of kidney filtering function. This will be accomplished using: (1) standard identification of specific urine protein and peptides using known databases and (2) statistical analyses for urine protein/peptide marker pattern development reflective of kidney pro-injury and irreversible kidney cell damage. (All serially collected, de-identified, and archived urine specimens and data will have been provided by Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lapolla A, Seraglia R, Molin L, Williams K, Cosma C, Reitano R, Sechi A, Ragazzi E, Traldi P. Low molecular weight proteins in urines from healthy subjects as well as diabetic, nephropathic and diabetic-nephropathic patients: a MALDI study. J Mass Spectrom. 2009 Mar;44(3):419-25. doi: 10.1002/jms.1520. PubMed 19165811 ↗
  • Metzger J, Kirsch T, Schiffer E, Ulger P, Mentes E, Brand K, Weissinger EM, Haubitz M, Mischak H, Herget-Rosenthal S. Urinary excretion of twenty peptides forms an early and accurate diagnostic pattern of acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2010 Dec;78(12):1252-62. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.322. Epub 2010 Sep 8. PubMed 20827258 ↗
  • Kistler AD, Serra AL, Siwy J, Poster D, Krauer F, Torres VE, Mrug M, Grantham JJ, Bae KT, Bost JE, Mullen W, Wuthrich RP, Mischak H, Chapman AB. Urinary proteomic biomarkers for diagnosis and risk stratification of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a multicentric study. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053016. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Erratum In: PLoS One. 2013;8(8). doi:10.1371/annotation/9281c713-d253-4a1a-8255-92e691e77a24. PubMed 23326375 ↗
  • Evan AP, Coe FL, Lingeman JE, Shao Y, Sommer AJ, Bledsoe SB, Anderson JC, Worcester EM. Mechanism of formation of human calcium oxalate renal stones on Randall's plaque. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007 Oct;290(10):1315-23. doi: 10.1002/ar.20580. PubMed 17724713 ↗
  • Yasui T, Fujita K, Hayashi Y, Ueda K, Kon S, Maeda M, Uede T, Kohri K. Quantification of osteopontin in the urine of healthy and stone-forming men. Urol Res. 1999 Aug;27(4):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s002400050114. PubMed 10460890 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Wen Z, Washburn MP, Florens L. Refinements to label free proteome quantitation: how to deal with peptides shared by multiple proteins. Anal Chem. 2010 Mar 15;82(6):2272-81. doi: 10.1021/ac9023999. PubMed 20166708 ↗
  • Pieper R. Preparation of urine samples for proteomic analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;425:89-99. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-210-0_8. PubMed 18369889 ↗
  • McIlwain S, Mathews M, Bereman MS, Rubel EW, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Estimating relative abundances of proteins from shotgun proteomics data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Nov 19;13:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-308. PubMed 23164367 ↗
  • Skates SJ, Gillette MA, LaBaer J, Carr SA, Anderson L, Liebler DC, Ransohoff D, Rifai N, Kondratovich M, Tezak Z, Mansfield E, Oberg AL, Wright I, Barnes G, Gail M, Mesri M, Kinsinger CR, Rodriguez H, Boja ES. Statistical design for biospecimen cohort size in proteomics-based biomarker discovery and verification studies. J Proteome Res. 2013 Dec 6;12(12):5383-94. doi: 10.1021/pr400132j. Epub 2013 Oct 28. PubMed 24063748 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03067142
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 1, 2017
Start date
Jan 5, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2019
Completion
May 31, 2019
Last update
Jun 12, 2019

Study contacts

Craig B Langman, MD
principal investigator · Ann & Robert H Lurie hildren's Hospital of Chicago, Division of Kidney Diseases

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion