ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05238909Updated Sep 9, 2026

Developing Biomarkers of Plexiform Tumor Burden in Patients With Neurofibromatosis-Type 1

An observational study in Neurofibromatosis 1, NF1 and Neurofibromatosis Type 1, sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to identify tumor biomarkers in individuals with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Biomarkers are signals that the investigator can measure that tell us about a process such as progress of a disease or treatment. Individuals with this diagnosis are at an elevated risk of developing a type of tumor called a plexiform neurofibroma. Currently, detecting the risk factors of these tumors in children is difficult and requires whole body imaging. The NF1 team at Lurie Children's established a way of using blood plasma in mice with neurofibromatosis type 1 to identify biomarkers that might signal the presence of tumors in people with NF1.

This study is an effort to create biomarker profiles of patients with NF1 with known tumors. The study team will utilize whole-body MRI and mass spectrometry (a method for identifying unknown compounds and the properties of molecules). The ultimate goal of this study is to better understand the tumor biomarkers in patients with NF1.

Read the detailed description

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common inherited human disorder, with a frequency of approximately 1:2500 worldwide. A hallmark of NF1 is development of plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs) in 30 to 50% of NF1 patients. Currently, there are no biomarkers of tumor burden and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is expensive and limited to few centers. The investigator established an unbiased pipeline to identify candidate biomarker signals of tumor burden using plasma from neurofibroma-bearing DhhCre;Nf1fl/fl mice using untargeted metabolomics. Our preliminary data show that glucosylceramide (GC) is the most significantly deregulated compound in plasma from neurofibroma-bearing DhhCre;Nf1fl/fl mice. The investigator developed a novel targeted mass spectrometry method to accurately quantify multiple elevated GC and lactosylceramide (LC) species. In this proposal, the investigator will combine the clinical infrastructure of the NF1 comprehensive program and advance imaging at Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago with the mass spectrometry capabilities at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Taking advantage of our large, well-characterized, Lurie Children's NF1 population, the investigator propose to perform analytical validation studies of candidate GC/LC biomarker signature of tumor burden in plasma from NF1 patients with defined numbers of PNF (tumor burden) by whole body MRI. The potential outcomes of our study are identification of candidate biomarker of tumor burden that contribute to patient risk stratification, and analytical validation of GC/LC biomarker signature (context of use). Collectively, this work represents a synergistic approach for discovery and validation of biomarkers of tumor burden in NF1.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurofibromatosis 1
  • NF1
  • Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Keywords

  • NF1
  • Plexiform neurofibromas
  • neurofibromatosis type 1
  • neurofibromas
03

In context

Neurofibromatosis 1

176 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurofibromatosis 1; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 188 across 58 observational studies indexed under Neurofibromatosis 1.

Browse Neurofibromatosis 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients from the NF1 Clinical Program at Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

1. Individuals with known diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient does not meet NF1 diagnostic criteria
  2. Mosaic NF1 individuals
  3. Pregnant at Screening
  4. Patients who do not have the ability/capacity to undergo the process OR whose parent/legal guardian is unable to undergo the informed consent process.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine if glucosylceramide (GC) and lactosylceramide (LC) species levels correlate with tumor burden in patients with NF1

    The investigator and team will collect blood samples from individuals with NF1 stratified plexiform tumor (PNF) burden (none, small, intermediate, and large) versus age and sex matched healthy control.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Test if tumor burden correlates with GC and LC signature in individuals with NF1 who are undergoing clinical treatment with MEK inhibitors

    The investigator and team will enroll 20 individuals with NF1 and inoperable PNFs in treatment with MEK inhibitors to correlate biomarker with tumor burden changes with therapy.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Assemble a longitudinal cohort of individuals with NF1 with plexiform neurofibromas (n=100) for deep phenotyping and tumor burden response to MEK inhibitors

    Whole-body MRI at baseline and at time of annual visit (9-to-18-month intervals) will be used to deeply phenotype individuals based on tumor burden and tumor volume. Individuals will undergo plasma collection and clinical history assessment (medications, diet log, supplements, and anthropometric measurements) at each visit. For patients undergoing treatment with MEK inhibitors, a sample prior to treatment will be collected during this study.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Determine if glucosylceramide (GC) and lactosylceramide (LC) signature correlates with plexiform neurofibroma burden change in longitudinal cohort of 100 individuals with PNFs

    The investigator and team will test GC/LC levels using validated mass spectrometry target method for quantification of these biomarkers.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Tumor volumetric analysis will be performed to correlate with GC/LC monitoring biomarker signature

    GC/LC biomarker thresholds (cut-off) will be refined to evaluate predictive ability to identify individuals with large tumor burden. Tumor burden will be measured from whole-body MRI analysis with post-imaging processing software.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Le LQ, Parada LF. Tumor microenvironment and neurofibromatosis type I: connecting the GAPs. Oncogene. 2007 Jul 12;26(32):4609-16. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210261. Epub 2007 Feb 12. PubMed 17297459 ↗
  • McCormick F. Ras signaling and NF1. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Feb;5(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(95)90053-5. PubMed 7749326 ↗
  • Birnbaum RA, O'Marcaigh A, Wardak Z, Zhang YY, Dranoff G, Jacks T, Clapp DW, Shannon KM. Nf1 and Gmcsf interact in myeloid leukemogenesis. Mol Cell. 2000 Jan;5(1):189-95. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80415-3. PubMed 10678181 ↗
  • Bollag G, Clapp DW, Shih S, Adler F, Zhang YY, Thompson P, Lange BJ, Freedman MH, McCormick F, Jacks T, Shannon K. Loss of NF1 results in activation of the Ras signaling pathway and leads to aberrant growth in haematopoietic cells. Nat Genet. 1996 Feb;12(2):144-8. doi: 10.1038/ng0296-144. PubMed 8563751 ↗
  • Largaespada DA, Brannan CI, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. Nf1 deficiency causes Ras-mediated granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor hypersensitivity and chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nat Genet. 1996 Feb;12(2):137-43. doi: 10.1038/ng0296-137. PubMed 8563750 ↗
  • Ratner N, Miller SJ. A RASopathy gene commonly mutated in cancer: the neurofibromatosis type 1 tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 May;15(5):290-301. doi: 10.1038/nrc3911. Epub 2015 Apr 16. PubMed 25877329 ↗
  • Prada CE, Rangwala FA, Martin LJ, Lovell AM, Saal HM, Schorry EK, Hopkin RJ. Pediatric plexiform neurofibromas: impact on morbidity and mortality in neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;160(3):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.08.051. Epub 2011 Oct 11. PubMed 21996156 ↗
  • Wu J, Williams JP, Rizvi TA, Kordich JJ, Witte D, Meijer D, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Cancelas JA, Ratner N. Plexiform and dermal neurofibromas and pigmentation are caused by Nf1 loss in desert hedgehog-expressing cells. Cancer Cell. 2008 Feb;13(2):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.12.027. PubMed 18242511 ↗
  • Jessen WJ, Miller SJ, Jousma E, Wu J, Rizvi TA, Brundage ME, Eaves D, Widemann B, Kim MO, Dombi E, Sabo J, Hardiman Dudley A, Niwa-Kawakita M, Page GP, Giovannini M, Aronow BJ, Cripe TP, Ratner N. MEK inhibition exhibits efficacy in human and mouse neurofibromatosis tumors. J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan;123(1):340-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI60578. Epub 2012 Dec 10. PubMed 23221341 ↗
  • Jousma E, Rizvi TA, Wu J, Janhofer D, Dombi E, Dunn RS, Kim MO, Masters AR, Jones DR, Cripe TP, Ratner N. Preclinical assessments of the MEK inhibitor PD-0325901 in a mouse model of Neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Oct;62(10):1709-16. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25546. Epub 2015 Apr 22. PubMed 25907661 ↗
  • Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, Whitcomb P, Martin S, Aschbacher-Smith LE, Rizvi TA, Wu J, Ershler R, Wolters P, Therrien J, Glod J, Belasco JB, Schorry E, Brofferio A, Starosta AJ, Gillespie A, Doyle AL, Ratner N, Widemann BC. Activity of Selumetinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2550-2560. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605943. PubMed 28029918 ↗
  • Dombi E, Solomon J, Gillespie AJ, Fox E, Balis FM, Patronas N, Korf BR, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Packer RJ, Belasco J, Goldman S, Jakacki R, Kieran M, Steinberg SM, Widemann BC. NF1 plexiform neurofibroma growth rate by volumetric MRI: relationship to age and body weight. Neurology. 2007 Feb 27;68(9):643-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000250332.89420.e6. Epub 2007 Jan 10. PubMed 17215493 ↗
  • Gross AM, Wolters PL, Dombi E, Baldwin A, Whitcomb P, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, Bornhorst M, Shah AC, Martin S, Roderick MC, Pichard DC, Carbonell A, Paul SM, Therrien J, Kapustina O, Heisey K, Clapp DW, Zhang C, Peer CJ, Figg WD, Smith M, Glod J, Blakeley JO, Steinberg SM, Venzon DJ, Doyle LA, Widemann BC. Selumetinib in Children with Inoperable Plexiform Neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1430-1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912735. Epub 2020 Mar 18. PubMed 32187457 ↗
  • Fletcher JS, Pundavela J, Ratner N. After Nf1 loss in Schwann cells, inflammation drives neurofibroma formation. Neurooncol Adv. 2019 Nov 22;2(Suppl 1):i23-i32. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz045. eCollection 2020 Jul. PubMed 32642730 ↗
  • Fletcher JS, Springer MG, Choi K, Jousma E, Rizvi TA, Dombi E, Kim MO, Wu J, Ratner N. STAT3 inhibition reduces macrophage number and tumor growth in neurofibroma. Oncogene. 2019 Apr;38(15):2876-2884. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0600-x. Epub 2018 Dec 12. PubMed 30542122 ↗
  • Prada CE, Jousma E, Rizvi TA, Wu J, Dunn RS, Mayes DA, Cancelas JA, Dombi E, Kim MO, West BL, Bollag G, Ratner N. Neurofibroma-associated macrophages play roles in tumor growth and response to pharmacological inhibition. Acta Neuropathol. 2013 Jan;125(1):159-68. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1056-7. Epub 2012 Oct 26. PubMed 23099891 ↗
  • Fletcher JS, Wu J, Jessen WJ, Pundavela J, Miller JA, Dombi E, Kim MO, Rizvi TA, Chetal K, Salomonis N, Ratner N. Cxcr3-expressing leukocytes are necessary for neurofibroma formation in mice. JCI Insight. 2019 Feb 7;4(3):e98601. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98601. PubMed 30728335 ↗
  • Wu J, Dombi E, Jousma E, Scott Dunn R, Lindquist D, Schnell BM, Kim MO, Kim A, Widemann BC, Cripe TP, Ratner N. Preclincial testing of sorafenib and RAD001 in the Nf(flox/flox) ;DhhCre mouse model of plexiform neurofibroma using magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Feb;58(2):173-80. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23015. Epub 2011 Feb 11. PubMed 21319287 ↗
  • Bujak R, Struck-Lewicka W, Markuszewski MJ, Kaliszan R. Metabolomics for laboratory diagnostics. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015 Sep 10;113:108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.12.017. Epub 2014 Dec 25. PubMed 25577715 ↗
  • Grissa D, Petera M, Brandolini M, Napoli A, Comte B, Pujos-Guillot E. Feature Selection Methods for Early Predictive Biomarker Discovery Using Untargeted Metabolomic Data. Front Mol Biosci. 2016 Jul 8;3:30. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00030. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27458587 ↗
  • Watanabe M, Roth TL, Bauer SJ, Lane A, Romick-Rosendale LE. Feasibility Study of NMR Based Serum Metabolomic Profiling to Animal Health Monitoring: A Case Study on Iron Storage Disease in Captive Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis). PLoS One. 2016 May 27;11(5):e0156318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156318. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27232336 ↗
  • Setchell KD, Nardi E, Battezzati PM, Asciutti S, Castellani D, Perriello G, Clerici C. Novel soy germ pasta enriched in isoflavones ameliorates gastroparesis in type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3495-7. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1615. Epub 2013 Jul 8. PubMed 23835688 ↗
  • Weiss B, Plotkin S, Widemann B, Tonsgard J, Blakeley J, Allen J, Schorry E, Korf B, Rosser T, Goldman S, Vinks A, Cutter G, Dombi E, Ratner N, Packer R, Fisher M. NFM-06. NF106: PHASE 2 TRIAL OF THE MEK INHIBITOR PD-0325901 IN ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS WITH NF1-RELATED PLEXIFORM NEUROFIBROMAS: AN NF CLINICAL TRIALS CONSORTIUM STUDY. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jun;20(Suppl 2):i143. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy059.514. Epub 2018 Jun 22. PMCID: PMC6012484.
  • Johnson CH, Ivanisevic J, Benton HP, Siuzdak G. Bioinformatics: the next frontier of metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2015 Jan 6;87(1):147-56. doi: 10.1021/ac5040693. Epub 2014 Nov 20. No abstract available. PubMed 25389922 ↗
  • Redrup MJ, Igarashi H, Schaefgen J, Lin J, Geisler L, Ben M'Barek M, Ramachandran S, Cardoso T, Hillewaert V. Sample Management: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team. AAPS J. 2016 Mar;18(2):290-3. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9869-2. Epub 2016 Jan 28. PubMed 26821803 ↗
  • van de Merbel N, Savoie N, Yadav M, Ohtsu Y, White J, Riccio MF, Dong K, de Vries R, Diancin J. Stability: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team. AAPS J. 2014 May;16(3):392-9. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9573-z. Epub 2014 Feb 19. PubMed 24550081 ↗
  • Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997 Nov 30;16(22):2529-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971130)16:223.0.co;2-j. PubMed 9403954 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 63 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2022
First posted
Feb 14, 2022
StartActual
Mar 4, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05238909
Responsible party
Carlos Prada, MD (Principal Investigator, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 14, 2022
Start date
Mar 4, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Carlos Prada, MD
principal investigator · Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion