ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03057496Updated Feb 10, 2021Results posted

Collision Warning Device for Blind and Visually Impaired

An interventional study of Collision warning device in Hemianopia, Hemianopsia and Peripheral Visual Field Defect, sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-10.

Sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates a novel collision warning device to help people with severe vision impairment or blindness avoid collisions with obstacles. The main hypothesis to be tested is that the device reduces the number of collisions with obstacles in everyday activities.

Read the detailed description

Participants with blindness or severe visual field loss (hemianopia or tunnel vision) will be trained to use a collision warning device that alerts them to impending collisions. Participants will use the device at home during everyday mobility for about 1 month. The device is designed to supplement existing mobility devices, such as a long cane or dog guide. The device will provide warnings about potential collisions with mid- or high-level obstacles (which are typically not detected by a long cane).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemianopia
  • Hemianopsia
  • Peripheral Visual Field Defect
  • Blindness
  • Retinitis Pigmentosa
  • Glaucoma
03

In context

Hemianopsia

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemianopsia; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is above the median of 32 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Hemianopsia.

Browse Hemianopsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (54%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Blindness (or very limited vision with visual acuity no better than "counting fingers"),
  • Or severe peripheral field loss / tunnel vision (≤ 40° remaining visual field) with visual acuity of at least 20/200,
  • Or homonymous hemianopia with visual acuity of at least 20/200;
  • Able to walk independently either with or without mobility aids such as a long cane or guide dog (but without the aid of a sighted guide);
  • Reports at least minor bumps or collisions within the last 3 months;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently participating in a mobility training program
  • Diagnosed dementia
  • Significant cognitive decline
  • Participants with hemianopia will be excluded if they have hemianopia for less than 3 months and/or have spatial neglect
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants will use the collision warning device as much as possible for about one month during everyday activities, when walking indoors and outdoors.

    Device: Collision warning device

Interventions

  • DeviceCollision warning device

    The collision warning device is a pocket-sized, electronic system that includes a micro-computer, a clip-on miniature camera, a gyro-sensor, an accelerometer, and a rechargeable battery, all contained within a shoulder bag. It is about the size of a smart phone. When a potential collision is detected by the device it emits a warning to the user, either in the form of an audible beep or a tactile warning through bracelets worn on the wrist. The time to collision will be coded in both the auditory and tactile domains. The device is designed to only give warnings about high risk collisions, so the users will not be continually bombarded by warnings for every potential collision object in the environment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Collision Incidents (All Contacts)

    Collision incidents recorded by the device in everyday use, including long cane contacts and body contacts with surrounding objects in the environment.

    Time frame: During the one-month period of device use

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Body Contacts

    Collision incidents with body contacts recorded by the device

    Time frame: During the one-month period of device use

  2. Device Questionnaire

    Questionnaire addressing participants' experiences of using the device. Scores were on a 5-point rating scale (1 to 5) with higher scores representing a better score. Questions were grouped into four main categories: i) overall satisfaction, ii) comfort, iii) mobility benefit, and iv) ease of operation. An average score was computed for questions within each category.

    Time frame: During the one-month period of device use

07

Results

Posted Dec 21, 2020

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited between January 2018 and May 2019 via referrals from the Carroll Center for the Blind, the Massachusetts Commission for the Blind and practitioners at vision rehabilitation clinics in the Greater Boston area, and via a pool of volunteers who had previously participated in studies in our lab.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSilent and Active Mode
Started49
Started home-use trial36
Completed31
Not completed18
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject8
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Did not use device during home trial3
Withdrew: Device failure2

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Collision Incidents (All Contacts)

Collision incidents recorded by the device in everyday use, including long cane contacts and body contacts with surrounding objects in the environment.

Time frame:
During the one-month period of device use
Reported as:
Median · Rate (contacts per 100 hazards per hour)
Number of Collision Incidents (All Contacts)
Rate (contacts per 100 hazards per hour)Silent ModeActive Mode
Number of Collision Incidents (All Contacts)13.79 (7.28 to 24.29)9.26 (6.56 to 14.96)
Statistical analysis
  • Silent Mode vs Active Mode · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (Since the outcome (contacts) represented over-dispersed count data and there were repeated measurements per subject, a generalized mixed effects model with a negative binomial family was used with each subject treated as a random intercept.) · Rate ratio: 0.627 · 95% CI 0.536 to 0.734Silent mode is the denominator for the rate ratio.
SecondaryNumber of Body Contacts

Collision incidents with body contacts recorded by the device

Time frame:
During the one-month period of device use
Reported as:
Median · Rate (contacts per 100 hazards per hour)
Number of Body Contacts
Rate (contacts per 100 hazards per hour)Silent ModeActive Mode
Number of Body Contacts1.13 (0.45 to 3.08)1.09 (0.3 to 1.97)
SecondaryDevice Questionnaire

Questionnaire addressing participants' experiences of using the device. Scores were on a 5-point rating scale (1 to 5) with higher scores representing a better score. Questions were grouped into four main categories: i) overall satisfaction, ii) comfort, iii) mobility benefit, and iv) ease of operation. An average score was computed for questions within each category.

Time frame:
During the one-month period of device use
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Device Questionnaire
scores on a scaleSilent and Active Mode
Overall satisfaction3.68 ± 0.74
Comfort4.08 ± 0.53
Mobility benefit3.05 ± 1.08
Ease of operation3.96 ± 0.49

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected during the one-month period when subjects were using the device.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Silent and Active Mode0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)6/36 (16.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSilent and Active Mode
Minor contact with object in the environmentGeneral disorders6/36

Baseline characteristics

The baseline analysis population includes only those subjects who completed the one-month period of device use and had data successfully recorded by the device.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Silent and Active Mode
Median61 (25 to 73)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Silent and Active Mode
Female13
Male18
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Silent and Active Mode
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino28
Unknown or Not Reported3
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Silent and Active Mode
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American8
White18
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Silent and Active Mode
United States31
Habitual mobility aid
Habitual mobility aid(Participants)Silent and Active Mode
Long cane28
Guide dog3
Cause of vision impairment
Cause of vision impairment(Participants)Silent and Active Mode
Retinitis Pigmentosa8
Retinopathy of prematurity5
Other15
Unknown3
Vision impairment onset
Vision impairment onset(Participants)Silent and Active Mode
At birth17
Adult14

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Schepens Eye Research Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pundlik S, Baliutaviciute V, Moharrer M, Bowers AR, Luo G. Data Acquisition, Processing, and Reduction for Home-Use Trial of a Wearable Video Camera-Based Mobility Aid. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 11;9(7):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.14. eCollection 2020 Jun. PubMed 32832221 ↗
  • Pundlik S, Baliutaviciute V, Moharrer M, Bowers AR, Luo G. Home-Use Evaluation of a Wearable Collision Warning Device for Individuals With Severe Vision Impairments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):998-1005. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2624. PubMed 34292298 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2019, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2020, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 36 interventional studies with no phase under Hemianopsia, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 95. This study's 21 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 14, 2017
First posted
Feb 20, 2017
StartActual
Jan 22, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 8, 2019
CompletionActual
Dec 5, 2019
Results first posted
Dec 21, 2020
Last update
Feb 10, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03057496
Responsible party
Alexandra Bowers (Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2017
Start date
Jan 22, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 8, 2019
Completion
Dec 5, 2019
Results posted
Dec 21, 2020
Last update
Feb 10, 2021

Study contacts

Alex Bowers, PhD
principal investigator · Schepens Eye Research Institute, Mass Eye and Ear
Gang Luo, PhD
principal investigator · Schepens Eye Research Institute, Mass Eye and Ear

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion