ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07105358VIBRANTUpdated Sep 14, 2026

Vision Improvement Through Behavioral Rehabilitation And Neuroplasticity Training

An interventional study of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and Sham Stimulation in Visual Field Defect, Stroke and Hemianopia, sponsored by Georgetown University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Georgetown University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The VIBRANT (Vision Improvement through Behavioral Rehabilitation And Neuroplasticity Training) study is a prospective, double-blind, crossover design (within-subject) in participants with homonymous hemianopia-a type of visual field loss resulting from damage to the post-chiasmatic visual pathways. It aims to investigate whether transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) combined with perceptual learning-based training has potential for improving visual impairments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Field Defect
  • Stroke
  • Hemianopia
  • Quadrantanopia
  • Cortical Blindness
  • Brain Tumor
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Visual Field Defect, Peripheral
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Georgetown University is the lead sponsor of 292 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

A. Stroke, brain tumor, or traumatic brain injury patients

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 18 years of age.
  2. Capable of providing and complying with study procedures.
  3. Unilateral or bilateral focal brain damage causing loss of vision.
  4. At least three months post-stroke or traumatic brain injury, or a stable brain tumor within the past year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe CNS diseases or disorders unrelated to the focal lesion, which could interfere with study results.
  2. Severe mental health challenges that could interfere with study results, or current or recent (within the past 6 months) drug or alcohol abuse or addiction as defined by .
  3. Vision loss resulting from ocular disease or disorder.

B. Healthy volunteers (age-matched controls):

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 18 years of age.
  2. Capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any CNS diseases or psychiatric disorders (e.g., epilepsy, schizophrenia) that would interfere with study results.
  2. Previous head injury.
  3. Present or past (within past 6 months) drug or alcohol abuse or addiction based on DSM-5.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    tRNS with perceptual learning-based training

    Each 2-day session consists of up to three 18-minute transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) paired with perceptual learning-based training.

    Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) · Behavioral: Perceptual learning-based training

  • Sham comparator
    Sham with perceptual learning-based training

    Each 2-day session consists of up to three 18-minute sham stimulation paired with perceptual learning-based training.

    Device: Sham Stimulation · Behavioral: Perceptual learning-based training

Interventions

  • Devicetranscranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)

    Stimulation location: bilateral human middle temporal complex (hMT+). Stimulation parameters: 1 mA current intensity, with a frequency range of 101-640 Hz.

  • DeviceSham Stimulation

    Stimulation location: bilateral human middle temporal complex (hMT+). Stimulation parameters: Ramp up stimulation at 1mA with a frequency range of 101-640Hz for the first 30 seconds followed by no current for the remainder of the duration.

  • BehavioralPerceptual learning-based training

    A motion discrimination task, judging the global direction of moving dot stimuli with two different coherence levels.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Motion Discrimination Performance

    Change in accuracy on a computerized motion direction discrimination task programmed in the lab. The task assesses participants' ability to discriminate the direction of the peripherally presented moving dots at two locations (one within the blind field and the other at a mirror-symmetric location in the intact visual field). Accuracy is defined as the proportion of correct responses out of the total number of trials completed.

    Time frame: Study visit 1 to 2 (within a week), and study visit 3 to 4 (within a week)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Field Change

    Change in visual field function, assessed by perimetric mean deviation (PMD) measured using Humphrey perimetry. PMD is a global index representing the average deviation of visual field sensitivity compared to age-matched norms, measured in decibels (dB). More negative PMD values indicate greater visual field loss.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention follow-up (approximately 3 months, up to 6 months)

  2. Visual Perception Change

    Change in visual perception in the following two task: 1. Face/Object Recognition: identify whether a peripherally presented stimulus is a face or an object. 2. Motion Discrimination: discriminate the direction of the peripherally presented moving dots. Performance on both tasks will be measured at visual field locations targeted by brain stimulation and at control visual field locations not targeted by brain stimulation.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention follow-up (approximately 3 months, up to 6 months)

  3. Quality of Life Change

    Change in quality of life evaluated using the National Eye Institute 25 Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention follow-up (approximately 3 months, up to 6 months)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Georgetown University Medical Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20057, United States
    Recruiting
    • Visual Perception and Plasticity Lab · Contactvpplab@georgetown.edu · 202-784-9949
    • Tina Liu, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07105358
Responsible party
Tong (Tina) Liu (Assistant Professor of Neurology, Georgetown University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
Start date
Jul 17, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Tina Liu, PhD
Contact
tina.liu@georgetown.edu
2027849920
Kyungji Moon, MS
Contact
vpplab@georgetown.edu
2027849949

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion