CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02995083Updated Dec 18, 2017

Intra-articular Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single Blinded Prospective Randomized Trial

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of 40 mg Depo-Medrol in 1 ml, 9 ml of 1% lidocaine and Normal Saline 10 ml in Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-18.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Study deemed not feasible
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the clinical benefit of intra-articular injections of saline in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee and compare the clinical response of saline to the current standard treatment with corticosteroids and an air injection placebo.

Read the detailed description

As non-surgical treatments of OA are essential, multiple trials have been done to compare standard of care IA injection therapies to more novel injection treatments, with many of these trials using saline as the control arm. The purpose of using a control arm is to attempt to eliminate placebo effect and help distinguish the true effectiveness of a therapy. There has been controversy over the clinical effect of saline in treating OA with some arguing that saline may have some clinical benefit. If this is true, it could allow for the true effect of standard of care therapies to appear diminished when compared to saline as a placebo. A recent meta analysis looked at the use of saline as a placebo in 38 randomized control trials to determine if intra-articular saline injections for knee OA had a clinical effect. The study found that IA injections of saline significantly improved short-term knee pain in 32 of the studies which involved 1705 patients, p \<0.001, and long-term pain was significantly decreased in 19 of the studies involving 1445 patients, p \<0.001. It is essential to empirically determine if saline has a clinical effect due to the role it plays as a placebo in many clinical studies of the management of OA with intra-articular injections.

Objective: To investigate the clinical benefit of intra-articular injections of saline in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee and compare the clinical response of saline to the current standard treatment with corticosteroids and an air injection placebo.

Study Design: Prospective, single-blinded, randomized, clinical study. Patients will be randomized into three treatment arms in a 1:1:1 fashion with approximately 50 patients in the saline arm, 50 patients in the corticosteroid arm, and 50 patients in the placebo arm.

Null Hypothesis: Clinical knee outcomes of subjects following one intra-articular knee injection of air will be similar to one intra-articular knee injection of saline or corticosteroid for symptomatic patients diagnosed with knee OA.

Statistical Assumptions: Power Analysis

Investigational Arm: 10 ml Saline (Normal Saline)

Control Arm: 1 ml of 40 mg corticosteroid in 9 ml 1% lidocaine (Depo-medrol, Pfizer, New York, New York), 10 ml air (placebo)

Primary Efficacy Endpoint: The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in the WOMAC Index score 12 weeks after first injection with regards to baseline score.

Secondary Efficacy Secondary efficacy endpoints include the change in the full Endpoints: WOMAC Index, KOOS, Lysholm, IKDC, VAS, SF-12 and use of rescue medication (steroid at 12 weeks).

Enrollment: Prospective, randomized, clinical study designed to evaluate 150 subjects. All enrolled subjects will have a pre-procedure visit, one treatment visit, and follow-up visits at week 6 and week 12 if they require a rescue injection and will fill out patient reported outcome measures at 1, 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Keywords

  • osteoarthritis
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 394 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patient must be between the ages of 18 and 80
  2. Informed consent has been obtained from the patient
  3. The patient must have diagnosed symptomatic osteoarthritis of the tibio-femoral or patello-femoral compartment of the target knee for at least 1 month
  4. The patient has moderate-to-severe knee pain reflected by an average visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 4 or greater (out of a possible 10) over the previous 7 days.
  5. Radiographic imaging must show grade II-III osteoarthritis on the Kellgren \& Lawrence Scale.
  6. Patients may have bilateral osteoarthritis but only patients with unilateral symptoms may be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Knee instability
  2. A score less than 4 (out of a possible 10) on their intake VAS
  3. Major axial deviation (>5º valgus or varus deviation as evidenced on a standard of care x-ray.
  4. Previous surgery at the target knee \< 6 months.
  5. Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the contralateral knee or any other joint.
  6. Systemic or intra articular injection to any joint with corticosteroids within 6 months prior to screening
  7. Previous joint injection of any type in the past 6 months
  8. Systemic conditions that could interfere with outcome such as Rheumatoid arthritis, coagulopathy, and anemia.
  9. Allergy to any of the injected substances.
  10. Any patient unable to cease NSAID usage (other than low dose aspirin) due to unrelated condition.
  11. Cognitive impairment or unable to provide informed consent
  12. Recent knee trauma with violation of the intra-articular bone.
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Knee injection with corticosteroids

    Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo a palpation guided injection of corticosteroids into the knee joint. Subjects will then return for follow-up visit at 12 weeks for a physical exam of the knee. Patients will fill out questionnaires online at 1, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

    Drug: 40 mg Depo-Medrol in 1 ml, 9 ml of 1% lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Knee injection with saline

    Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo a palpation guided injection of saline into the knee joint. Subjects will then return for follow-up visit at 12 weeks for a physical exam of the knee. Patients will fill out questionnaires online at 1, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

    Drug: Normal Saline 10 ml

  • Sham comparator
    Knee injection with air

    Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo a palpation guided injection of air into the knee joint. Subjects will then return for follow-up visit at 12 weeks for a physical exam of the knee. Patients will fill out questionnaires online at 1, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

    Drug: Air 10 ml

Interventions

  • Drug40 mg Depo-Medrol in 1 ml, 9 ml of 1% lidocaine

    Patients will receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of 40 mg Depo-Medrol in 1 ml, 9 ml of 1% lidocaine

    Also known as: Corticosteroid

  • DrugNormal Saline 10 ml

    Patients will receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of Normal Saline 10 ml

    Also known as: Saline

  • DrugAir 10 ml

    Patients will receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of Air 10 ml

    Also known as: Air

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score (WOMAC)

    Mean change in the WOMAC Index score from baseline score

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Mean change in the KOOS from baseline score

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

  2. Mean change in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score

    Mean change in IKDC from baseline score

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

  3. Mean change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Mean change in VAS from baseline score

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

  4. Mean change in Short Form 12 (SF-12) score

    Mean change in SF-12 from baseline score

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

  5. Mean change in The Lysholm Knee score

    Mean change in The Lysholm Knee score from baseline score

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

  6. Mean change in use of rescue medication

    Use of anti-inflammatory, analgesics, and rescue corticosteroid injection. Number of pills taken each day. This will be collected via survey. If the medical examiner feels that the patient is continuing to do poorly and they did not receive the steroid injection intervention, then they will be offered a rescue corticosteroid injection at 12 weeks. The number of patients who do not initially receive a corticosteroid injection and require a rescue corticosteroid injection at 12 weeks will be recorded.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injection

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, Dragomir A, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1207-13. doi: 10.1002/art.24021. PubMed 18759314 ↗
  • Altman RD, Devji T, Bhandari M, Fierlinger A, Niazi F, Christensen R. Clinical benefit of intra-articular saline as a comparator in clinical trials of knee osteoarthritis treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Oct;46(2):151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 27. PubMed 27238876 ↗
  • Williams VJ, Piva SR, Irrgang JJ, Crossley C, Fitzgerald GK. Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Aug;42(8):716-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4038. Epub 2012 Mar 8. PubMed 22402677 ↗
  • Kim J, Seo BS. How to calculate sample size and why. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;5(3):235-42. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.3.235. Epub 2013 Aug 20. PubMed 24009911 ↗
  • Zhang W, Robertson J, Jones AC, Dieppe PA, Doherty M. The placebo effect and its determinants in osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Dec;67(12):1716-23. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092015. Epub 2008 Jun 9. PubMed 18541604 ↗
  • Eker HE, Cok OY, Aribogan A, Arslan G. The efficacy of intra-articular lidocaine administration in chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017 Apr;36(2):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jul 30. PubMed 27485803 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02995083
Lead sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Responsible party
Mukesh Ahuja (Certified Principal Investigator, Research Administrator, Rush University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2016
Start date
Jun 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2017

Study contacts

Nikhil N Verma, MD
principal investigator · Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion