CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05985772Updated Aug 24, 2026

Operative vs Non-operative Management of Posterior-medial Meniscal Root Tears: A Randomized Multicenter Trial (RCT)

An interventional study of Non-Operative Pain Management and Operative treatment arm will undergo transtibial medial meniscus root repair within 3 weeks of enrollment in Meniscus Tear, Tibial, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine differences in pain, functional patient reported outcomes, and objective imaging parameters following non-operative and meniscus root repair treatment. Furthermore, the long-term goal of this research proposal is to understand the natural history of meniscal root tears and their subsequent repair, in order to better determine risk factors for inferior outcomes and progression to osteoarthritis (OA).

Read the detailed description

This study is a pragmatic design, parallel group, randomized clinical trial in which 140 subjects with a diagnosed medial meniscus root tear based on MRI and confirmed intra-operatively will be randomized to one of two treatment arms. The first group (ARM 1) will be treated non-operatively with analgesics, physical therapy, and will be kept non-weight bearing for 6 weeks (to match the postoperative protocol). If no subjective improvement is seen at 3 months, crossover will be allowed to a transtibial medial meniscal root repair (acute operative pathway (ARM 2) (CONSORT Flow Diagram)) as determined by 3 month patient reported outcomes (PROs and operating study physician approval.

The second group (ARM 2) will be treated acutely with a transtibial medial meniscus root repair and will be non-weight bearing for 6 weeks as well. A previously published protocol will be used to standardize the rehabilitation. (14) Subjects will be followed with patient reported outcomes, serial radiographs (3 views), and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at 12 months to determine repair status, meniscal extrusion, and presence of degenerative changes. Subjects who crossover at 3 months will be evaluated using additional MRI imaging prior to assignment to the acute operative meniscal root repair pathway (ARM 2). These subjects will crossover from ARM 1 to ARM 2 without first performing the ARM 1, 3 month radiograph (x-rays-3 views). The 3-month radiograph (x-rays-3 views) will be performed 3 months post-operative.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meniscus Tear, Tibial
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • MRI-verified isolated tibial medial meniscus root tear
  • Subject must be 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent ligamentous knee pathology requiring surgical intervention (i.e. anterior cruciate ligament tear, posterior cruciate ligament tear, posterolateral corner injury, high-grade medial collateral ligament tear),
  • Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 3 or 4
  • Inability to complete outcome questionnaires or comply with required postoperative imaging or MRI requirements, or medical contraindications to surgery or physical therapy.
  • There will be no exclusion criteria regarding body mass index (BMI) or mechanical alignment, however subjects will be stratified in groups for further analysis (BMI less and over 35 and varus alignment below and over 3º of varus).
  • Pregnancy
  • Subjects \< 18 years of age
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Non-operative Control (ARM 1)

    Subjects randomized to the non-operative treatment arm will receive analgesics, physical therapy and will remain non-weight bearing. This will consist in anti-inflammatory drugs daily for 8-12 weeks and supervised physical therapy at least twice a week over a period of 8 weeks. Subjects in the non-operative arm will be offered the opportunity to crossover to the operative arm (ARM 2) of the study if the subjects do not report symptomatic improvement within 3 months after entry in this study.

    Other: Non-Operative Pain Management

  • Experimental
    Operative Intervention (ARM 2)

    Subjects randomized to the operative treatment arm will undergo transtibial medial meniscus root repair within 3 weeks of enrollment. All surgically treated subjects, regardless if repairs were performed acutely or after cross over, will receive identical postoperative rehabilitation.

    Procedure: Operative treatment arm will undergo transtibial medial meniscus root repair within 3 weeks of enrollment

Interventions

  • OtherNon-Operative Pain Management

    The non-operative treatment arm will receive analgesics, physical therapy and will remain non-weight bearing. This will consist in anti-inflammatory drugs daily for 8-12 weeks and supervised physical therapy at least twice a week over a period of 8 weeks. Subjects in the non-operative arm will be offered the opportunity to crossover to the operative arm (ARM 2) of the study if the subjects do not report symptomatic improvement within 3 months after entry in this study.

  • ProcedureOperative treatment arm will undergo transtibial medial meniscus root repair within 3 weeks of enrollment

    The operative treatment group (ARM 2) will be treated acutely with a transtibial medial meniscus root repair and will be non-weight bearing for 6 weeks as well. For ARM 1 subjects if no subjective improvement is seen at 3 months, crossover will be allowed to a transtibial medial meniscal root repair (acute operative pathway (ARM 2)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). Ask the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line.

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 12 months postoperatively (18 months if crossover at 3 months from ARM 1 to ARM 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET)

    We will measure symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee using the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET). The instrument has 16 items representing the domains of physical symptoms (nine items), sports/recreation/work/lifestyle (four items), and emotions (three items).This instrument has been validated for additional meniscal injury etiologies including degenerative tears.

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 12 months postoperatively (18 months if crossover at 3 months from ARM 1 to ARM 2)

  2. Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcomes Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS is a 42-item knee-specific questionnaire with five separately reported domains, including pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in daily living (17 items), function in sports/recreation (5 items) and knee-related quality of life (4 items). Domain scores represent the average of all items in the domain standardized to a score from 0 to 100. This instrument has face validity and has demonstrated construct validity, excellent test-retest reliability for each domain (range, 0.75 to 0.93) and has been shown to be responsive to change in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 12 months postoperatively (18 months if crossover at 3 months from ARM 1 to ARM 2)

  3. European Quality of Life Scale (Euro-QoL)

    The EuroQol (EQ) comprises two sections, the EQ-5D(5 level digit) index and the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ-5D index is a 5 item standardized generic measure of HRQOL that includes domains of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item is scored using a 3-point response scale and each combination of response choices describes a health state.

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 12 months postoperatively (18 months if crossover at 3 months from ARM 1 to ARM 2)

  4. Lysholm knee score

    The Lysholm score is comprised of eight domains including limp, locking, pain, stair climbing, and use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting, for a combined score ranging from 0-100.

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 12 months postoperatively (18 months if crossover at 3 months from ARM 1 to ARM 2)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
    • Carla M Edwards, PhD · Contact · carla_edwards@rush.edu · 312-563-5735
    • Jorge Chahla, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Adam Yanke, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05985772
Lead sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Collaborators
International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Start date
Apr 20, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Study contacts

Carla M. Edwards, PhD
Contact
carla_edwards@rush.edu
312-563-5735
Jorge Chahla, MD
Contact
jorge.chahla@rushortho.com
(312) 432-2818
Jorge Chahla, MD
principal investigator · Rush University Medical Center Associate Professor and Surgeon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion