An interventional study of NIV/HFNC and HFNC in Acute Respiratory Failure and Immunosuppression, sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-04.
Sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Acute respiratory failure is the leading cause of ICU admission of immunocompromized patients. In this subgroup of patients, the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation occurs in about 50% of cases and is associated with very a high mortality rate, reaching 70% of cases. Therefore, noninvasive oxygenation strategies have been developed to avoid intubation.
More than 15 years ago, 2 trials have suggested that NIV could decrease intubation and mortality rates of immunocompromized patients as compared to standard oxygen through a mask. However these results have not been confirmed in a recent large trial.
HFNC is a recent and well-tolerated oxygenation technique. In a recent trial, HFNC alone could decrease mortality and intubation rates in patients with ARF as compared to NIV. Similar findings have been reported in a post-hoc analysis on immunocompromized patients excluding those with profound neutropenia. Likewise in a retrospective monocentric cohort of immunocompromized patients, we reported better outcomes with HFNC than with NIV.
1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.
Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →Poitiers University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 310 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Admission to ICU for acute respiratory failure defined by all of the following criteria:
Immunosuppresion defined by 1 of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Continuous NIV for at least 4 hours until clinical improvement then intermittent 1-hour sessions for a minimal duration of 12 hours a day. Between NIV sessions HFNC will be delivered as in the HFNC group.
Device: NIV/HFNC
Continuous HFNC alone 24h/24 until weaning or intubation.
Device: HFNC
Pressure support level to achieve an expired tidal volume between 6 and 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight Positive end expiratory pressure from 5 to 10 cm H2O, aiming a PEEP level ≥ 8 cm H2O FiO2 set to achieve SpO2 ≥ 92%
Gas flow of 60 l/min and FiO2 set to achieve SpO2 ≥ 92%
mortality rates
Mortality rates at day 28 after randomization will be compared between the 2 groups
Time frame: day 28
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Poitiers University Hospital