ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07606495MEDICOSLEEPUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Impact on Prognosis of Increased Sleep Quality Obtained by Personalized Night-time Nursing Care in Critically Ill Patients

An interventional study of Sleepscan device and Sleep-guided nursing care in Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Sleep Disruption and Sleep Monitoring, sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital. Recruiting at 7 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
460
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sleep disturbances are common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients and have been associated with difficult weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, with an increased risk of endotracheal intubation. Other studies have reported associations between sleep disturbances and prolonged ICU length of stay or the occurrence of delirium. Among the factors contributing to sleep impairment, nighttime care interventions have been identified as a major cause. The management of sleep disorders in the ICU remains complex and often disappointing, and no pharmacological treatment is currently formally recommended. Very recently, a considerable improvement of sleep quantity (+50%) and quality (doubling of deep sleep quantity) has been reported by reorganizing nighttime nursing care according to patients' sleep cycles, using a sleep monitoring medical device.

The objective of this study is to quantify the impact of a better sleep on prognosis. Sleep will be improved using sleep-guided nursing care during nighttime thanks to a real-time sleep monitor (Sleepscan°).

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or who have died at day 7 after inclusion. The main secondary outcomes include the duration of ICU stay, the number of delirium free-days, the score at a discomfort scale, the score at a post-traumatic stress disorder scale at ICU discharge. Intensive care unit-related costs will be assessed.

A multi-sites, prospective, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with two parallel arms will be conducted.

Awake and conscious patients without continuous sedation, regardless of ventilatory support, with no indication for urgent intubation (\<12 hours) and with an expected ICU length of stay greater than 48 hours will be included.

The intervention will consist of sleep-guided nighttime nursing care using the Sleepscan monitor from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., every night until ICU discharge or day 7. Sleep-guided nursing care consist in postponing non urgent care (such as temperature measurement…) and avoiding entering the room when patients are asleep. Otherwise, when patients are awake, instructions are to go for all care, to cluster and anticipate nursing care and perform comfort care.

In the control group, sleep will also be recorded using the same device but the tablet will not display the patient's sleep (or awake) status, and nighttime nursing care will be performed according to usual practice and independently of patients' sleep cycles.

Based on our preliminary data and previous studies, it has been estimated that 230 patients per group will be required to detect a reduction in the proportion of patients intubated or deceased at day 7 from 20% in the control group to 10% in the intervention group.

The intention-to-treat analysis population will include all randomized patients.

Demonstrating an improvement in patient prognosis through enhanced sleep quality would represent a major advancement for intensive care medicine. Reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation may lead to shorter ICU stays, lower mortality, fewer post-ICU complications, and reduced hospital costs. Demonstrating an improvement in patient prognosis through enhanced sleep quality would represent a major advancement for intensive care medicine. Reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and the incidence of delirium may lead to shorter ICU stays, lower mortality, fewer post-ICU complications, and reduced hospital costs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
  • Sleep Disruption
  • Sleep Monitoring

Keywords

  • night-time nurse care
  • sleep promotion
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Poitiers University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 314 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older admitted to an intensive care unit
  • Conscious patients with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -2 and +1
  • Patients without continuous sedation, regardless of ventilatory support
  • No indication for urgent intubation (\<12 hours)
  • from the relatives or the patient himself

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain tumor or neuropsychiatric disorders affecting sleep
  • Amission for stroke or epilepsy
  • Administration of sleep-modifying medication within 24 hours prior to randomization
  • Patients with skin lesions around the central right and left areas preclunding the placement of the electrodes
  • Patients with expected ICU length of stay less than 48 hours
  • Patients with limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies
  • Patients already included in the study during a previous hospitalization
  • Patients under law protection (guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protective measures)
  • People under protection (minors, persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, patients in emergency situations)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control arm

    Standard care with sleep recording using the Sleepscan® device.

    Device: Sleepscan device

  • Experimental
    Experimental arm

    Sleep-guided nursing carewith sleep monitoring using the Sleepscan® device.

    Device: Sleepscan device · Procedure: Sleep-guided nursing care

Interventions

  • DeviceSleepscan device

    The Sleepscan® will be installed around 8:00 p.m., for both groups. For the control group, the tablet will not display the sleep/wake status. For the experimental group, the tablet will display the sleep/wake status.

  • ProcedureSleep-guided nursing care

    Nighttime nursing care will be guided by the Sleepscan device whether the patient is awake or asleep. When "Prioritize Sleep" signal will be displayed, caregivers may choose to postpone non-urgent care and reduce signal light and sound levels. When "Prioritize Care" signal will be displayed, caregivers prioritize care will be encouraged.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient prognosis

    Proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or who have died at day 7 after inclusion

    Time frame: Day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. ICU length of stay

    Number of days in the ICU

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 90 days

  2. Hospital length of stay

    Number of days in the hospital

    Time frame: Day 90

  3. Need for invasive ventilation

    Proportion of patients on invasive ventilation at 7 days.

    Time frame: Day 7

  4. Death in the intensive care unit

    Proportion of patients who died in the intensive care unit

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 90 days

  5. Delirium free days

    Number of days without delirium, as defined by a negative score on the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) scale. The CAM-ICU is considered positive (confusion present) if criteria 1 and 2 + 3 or 4 are met.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

  6. Delirium requiering treatment

    Proportion of patients treated for delirium during their stay in the intensive care unit.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

  7. Patient discomfort

    Comfort score derived from the Scale of Perceived Discomfort in ICU Patients (IPREA) 18, assessed upon discharge from the ICU. The scale ranges from 0 (minimal discomfort) to 100 (maximum discomfort).

    Time frame: Day of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 90 days

  8. Post-traumatic stress symptoms

    Proportion of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder upon discharge from the intensive care unit, as assessed using the Revised Impact of Events Scale (IES-R) going from 0 (no post traumatic stress disorder) to 88 (severe post traumatic stress disorder).

    Time frame: Day of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 90 days

  9. Insomnia

    Average severity of sleep disturbances upon discharge from the intensive care unit, as measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) going from 0 (non insomnia) to 28 (severe insomnia).

    Time frame: Day of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 90 days

  10. ICU-related costs

    Average cost of a stay in the intensive care unit from admission to discharge, according to the national cost index

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 90 days

  11. Patient-reported sleep quality

    Average sleep quality perceived by the patient during their stay in the intensive care unit, as measured using the Richard-Campbell Sleep Quality Scale. It is based on five questions regarding falling asleep, sleep depth, the number of awakenings, time spent awake, sleep quality, and noise. A sixth question asks respondents to estimate the extent to which noise disturbs their sleep at night. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (poor sleep quality) to 100 (high sleep quality).

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

  12. Nurses' workload

    Average workload for nurses related to sleep-guided nursing care, as measured using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Going from 0 (low workload) to 10 (high work load).

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

  13. Sleep duration

    Total sleep time in minutes, as measured by the Sleepscan® device.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

  14. Mesured sleep quality

    Measured sleep quality will be assessed using three indicators from the Sleepscan® device: * The duration of sleep spent in episodes lasting \> 10 minutes (in minutes and as a percentage). * The duration of deep sleep in stage N3 (in minutes and as a percentage of total sleep time) * The duration of REM sleep (in minutes and as a percentage of total sleep time).

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

  15. Artifacts of the system

    Proportion of nights with more than 50% artifacts

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the ICU, assessed up to 7 days

07

Study locations

1 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2028, 18 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 30, 2026
First posted
May 26, 2026
StartActual
Sep 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 2028
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07606495
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 26, 2026
Start date
Sep 16, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Xavier DROUOT
Contact
xavier.drouot@chu-poitiers.fr
+33549444444

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion