ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02951559Updated May 26, 2022

SOLFAMU Study of Nasal Brushing Collected OLFActory MUcosa Samples in the Diagnosis of Human Encephalopathies

A Phase 4 interventional study of Nasal Brushing in Encephalopathy, HIV-encephalopathy and Alzheimer Dementia, sponsored by University of Turin, Italy. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-26.

Sponsored by University of Turin, Italy · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Encephalopathies are a group of central nervous system (CNS) affection with heterogeneous etiology. Several causes have been recognized including neurodegenerative, vascular, infectious, autoimmune, toxic or allergic affections or secondary to systemic disorders. While 30-50% of acute encephalitis remains without etiological definition, definitive criteria for neurodegenerative diseases are usually unavailable in vivo and possible or probable definitions are used. The Olfactory mucosa (OM) is the part of the nasal mucosa that carries the specialized sensory organ for the modality of smell; the olfactory epithelium is composed of five principal cell types including olfactory receptor neurons. A sample of OM may be collected through a rhinoscopy-guided brushing: it is well-accepted by patients, not-contraindicated in patients with raised intracranial pressure and associated with almost no side-effects. Nasal brushing has recently been proposed for the in vivo diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

Aims of the project are:

  1. Training of ear throat and nose (ETN), Infectious disease (ID) and neurology (NEU) specialists in the technique of nasal brushing;
  2. Conducting a prospective study comparing the use of nasal brushing with gold-standard criteria in the diagnosis of Encephalopathies;
  3. Increasing the diagnostic and prognostic power in the diagnosis of encephalopathies.

A prospective, case control, multicentric study enrolling 400 patients and 100 controls (patients with nasal stenosis undergoing rhinoscopy for clinical reasons). Patients will be diagnosed and followed according to international guidelines and local clinical practice. Cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging will be used, where indicated, for the diagnosis according to the clinical or radiological suspect.

02

Conditions studied

  • Encephalopathy
  • HIV-encephalopathy
  • Alzheimer Dementia
03

In context

Brain Diseases

502 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Diseases; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 66 across 339 interventional studies indexed under Brain Diseases.

Browse Brain Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy is the lead sponsor of 214 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria for cases:

  • age>18 years;
  • signing a written (by the patients or his/her legal representant);
  • clinical suspect of encephalopathy (acute or subacute) including acute encephalitis, neurodegenerative disorders and -associated neurocognitive disorders.

Inclusion criteria for controls:

  • age>18 years;
  • signing a written informed consent (by the patients or his/her legal representant); • clinical indication for rhinoscopy for stenotic disease of nasal sept or turbinates.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Nasal anatomical abnormalities precluding the execution of nasal brushing;
  • Serious general conditions and/or comorbidities in patients for whom nasal brushing may be a risk factor precipitating their pre-existing condition;
  • Anti-coagulant treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brushing

    Patients will undergo nasal brushing as further described additionally to other gold standard practices according to the suspected aetiology (brain MRI, lumbar puncture, plasma tests, etc.)

    Device: Nasal Brushing

Interventions

  • DeviceNasal Brushing

    Nasal brushing will be performed in non-sedated patients as follows. After administration of a local vasoconstrictor (1% epinephrine) with the use of a nasal tampon, inserted into the nasal cavity of the patient to locate the olfactory mucosa lining the nasal vault. A sterile, disposable brush ("Copanflock", "Copan", Brescia, Italy) will be inserted gently rolled on the mucosal surface, withdrawn,and immersed in 0.9% saline solution, UTM (Universal Transporter Medium) or 4% formaldehyde. Two swabs will be collected for each nostril.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic concordance with gold standard diagnostic procedures

    Positive and negative predictive values and correct classification rates of OM tests versus gold standard diagnostic procedures

    Time frame: Single-visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Side effects of the nasal brushing

    Prevalence of side effects reported during the brushing and up to 6 months afterwards

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after the procedure

  2. Cytological and immunohistochemistry examination of nasal brushing smear (neuronal abnormalities and expression of specific markers according to the different aetiologies)

    Prevalence of samples showing: abnormalities in cytological examination, antiOMP (Olfactory Marker Protein) positive cells, white blood cells and subtypes.

    Time frame: single-visit

  3. OM markers of neuronal damage and amyloid deposition

    Quantification of tau, p-tau, 1-42 beta amyloid, S100beta, alpha synuclein, TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein 43) on cell blocks and supernatant

    Time frame: single-visit

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Torino
    Torino, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Andrea Calcagno, MD · Contactandrea.calcagno@unito.it · +390114393884
    • Stefano Bonora, MD · Sub investigator
    • Giovanni Di Perri, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Andrea Calcagno, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2016, a primary completion of Feb 2023 and a completion of Feb 2023. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2016
First posted
Nov 1, 2016
Start
Mar 2016
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2023
CompletionEst.
Feb 2023
Last update
May 26, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02951559
Responsible party
Giovanni Di Perri (Professor of Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Italy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Feb 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2023 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2022

Study contacts

ANDREA CALCAGNO, MD, DTM&H
Contact
andrea.calcagno@unito.it
+390114393884
GIOVANNI DI PERRI, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Torino

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion