CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02903407Updated Jul 13, 2020Results posted

Pain, Agitation and Delirium (PAD) Protocol in the Duke CICU

A Phase 4 interventional study of Midazolam and Propofol in Deep Sedation, Ventilators, Mechanical and Critical Illness, sponsored by Duke University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-13.

Sponsored by Duke University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
All enrolled participants completed the study protocol but the study was terminated prior to the goal number of participants due to low recruitment
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to examine the use of protocol directed sedation using the Duke PAD protocol with the current sedation medications of propofol or dexmedetomidine compared to the PAD protocol with midazolam, per cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) usual care, as an initial step toward understanding the best management of sedation in these patients.

Read the detailed description

The optimal approach to management of sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) has become a topic of increasing interest. The most recent guidelines outline the pharmacologic mechanisms of commonly used medications as well as scales on which to measure goals of pain, sedation, agitation and delirium in the critically ill patient. This guideline is based on a cadre of randomized controlled trials examining the medications in the medical intensive care unit and post cardiac surgery patient. Notably, in each of the trials, patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardiogenic shock have been excluded or largely underrepresented.

Using the current guidelines as a foundation, a new pain, agitation and delirium (PAD) protocol, which prioritizes the use of propofol or dexmedetomidine for sedation, was developed and instituted at Duke University Hospital. However, use of this protocol in the CICU has raised important considerations. Some of these stem from the specific hemodynamic characteristics of the population, including significant bradycardia and hypotension, which can be worsened due to known side effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine. It remains unclear whether the benefits of these medications outweigh the risks in CICU patients as the use of these medications has not been studied previously in this population. This study aims to examine the use of protocol directed sedation using the Duke PAD protocol with the current sedation medications of propofol or dexmedetomidine compared to the PAD protocol with midazolam, per CICU usual care, as an initial step toward understanding the best management of sedation in these patients.

Project Aims Include:

  1. Examine the efficacy of the PAD protocol using propofol or dexmedetomidine versus midazolam with regard to goal sedation, pain control and level of delirium in intubated Duke CICU patients.
  2. Determine differences in duration of ventilator days, CICU stay and total hospital stay with the PAD protocol using propofol or dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam in the Duke CICU.
  3. Compare the rates of adverse effects of the current PAD protocol with propofol or dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation in the Duke CICU, including hypotension, bradycardia, difficulty with ventilator weaning due to sedation, and delirium.
02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Sedation
  • Ventilators, Mechanical
  • Critical Illness

Keywords

  • Ventilators, Mechanical
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Deep Sedation
03

In context

Delirium

1,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Delirium; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 120 across 599 interventional studies indexed under Delirium.

Browse Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients admitted to the Duke CICU, who require intubation and sedation for mechanical ventilation that is expected to be >24 hours in duration will be included, unless they meet the specified exclusion criteria.
  • Patients intubated within one hour prior to care transition to the CICU will also be screened for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include patients following resuscitation from cardiac arrest who are treated on the cooling protocol
  • patients who have suffered a neurologic event (seizure, stroke) or who have baseline dementia, both of which could limit delirium assessment
  • patients with child class B and C liver disease
  • patients with known allergy to study medications.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Midazolam

    IV midazolam will be administered for sedation while patient is mechanically ventilated. Patient will be monitored per standard of care in the CICU using the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) with a set goal sedation level of RASS 0 to -2. Pain will be monitored based on the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) assessment with goal less than or equal to 2. Delirium will be evaluated based on the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) with goal of negative or patient's baseline.

    Drug: Midazolam

  • Active comparator
    Propofol or Dexmedetomidine

    Propofol or Dexmedetomidine per physician discretion will be administered for sedation while patient is mechanically ventilated. Patient will be monitored per standard of care in the CICU using the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) with a set goal sedation level of RASS 0 to -2. Pain will be monitored based on the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) assessment with goal less than or equal to 2. Delirium will be evaluated based on the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) with goal of negative or patient's baseline.

    Drug: Propofol · Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugMidazolam

    IV midazolam will be administered as a continuous infusion to maintain set goal sedation level of RASS 0 to -2.

    Also known as: Versed

  • DrugPropofol

    IV propofol will be administered as a continuous infusion to maintain set goal sedation level of RASS 0 to -2.

    Also known as: Diprivan

  • DrugDexmedetomidine

    IV dexmedetomidine will be administered as a continuous infusion to maintain set goal sedation level of RASS 0 to -2.

    Also known as: Precedex

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

    Number of days of admission to the CICU during the index hospitalization

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. In Hospital Mortality

    All-cause mortality during the hospitalization

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  2. Hospital Length of Stay

    Index hospitalization length of stay in days

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  3. Number of Participants With Increased Vasopressor Requirement

    Patients will be monitored for increased pressor requirement during the CICU stay

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  4. Number of Participants With Bradycardia

    Patients will be monitored for bradycardia which may be associated with sedation drug. Average heart rate before, during and after use of drug will be recorded for each patient.

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  5. Number of Ventilator Days

    Days requiring mechanical ventilation during the initial episode of intubation during the hospitalization

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  6. Number of Days From Decision to Extubate to True Extubation

    The time (in days) from when the clinical care team documents a decision to pursue extubation until the time the patient was extubated

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  7. Number of Days Alive During Admission and Free From Delirium or Coma

    The number of days alive and free from delirium or coma during admission will be evaluated among patients with CAM-ICU documented

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  8. Percentage of Time at Goal Sedation

    Will use RASS (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale) to assess level of sedation as per standard of care by nurses in the CICU. Data that is recorded will be evaluated following discharge. The RASS ranges from -5 (unrousable) to +4 (combative) and 0 (zero) = alert and calm and goal sedation is considered a RASS level of 0 to -2.

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  9. Time From Withdrawal of Sedation to ICU Discharge

    The duration, in days, from withdrawal of sedation for mechanical ventilation until the time of discharge from the ICU

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  10. Number of Participants With Delirium

    Will use the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) to assess presence of delirium as per standard of care by nurses in the CICU. Patients with CAM-ICU data recorded will be included.

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  11. Pain Management

    Will use the CPOT (Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool) score to assess pain level as per standard of care by nurses in the CICU. The CPOT has a range of 0 to 8. A CPOT score of ≤ 2 = minimal to no pain present and \>2 = unacceptable level of pain. Data that is recorded will be evaluated following discharge.

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

  12. Number of Participants Requiring Reintubation

    Following ICU discharge, patient charts will be reviewed to evaluate whether they required reintubation. If so, will determine whether necessity of reintubation was related to delirium.

    Time frame: One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first

07

Results

Posted Jul 13, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Our trial was terminated prior to goal enrollment due to difficulty with enrollment in this critically ill population of patients. The data here represent a small sample size of patients and should be viewed as pilot data for hypothesis generation.

Participant flow

Patients were recruited from the Duke CICU between September 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019. Patients were identified by the rounding team for potential inclusion in the sedation trial and then screened by study team members to determine whether they met inclusion criteria. Consent was obtained from eligible patient's primary decision maker.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Started43
Completed43
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryIntensive Care Unit Length of Stay

Number of days of admission to the CICU during the index hospitalization

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · Days
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay
DaysMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay4.1 (3.6 to 6.7)10.0 (8.2 to 10.3)
SecondaryIn Hospital Mortality

All-cause mortality during the hospitalization

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Number · participants
In Hospital Mortality
participantsMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
In Hospital Mortality11
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay

Index hospitalization length of stay in days

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · Days
Hospital Length of Stay
DaysMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Hospital Length of Stay19.5 (15.0 to 23.5)30.0 (21.5 to 35.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Increased Vasopressor Requirement

Patients will be monitored for increased pressor requirement during the CICU stay

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Increased Vasopressor Requirement
ParticipantsMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Participants With Increased Vasopressor Requirement22
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Bradycardia

Patients will be monitored for bradycardia which may be associated with sedation drug. Average heart rate before, during and after use of drug will be recorded for each patient.

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Bradycardia
ParticipantsMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Participants With Bradycardia00
SecondaryNumber of Ventilator Days

Days requiring mechanical ventilation during the initial episode of intubation during the hospitalization

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · Days
Number of Ventilator Days
DaysMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Ventilator Days2.5 (2.1 to 4.2)6.8 (3.9 to 8.4)
SecondaryNumber of Days From Decision to Extubate to True Extubation

The time (in days) from when the clinical care team documents a decision to pursue extubation until the time the patient was extubated

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · Days
Number of Days From Decision to Extubate to True Extubation
DaysMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Days From Decision to Extubate to True Extubation0 (0 to 0.25)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryNumber of Days Alive During Admission and Free From Delirium or Coma

The number of days alive and free from delirium or coma during admission will be evaluated among patients with CAM-ICU documented

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · Days
Number of Days Alive During Admission and Free From Delirium or Coma
DaysMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Days Alive During Admission and Free From Delirium or Coma14.0 (13.5 to 20.0)—
SecondaryPercentage of Time at Goal Sedation

Will use RASS (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale) to assess level of sedation as per standard of care by nurses in the CICU. Data that is recorded will be evaluated following discharge. The RASS ranges from -5 (unrousable) to +4 (combative) and 0 (zero) = alert and calm and goal sedation is considered a RASS level of 0 to -2.

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · percentage of time
Percentage of Time at Goal Sedation
percentage of timeMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Percentage of Time at Goal Sedation63.3 (43.8 to 70.8)63.2 (56.6 to 64.4)
SecondaryTime From Withdrawal of Sedation to ICU Discharge

The duration, in days, from withdrawal of sedation for mechanical ventilation until the time of discharge from the ICU

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time From Withdrawal of Sedation to ICU Discharge
DaysMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Time From Withdrawal of Sedation to ICU Discharge1.6 (0.77 to 2.8)5.6 (2.8 to 5.8)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Delirium

Will use the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) to assess presence of delirium as per standard of care by nurses in the CICU. Patients with CAM-ICU data recorded will be included.

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Delirium
ParticipantsMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Participants With Delirium1—
SecondaryPain Management

Will use the CPOT (Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool) score to assess pain level as per standard of care by nurses in the CICU. The CPOT has a range of 0 to 8. A CPOT score of ≤ 2 = minimal to no pain present and \>2 = unacceptable level of pain. Data that is recorded will be evaluated following discharge.

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pain Management
score on a scaleMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Pain Management0.0 (0.0 to 0.5)0.0 (0.0 to 0.3)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Requiring Reintubation

Following ICU discharge, patient charts will be reviewed to evaluate whether they required reintubation. If so, will determine whether necessity of reintubation was related to delirium.

Time frame:
One month or hospital discharge, whichever time point comes first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Requiring Reintubation
ParticipantsMidazolamPropofol or Dexmedetomidine
Number of Participants Requiring Reintubation01

Adverse events

Collected over From time of enrollment to hospital discharge - a range of 2-29 days for the patients enrolled in the trial. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Midazolam1/4 (25%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Propofol or Dexmedetomidine1/3 (33.3%)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MidazolamPropofol or DexmedetomidineTotal
Median72.5 (66.3 to 73.3)57.0 (55.5 to 63.5)70.0 (55.5 to 72.5)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MidazolamPropofol or DexmedetomidineTotal
Female235
Male202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MidazolamPropofol or DexmedetomidineTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American112
White325
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)MidazolamPropofol or DexmedetomidineTotal
United States437
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)MidazolamPropofol or DexmedetomidineTotal
Median36.1 (33.2 to 38.5)34.4 (33.5 to 35.8)34.4 (33.3 to 37.7)
Ejection Fraction
Ejection Fraction(Percentage of blood)MidazolamPropofol or DexmedetomidineTotal
Median30.0 (18.8 to 43.8)55.0 (40.0 to 55.0)40.0 (22.5 to 55.0)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72. PubMed 23269131 ↗
  • Carson SS, Kress JP, Rodgers JE, Vinayak A, Campbell-Bright S, Levitt J, Bourdet S, Ivanova A, Henderson AG, Pohlman A, Chang L, Rich PB, Hall J. A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1326-32. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215513.63207.7F. PubMed 16540958 ↗
  • Hall RI, Sandham D, Cardinal P, Tweeddale M, Moher D, Wang X, Anis AH; Study Investigators. Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation : a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. Chest. 2001 Apr;119(4):1151-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1151. PubMed 11296183 ↗
  • Huey-Ling L, Chun-Che S, Jen-Jen T, Shau-Ting L, Hsing-I C. Comparison of the effect of protocol-directed sedation with propofol vs. midazolam by nurses in intensive care: efficacy, haemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1510-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02128.x. PubMed 18482144 ↗
  • Pandharipande PP, Sanders RD, Girard TD, McGrane S, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Herr DL, Maze M, Ely EW; MENDS investigators. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc8916. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Erratum In: Crit Care. 2011;15(1):402. PubMed 20233428 ↗
  • Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2. PubMed 19188334 ↗
  • Searle NR, Cote S, Taillefer J, Carrier M, Gagnon L, Roy M, Lussier D. Propofol or midazolam for sedation and early extubation following cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1997 Jun;44(6):629-35. doi: 10.1007/BF03015447. PubMed 9187783 ↗
  • Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock SJ, Bratty JR, Takala J; Dexmedetomidine for Long-Term Sedation Investigators. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304. PubMed 22436955 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 4, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 30, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02903407
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2016
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Results posted
Jul 13, 2020
Last update
Jul 13, 2020

Study contacts

Kristin Newby, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion