ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02837445Updated Jun 18, 2026

Moderato System: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial Ver 1.1

An interventional study of PHC ON and PHC OFF in Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy, Bradycardia and Atrioventricular Block, sponsored by BackBeat Medical Inc. Terminated at 12 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-18.

Sponsored by BackBeat Medical Inc · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Recruitment for this study was initially suspended as a larger global study was initiated in parallel. Later on, this study was terminated.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this double blind randomized study is the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the Moderato System.

The Moderato implantable pulse generator is indicated for patients who have hypertension and also require a dual chamber pacemaker in order to reduce their blood pressure.

The primary objectives of this study are to provide evidence of safety and clinical efficacy of the anti-hypertensive effects of the Moderato System. This will be accomplished by evaluating changes in blood pressure in an active treatment vs. a control patient population for a period of 6 months.

The device will be considered to have a clinical effectiveness with regard to its anti-hypertension functions if there is a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure in the treatment group compared to the control group.

Read the detailed description

Protocol CS-03 Ver 1.1 (NCT02837445) was amended at the advice of the Scientific Advisory to protocol CS-03 Version 3.0 with more stringent hypertension inclusion criteria and different observation intervals for efficacy and safety.

In CS-03 Version 3.0 the time of the primary efficacy endpoint was reduced from 6 months to 3 months post randomization which was deemed a suitable interval for the chronic effect, whereas for the safety endpoint, the period was lengthened from 6 month to 12 months post randomization to better monitor potential risks of the treatment on cardiac function (Blinding period was increased from 6 to 12 months). Protocols were thus split in order to allow better clarification to the difference in the time to the primary endpoints for efficacy and safety between the two CIP versions and simplify data analysis.

Protocol Ver 3.0 prescribes data analysis of all patients randomized under version 1.1 to be performed once they complete the 6 months follow-up as set in protocol version 1.1 (NCT0283744). It is expected that \~40 patients will be randomized according to protocol version 1.1 prior to the enrollment of patients according to protocol version 3.0. The results will be considered as interim analysis.

The recruitment for the protocol version 1.1 is now completed. Total of 47 patients were randomized according to protocol version 1.1 and all patients completed the follow-up period for the primary endpoint.

Patients are currently being followed up for the study "extension period".

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy
  • Bradycardia
  • Atrioventricular Block
03

In context

Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 57 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy.

Browse Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy studies →

Lead sponsor

BackBeat Medical Inc is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject requires an implant or replacement a of dual chamber pacemaker
  • Stable (at least one month) hypertension treatment with at least 1 anti-hypertensive drug, which is anticipated to be maintained for 7 months.
  • Average day time (7AM-10PM) ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and office blood pressure ≥140 mmHg.
  • Subject lives in the proximity of the study center, which permits compliance with study visits for at least 7 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known secondary cause of HTN.
  • Average ambulatory or office systolic BP > 195 mmHg.
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation.
  • History of significant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter burden (defined as >25% of beats).
  • Cardiac \<50%.
  • Symptoms of heart failure, Class II or greater.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy or inter-ventricular septal thickness ≥ 15 mm.
  • Subject is on dialysis.
  • Subject has an estimated \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m²
  • Prior neurological events (stroke or ) within the past year or events at a prior time that has resulted in residual neurologic deficit.
  • Carotid artery disease.
  • Known autonomic dysfunction.
  • History of untreated ventricular tachyarrhythmia or has experienced sudden death.
  • Previous active device-based treatment for HTN.
  • Existing implant, other than a pacemaker that needs replacing.
  • Subject is or has the possibility of becoming pregnant and is unwilling of during the study.
  • Subject is unwilling or cannot provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment

    Eligible patients randomized after optimization phase to PHC ON for 6 months Patients continue standard or modified anti-hypertension medical regime at discretion of the investigator

    Device: PHC ON

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Eligible patients randomized after optimization phase to pacemaker only (PHC OFF) for 6 months. Patients continue standard or modified anti-hypertension medical regime at discretion of the investigator

    Device: PHC OFF

Interventions

  • DevicePHC ON

    Eligible patients randomized after optimization phase to PHC ON for 6 months. Patients continue standard or modified anti-hypertension medical regime at discretion of the investigator

  • DevicePHC OFF

    Eligible patients randomized after optimization phase to PHC OFF for 6 months. Patients continue standard or modified anti-hypertension medical regime at discretion of the investigator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of composite of major cardiac events

    including heart failure, clinically significant arrhythmias eg, persistent or increased atrial fibrillation, serious ventricular arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, renal failure and/or related safety events that result in death

    Time frame: 6 months post Randomization

  2. Change in average 24 hour systolic ambulatory blood pressure

    Time frame: Week 3 pre Randomization and 6 months post Randomization

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Medical University Vienna
    Vienna, 1090, Austria
  • UZ Brussel - Heart Rhythm Management Center
    Brussels, 1090, Belgium
  • Na Homolce Hospital
    Prague, 15030, Czechia
  • Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
    Budapest, 1122, Hungary
  • P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital
    Riga, 1002, Latvia
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos
    Vilnius, 08661, Lithuania
  • Medical University of Gdansk
    Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • Szpital Kliniczny Przemiemienia Panskiego
    Poznan, 61-848, Poland
  • Pomeranian Medical University Hospital no. 2
    Szczecin, 70-111, Poland
  • Samodzielnym Publicznym Centralnym Szpitalem Klinicznym
    Warsaw, 02-097, Poland
  • Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
    Zabrze, 41-800, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chovanec M, Merkely B, Sokal A, Petru J, Kralovec S, Drtina T, Mudroch M, Geller L, Osztheimer I, Morawski S, Mika YH, Fischer A, Evans SJ, Aviv R, Rosenthal N, Burkhoff D, Kuck KH, Neuzil P. Pressure-Volume Analysis Demonstrates Short- and Long-Term Hemodynamic Effects of Atrioventricular Interval Modulation Therapy in Hypertension. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Nov;11(11):2493-2504. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.06.017. Epub 2025 Aug 13. PubMed 40801869 ↗
  • Kalarus Z, Merkely B, Neuzil P, Grabowski M, Mitkowski P, Marinskis G, Erglis A, Kazmierczak J, Sturmberger T, Sokal A, Pluta S, Geller L, Osztheimer I, Malek F, Kolodzinska A, Mika Y, Evans SJ, Hastings HM, Burkhoff D, Kuck KH. Pacemaker-Based Cardiac Neuromodulation Therapy in Patients With Hypertension: A Pilot Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 17;10(16):e020492. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020492. Epub 2021 Aug 13. PubMed 34387126 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02837445
Lead sponsor
BackBeat Medical Inc
Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital, MLM Medical Labs GmbH, nabios GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2016
Start date
Jul 12, 2016
Primary completion
May 13, 2021
Completion
May 13, 2021
Last update
Jun 18, 2026

Study contacts

Karl-Heinz Kuck, Prof. MD
principal investigator · Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion