An interventional study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Status unknown at 13 sites in France. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-11.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The study of non-invasive and reliable biomarkers to track progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) is essential while disease-modifying treatments are being developed. Many clinical biological or imaging biomarkers have been tested but no "gold standard" has been found as of yet. Among these, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) relaxometry using R2* measurement (R2* = 1/T2*), which is a validated marker for estimating brain iron concentration, appears to be an attractive technique because its safety, rapidly measured in clinical conditions and its ease to ensure individual longitudinal follow-up. Current data of cross sectional studies of R2*, which have shown an iron increase in Substantia Nigra (SN), led to suppose that it could be a biomarker of disease vulnerability. Recently, the investigators have conducted the first longitudinal follow-up of R2* (1.5 T MRI), which showed a rapid R2* increase in both parts of the SN and in the caudal putamen. We propose, here, a multicenter prospective study of one-year cohort follow-up of R2* variations (ΔR2*) in three regions of interest (ROIs) (the SN, the Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) and the Putamen) of 160 patients with PD, using a 3 Tesla MRI, to evaluate the potential interest of R2* as a biomarker of disease progression. The variation of R2* (ΔR2*) will be correlated with clinical markers of disease progress, non-motor symptoms. 80 healthy controls subjects will also be included to assess the effect of aging on cerebral physiological iron levels.
Use lay language.
The study of non-invasive and reliable biomarkers to track progression of Parkinson's disease is essential while disease-modifying treatments are being developed. Many clinical biological or imaging biomarkers have been tested but no "gold standard" has been found as of yet. Among these, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) relaxometry using R2* measurement (R2* = 1/T2*), which is a validated marker for estimating brain iron concentration, appears to be an attractive technique because its safety, rapidly measured in clinical conditions and its ease to ensure individual longitudinal follow-up. Current data of cross sectional studies of R2*, which have shown an iron increase in substantia nigra, led to suppose that it could be a biomarker of disease vulnerability. Recently, we have conducted the first longitudinal follow-up of R2* (1.5 T MRI), which showed a rapid R2* increase in both parts of the SN and in the caudal putamen. We propose, here, a multicenter prospective study of one-year cohort follow-up of R2* variations (ΔR2*) in three regions of interest (the substantia nigra, the ventral tegmental area and the putamen) of 160 patients with Parkinson's disease, using a 3 Tesla MRI, to evaluate the potential interest of R2* as a biomarker of disease progression. The variation of R2* (ΔR2*) will be correlated with clinical markers of disease progress, non-motor symptoms. 80 healthy controls subjects will also be included to assess the effect of aging on cerebral physiological iron levels.
Type of study : Interventional multicenter prospective study of cohort follow-up.
Number of centers : 6 (Clermont-Ferrand, Lyon, Grenoble, Paris, Limoges, Lille)
Study population :
Recruitment
160 patients with Parkinson's disease divided into four subgroups of 40 patients according to disease duration:
In parallel, 80 sex-age matched healthy controls subjects matched equally distributed in the 4 groups (n = 20/group) based on a stratified plan by gender and age (ratio 1:2).
Subjects will be assessed twice, one year apart by the procedures detailed below. The two neurological assessments should be made by the same certified neurologist.
Patients' procedure:
Visit 1 (Day 0) (duration: 1 day or 2 half days)
Visit 2 (Day 0 + 1 year) (duration: 1 day or 2 half days)
Matched healthy controls subjects' procedure:
Visit 1 (Day 0) (duration: 1 half day)
Visit 2 (Day 0 + 1 year) (duration: 1 half day)
MRI acquisition (duration: 45 to 60 min)
The procedure will be performed on a 3 Tesla MRI, allowing a substantial gain in signal-to-noise ratio compared with the one obtained at 1.5 Tesla.
Different sequences will be planned:
The R2* (1/T2*) will be measured in three different regions of interest (substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area and the putamen) for the 2 MRI's in order to calculate ΔR2.
4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.
Browse Parkinson Disease studies →University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 841 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion criteria for PATIENTS :
Inclusion criteria for HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS :
Exclusion criteria for PATIENTS :
Exclusion criteria for HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS :
160 PD patients divided into four subgroups of 40 patients according to disease duration: * \< 5 years * Between 5 and 10 years * Between 10 and 15 years * \> 15 years
Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
160 PD patients divided into four subgroups of 40 patients according to disease duration: * \< 5 years * Between 5 and 10 years * Between 10 and 15 years * \> 15 years
Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
160 PD patients divided into four subgroups of 40 patients according to disease duration: * \< 5 years * Between 5 and 10 years * Between 10 and 15 years * \> 15 years
Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
160 PD patients divided into four subgroups of 40 patients according to disease duration: * \< 5 years * Between 5 and 10 years * Between 10 and 15 years * \> 15 years
Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Change from baseline cerebral R2*
Change from baseline cerebral R2\* quantification at 1 year in three regions of interest (Substantia Nigra, Ventral Tegmental Area and Putamen).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline Parkinson's disease clinical symptoms
- Change from baseline Parkinson's disease clinical symptoms at one year with the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Score.
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline severity of Parkinson's disease
- Change from baseline severity of Parkinson's disease at one year with the HOEHN \& YAHR status.
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline activities of daily living
- Change from baseline activities of daily living at one year with the SCHWAB \& ENGLAND scale.
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline freezing
- Change from baseline freezing at one year with the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q).
Time frame: at 1 year
change from baseline cognitive function
- Change from baseline cognitive function at one year with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline hyper and hypo dopaminergic symptoms scores
- Change from baseline hyper and hypo dopaminergic symptoms scores at one year with the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease (ASBPD)
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline sleepiness score
Change from baseline sleepiness score at one year with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline autonomic functions score
Change from baseline autonomic functions score at one year with the SCales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease (SCOPA-AUT).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline non-motor symptoms score
Change from baseline non-motor symptoms score at one year with the Non-Motor symptom assessment Scale for Parkinson's Disease (NMSS).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline apathy score
- Change from baseline apathy score at one year with the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline depression score
- Change from baseline depression score at one year with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D).
Time frame: at 1 year
Change from baseline anxiety score
- Change from baseline anxiety score at one year with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A).
Time frame: at 1 year
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand