CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02803346IMMUNOSEPSISUpdated Jun 16, 2016

Evaluation of Immunosuppression in Septic Shock: Biomarkers and Pharmacological Restoration (IMMUNOSEPSIS)

An observational study in Immunology of Septic Shock, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-16.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Septic syndromes (systemic inflammatory response associated with infection) remain a major although largely under-recognized health care problem and represent the first cause of mortality in intensive care units. While it has long been known that sepsis deeply perturbs immune homeostasis by inducing a tremendous systemic inflammatory response, novel findings indicate that sepsis indeed initiates a more complex immunologic response that varies over time, with the concomitant occurrence of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a resultant, after a short pro-inflammatory phase, septic patients enter a stage of protracted immunosuppression. This is illustrated in those patients by reactivation of dormant viruses (CMV or HSV) or infections due to pathogens, including fungi, which are normally pathogenic solely in immunocompromised hosts. These alterations might be directly responsible for worsening outcome in patients who survived initial resuscitation as nearly all immune functions are deeply compromised. Both arms of immunity (innate and adaptive) are indeed markedly suppressed (including enhanced leukocyte apoptosis, lymphocyte anergy and deactivated monocyte functions). New promising therapeutic avenues are currently emerging from those recent findings such as adjunctive immunostimulation for the most immunosuppressed patients. The prerequisite for immunostimulation administration (IFNg, GM-CSF, IL-7) however relies on the investigators capacity in identifying the patients who could benefit from it, as there is no clinical sign of immune dysfunctions. The main objectives are:

  1. to identify the best biomarkers for sepsis-induced immunosuppression and
  2. to evaluate ex vivo whether drugs could rejuvenate immune functions.
02

Conditions studied

  • Immunology of Septic Shock

Keywords

  • sepsis
  • septic shock
  • immunosuppression
  • HLA-DR
  • lymphopenia
03

In context

Shock, Septic

862 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 207 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 100 across 298 observational studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

septic shock patients

Inclusion criteria

  • septic shock is defined by an identifiable site of infection, persisting hypotension despite fluid resuscitation requiring vasopressor therapy, and evidence of a systemic inflammatory response

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \< 18
  • immunosuppressive disease (HIV, cancer, primary immune deficiency)
  • immunosuppressive treatment or corticoid treatment (dosage > 10mg/day or cumulative dose >700 mg equivalent prednisolone)
  • aplasia as defined by number of circulating neutrophils \< 500 cells / mm3
  • extracorporeal circulation during the month prior ICU admission
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • septic shock patients

    Other: Circulating blood (leukocytes)

Interventions

  • OtherCirculating blood (leukocytes)

    mHLA-DR measurement (in vitro)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. mortality

    Time frame: 28 days post diagnosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. occurrence of nosocomial infection

    Time frame: 28 days post diagnosis

  2. decreased monocyte HLA-DR expression

    Time frame: day 3 post diagnosis

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital Edouard Herriot
    Lyon, 69003, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bodinier M, Peronnet E, Brengel-Pesce K, Conti F, Rimmele T, Textoris J, Vedrine C, Quemeneur L, Griffiths AD, Tan LK, Venet F, Maucort-Boulch D, Monneret G; REALISM study group. Monocyte Trajectories Endotypes Are Associated With Worsening in Septic Patients. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 29;12:795052. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.795052. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34912347 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02803346
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2016
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2016

Study contacts

Guillaume Monneret
Contact
guillaume.monneret@chu-lyon.fr
+33 4 72 11 97 58

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion