An interventional study of metabolic syndrome in Postoperative Complications, sponsored by General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. Completed. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-30.
Sponsored by General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study is to investigate propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia on the effects of early postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome.
By now, a series risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, which are also related to the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), are becoming more common.The investigators don't know whether propofol based anesthesia has a more severe impact on early postoperative cognitive function than sevoflurane in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome. In this study, the investigators want to investigate propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia on the effects of early postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome.
1,964 studies on the registry are indexed under Metabolic Syndrome; 330 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 94 is above the median of 60 across 1,460 interventional studies indexed under Metabolic Syndrome.
Browse Metabolic Syndrome studies →General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University is the lead sponsor of 102 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with metabolic syndrome were randomly assigned to receive propofol anesthesia
Other: metabolic syndrome
Patients with metabolic syndrome were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane anesthesia
Other: metabolic syndrome
metabolic syndrome
Number of participants with Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) as assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score in propofol group and sevoflurane group
Time frame: up to 7days postoperatively
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No — safety
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University