ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02732145DATRIVUpdated Oct 30, 2019Results posted

Diagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis

An interventional study of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) and Histopathology in Lichen Sclerosus, Lichen Planus and Lichen Simplex Chronicus, sponsored by Ginekološka Poliklinika Dr. Vesna Harni. Completed at 1 site in Croatia. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-30.

Sponsored by Ginekološka Poliklinika Dr. Vesna Harni · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
328
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The objective of the study was to determine sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" for detection of vulvar dermatosis using histopathology as the reference standard.

Read the detailed description

"Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) is a new, and original technique for performing colposcopy of the vulva, taking into account three different skin types and zones as well as morphological evaluation of vulvar lesions according to their specificity (non-specific and lesions specific for dermatosis). To evaluate the clinical value of TRIV, we designed two index tests, a quantitative test called "Vulvoscopy Index" and a semi-quantitative test marked as "N-S-P scheme." The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of both index tests were estimated in comparison with histopathology as the reference test in two groups of 164 consecutive patients with vulvar discomfort (82 patients with vulvar dermatosis and 82 patients with vulvodynia ) and 164 consecutive patients without vulvar discomfort (82 patients with "normal vulva" and 82 patients with "impaired vulvar skin").

The study was performed stratified, on three levels, whereby the first two levels were pre-assignments.

The first level of the study was an evaluation of vulvar discomfort during the routine gynecological care in the clinic "Poliklinika Harni" Zagreb, Croatia, where we searched for symptomatic patients; and in the esthetic gynecological unit of the same clinic, where we searched for asymptomatic patients. Vulvar discomfort was evaluated anamnestically by the "International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Vulvodynia Pattern Questionnaire." On the second level, we performed detailed clinical examination (inspection and Cotton-Swab test), searching for non-specific and lesions specific for skin (vulvar) dermatosis, and patients with vulvodynia who fulfilled Friedrich's criteria. Patients with vulvar infection or pre/malignancy were excluded from the study. Vulvar lesions in patients with vulvodynia were not relevant to the diagnosis of vulvodynia.

Among women without vulvar discomfort, we described those without any clinical findings ("normal vulva") and those with some non-specific findings on the vulva. We called this group "impaired vulvar skin." The results of the clinical examination were collected using "TRIV Form Data." On this way, we identified four groups of patients during the recruitment: vulvar dermatosis, vulvodynia, impaired vulvar skin, and normal vulva. For each patient with vulvar dermatosis (82 patients), the first consecutive patient with vulvodynia (82), impaired vulvar skin (82) and normal vulva (82) were taken for comparison.

The third level of the study presents the investigation and included diagnostic interventions "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" and vulvar biopsy with histopathology. The results of vulvoscopy were collected using "TRIV Form Data" and then assessed by "Vulvoscopy Index" and the "N-S-P Scheme." Biopsy of the vulva from the symptomatic patients was taken to confirm/exclude vulvar dermatosis. Asymptomatic patients, who were recruited from patients undergoing planned labiaplasty, granted vulvar samples to further investigation.

The statistical tests were made on a personal computer (PC) in the Statistical Package 12.0. All qualitative variables are shown in the tables with the absolute number and percentage. Quantitative variables are presented with arithmetic mean and standard deviation (if normal distribution), and by the median and range (if not a normal distribution).

A chi-squared test was used to test the difference between qualitative variables among the two groups. A chi-squared test with Yates correction was used for 2x2 size tables, and Fisher's exact test was used for small values. T-test proportions were used for the evaluation of the differences between the two percentages. Variance analysis (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD were used to test quantitative variables with normal distribution between multiple groups. Differences between the arithmetic mean of the two groups were tested by t-test.

Variables that did not have normal distribution were tested by nonparametric tests. The differences between several groups were tested by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and the differences between the two groups Mann-Whitney U test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lichen Sclerosus
  • Lichen Planus
  • Lichen Simplex Chronicus
  • Vulvodynia

Keywords

  • Three-Vulvar-Rings
  • Three-Rings-Vulvoscopy
  • N-S-P scheme
  • Vulvoscopy Index
  • Vulvar Dermatosis
  • Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
  • Lichen Planus
  • Lichen Simplex Chronicus
  • Vulvodynia
  • Provoked Vestibulodynia
  • Vulvar Vestibulitis
  • Vulvar Diseases
03

In context

Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 328 is above the median of 45 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus.

Browse Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ginekološka Poliklinika Dr. Vesna Harni as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

"Three Rings Vulvoscopy" performed at Poliklinika Harni, during the period from December 2011 - December 2016.

Ability to provide and complete Questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Incomplete medical records. Lack of histopathology. Vulvo-vaginal infection. Benign tumors of the vulva. Pre-/malignant conditions of the vulva.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
328 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Normal vulva

    The "Normal vulva" group consisted of patients without vulvar discomfort (ISSVD Questionnaire), and without any vulvar lesion (Clinical examination) undergoing planned labioplasty. For each patient with vulvar dermatosis, the first consecutive patient with normal vulva was taken for comparison. Interventions: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, Vulvar Biopsy, and Histopathology.

    Diagnostic Test: "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) · Procedure: Histopathology

  • Placebo comparator
    Impaired vulvar skin

    The group of "Impaired vulvar skin" was formed by the patients without vulvar symptoms (ISSVD Questionnaire), but with some non-specific vulvar lesions (Clinical examination) undergoing planned labioplasty, before surgery. For each patient with vulvar dermatosis, the first consecutive patient with impaired vulvar skin was taken for comparison. Interventions: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, Vulvar Biopsy, and Histopathology.

    Diagnostic Test: "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) · Procedure: Histopathology

  • Placebo comparator
    Vulvodynia

    The "Vulvodynia" group consisted of patients with vulvar discomfort (ISSVD Questionnaire), who fulfilled Friedrich's criteria (Clinical examination). Non-specific lesions found with TRIV were not relevant for the diagnosis of vulvodynia. For each patient with vulvar dermatosis, the first consecutive patient with vulvodynia was taken for comparison. Interventions: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, Vulvar Biopsy, and Histopathology.

    Diagnostic Test: "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) · Procedure: Histopathology

  • Active comparator
    Vulvar dermatosis

    The group of "Vulvar Dermatosis" was formed by the patients with vulvar discomfort (ISSVD Questionnaire) and vulvar lesion specific for dermatosis (Clinical examination). Interventions: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, Vulvar Biopsy, and Histopathology.

    Diagnostic Test: "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) · Procedure: Histopathology

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test"Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV)

    Mapping of the vulvar lesions according to the three vulvar rings and specificity of the lesions during "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" technique (TRIV Form Data). Assessing of the data by the "Vulvoscopy Index" and the "N-S-P Scheme".

    Also known as: Colposcopy of the Vulva

  • ProcedureHistopathology

    Biopsy of the vulva in symptomatic patients, vulvar samples after labiaplasty in asymptomatic patients.

    Also known as: Biopsy of the Vulva

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" by the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis

    The table shows the distribution of patients with and without vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) using the "Vulvoscopy Index" and histopathology as a reference test. The Vulvoscopy Index as an outcome measure of TRIV is designed as a quantitative test based on five characteristics: vulvar complaints, Marinoff index, Cotton-Swab test, vulvar lesions according to the three vulvar rings and specificity of lesions; with following results: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). Since histopathology distinguishes only patients with and without vulvar dermatosis, the clinical value the Vulvoscopy Index had been estimated according to these two groups of patients. Patients with vulvoscopy diagnoses: "Normal Vulva," "Impaired Vulvar Skin" and "Vulvodynia" were classified into the group "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis."

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  2. Distribution of Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology According to Single Categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index"

    The table shows the distribution of patients with "Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" and histopathology according to single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index." We described five categories within the Vulvoscopy Index: 1. Vulvar complaints (present vs. absent), 2. Marinoff index (positive vs. negative), 3. Cotton-Swab test (positive vs. negative), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer, Middle, and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesion) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-specific and Specific Lesions).

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  3. Distribution of Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology According to Single Categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index"

    The table shows the distribution of patients with "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (patients with vulvoscopical diagnoses "Normal Vulva," Impaired Vulvar Skin "and" Vulvodynia") and histopathology, according to single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index." The five categories within the Vulvoscopy Index are: 1. Vulvar complaints (present vs. absent), 2. Marinoff index (positive vs. negative), 3. Cotton-Swab test (positive vs. negative), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer, Middle, and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesion) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-specific and Specific Lesions).

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  4. "Vulvoscopy Index" (Mean ± SD) in Patients With "Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

    The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (mean ± SD) in patients with "Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV and histopathology. The Vulvoscopy Index is based on five characteristics: 1. Vulvar complaints (negative=0; positive=4 points), 2. Marinoff index (negative=0; positive=3 points), 3. Cotton-Swab test (negative=0; positive=2 points), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions=4 points; Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions=2 points and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions=1 point) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-Specific Lesions=2 points; Specific Lesions=14 points). According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was higher.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  5. "Vulvoscopy Index" (Mean ± SD) in Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

    The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (mean± SD) in patients with "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV and histopathology. According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). Since histopathology can distinguish only patients with and without vulvar dermatosis, the distribution was estimated according to these two groups of patients. Hence, patients with vulvoscopical diagnoses "Normal Vulva," Impaired Vulvar Skin "and" Vulvodynia" were classified into the one group called "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis." The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was lower.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  6. "Vulvoscopy Index" (Median | Range) in Patients With "Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

    The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (median ± SD) in patients with "Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV and histopathology. The Vulvoscopy Index is based on five characteristics: 1. Vulvar complaints (negative=0; positive=4 points), 2. Marinoff index (negative=0; positive=3 points), 3. Cotton-Swab test (negative=0; positive=2 points), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions=4 points; Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions=2 points and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions=1 point) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-specific Lesions=2 points; Specific Lesions=14 points). According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was higher.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  7. "Vulvoscopy Index" (Median | Range) in Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

    The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (median ± SD) in patients with "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV (patients with vulvoscopical diagnoses "Normal Vulva," Impaired Vulvar Skin "and" Vulvodynia") and histopathology. According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was lower.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  8. Diagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" by the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis

    The distribution of patients with and without vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by vulvoscopy ("N-S-P Scheme") and histopathology. According to the specificity of lesions, vulvoscopy results were classified as normal "N" (absence of any lesion), suspect "S" (non-specific lesions) and pathologic "P" results (lesion specific to dermatosis); and each of the three vulvar rings is represented by a single result. The final vulvoscopy result is presented in the form of a three-letter formula, where the first letter indicates the vulvoscopy result in the Outer Vulvar Ring, the mean initial indicates the vulvoscopy result of the Middle Vulvar Ring and the last letter denotes the vulvoscopy result of the Inner Vulvar Ring. "N-S-P Scheme" divides the results of the vulvoscopy into three groups: "Normal Vulvoscopy," "Suspect Vulvoscopy" and "Pathological Vulvoscopy." Diagnosis of vulvar dermatosis was established if one or more vulvar rings showed pathological results ("Pathological Vulvoscopy").

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  9. Distribution of Vulvar Lesions According to the "N-S-P Scheme" in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

    The table shows the distribution of vulvoscopy lesions in relation to the vulvar rings and their specificity according to the "N-S-P Scheme," in patients with vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by vulvoscopy (TRIV) and histopathology. Vulvoscopy findings of each of the three vulvar rings: Outer (first letter in the formula), Middle (second letter), and Inner Vulvar Ring (third letter) were evaluated as normal "N" (absence of any lesions), suspect "S" (non-specific lesions), or pathological "P" (lesions specific for dermatosis). "Normal vulvoscopy" indicated the absence of any lesion in all three vulvar rings ("N-N-N"). "Suspect vulvoscopy" was used to mark findings of non-specific lesions ("S-#\*-#"; "S-S-#"; "S-S-S"; "S-N-S" etc.). "Pathological vulvoscopy" spelled out the finding of lesions specific for dermatosis in any of the three vulvar rings ("P-#-#"; "P-P-"; "P-P-P"; "P-N-S" etc.). * is the label for any of the three possibilities: N or S or P.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

  10. Distribution of Vulvar Lesions According to the "N-S-P Scheme" in Patients With Absent Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

    The table shows the distribution of lesions according to their specificity and vulvar rings in patients without vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by vulvoscopy (TRIV) and histopathology, as a reference test. According to the "N-S-P scheme," we have set the diagnoses: "Normal result" (no lesion), "Suspect result" (non-specific lesion in any of the vulvar rings), and "Pathological result" (specific for dermatosis in any of the vulvar rings). Since histopathology can distinguish only patients with and without dermatosis, the distribution was estimated according to these two groups of patients. Hence, patients with normal and suspect vulvoscopic results were classified into one group called "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis."

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Baseline Characteristics: Age

    The table shows the age in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  2. Baseline Characteristics: Weight

    The table shows the weight in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  3. Baseline Characteristics: Height

    The table shows the height in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  4. Baseline Characteristics: BMI

    The table shows the body mass index (Mean ± SD) in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  5. Demographic Data in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows demographic data - age: more or less than 65 years, reproductive age, menopause, domicile country as a country of birth, the degree of education (more and less than 12 years), marital status, births, abortions, and using of contraception among four groups of patient.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  6. Various Characteristics and Duration of Vulvar Discomfort in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia

    The table shows various characteristics of vulvar pain (complaints) in patients with vulvar dermatosis or vulvodynia. Generally, we can differentiate between two categories of pain - the dull pain vs. the sharp pain depending on the nerve fibers in the skin, which are involved in the provocation of the pain. The symptoms of the dull pain are burning, stinging, soreness, irritation, itching, feeling of inflammation and aching. The symptoms of the sharp pain are a knife-like pain, paper-cuts pain, stabbing and sticking. We do not know, are there some symptoms characteristic for vulvar dermatosis or vulvodynia.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  7. Sexual Activity and Abstinence in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows sexual activity and sexual abstinence due to dyspareunia or lack of a sexual partner in four groups of patients.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  8. Dyspareunia and Marinoff Index in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the degree of dyspareunia in sexually active patients with and without vulvar discomfort. We used Marinoff Index as a measure of the degree of dyspareunia. Negative Marinoff Index (0) is a sign of the absence of dyspareunia. Four grades of Marionoff Index are: Marinoff Index 0 = no dyspareunia; Marinoff Index 1= discomfort/pain with intercourse that doesn't interfere with the frequency of sex; Marinoff Index 2= pain with intercourse which sometimes prevents intercourse and Marinoff Index 3= pain with intercourse preventing any intercourse.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  9. Aggravation Of Vulvar Complaints Depending On Sexual Intercourse In Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis And Vulvodynia

    The relationship between sexual vulvar discomfort and sexual intercourse (provocation and aggravation) in patients with vulvar dermatosis and vulvodynia, as recommended in the ISSVD Questionnaire.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  10. Aggravation of Vulvar Discomfort Through Various Triggers in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia

    The table shows the relationship among worsening of vulvar discomfort by using tampons, cycling, wearing tight clothes, menstruation, and urination in patients with vulvar dermatosis and vulvodynia.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  11. Problems Associated With Urination and Defecation in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the incidence of the problems with urination and defecation in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  12. Other Associated Symptoms and Diseases in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the incidence of the other associated symptoms and diseases in four groups of patients, as recommended in the ISSVD Questionnaire.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  13. Previous Treatment of Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia

    The table shows the incidence of the previous treatment in patients with vulvar dermatosis and vulvodynia.

    Time frame: ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.

  14. Cotton Swab Test (Q-Tip) in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the results of Cotton-Swab Test in four groups of patients. Cotton-Swab Test or Q-Tip Testing is part of a multidisciplinary approach to the assessment of sexual pain, especially, vulvodynia or vestibulodynia, in women. ISSVD recommended the Cotton-Swab test for the differential diagnosis of vulvodynia. The test consists of using a cotton-swab to palpate multiple vulvar and vestibular site while recording the woman's pain. We performed Cotton-Swab Test by touching the vulva at 6 points (each vulvar ring), organized into locations based on a clock face and marked like the hours on the clock: 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, and 12 h.

    Time frame: Cotton Swab Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  15. Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Vulvar Lesions in Relation to The Three Vulvar Rings (TRIV)

    The table shows the distribution of non-specific and specific vulvar lesions in relation to the three vulvar rings (TRIV). The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" includes vulvar skin, the "MIDDLE Vulvar Ring" encompasses the modified mucosa, and the "INNER Vulvar Ring" is presented with glicogenized mucosa. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

    Time frame: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.

  16. Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Outer Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"

    The table shows the distribution of the non-specific and specific lesions of the vulva according to individual structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring according to the TRIV. The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" includes vulvar skin with the following structures: mons pubis, labia majora, and the perineum. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" (lesions specific for vulvar dermatosis) comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

    Time frame: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.

  17. Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Middle Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"

    The table shows the distribution of non-specific and specific lesions of the vulva in relation to the individual structures of the Middle vulvar ring according to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy." The "MIDDLE vulvar ring" includes the anterior commissure with the prepuce of the clitoris, interlabial sulci, labia minora, and the posterior commissure. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

    Time frame: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.

  18. Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Inner Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"

    The table shows the distribution of non-specific and specific lesions of the vulva in relation to the individual structures of the Inner vulvar ring according to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy." The "INNER vulvar ring" includes clitoris, Hart's line, urethral sulcus, urethral meatus, hymenal remnants, Bartholin's gland opening, and the vestibule. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

    Time frame: Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.

  19. Aceto-Whitening Reaction (AWR) in Relation to the Three Vulvar Rings

    The table shows the presence, the quality, and the distribution of the aceto-whitening reaction after 5% acetic acid application (Aceto-Whitening Test), in relation to the three vulvar rings. The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" includes vulvar skin, the "MIDDLE Vulvar Ring" encompasses the modified mucosa, and the "INNER Vulvar Ring" is presented with glicogenized mucosa. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

    Time frame: Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  20. Velocity of the Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Mean ± SD)

    The table shows the velocity (Mean ± SD) of the aceto-whitening occurrence after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in patients with positive AWR classified into four groups based on anamnestic data and clinical examination. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to their higher concentration of abnormal nuclear protein and the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein like immature squamous metaplasia, regeneration, inflammation, HPV-infection, hyperkeratosis, etc. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

    Time frame: Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  21. Velocity of Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Median | Range)

    The table shows the velocity (Median \| Range) of the aceto-whitening occurrence after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in patients with positive AWR classified into four groups based on anamnestic data and clinical examination. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to their higher concentration of abnormal nuclear protein and the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein like immature squamous metaplasia, regeneration, inflammation, HPV-infection, hyperkeratosis, etc. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

    Time frame: Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  22. Distribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring

    The table shows the distribution of aceto-whitening occurrence (AWR) after 5% acetic acid application in relation to the structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring. The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" is presented with the following structures: Mons Pubis, Labia Majora, and the Perineum. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

    Time frame: Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  23. Distribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Middle Vulvar Ring

    The distribution of aceto-whitening occurrence after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in relation to the structures of the Middle Vulvar Ring. The "MIDDLE vulvar ring" encompasses the following structures: the anterior commissure with the prepuce of the clitoris, interlabial sulci, labia minora, and the posterior commissure.

    Time frame: Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  24. Distribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Inner Vulvar Ring

    The table shows the distribution of aceto-whitening reaction (AWR) after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in relation to the structures of the Inner Vulvar Ring. The "INNER Vulvar Ring" is presented with the following structures: the clitoris, Hart's line, the urethral sulcus, the urethral meatus, hymenal remnants, Bartholin's gland opening, and the vestibule. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

    Time frame: Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.

  25. Histopathological Characteristics of Vulvar Specimens in Patients With And Without Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the distribution of histopathological findings of vulvar epidermis among patients with and without vulvar discomfort, classified into four groups based on anamnestic data, clinical examination and "Three Rings Vulvoscopy." Histopathological characteristics of vulvar epidermis included hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, acanthosis, and epidermal atrophy. In the vulvar dermis, there were evaluated presence of inflammatory infiltrates (monocytes, lymphocytes, mastocytes), collagen fibers, hyalinization, hyperpigmentation, elongated dermal papillae, blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and nerve fibers.

    Time frame: Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.

  26. Histopathological Features of the Vulvar Epidermis and Vulvar Discomfort in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis

    The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar epidermis (normal versus abnormal) and single vulvar symptoms from the categories of the dull ("slow") and sharp ("fast") pain of the vulva in 82 patients with vulvar dermatosis. The dull pain comprises sensations of burning, stinging, soreness, irritation,itching, inflammation and aching. The fast pain includes sensations like sticking and stabbing, paper-cut or knife-like pain.

    Time frame: Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.

  27. Histopathological Features of the Vulvar Epidermis and Vulvar Complaints in Patients With Vulvodynia

    The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar epidermis (normal versus abnormal), and single vulvar symptoms from the categories of the dull ("slow") and sharp ("fast") pain of the vulva in 82 patients with vulvodynia diagnosed anamnestically and clinically following Friedrich's criteria. The "dull" pain comprises sensations of burning, stinging, soreness, irritation, itching, inflammation and aching. The "fast" pain includes sensations like sticking and stabbing, paper-cut or knife-like pain.

    Time frame: Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.

  28. Histopathological Features of Vulvar Dermis in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Depending On The Duration of Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar dermis depending on the duration of vulvar discomfort (less or more than 24 months) in 82 consecutive patients with vulvar dermatosis. Histopathological characteristics of vulvar dermis included inflammatory infiltrates (mononuclear, lymphocytes, mastocytes), collagen fibers, hyalinization, hyperpigmentation, elongated dermal papillae, blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and nerve fibers.

    Time frame: Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.

  29. Histopathological Features of the Vulvar Dermis in Patients With Vulvodynia Depending on The Duration of Vulvar Discomfort

    The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar dermis depending on the duration of vulvar discomfort (less or more than 24 months) in 82 patients with vulvodynia, diagnosed anamnestically and clinically following Friedrich's criteria. Histopathological characteristics of vulvar dermis included inflammatory infiltrates (mononuclear, lymphocytes, mastocytes), collagen fibers, hyalinization, hyperpigmentation, elongated dermal papillae, blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and nerve fibers.

    Time frame: Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.

07

Results

Posted Oct 30, 2019

Participant flow

Patients were recruited at "Poliklinika Harni," Zagreb, Croatia, during routine gynecological care, and from esthetic unit to obtain vulvar specimens from patients with the normal vulva. For each patient with vulvar dermatosis, the first consecutive patient with vulvodynia, impaired vulvar skin, and normal vulva was taken for comparison.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Started82828282
Completed82828282
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDiagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" by the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis

The table shows the distribution of patients with and without vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) using the "Vulvoscopy Index" and histopathology as a reference test. The Vulvoscopy Index as an outcome measure of TRIV is designed as a quantitative test based on five characteristics: vulvar complaints, Marinoff index, Cotton-Swab test, vulvar lesions according to the three vulvar rings and specificity of lesions; with following results: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). Since histopathology distinguishes only patients with and without vulvar dermatosis, the clinical value the Vulvoscopy Index had been estimated according to these two groups of patients. Patients with vulvoscopy diagnoses: "Normal Vulva," "Impaired Vulvar Skin" and "Vulvodynia" were classified into the group "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis."

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Diagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" by the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis
ParticipantsVulvoscopy: Vulvar DermatosisVulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis
Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis720
Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis10246
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Sensitivity (2x2 table): 1.0000 · 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000The Sensitivity of the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 1.000 (Range: 1.0000 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Specificity (2x2 table): 0.9609 · 95% CI 0.5794 to 1.0000The Specificity of the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 0.9609 (Range: 0.5794 - 1.0000)
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Diagnostic accuracy (2x2 table): 0.9695 · 95% CI 0.6313 to 1.0000The Diagnostic accuracy of the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 0.9695 (Range: 0.6313 - 1.0000)
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Ppv (2x2 table): 0.8780 · 95% CI 0.2270 to 1.0000Positive predictive value of the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 0.8780 (Range: 0.2270 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Npv (2x2 table): 1.0000 · 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000Negative predictive value of the "Vulvoscopy Index" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 1.0000 (Range: 1.0000 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6108
PrimaryDistribution of Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology According to Single Categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index"

The table shows the distribution of patients with "Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" and histopathology according to single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index." We described five categories within the Vulvoscopy Index: 1. Vulvar complaints (present vs. absent), 2. Marinoff index (positive vs. negative), 3. Cotton-Swab test (positive vs. negative), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer, Middle, and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesion) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-specific and Specific Lesions).

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology According to Single Categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index"
ParticipantsVulvoscopy: Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis
Vulvar Complaints8272
Positive Marinoff Index3531
Positive Cotton-Swab2824
Lesions In Any Vulvar Ring8272
Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions7768
Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions8272
Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions7468
Non-Specific Lesions7163
Specific Lesions8272
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9628
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9152
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8862
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.3319
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8662
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
PrimaryDistribution of Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology According to Single Categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index"

The table shows the distribution of patients with "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (patients with vulvoscopical diagnoses "Normal Vulva," Impaired Vulvar Skin "and" Vulvodynia") and histopathology, according to single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index." The five categories within the Vulvoscopy Index are: 1. Vulvar complaints (present vs. absent), 2. Marinoff index (positive vs. negative), 3. Cotton-Swab test (positive vs. negative), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer, Middle, and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesion) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-specific and Specific Lesions).

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology According to Single Categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index"
ParticipantsVulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis
Vulvar Complaints8292
Positive Marinoff Index7478
Positive Cotton-Swab104108
Any Vulvar Ring Lesions163173
Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions1827
Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions115125
Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions156162
Non-Specific Lesions163171
Specific Lesions010
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.5399
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9248
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9839
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t · p = 0.7537
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.2054
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6409
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9753
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8986
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0017
Primary"Vulvoscopy Index" (Mean ± SD) in Patients With "Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (mean ± SD) in patients with "Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV and histopathology. The Vulvoscopy Index is based on five characteristics: 1. Vulvar complaints (negative=0; positive=4 points), 2. Marinoff index (negative=0; positive=3 points), 3. Cotton-Swab test (negative=0; positive=2 points), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions=4 points; Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions=2 points and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions=1 point) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-Specific Lesions=2 points; Specific Lesions=14 points). According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was higher.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
"Vulvoscopy Index" (Mean ± SD) in Patients With "Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology
units on a scaleVulvoscopy: Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis
Vulvar Complaints (0-4 Points)4.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 0.0
Marinoff Index (0-3 Points)1.28 ± 1.491.29 ± 1.50
Cotton-Swab (0-2 Points)0.68 ± 0.950.67 ± 0.95
Any Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-7 Points)6.66 ± 1.086.72 ± 1.00
Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-4 Points)3.76 ± 0.963.78 ± 0.92
Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-2 Points)2.0 ± 0.02.0 ± 0.0
Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-1 Point)0.90 ± 0.300.94 ± 0.23
Specificity of Lesions (0-16)15.73 ± 0.6915.75 ± 0.67
Non-Specific Lesions (0-2 Points)1.73 ± 0.691.75 ± 0.67
Specific Lesions (0-14 Points)14.0 ± 0.014.0 ± 0.0
Sum (0-32 Points)28.35 ± 2.4628.43 ± 2.47
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9899
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9686
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.7055
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8852
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.3351
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8673
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8673
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8472
Primary"Vulvoscopy Index" (Mean ± SD) in Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (mean± SD) in patients with "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV and histopathology. According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). Since histopathology can distinguish only patients with and without vulvar dermatosis, the distribution was estimated according to these two groups of patients. Hence, patients with vulvoscopical diagnoses "Normal Vulva," Impaired Vulvar Skin "and" Vulvodynia" were classified into the one group called "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis." The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was lower.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
"Vulvoscopy Index" (Mean ± SD) in Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology
units on a scaleVulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis
Vulvar Complaints (0-4 Points)1.33 ± 1.891.44 ± 1.92
Marinoff Index (0-3 Points)0.90 ± 1.380.91 ± 1.38
Cotton-Swab (0-2 Points)0.85 ± 0.990.84 ± 0.99
Any Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-7 Points)1.86 ± 1.922.03 ± 2.09
Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-4 Points)0.29 ± 1.040.49 ± 1.23
Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-2 Points)0.93 ± 1.000.98 ± 1.00
Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-1 Point)0.63 ± 0.480.63 ± 0.48
Specificity of Lesions (0-16 Points)1.33 ± 0.951.88 ± 2.93
Non-Specific Lesions (0-2 Points)1.33 ± 0.951.34 ± 094
Specific Lesions (0-14 Points)0.0 ± 0.00.55 ± 2.72
Sum (0-32 Points)6.27 ± 5.897.11 ± 7.15
Primary"Vulvoscopy Index" (Median | Range) in Patients With "Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (median ± SD) in patients with "Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV and histopathology. The Vulvoscopy Index is based on five characteristics: 1. Vulvar complaints (negative=0; positive=4 points), 2. Marinoff index (negative=0; positive=3 points), 3. Cotton-Swab test (negative=0; positive=2 points), 4. Vulvar lesions according to the vulvar rings (Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions=4 points; Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions=2 points and Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions=1 point) and 5. Specificity of lesions (Non-specific Lesions=2 points; Specific Lesions=14 points). According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was higher.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
"Vulvoscopy Index" (Median | Range) in Patients With "Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology
units on a scaleVulvoscopy: Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis
Vulvar Complaints (0-4 Points)4 (4 to 4)4 (4 to 4)
Marinoff Index (0-3 Points)0 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 3)
Cotton-Swab (0-2 Points)0 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)
Any Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-7 Points)7 (2 to 7)7 (2 to 7)
Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-4 Points)4 (0 to 4)4 (0 to 4)
Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-2 Points)2 (2 to 2)2 (2 to 2)
Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-1 Point)1 (0 to 1)1 (0 to 1)
Specificity of Lesions, in total (0-16 Points)16 (14 to 16)16 (14 to 16)
Non-Specific Lesions (0-2 Points)2 (0 to 2)2 (0 to 2)
Specific Lesions (0-14 Points)14 (14 to 14)14 (14 to 14)
Sum (0-32 Points)28.5 (21 to 32)28.5 (21 to 32)
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9629
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9155
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.4913
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8866
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.3335
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8666
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8666
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8144
Primary"Vulvoscopy Index" (Median | Range) in Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

The table shows the results of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" (TRIV) by single categories of the "Vulvoscopy Index" (median ± SD) in patients with "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" diagnosed by TRIV (patients with vulvoscopical diagnoses "Normal Vulva," Impaired Vulvar Skin "and" Vulvodynia") and histopathology. According to the Vulvoscopy Index, we have set the diagnoses: "Normal Vulva" (0-2 points), "Impaired Vulvar Skin" (3-11 points), "Vulvodynia" (12-18 points), and "Vulvar Dermatosis" (19-32 points). The likelihood of the diagnosis of "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" was higher as the value of the Vulvoscopy index was lower.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
"Vulvoscopy Index" (Median | Range) in Patients With "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis" Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology
units on a scaleVulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis
Vulvar Complaints (0-4 Points)0 (0 to 4)0 (0 to 4)
Marinoff Index (0-3 Points)0 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 3)
Cotton-Swab (0-2 Points)0 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)
Any Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-7 Points)1 (0 to 7)1 (0 to 7)
Outer Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-4 Points)0 (0 to 4)0 (0 to 4)
Middle Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-2 Points)0 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)
Inner Vulvar Ring Lesions (0-1 Point)1 (0 to 1)1 (0 to 1)
Specificity of Lesions, in total (0-16 Points)2 (0 to 2)2 (0 to 16)
Non-Specific Lesions (0-2 Points)2 (0 to 2)2 (0 to 2)
Specific Lesions (0-14 Points)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 14)
Sum (0-32 Points)5 (0 to 18)5 (0 to 32)
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.5403
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9248
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9839
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.5124
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.2058
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.6412
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9753
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.3621
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8987
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0018
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.4409
PrimaryDiagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" by the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis

The distribution of patients with and without vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by vulvoscopy ("N-S-P Scheme") and histopathology. According to the specificity of lesions, vulvoscopy results were classified as normal "N" (absence of any lesion), suspect "S" (non-specific lesions) and pathologic "P" results (lesion specific to dermatosis); and each of the three vulvar rings is represented by a single result. The final vulvoscopy result is presented in the form of a three-letter formula, where the first letter indicates the vulvoscopy result in the Outer Vulvar Ring, the mean initial indicates the vulvoscopy result of the Middle Vulvar Ring and the last letter denotes the vulvoscopy result of the Inner Vulvar Ring. "N-S-P Scheme" divides the results of the vulvoscopy into three groups: "Normal Vulvoscopy," "Suspect Vulvoscopy" and "Pathological Vulvoscopy." Diagnosis of vulvar dermatosis was established if one or more vulvar rings showed pathological results ("Pathological Vulvoscopy").

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Diagnostic Accuracy of "Three Rings Vulvoscopy" by the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis
ParticipantsVulvoscopy: Vulvar DermatosisVulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis
Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis720
Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis10246
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Sensitivity (2x2 table): 1.0000 · 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000The Sensitivity of the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 1.0000 (Range: 1.0000 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Specificity (2x2 table): 0.9609 · 95% CI 0.5794 to 1.0000The Specificity of the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 0.9609 (Range: 0.5794 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Diagnostic accuracy (2x2 table): 0.9695 · 95% CI 0.6313 to 1.0000The Diagnostic accuracy of the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 0.9695 (Range: 0.6313 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Ppv (2x2 table): 0.8780 · 95% CI 0.2270 to 1.0000Positive predictive value of the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 0.8780 (Range: 0.2270 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · Npv (2x2 table): 1.0000 · 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000Negative predictive value of the "N-S-P Scheme" for Detection of Vulvar Dermatosis was 1.0000 (Range: 1.0000 - 1.0000).
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6108
PrimaryDistribution of Vulvar Lesions According to the "N-S-P Scheme" in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

The table shows the distribution of vulvoscopy lesions in relation to the vulvar rings and their specificity according to the "N-S-P Scheme," in patients with vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by vulvoscopy (TRIV) and histopathology. Vulvoscopy findings of each of the three vulvar rings: Outer (first letter in the formula), Middle (second letter), and Inner Vulvar Ring (third letter) were evaluated as normal "N" (absence of any lesions), suspect "S" (non-specific lesions), or pathological "P" (lesions specific for dermatosis). "Normal vulvoscopy" indicated the absence of any lesion in all three vulvar rings ("N-N-N"). "Suspect vulvoscopy" was used to mark findings of non-specific lesions ("S-#\*-#"; "S-S-#"; "S-S-S"; "S-N-S" etc.). "Pathological vulvoscopy" spelled out the finding of lesions specific for dermatosis in any of the three vulvar rings ("P-#-#"; "P-P-"; "P-P-P"; "P-N-S" etc.). * is the label for any of the three possibilities: N or S or P.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Vulvar Lesions According to the "N-S-P Scheme" in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology
ParticipantsVulvoscopy: Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis
Outer Vulvar Ring: No Lesion | N-#-#65
Outer Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions | S-#-#2422
Outer Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions | P-#-#7364
Middle Vulvar Ring: No Lesion | #-N-#00
Middle Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions | #-S-#4135
Middle Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions | #-P-#7365
Inner Vulvar Ring: No Lesion | #-#-N95
Inner Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions | #-#-S5551
Inner Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions | #-#-P4946
All Three Vulvar Rings: No Lesion N-N-N00
Any Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions6760
Any Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions8272
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9286
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8618
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9786
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8634
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.7992
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.3912
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6152
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6108
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.7912
  • Vulvoscopy: Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
PrimaryDistribution of Vulvar Lesions According to the "N-S-P Scheme" in Patients With Absent Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology

The table shows the distribution of lesions according to their specificity and vulvar rings in patients without vulvar dermatosis diagnosed by vulvoscopy (TRIV) and histopathology, as a reference test. According to the "N-S-P scheme," we have set the diagnoses: "Normal result" (no lesion), "Suspect result" (non-specific lesion in any of the vulvar rings), and "Pathological result" (specific for dermatosis in any of the vulvar rings). Since histopathology can distinguish only patients with and without dermatosis, the distribution was estimated according to these two groups of patients. Hence, patients with normal and suspect vulvoscopic results were classified into one group called "Absent Vulvar Dermatosis."

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire and TRIV, up to 75 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Vulvar Lesions According to the "N-S-P Scheme" in Patients With Absent Vulvar Dermatosis Diagnosed by Vulvoscopy (TRIV) and Histopathology
ParticipantsVulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar DermatosisHistopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis
Outer Vulvar Ring: No Lesion | N-#-#227228
Outer Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions | S-#-#1820
Outer Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions | P-#-#09
Middle Vulvar Ring: No Lesion | #-N-#131131
Middle Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions | #-S-#115121
Middle Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions | #-P-#08
Inner Vulvar Ring: No Lesion | #-#-N8993
Inner Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions | #-#-S157161
Inner Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions | #-#-P03
All Three Vulvar Rings: No Lesion N-N-N8383
Any Vulvar Ring: Non-Specific Lesions163170
Any Vulvar Ring: Specific Lesions010
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.2530
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8338
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0019
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6541
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8224
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0064
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9723
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8161
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1165
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6339
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.9724
  • Vulvoscopy: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis vs Histopathology: Absent Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0016
SecondaryBaseline Characteristics: Age

The table shows the age in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · years
Baseline Characteristics: Age
yearsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Baseline Characteristics: Age34.2 ± 10.034.4 ± 9.434.2 ± 10.051.1 ± 16.2
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · ANOVA · p = 0.0000
SecondaryBaseline Characteristics: Weight

The table shows the weight in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Baseline Characteristics: Weight
kgNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Baseline Characteristics: Weight61.9 ± 8.363.3 ± 10.961.1 ± 9.271.3 ± 12.0
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · ANOVA · p = 0.0000
SecondaryBaseline Characteristics: Height

The table shows the height in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Baseline Characteristics: Height
cmNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Baseline Characteristics: Height169.1 ± 6.0168.7 ± 6.3166.7 ± 6.7167.5 ± 5.7
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · ANOVA · p = 0.0557
SecondaryBaseline Characteristics: BMI

The table shows the body mass index (Mean ± SD) in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
Baseline Characteristics: BMI
kg/m^2Normal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Baseline Characteristics: BMI21.6 ± 2.522.3 ± 3.622.0 ± 2.925.4 ± 4.1
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · ANOVA · p = 0.0000
SecondaryDemographic Data in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows demographic data - age: more or less than 65 years, reproductive age, menopause, domicile country as a country of birth, the degree of education (more and less than 12 years), marital status, births, abortions, and using of contraception among four groups of patient.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Demographic Data in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Age: ≥ 65 years01015
Age: < 65 years82818267
Reproductive Age77797636
Menopausal age53646
Domicile country (Croatia) as a Country of Birth68626861
Education: >12 Years52585242
Education: ≤12 Years30243040
Married44394469
Nuliparious49524417
Multiparous (3 and more births)64612
Abortion871529
Contraception21162010
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.3708
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0180
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.1323
SecondaryVarious Characteristics and Duration of Vulvar Discomfort in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia

The table shows various characteristics of vulvar pain (complaints) in patients with vulvar dermatosis or vulvodynia. Generally, we can differentiate between two categories of pain - the dull pain vs. the sharp pain depending on the nerve fibers in the skin, which are involved in the provocation of the pain. The symptoms of the dull pain are burning, stinging, soreness, irritation, itching, feeling of inflammation and aching. The symptoms of the sharp pain are a knife-like pain, paper-cuts pain, stabbing and sticking. We do not know, are there some symptoms characteristic for vulvar dermatosis or vulvodynia.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Various Characteristics and Duration of Vulvar Discomfort in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia
ParticipantsVulvar DermatosisVulvodynia
Dull / Slow Pain8281
Burning2237
Stinging6566
Soreness3754
Irritation3548
Itching7963
Inflammation3849
Aching2145
Sharp / Fast Pain1231
Knife-Like Pain513
Paper-Cuts Pain310
Stabbing617
Sticking918
Association Of Symptoms2464
Duration Of Discomfort >24 month5853
Duration Of Discomfort >12 monts1116
Duration Of Discomfort >6 months98
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.3158
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0007
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0147
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.8456
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0076
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0423
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0457
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0430
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0134
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0581
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0002
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0852 · T-test proportion: 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0008
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000 (There was a statistically significant difference at p\<0.001. Patients with vulvar dermatosis had significantly more often itching than the feeling of inflammation of the vulva.)
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8591
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0090
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0212
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0057
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0977
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0143
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.2059
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6820
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.2059
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0344
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0023
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.5675
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0037
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0005
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.1201
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0123
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0188
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0030
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.2155
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.1508
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.6364
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.5277
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.2041
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0412
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.7978
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.3094
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0730
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.4038
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.7299
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.7241
SecondarySexual Activity and Abstinence in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows sexual activity and sexual abstinence due to dyspareunia or lack of a sexual partner in four groups of patients.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sexual Activity and Abstinence in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Sexually Active Patients81777349
No sexual activity15933
Sexual Abstinence Due To Dyspareunia1181
Dyspareunia And Lack Of Partner00932
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0006
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
SecondaryDyspareunia and Marinoff Index in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the degree of dyspareunia in sexually active patients with and without vulvar discomfort. We used Marinoff Index as a measure of the degree of dyspareunia. Negative Marinoff Index (0) is a sign of the absence of dyspareunia. Four grades of Marionoff Index are: Marinoff Index 0 = no dyspareunia; Marinoff Index 1= discomfort/pain with intercourse that doesn't interfere with the frequency of sex; Marinoff Index 2= pain with intercourse which sometimes prevents intercourse and Marinoff Index 3= pain with intercourse preventing any intercourse.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Dyspareunia and Marinoff Index in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Dyspareunia117334
Marinoff Index 0807600
Marinoff Index 110227
Marinoff Index 2014018
Marinoff Index 300119
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.2999
SecondaryAggravation Of Vulvar Complaints Depending On Sexual Intercourse In Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis And Vulvodynia

The relationship between sexual vulvar discomfort and sexual intercourse (provocation and aggravation) in patients with vulvar dermatosis and vulvodynia, as recommended in the ISSVD Questionnaire.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Aggravation Of Vulvar Complaints Depending On Sexual Intercourse In Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis And Vulvodynia
ParticipantsVulvar DermatosisVulvodynia
Sexually active patients4973
Intercourse aggravates vulvar discomfort027
Penetration aggravates vulvar complaints1639
Vulvar complaints during intercourse1521
Vulvar complaints after intercourse1442
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0347
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.7068
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0025
SecondaryAggravation of Vulvar Discomfort Through Various Triggers in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia

The table shows the relationship among worsening of vulvar discomfort by using tampons, cycling, wearing tight clothes, menstruation, and urination in patients with vulvar dermatosis and vulvodynia.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Aggravation of Vulvar Discomfort Through Various Triggers in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia
ParticipantsVulvar DermatosisVulvodynia
Using of tampons2154
Tampon aggravates vulvar complaints721
Cycling1942
Cycling aggravates vulvar complaints926
Wearing tight clothes4470
Tight clothes aggravates vulvar complaints2646
Menstrual cycle3676
Influence of menstrual cycle on symptoms1544
Worsening before menstrual bleeding527
Worsening during menstrual bleeding46
Worsening after menstrual bleeding718
Worsening between menstrual bleeding34
Worsening during urination3039
Worsening during urination after intercourse714
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.6552
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0002
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.2877
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.4754
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.1082
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0179
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.5722
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.6148
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.5307
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.1546
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.1019
SecondaryProblems Associated With Urination and Defecation in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the incidence of the problems with urination and defecation in four groups of patients with and without vulvar discomfort.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Problems Associated With Urination and Defecation in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Any Problem With Urinating and Defecation54477472
Dysuria773633
Intermittent Dysuria772626
Frequent Dysuria00107
Urinary Incontinence16111932
Intermittent Urinary Incontinence16101721
Frequent Urinary Incontinence01211
Difficulties At Starting Urination21129
Intermittent Diff. At Starting Urination20117
Frequent Diff. At Starting Urination0112
Urgency11112424
Intermittent Urgency11112215
Frequent Urgency0029
Nocturia30224056
Intermittent Nocturia25203130
Frequent Nocturia52926
Recurrent Cystitis841510
Constipation12162720
Intermittent Constipation9132014
Frequent Constipation3376
Diarrhea32912
Intermittent Diarrhea31710
Frequent Diarrhea0122
Irritable Colon0279
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0003
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0010
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.1859
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0003
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0015
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0013
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.5673
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0065
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0830
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.2315
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0539
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0379
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.1485
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.4155
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0092
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0192
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.5253
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0060
SecondaryOther Associated Symptoms and Diseases in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the incidence of the other associated symptoms and diseases in four groups of patients, as recommended in the ISSVD Questionnaire.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Other Associated Symptoms and Diseases in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Other Symptoms and Diseases52587975
Recurrent Headache13172114
Chronic Fatigue4102825
Lumbar Pain14244034
Fibromyalgia3133123
Energy Loss11225043
Sleep Disorders9142335
Pelvic Pain272817
Unintended Weight Loss7164
Endometriosis1464
"D-D-D Triad"0171
Hypertension20222
Angina pectoris0002
Diabetes mellitus0002
Genital Herpes2122
Thyroid Disease1182424
Drug Allergy98158
Recurrent Attacs of Sinusitis10262315
HPV Testing29364519
Positive Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test9201910
Abnormal Papanicolaou (PAP) Smear8192510
Genital Warts1363
Conization | LETZ (Loop Excis. of the Trans. Zone)411107
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.3957
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.1764
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.3127
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0028
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.9323
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0011
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.2756
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0105
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.2128
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0018
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.2524
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.2452
SecondaryPrevious Treatment of Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia

The table shows the incidence of the previous treatment in patients with vulvar dermatosis and vulvodynia.

Time frame:
ISSVD Questionnaire, up to 30 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Previous Treatment of Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis and Vulvodynia
ParticipantsVulvar DermatosisVulvodynia
Any prior treatment3342
Antifungals Local2639
Antifungals Systemic1012
Antibiotics Local1822
Antibiotics Systemic1117
Corticosteroids Local255
Corticosteroids Systemic10
Antidepressants15
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.1583
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0380
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.6468
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.4670
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.2131
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis vs Vulvodynia · Chi-squared · p = 0.0962
SecondaryCotton Swab Test (Q-Tip) in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the results of Cotton-Swab Test in four groups of patients. Cotton-Swab Test or Q-Tip Testing is part of a multidisciplinary approach to the assessment of sexual pain, especially, vulvodynia or vestibulodynia, in women. ISSVD recommended the Cotton-Swab test for the differential diagnosis of vulvodynia. The test consists of using a cotton-swab to palpate multiple vulvar and vestibular site while recording the woman's pain. We performed Cotton-Swab Test by touching the vulva at 6 points (each vulvar ring), organized into locations based on a clock face and marked like the hours on the clock: 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 10h, and 12 h.

Time frame:
Cotton Swab Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cotton Swab Test (Q-Tip) in Patients With and Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Positive Cotton Swab Test, generally (any point)10117328
Positive Cotton Swab at the point of 2h24349
Positive Cotton Swab at the point of 4h695817
Positive Cotton Swab at the point of 6h7116221
Positive Cotton Swab at the point of 8h6115918
Positive Cotton Swab at the point of 10h494211
Positive Cotton Swab at the point of 12h38389
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0009
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0289
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0134
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0037
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0080
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0579
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0720
SecondaryDistribution of Non-Specific and Specific Vulvar Lesions in Relation to The Three Vulvar Rings (TRIV)

The table shows the distribution of non-specific and specific vulvar lesions in relation to the three vulvar rings (TRIV). The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" includes vulvar skin, the "MIDDLE Vulvar Ring" encompasses the modified mucosa, and the "INNER Vulvar Ring" is presented with glicogenized mucosa. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

Time frame:
Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Vulvar Lesions in Relation to The Three Vulvar Rings (TRIV)
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Non-specific Findings of the Outer Vulvar Ring041558
Non-specific Findings of the Middle Vulvar Ring26717968
Non-specific Findings of the Inner Vulvar Ring32798170
Erythema of the Outer Vulvar Ring031227
Erythema of the Middle Vulvar Ring2416245
Erythema of the Inner Vulvar Ring11617659
Excoriations of the Outer Vulvar Ring00223
Fissures of the Middle Vulvar Ring00229
Fissures of the Inner Vulvar Ring0003
Rhagades of the Outer Vulvar Ring01032
Smoothness of the Middle Vulvar Ring03013
Smoothness of the Inner Vulvar Ring12234128
Ischemia of the Middle Vulvar Ring0562
Ischemia of the Inner Vulvar Ring6364027
Punctuation of the Middle Vulvar Ring0183
Punctuation of the Inner Vulvar Ring0364520
Papillae of the Inner Vulvar Ring921212
Specific Lesions of the Outer Vulvar Ring00073
Specific Lesions of the Middle Vulvar Ring00066
Specific Lesions of the Inner Vulvar Ring00049
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0632
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0043
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0697
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0319
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.7273
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.2203
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.1456
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1133
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0058
SecondaryDistribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Outer Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"

The table shows the distribution of the non-specific and specific lesions of the vulva according to individual structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring according to the TRIV. The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" includes vulvar skin with the following structures: mons pubis, labia majora, and the perineum. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" (lesions specific for vulvar dermatosis) comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

Time frame:
Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Outer Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Non-specific Lesions of Mons Pubis01218
Non-specific Lesions of Labia Majora01738
Non-specific Lesions of the Perineum041551
Erythema of Mons Pubis01212
Erythema of Labia Majora01624
Erythema of the Perineum031120
Excoriations of Mons Pubis0009
Excoriations of Labia Majora00018
Excoriations of the Perineum00216
Rhagades of Mons Pubis0005
Rhagades of Labia Majora00012
Rhagades of the Perineum01028
Specific Lesions of Mons Pubis00030
Specific Lesions of Labia Majora00055
Specific Lesions of the Perineum00065
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0016
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0014
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0414
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0898
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0008
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0587
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.1352
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.1352
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0002
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0854
SecondaryDistribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Middle Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"

The table shows the distribution of non-specific and specific lesions of the vulva in relation to the individual structures of the Middle vulvar ring according to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy." The "MIDDLE vulvar ring" includes the anterior commissure with the prepuce of the clitoris, interlabial sulci, labia minora, and the posterior commissure. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

Time frame:
Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Middle Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Non-specific Lesions of the Anterior Commissure17930
Non-specific Lesions of Interlabial Sulci1324146
Non-specific Lesions of Labia Minora10254842
Non-specific Lesions of the Posterior Commissure23567656
Erythema of the Anterior Commissure0338
Erythema of Interlabial Sulci0283525
Erythema of Labia Minora1092521
Erythema of the Posterior Commissure23234833
Fissures of the Anterior Commissure0006
Fissures of Interlabial Sulci00012
Fissures of Labia Minora0005
Fissures of the Posterior Commissure00220
Smoothness of the Anterior Commissure0009
Smoothness of Interlabial Sulci01011
Smoothness of Labia Minora0106
Smoothness of the Posterior Commissure0205
Specific Lesions of the Anterior Commissure00058
Specific Lesions of Interlabial Sulci00064
Specific Lesions of Labia Minora00060
Specific Lesions of the Posterior Commissure00061
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0199
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0024
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0205
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0158
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0001
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0280
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0006
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0003
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.3053
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.7758
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.6676
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.4577
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1681
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8848
SecondaryDistribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Inner Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"

The table shows the distribution of non-specific and specific lesions of the vulva in relation to the individual structures of the Inner vulvar ring according to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy." The "INNER vulvar ring" includes clitoris, Hart's line, urethral sulcus, urethral meatus, hymenal remnants, Bartholin's gland opening, and the vestibule. "Non-Specific Lesions" include non-specific erythema, punctuations, papillae, paleness and smoothness, fissures or sores in the absence of infection and pre/malignancy in any part of the vulva. "Specific Lesions" comprise eczematous inflammation with thickened, excoriated skin within chronic lichen simplex; hypopigmented or white lesions, fusion or resorption of the labia minora and clitoral hood, loss of vulvar architecture and sclerotic changes in lichen sclerosis; white reticular pattern to extensive erosion with agglutination or resorption of the labia within lichen planus and psoriatic erythematous papules with silver, scaly plaques.

Time frame:
Three Rings Vulvoscopy, up to 45 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Non-Specific and Specific Lesions of the Inner Vulvar Ring According to the "Three Rings Vulvoscopy"
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Non-specific Lesions of the clitoris8437634
Non-specific Lesions of Hart's line21688155
Non-specific Lesions of the Urethral Sulcus16698155
Non-specific Lesions of the Urethral Meatus7457243
Non-specific Lesions of Hymenal remnants6376930
Non-specific Lesions of Bartholin's gland opening8497733
Non-specific Lesions of the Vestibule22598061
Erythema of the clitoris011295
Erythema of Hart's line11526943
Erythema of the Urethral Sulcus0264316
Erythema of the Urethral Meatus161820
Erythema of Hymenal remnants571716
Erythema of Bartholin's gland opening7304924
Erythema of the Vestibule9294541
Smoothness of the clitoris05311
Smootness of Hart's line1115
Smoothness of the Urethral Sulcus12223726
Smoothness of the Urethral Meatus2216
Smoothness of Hymenal remnants1105
Smoothness of Bartholin's gland opening1105
Smoothness of the Vestibule3346
Ischemia of the clitoris011148
Ischemia of Hart's line1141
Ischemia of the Urethral Sulcus4312421
Ischemia of the Urethral Meatus2392
Ischemia of Hymenal remnants0042
Ischemia of Bartholin's gland opening0032
Ischemia of the Vestibule67148
Punctuation of the clitoris0000
Punctuation of Hart's line0364312
Punctuation of the Urethral Sulcus0320
Punctuation of the Urethral Meatus0144
Punctuation of Hymenal remnants0253
Punctuation of Bartholin's gland opening0144
Punctuation of the Vestibule08108
Papillae of Hart's line817182
Papillae of the Urethral Sulcus0020
Papillae of the Vestibule412101
Specific Lesions of the clitoris00043
Specific Lesions of Hart's line00028
Specific Lesions of the Urethral Sulcus00036
Specific Lesions of the Urethral Meatus00029
Specific Lesions of Hymenal remnants00027
Specific Lesions of Bartholin's gland opening00025
Specific Lesions of the Vestibule00029
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0023
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0235
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0021
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0038
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0019
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0198
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0004
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0053
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0010
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0010
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0208
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0007
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0208
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0007
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0040
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0012
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0048
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0007
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0048
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0007
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0131
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0423
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0021
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0091
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0002
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0013
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0001
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0008
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0251
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0006
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0211
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.3067
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0295
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0149
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0007
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0295
SecondaryAceto-Whitening Reaction (AWR) in Relation to the Three Vulvar Rings

The table shows the presence, the quality, and the distribution of the aceto-whitening reaction after 5% acetic acid application (Aceto-Whitening Test), in relation to the three vulvar rings. The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" includes vulvar skin, the "MIDDLE Vulvar Ring" encompasses the modified mucosa, and the "INNER Vulvar Ring" is presented with glicogenized mucosa. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

Time frame:
Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Aceto-Whitening Reaction (AWR) in Relation to the Three Vulvar Rings
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Aceto-Whitening Presence | Positive AWR38748157
Semitransparent AWR: Presence38716853
Coarse AWR: Presence03134
Fast AWR (<30 sec)17129
Slow AWR (>60 sec)24242123
Provoked Erythema0290
Sharply bordered AWR6234021
AWR of Outer Vulvar Ring041237
AWR of Middle Vulvar Ring23617548
AWR of Inner Vulvar Ring27647932
Ring Sign631679
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0071
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0010
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0036
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0032
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0856
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.4290
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0124
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.1918
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.5822
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.4975
SecondaryVelocity of the Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Mean ± SD)

The table shows the velocity (Mean ± SD) of the aceto-whitening occurrence after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in patients with positive AWR classified into four groups based on anamnestic data and clinical examination. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to their higher concentration of abnormal nuclear protein and the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein like immature squamous metaplasia, regeneration, inflammation, HPV-infection, hyperkeratosis, etc. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

Time frame:
Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Mean · second
Velocity of the Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Mean ± SD)
secondNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Velocity of the Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Mean ± SD)69.2 ± 24.354.9 ± 21.551.6 ± 21.265.9 ± 34.7
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · ANOVA · p = 0.0003
SecondaryVelocity of Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Median | Range)

The table shows the velocity (Median \| Range) of the aceto-whitening occurrence after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in patients with positive AWR classified into four groups based on anamnestic data and clinical examination. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to their higher concentration of abnormal nuclear protein and the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein like immature squamous metaplasia, regeneration, inflammation, HPV-infection, hyperkeratosis, etc. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

Time frame:
Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Median · second
Velocity of Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Median | Range)
secondNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Velocity of Aceto-Whitening Reaction (Median | Range)64.5 (30 to 120)51.5 (21 to 131)49 (16 to 120)58 (18 to 184)
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.0004
  • Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0231
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0006
  • Normal Vulva vs Vulvodynia · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0000
SecondaryDistribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring

The table shows the distribution of aceto-whitening occurrence (AWR) after 5% acetic acid application in relation to the structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring. The "OUTER Vulvar Ring" is presented with the following structures: Mons Pubis, Labia Majora, and the Perineum. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

Time frame:
Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Outer Vulvar Ring
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
AWR of Mons Pubis0008
AWR of Labia Majora00420
AWR of the Perineum041031
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0128
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0635
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0429
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0011
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0936
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0429
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0429
SecondaryDistribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Middle Vulvar Ring

The distribution of aceto-whitening occurrence after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in relation to the structures of the Middle Vulvar Ring. The "MIDDLE vulvar ring" encompasses the following structures: the anterior commissure with the prepuce of the clitoris, interlabial sulci, labia minora, and the posterior commissure.

Time frame:
Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Middle Vulvar Ring
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
AWR of the Anterior Commissure12415
AWR of Interlabial Sulci1162227
AWR of Labia Minora6204327
AWR of the Posterior Commissure23537240
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0318
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0318
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0389
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0389
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.00001
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0008
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0005
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.4505
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0534
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0534
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0005
SecondaryDistribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Inner Vulvar Ring

The table shows the distribution of aceto-whitening reaction (AWR) after 5% acetic acid application (AWR - aceto-whitening reaction) in relation to the structures of the Inner Vulvar Ring. The "INNER Vulvar Ring" is presented with the following structures: the clitoris, Hart's line, the urethral sulcus, the urethral meatus, hymenal remnants, Bartholin's gland opening, and the vestibule. Acetic acid is thought to cause swelling of the epithelial tissue through reversible coagulation or precipitation of the nuclear proteins and cytokeratins. Areas of pre-/malignant lesions turn densely white and opaque immediately after application of acetic acid, due to the presence of large numbers of dysplastic cells in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The acetowhite appearance is not unique to pre-/malignancy; it is also seen in other conditions with increased nuclear protein. The acetowhite reaction varies in intensity, within and between patients.

Time frame:
Aceto-Whitening Test, up to 10 minutes for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Distribution of Aceto-Whitening Reaction in Relation to the Structures of the Inner Vulvar Ring
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
AWR of the Clitoris8357320
AWR of Hart's Line14507919
AWR of the Urethral Sulcus16497321
AWR of the Urethral Meatus6387014
AWR of Hymenal Remnants6336914
AWR of Bartholin's Gland Opening8427512
AWR of the Vestibule21497623
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8545
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.8569
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.2478
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.2478
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1627
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.5943
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.7161
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.3301
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.3301
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1627
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.4742
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1822
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.1822
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0927
  • Vulvar Dermatosis · t-test proportion · p = 0.0360
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0720
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.4833
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.3594
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.5987
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.4164
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0720
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0148
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0085
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.1918
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.3037
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.4833
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.3594
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.0877
  • Vulvodynia · t-test proportion · p = 0.7726
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0191
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0287
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.6374
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.7512
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.2734
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0287
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.8732
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0602
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0079
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.2081
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.8732
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0852
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0125
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.0125
  • Impaired Vulvar Skin · t-test proportion · p = 0.2714
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.1692
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0772
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.5762
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.5762
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 1.0000
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0078
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.6862
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0563
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0563
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.1692
  • Normal Vulva · t · p = 0.1822
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0220
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0220
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0220
  • Normal Vulva · t-test proportion · p = 0.0078
SecondaryHistopathological Characteristics of Vulvar Specimens in Patients With And Without Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the distribution of histopathological findings of vulvar epidermis among patients with and without vulvar discomfort, classified into four groups based on anamnestic data, clinical examination and "Three Rings Vulvoscopy." Histopathological characteristics of vulvar epidermis included hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, acanthosis, and epidermal atrophy. In the vulvar dermis, there were evaluated presence of inflammatory infiltrates (monocytes, lymphocytes, mastocytes), collagen fibers, hyalinization, hyperpigmentation, elongated dermal papillae, blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and nerve fibers.

Time frame:
Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Histopathological Characteristics of Vulvar Specimens in Patients With And Without Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsNormal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar Dermatosis
Hyperkeratosis06362
Parakeratosis35730
Acanthosis31116
Epidermal Atrophy00025
Inflammatory Infiltrates42526573
Mononuclear Infiltrates33466163
Lymphocytes93313
Mastocytes2060
Collagen Fibers71944
Hyalinization20025
Hyperpigmentation7250
Elongated Dermal Papillae5701
Blood Vessels3130535
Sebaceous Glands3948611
Nerve Fibers2827680
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0105
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0064
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0342
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0148
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Normal Vulva vs Impaired Vulvar Skin vs Vulvodynia vs Vulvar Dermatosis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
SecondaryHistopathological Features of the Vulvar Epidermis and Vulvar Discomfort in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis

The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar epidermis (normal versus abnormal) and single vulvar symptoms from the categories of the dull ("slow") and sharp ("fast") pain of the vulva in 82 patients with vulvar dermatosis. The dull pain comprises sensations of burning, stinging, soreness, irritation,itching, inflammation and aching. The fast pain includes sensations like sticking and stabbing, paper-cut or knife-like pain.

Time frame:
Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Histopathological Features of the Vulvar Epidermis and Vulvar Discomfort in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis
ParticipantsVulvar Dermatosis With Normal EpidermisVulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis
Dull / Slow Pain2953
Burning616
Stinging2441
Soreness1324
Irritation1223
Itching2851
Inflammation1325
Aching813
Sharp / Fast Pain39
Knife-Like Pain05
Paper-Cuts Pain12
Stabbing24
Sticking36
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 1.0000
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.3533
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.5641
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.9684
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.8599
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.9402
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.8389
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.7617
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.4613
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared, Corrected · p = 0.0331
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.9402
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.9139
  • Vulvar Dermatosis With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvar Dermatosis With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.8925
SecondaryHistopathological Features of the Vulvar Epidermis and Vulvar Complaints in Patients With Vulvodynia

The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar epidermis (normal versus abnormal), and single vulvar symptoms from the categories of the dull ("slow") and sharp ("fast") pain of the vulva in 82 patients with vulvodynia diagnosed anamnestically and clinically following Friedrich's criteria. The "dull" pain comprises sensations of burning, stinging, soreness, irritation, itching, inflammation and aching. The "fast" pain includes sensations like sticking and stabbing, paper-cut or knife-like pain.

Time frame:
Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Histopathological Features of the Vulvar Epidermis and Vulvar Complaints in Patients With Vulvodynia
ParticipantsVulvodynia With Normal EpidermisVulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis
Dull / Slow Pain7011
Burning307
Stinging579
Soreness486
Irritation399
Itching549
Inflammation418
Aching387
Sharp / Fast Pain229
Knife-Like Pain76
Paper-Cuts Pain64
Stabbing125
Sticking153
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0000
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.6921
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.1848
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.9048
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.3953
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0921
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.6734
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.3458
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.5304
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0012
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0002
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared, Corrected · p = 0.0218
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.0297
  • Vulvodynia With Normal Epidermis vs Vulvodynia With Abnormal Epidermis · Chi-squared · p = 0.6468
SecondaryHistopathological Features of Vulvar Dermis in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Depending On The Duration of Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar dermis depending on the duration of vulvar discomfort (less or more than 24 months) in 82 consecutive patients with vulvar dermatosis. Histopathological characteristics of vulvar dermis included inflammatory infiltrates (mononuclear, lymphocytes, mastocytes), collagen fibers, hyalinization, hyperpigmentation, elongated dermal papillae, blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and nerve fibers.

Time frame:
Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Histopathological Features of Vulvar Dermis in Patients With Vulvar Dermatosis Depending On The Duration of Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsVulvar Dermatosis 1Vulvar Dermatosis 2
Inflammatory Infiltrates2350
Mononuclear Inflammatory Infiltrates1944
Lymphocytes58
Mastocytes00
Collagen Fibers1133
Hyalinization718
Hyperpigmentation00
Elongated Dermal Papillae01
Blood Vessels14
Sebaceous Glands01
Nerve Fibers00
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvar Dermatosis 1 vs Vulvar Dermatosis 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.2045
  • Vulvar Dermatosis 1 vs Vulvar Dermatosis 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.7469
  • Vulvar Dermatosis 1 vs Vulvar Dermatosis 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.4271
  • Vulvar Dermatosis 1 vs Vulvar Dermatosis 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.3607
  • Vulvar Dermatosis 1 vs Vulvar Dermatosis 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.8672
SecondaryHistopathological Features of the Vulvar Dermis in Patients With Vulvodynia Depending on The Duration of Vulvar Discomfort

The table shows the relationship between histopathological features of the vulvar dermis depending on the duration of vulvar discomfort (less or more than 24 months) in 82 patients with vulvodynia, diagnosed anamnestically and clinically following Friedrich's criteria. Histopathological characteristics of vulvar dermis included inflammatory infiltrates (mononuclear, lymphocytes, mastocytes), collagen fibers, hyalinization, hyperpigmentation, elongated dermal papillae, blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and nerve fibers.

Time frame:
Histopathological Examination, up to 30 minutes for each vulvar sample.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Histopathological Features of the Vulvar Dermis in Patients With Vulvodynia Depending on The Duration of Vulvar Discomfort
ParticipantsVulvodynia 1Vulvodynia 2
Inflammatory Infiltrates1847
Mononuclear Inflammatory Infiltrates1645
Lymphocytes12
Mastocytes42
Collagen Fibers18
Hyalinization00
Hyperpigmentation14
Elongated Dermal Papillae00
Blood Vessels1439
Sebaceous Glands2239
Nerve Fibers2147
Statistical analysis
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.0045
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.0032
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.1067
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.8672
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.0219
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.8213
  • Vulvodynia 1 vs Vulvodynia 2 · Chi-squared · p = 0.0613

Adverse events

Collected over We collected the adverse event data from hospital admission up to 2 years after TRIV for each participant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Normal Vulva0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)
Impaired Vulvar Skin0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)
Vulvodynia0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)
Vulvar Dermatosis0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Normal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar DermatosisTotal
<=18 years12014
Between 18 and 65 years81798266308
>=65 years0101516
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Normal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar DermatosisTotal
Mean34.21 ± 10.0134.44 ± 9.3735.71 ± 7.9751.11 ± 16.2138.87 ± 10.89
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Normal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar DermatosisTotal
Female82828282328
Male00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Normal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar DermatosisTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American00000
White82828282328
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Normal VulvaImpaired Vulvar SkinVulvodyniaVulvar DermatosisTotal
Croatia82828282328
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Poliklinika Harni
    Zagreb, HR-10000, Croatia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Moyal-Barracco M, Wendling J. Vulvar dermatosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Oct;28(7):946-58. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 18. PubMed 25132276 ↗
  • Doyen J, Demoulin S, Delbecque K, Goffin F, Kridelka F, Delvenne P. Vulvar skin disorders throughout lifetime: about some representative dermatoses. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:595286. doi: 10.1155/2014/595286. Epub 2014 Jan 8. PubMed 24511539 ↗
  • Ball SB, Wojnarowska F. Vulvar dermatoses: lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and vulval dermatitis/lichen simplex chronicus. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1998 Sep;17(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/s1085-5629(98)80012-6. PubMed 9759675 ↗
  • McKay M. Vulvar dermatoses: common problems in dermatological and gynaecological practice. Br J Clin Pract Suppl. 1990 Sep;71:5-10. PubMed 2091734 ↗
  • O'Keefe RJ, Scurry JP, Dennerstein G, Sfameni S, Brenan J. Audit of 114 non-neoplastic vulvar biopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Oct;102(10):780-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10842.x. PubMed 7547733 ↗
  • Cooper SM, Ali I, Baldo M, Wojnarowska F. The association of lichen sclerosus and erosive lichen planus of the vulva with autoimmune disease: a case-control study. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Nov;144(11):1432-5. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.11.1432. PubMed 19015417 ↗
  • Raspollini MR, Asirelli G, Moncini D, Taddei GL. A comparative analysis of lichen sclerosus of the vulva and lichen sclerosus that evolves to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):592.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Aug 21. PubMed 17714682 ↗
  • Shier M, El-Khatib S. Vulvar lichen sclerosus. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Oct;32(10):929-30. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34676-x. No abstract available. English, French. PubMed 21176300 ↗
  • Petersen CD, Kristensen E, Lundvall L, Giraldi A. A retrospective study of relevant diagnostic procedures in vulvodynia. J Reprod Med. 2009 May;54(5):281-7. PubMed 19517691 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2011, a primary completion of Dec 2016 and a completion of Dec 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2019, 2 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2016
First posted
Apr 8, 2016
Start
Dec 2011
Primary completionActual
Dec 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 2016
Results first posted
Oct 30, 2019
Last update
Oct 30, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02732145
Lead sponsor
Ginekološka Poliklinika Dr. Vesna Harni
Collaborators
Klinički Bolnički Centar Zagreb, University of Zagreb
Responsible party
Vesna Harni (Dr. med. Vesna Harni, Ginekološka Poliklinika Dr. Vesna Harni) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2016
Start date
Dec 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Oct 30, 2019
Last update
Oct 30, 2019

Study contacts

Vesna Harni, MD
principal investigator · Poliklinika Harni, Bukovacka 1, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion