CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02680717Updated Jul 18, 2018

Comparative Effectiveness Trial in the Treatment of Pediatric Plaque Morphea

A Phase 1 interventional study of Clobetasol and Calcipotriene in Scleroderma, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-18.

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Unable to obtain IRB approval at all sites
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
2 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study designed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of topical medications for the treatment of circumscribed morphea.

Read the detailed description

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, is a rare autoimmune fibrosing disorder that affects children and adults. Morphea causes significant morbidity through atrophy and fibrosis of the skin and underlying structures. Treatment can halt the progression of disease but cannot reverse disease damage, leaving children with disfiguring scars and sometimes functional impairment. Consequently, it is of extreme importance to intervene early in the disease course with effective therapies to limit morbidity.

Circumscribed morphea is the second most common subtype in children, comprising approximately 1/3 of pediatric morphea cases. It is a disfiguring disease that can cause pain and pruritus. There are no FDA-approved treatments and no consensus exists on the ideal therapy for circumscribed morphea, either in adults or children. Most physicians use topical medications for circumscribed morphea yet there is little evidence to support these therapies. Topical immune modulators such as tacrolimus, imiquimod, and calcipotriene have been investigated in small studies, though these trials were limited by very small sample sizes of 9-19 patients and lack of a control in most. Surveys have demonstrated that topical steroids are the most commonly prescribed medication, even though the only evidence to support their use comes from case reports. With insufficient evidence regarding topical therapies, providers have no guidance when making treatment decisions, practice patterns vary widely even amongst pediatric dermatologists, and children continue with preventable scars.

The investigators specific aim is to identify effective topical therapy for circumscribed morphea. The investigators will utilize a comparative cohort study design to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three topical medications: clobetasol ointment, calcipotriene ointment, and tacrolimus 0.1% ointment. The investigators will enroll subjects at CHW and other institutions to achieve the study enrollment necessary to power this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scleroderma
03

In context

Scleroderma, Localized

115 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Localized; 16 are open to participants now.

Browse Scleroderma, Localized studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 540 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.

Of its 71 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • presence of at least 1 active lesion of morphea on the neck, trunk, or extremities with no prior treatment to that lesion for at least 4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children receiving phototherapy or systemic therapy for their morphea
  • children with linear or generalized morphea
  • lesions on the face
  • greater than 3% body surface area involvement
  • open or ulcerated skin within morphea lesions
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment 1

    Calcipotriene 0.005% ointment

    Drug: Calcipotriene

  • Active comparator
    Treatment 2

    Clobetasol 0.05% ointment

    Drug: Clobetasol

  • Active comparator
    Treatment 3

    Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment

    Drug: Tacrolimus

Interventions

  • DrugClobetasol

    ointment, twice daily (alternating weeks)

  • DrugCalcipotriene

    ointment, twice daily

  • DrugTacrolimus

    ointment, 0.1%, twice daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    This is a 100 mm scale with 3 anchors; each 5 mm of the scale is equivalent to 10% change.

    Time frame: 2 months

  2. Visual Analog Scale

    This is a 100 mm scale with 3 anchors; each 5 mm of the scale is equivalent to 10% change.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02680717
Lead sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
May 2017 (estimated)
Completion
May 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 18, 2018

Study contacts

Yvonne Chiu, MD
principal investigator · Medical College of Wisconsin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion