ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07182981Updated Sep 19, 2025

Patients Diagnosed With Scleroderma and Their Chewing and Swallowing Performance

An observational study in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), Scleroderma and Scleroderma (Limited and Diffuse), sponsored by Hacettepe University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 7 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
7 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is recommended to focus on the physical functionality, chewing, and swallowing performance of individuals diagnosed with scleroderma. There is a need to address children and adults diagnosed with scleroderma comprehensively and to evaluate them on a biopsychosocial basis to support their disease management. The aim was to assess the biopsychosocial characteristics of both children and adults diagnosed with scleroderma and to examine their chewing and swallowing performance.

Additionally, this study aims to identify effective scales that can be used in future research to assess chewing and swallowing in individuals diagnosed with scleroderma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
  • Scleroderma
  • Scleroderma (Limited and Diffuse)
  • Scleroderma, Localized
  • Swallowing

Keywords

  • Juvenile scleroderma
  • scleroderma
  • systemic sclerosis
03

In context

Scleroderma, Systemic

610 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Systemic; 218 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 145 observational studies indexed under Scleroderma, Systemic.

Browse Scleroderma, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of individuals who come to the university hospital for routine controls.

Eligibility criteria

For a child diagnosed with scleroderma:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases diagnosed with scleroderma,
  • Cases aged 7-18 years will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced heart/lung/liver/kidney disease, neurological disease, and
  • Cases that are not willing to participate in the study will be excluded.
  • Having participated in a regular exercise program for the past 3 months
  • Individuals who are not willing to participate in the study

For adults diagnosed with scleroderma:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with scleroderma,
  • Individuals over the age of 18 will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced heart/lung/liver/kidney disease, neurological disease, and malignancies
  • Individuals who are not willing to participate in the study will be excluded.
  • Having participated in a regular exercise program for the past 3 months
  • Individuals who are not willing to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Cases diagnosed with scleroderma

    Child and adult scleroderma patients who visited the rheumatology outpatient clinic at a university hospital will complete a questionnaire.

    Other: Questionnaire application for child and adult scleroderma patients

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaire application for child and adult scleroderma patients

    Scales will be applied to cases diagnosed with scleroderma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pediatric Eating Assessment Scale (PEDI-EAT-10)

    It is used to evaluate swallowing disorders in pediatric patients. It was developed as the pediatric version of the EAT-10, which is used in adults. The PEDI-EAT-10 comprises 10 questions, each with a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = no problem, 4 = severe problem). The total score is calculated out of 40 points.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  2. Chewing and Swallowing Test for Children (TOMASS-C)

    It is a measurement tool developed specifically for children to assess chewing performance. TOMASS-C is a standardized method that quantitatively evaluates the chewing and swallowing of a solid food (cracker) in the pediatric population. During the test, the following parameters will be observed and recorded: * Number of bites * Number of chewing cycles * Number of swallows * Task completion time (in seconds)

    Time frame: Two weeks

  3. 3-Ounce Water Swallow Challenge

    It is a commonly used method for assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration risk. Subjects must swallow 3 ounces (90 cc) of water without interruption. Failure to complete the task, coughing, choking, or exhibiting a wet-gurgling voice quality within 1 minute during or after the test is included. Subjects who can drink 90 cc of water completely and in one go without coughing, choking, or drinking the water in portions have completed the test.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  4. Turkish Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10)

    It is a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions with a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = no problem, 4 = severe problem). The total score is calculated out of 40 points by summing the responses given to each question. A score of 3 or higher is considered abnormal in the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  5. Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS)

    The test evaluates how many bites it takes an individual to eat a biscuit while sitting upright, how many chewing cycles they perform, how many times they swallow, and the total time from bite to swallow. The number of bites, number of chewing cycles, number of swallows, and total time will be calculated.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  6. Maximum Mouth Opening (MMO)

    After ensuring that individuals open their mouths as wide as possible, the distance between the incisal edges of the central incisors in the upper and lower jaws will be measured in millimeters using a ruler, and the values will be recorded.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  7. Dysphagia Limit (DL)

    Individuals are given liquids in volumes of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 mL using a graduated syringe, and they are asked to swallow the liquid. The maximum amount of liquid that can be swallowed during a single movement of the thyroid cartilage is determined. In healthy individuals, the normal dysphagia limit is more than 20 mL. If a person can normally swallow 20 mL, the dysphagia limit is considered normal.

    Time frame: Two weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS)

    A pediatric and adult rheumatologist assessed it. The MRSS evaluates skin thickening in 17 body regions, graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening). The total score ranges from 0 to 51, with increased scores indicating poor skin involvement.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  2. Localized Scleroderma Assessment Tool (LoSCAT)

    LoSCAT consists of two sections: the modified Localized Skin Severity Index, which measures disease activity, and the Localized Scleroderma Damage Index, which assesses damage (usually scored between 0 and 3). In the Localized Skin Severity Index, it evaluates the color of the lesion border for erythema, skin thickness, and the presence of new lesions or lesion extension. In the Localized Scleroderma Damage Index, three areas of cutaneous damage are combined to obtain a score. These areas evaluate hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation, whichever is more prominent, as well as dermal atrophy, subcutaneous atrophy, and dyspigmentation.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  3. Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis Questionnaire (MHIIS)

    It consists of 12 items. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with response options of "Never (0)", "Rarely (1)", "Sometimes (2)", "Usually (3)", and "Always (4)". The total score ranges from 0 to 48. It covers three areas: mouth opening (questions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6), dry mouth (questions 2, 7, 8, 9, 10), and aesthetic concerns (questions 11, 12). Higher scores reflect greater limitations in oral functions.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  4. Fonseca Anamnestic Questionnaire

    Participants are asked to answer 10 questions without any time constraints. Each answer is scored as "yes = 10," "no = 0," and "sometimes = 5." Based on the total score, participants are classified as TMR-Absent (0-15), Mild-TMR (20-40), Moderate-TMR (45-65), and Severe-TMR (70-100).

    Time frame: Two weeks

  5. Modified Hand Mobility in Scleroderma Test (mHAMIS)

    It is a functional test developed specifically for scleroderma to assess an individual's hand function. It evaluates four specific hand movements (finger flexion, finger extension, finger abduction, and dorsal extension). Scores range from 0 (normal) to 3 (complete failure) for each movement, with a total score ranging from 0 to 12.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  6. Juvenile Arthritis Biopsychosocial Scale-JAB-Q-Patient

    It is a patient/parent-centered measurement method that helps assess the patient's biopsychosocial aspects, such as disease activity, posture, functional and psychosocial status, fatigue, and school performance. The results from the questions are used to assess the functional status of children, while their psychosocial status is recorded based on their answers to 21 questions (ranging from 0 to 358). A high score indicates a poor psychosocial status.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  7. Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JAQQ)

    It consists of 74 items covering various health domains, including physical functioning, emotional well-being, and general symptoms. The items are divided into four dimensions related to the child's quality of life: gross motor function (GMF), fine motor function (FMF), psychosocial function (PF), and systemic or general symptoms (SGS). Each domain is scored on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 7; higher scores indicate poorer health-related quality of life. There is also a "not applicable to me" option for the items. The scale also includes a pain measurement (10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) to assess pain, but this score is not included in the total score.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  8. Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)

    It assesses the functional abilities of children diagnosed with rheumatic diseases in their daily living activities. It consists of eight subscales (dressing and personal care, standing up, eating, walking, body care, reaching, grasping, activities) (0-3) and also assesses pain and general well-being using a visual analog scale (0-100). A high score indicates low functionality.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  9. Juvenile Arthritis Biopsychosocial Scale-JAB-Q-Family

    JAB-Q is a multidimensional questionnaire and a parent (family) form. Developed in Turkish by Ünal and colleagues, the questionnaire is completed by one of the child's parents. The family form evaluates the parents' biopsychosocial status from their own perspective and provides scores ranging from 0 to 102. Higher scores indicate a worse biopsychosocial status.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  10. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Parent (PCS-P)

    It is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always) and consists of 13 items. Similar to the child questionnaire, it assesses 3 domains: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. A total score between 0 and 52 is obtained; higher scores reflect a higher level of catastrophizing in parents.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  11. Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP)

    It is a 20-question survey that evaluates the community participation of children and adolescents in school, neighborhood, and local settings. The survey is divided into four sections: 6 questions about home participation, four questions on neighborhood and community involvement, five questions regarding school participation, and five questions on home and community engagement. It is rated on a scale of "expected for their age (full participation), somewhat limited, very limited, unable to participate, and inapplicable." The survey is completed by the child's family or primary caregiver. The person filling out the questionnaire is asked to select the answer that best describes the child's level of participation. The assessment is scored out of 100 points, with higher scores reflecting a greater level of participation.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  12. Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire (BETY-BQ)

    It was standardized as a biopsychosocial assessment tool and is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, with each item rated from 0 to 4 points. A high total score on the 30-item scale indicates a high level of biopsychosocial impact.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  13. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    It will be used to determine an individual's quality of life levels. Each sub-parameter is scored between 0 and 100 points, with a high score indicating good health status. The SF-36 scale has eight sub-parameters: general health perception, physical function, social function, pain, mental health, role difficulty due to physical reasons, role difficulty due to emotional reasons, and vitality. It contains 11 questions consisting of a total of 36 items.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  14. Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ)

    It was developed by adding five questions to the HAQ regarding Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and general scleroderma symptoms, to be rated on a 15 cm line. The SHAQ total score ranges from 0 to 3. A high score indicates low functionality.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  15. Central Sensitization Scale (CSS)

    It is a 40-item scale, scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, that assesses symptoms related to central sensitization. A score above 40 is interpreted as an indicator of central sensitization.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  16. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    It consists of fourteen questions, with odd-numbered questions assessing anxiety and even-numbered questions assessing depression. The options are scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating a worse emotional state. The Turkish cut-off values for the scale are 10 for the anxiety subscale and 7 for the depression subscale.

    Time frame: Two weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 59 non-industry observational studies under Scleroderma, Systemic, half reached primary completion within 55 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 80. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 44 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 80.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2025
First posted
Sep 19, 2025
StartActual
Aug 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 4, 2027
Last update
Sep 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07182981
Responsible party
Orkun Tüfekçi (Principal Investigator, PT, PhD(c), Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2025
Start date
Aug 4, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 4, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Orkun Tüfekçi, PT, PhD(c)
Contact
orkuntf@gmail.com
5319502648

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion