ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07183072Updated Sep 19, 2025

Patients Diagnosed With Scleroderma: Physical Performance and Functionality

An observational study in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), Scleroderma and Scleroderma (Limited and Diffuse), sponsored by Hacettepe University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 7 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
7 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Physical functionality and performance are important for individuals diagnosed with scleroderma. There is a need to address children and adults diagnosed with scleroderma comprehensively and to evaluate them on a biopsychosocial basis to support their disease management. In light of all this literature, the aim was to evaluate the biopsychosocial characteristics of both pediatric and adult scleroderma patients and to examine their physical performance and functionality.

Additionally, this study aims to identify effective tests that can be used in future research to assess physical performance and functionality in individuals diagnosed with scleroderma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
  • Scleroderma
  • Scleroderma (Limited and Diffuse)
  • Scleroderma, Localized
  • Functionality

Keywords

  • Juvenile scleroderma
  • scleroderma
  • systemic sclerosis
  • physical performance
  • functionality
03

In context

Scleroderma, Systemic

610 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Systemic; 218 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 145 observational studies indexed under Scleroderma, Systemic.

Browse Scleroderma, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of individuals who come to the university hospital for routine controls.

Eligibility criteria

*For a child diagnosed with scleroderma*

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases diagnosed with scleroderma,
  • Cases aged 7-18 years will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced heart/lung/liver/kidney disease, neurological disease, and
  • Cases that are not willing to participate in the study will be excluded.
  • Having participated in a regular exercise program for the past 3 months
  • Individuals who are not willing to participate in the study

*For adults diagnosed with scleroderma*

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with scleroderma,
  • Individuals over the age of 18 will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced heart/lung/liver/kidney disease, neurological disease, and malignancies
  • Individuals who are not willing to participate in the study will be excluded.
  • Having participated in a regular exercise program for the past 3 months
  • Individuals who are not willing to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Cases diagnosed with scleroderma

    Child and adult scleroderma patients who visited the rheumatology outpatient clinic at a university hospital will complete a questionnaire.

    Other: Questionnaire and functionality application for child and adult scleroderma patients

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaire and functionality application for child and adult scleroderma patients

    Scales and functionality tests will be applied to cases diagnosed with scleroderma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 6-Minute Walk Test

    Participants are asked to walk as quickly as they can along a 30-meter corridor. The total distance will be measured in meters. Fatigue, pain and dyspnea will be monitored using the Modified Borg Scale.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  2. Timed Up and Go Test

    The time it takes for a person to get up from a chair with back support, walk 3 meters at a normal pace, and return to the chair is measured in seconds to evaluate lower extremity balance. The test will be performed 3 times.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  3. 10-Step Stair Climbing Test

    To assess the subject's lower extremity strength and dynamic balance, the time taken to quickly climb and descend a staircase with 10 steps, each measuring 16-20 cm high and equipped with a handrail, is recorded in seconds. The test is repeated three times, and the times are recorded.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  4. 10-meter walk test

    The individual is on a 10-meter path. The assessment is performed in three repetitions and recorded in seconds.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  5. 30-second sit-to-stand test

    It is performed to evaluate lower extremity endurance by having the individual stand up from a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and then sit back down. The individual is instructed to repeat this as quickly as possible for 30 seconds. The score for this assessment is the number of times the person fully stands up from a sitting position with arms crossed within 30 seconds.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  6. Glittre Activities of Daily Living Test

    It consists of a cycle of standardized activities such as walking, carrying weights, climbing stairs, and moving objects on a shelf. The equipment required for the test includes a chair, steps, a shelf, a backpack, weights (0.5 kg-2.5 kg), and a stopwatch. The patient completes the 10-meter course created for the test for five laps, and the time is recorded.

    Time frame: Two weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)

    It assesses the functional abilities of children diagnosed with rheumatic diseases in their daily living activities. It consists of eight subscales (dressing and personal care, standing up, eating, walking, body care, reaching, grasping, activities) (0-3) and also assesses pain and general well-being using a visual analog scale (0-100). A high score indicates low functionality.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  2. Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JAQQ)

    It consists of 74 items covering various health domains, including physical functioning, emotional well-being, and general symptoms. The items are divided into four dimensions related to the child's quality of life: gross motor function (GMF), fine motor function (FMF), psychosocial function (PF), and systemic or general symptoms (SGS). Each domain is scored on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 7; higher scores indicate poorer health-related quality of life. There is also a "not applicable to me" option for the items. The scale also includes a pain measurement (10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) to assess pain, but this score is not included in the total score.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  3. Juvenile Arthritis Biopsychosocial Scale-JAB-Q-Patient

    It is a patient/parent-centered measurement method that helps assess the patient's biopsychosocial aspects, such as disease activity, posture, functional and psychosocial status, fatigue, and school performance. The results from the questions are used to assess the functional status of children, while their psychosocial status is recorded based on their answers to 21 questions (ranging from 0 to 358). A high score indicates a poor psychosocial status.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  4. Juvenile Arthritis Biopsychosocial Scale-JAB-Q-Family

    JAB-Q is a multidimensional questionnaire and a parent (family) form. Developed in Turkish by Ünal and colleagues, the questionnaire is completed by one of the child's parents. The family form evaluates the parents' biopsychosocial status from their own perspective and provides scores ranging from 0 to 102. Higher scores indicate a worse biopsychosocial status.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  5. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Parent (PCS-P)

    It is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always) and consists of 13 items. Similar to the child questionnaire, it assesses 3 domains: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. A total score between 0 and 52 is obtained; higher scores reflect a higher level of catastrophizing in parents.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  6. Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP)

    It is a 20-question survey that evaluates the community participation of children and adolescents in school, neighborhood, and local settings. The survey is divided into four sections: 6 questions about home participation, four questions on neighborhood and community involvement, five questions regarding school participation, and five questions on home and community engagement. It is rated on a scale of "expected for their age (full participation), somewhat limited, very limited, unable to participate, and inapplicable." The survey is completed by the child's family or primary caregiver. The person filling out the questionnaire is asked to select the answer that best describes the child's level of participation. The assessment is scored out of 100 points, with higher scores reflecting a greater level of participation.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  7. Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ)

    It was developed by adding five questions to the HAQ regarding Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and general scleroderma symptoms, to be rated on a 15 cm line. The SHAQ total score ranges from 0 to 3. A high score indicates low functionality.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  8. Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire (BETY-BQ)

    It was standardized as a biopsychosocial assessment tool and is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, with each item rated from 0 to 4 points. A high total score on the 30-item scale indicates a high level of biopsychosocial impact.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  9. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    It will be used to determine an individual's quality of life levels. Each sub-parameter is scored between 0 and 100 points, with a high score indicating good health status. The SF-36 scale has eight sub-parameters: general health perception, physical function, social function, pain, mental health, role difficulty due to physical reasons, role difficulty due to emotional reasons, and vitality. It contains 11 questions consisting of a total of 36 items.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  10. Central Sensitization Scale (CSS)

    It is a 40-item scale, scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, that assesses symptoms related to central sensitization. A score above 40 is interpreted as an indicator of central sensitization.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  11. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    It consists of fourteen questions, with odd-numbered questions assessing anxiety and even-numbered questions assessing depression. The options are scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating a worse emotional state. The Turkish cut-off values for the scale are 10 for the anxiety subscale and 7 for the depression subscale.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  12. Modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS)

    A pediatric and adult rheumatologist assessed it. The MRSS evaluates skin thickening in 17 body regions, graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening). The total score ranges from 0 to 51, with increased scores indicating poor skin involvement.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  13. Localized Scleroderma Assessment Tool (LoSCAT)

    LoSCAT consists of two sections: the modified Localized Skin Severity Index, which measures disease activity, and the Localized Scleroderma Damage Index, which assesses damage (usually scored between 0 and 3). The Localized Skin Severity Index evaluates the color of the lesion border for erythema, skin thickness, and the presence of new lesions or lesion extension. In the Localized Scleroderma Damage Index, three areas of cutaneous damage are combined to obtain a score. These areas evaluate hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation, whichever is more prominent, as well as dermal atrophy, subcutaneous atrophy, and dyspigmentation.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  14. Modified Hand Mobility in Scleroderma Test (mHAMIS)

    It is a functional test developed specifically for scleroderma to assess an individual's hand function. It evaluates four specific hand movements (finger flexion, finger extension, finger abduction, and dorsal extension). Scores range from 0 (normal) to 3 (complete failure) for each movement, with a total score ranging from 0 to 12.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  15. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Children (PCS-C)

    It consists of 13 items that describe the different thoughts and feelings children may experience when they feel pain. The questionnaire assesses three areas: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. All items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Higher scores reflect more catastrophic beliefs about pain. The total score can range from 0 to 48.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  16. Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ)

    It includes 20 items divided into five subscales. These subscales are related to "Management of Treatment" (the first four items), "Scheduling Appointments" (items 5-11), "Monitoring Health Issues" (items 12-15), "Communication with Healthcare Personnel" (items 16-17), and "Management of Daily Activities" (items 18-20). The scale uses a 5-point Likert-type scale and has a total score range of 20 to 100. The scale score reflects the level of readiness for transitioning to adult care.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  17. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    It includes 13 items that describe different thoughts and feelings that may occur when pain is experienced. The questionnaire assesses three areas: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. All items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Higher scores indicate more catastrophic pain beliefs. The total score ranges from 0 to 52.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  18. Clinical Frailty Scale

    It assesses elements such as comorbidity, cognitive impairment, and disability. Frailty scores range from 1 to 9, with one meaning 'very fit' and nine meaning 'terminally ill'. A score of 5 or above is considered a sign of frailty.

    Time frame: Two weeks

  19. Frailty Scale

    FRAIL is a 5-item scale developed by Morley and colleagues to evaluate frailty. Each question is scored as 0 or 1 point. The total score ranges from 0 to 5 points (0 points = Fit, 1-2 points = Pre-frail, 3-5 points = Frail).

    Time frame: Two weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 59 non-industry observational studies under Scleroderma, Systemic, half reached primary completion within 55 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 80. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 44 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 80.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2025
First posted
Sep 19, 2025
StartActual
Aug 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 4, 2027
Last update
Sep 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07183072
Responsible party
Orkun Tüfekçi (Principal Investigator, PT, PhD(c), Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2025
Start date
Aug 4, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 4, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Orkun Tüfekçi, PT, PhD(c)
Contact
orkuntf@gmail.com
5319502648

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion