An interventional study of UVA-1 Phototherapy and UV-Blocking Glove in Scleroderma, sponsored by University of Utah. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.
Sponsored by University of Utah · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in scleroderma in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with scleroderma for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)
In this trial patients will be randomized to have their dominant or non-dominant hand undergo 30 sessions of UVA1 therapy. We will assess patient's hand mobility, hand function, skin hardening (assessed by durometer measurements), skin thickness, as well as patient reported outcomes to determine efficacy.
This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also called scleroderma, is a rare chronic autoimmune disease that can have a wide range of cutaneous, joint, and internal organ involvement. In the skin, SSc is characterized by enhanced fibroblast activity leading to hypertrophic dermal collagen that results in thickened, less flexible skin. (Hassani, 2016) SSc is often divided into two types based on extent of cutaneous involvement: diffuse SSc and limited SSc. The hand is a frequent area of involvement in both subtypes of SSc. Hand disability in SSc leads to a high burden on quality of life for patients as it limits both work and activities of daily living. Treatment for hand sclerosis remains limited with generally progressive disease despite aggressive treatment with anti-fibrotic medications, immunosuppressive agents, and topical approaches. Specific hand therapies include physiotherapy and injections of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction into the fingers with some success. (Guillaume-Jugnot, 2016; Liem, 2019)
Ultraviolet therapy has been used in dermatology for several decades. UVA-1 is a form of phototherapy that utilizes the longest wavelengths in the UV spectrum from 340-400 nm. It is able to penetrate deeper in the skin than other types of phototherapy and target different types of cells including fibroblasts. In sclerosing skin conditions UVA-1 appears to be superior to other forms of UV light. Medium to high dose UVA-1 also appears to be superior to low dose UVA-1 for sclerosing conditions. (Kreuter 2006).
UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in SSc in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with SSc for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)
If UVA1 therapy can significantly improve hand involvement in SSc with regards to functionality and disability, it may be a cost-effective and beneficial treatment for this patient segment with debilitating disease.
Purpose and Objectives:
1. To assess the efficacy of 30 sessions of ultraviolet-1 (UVA1) therapy in treating hand involvement of SSc in a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled, clinical trial.
a. To compare improvement in hand function as measured by the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test, in the UVA1-treated hand compared to control hand (gloved).
Study Design:
This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.
Procedures:
This is a single-blinded, randomized, UV-blocking glove controlled, dominant/non-dominant hand, study to determine the efficacy of UVA1 in the treatment of hand scleroderma. Each participant will have at least one hand treated with UVA1 during the active treatment period of the study. The study will be performed at the University of Utah Dermatology Department using both the University of Utah E12 Clinic space as well as the Midvalley Clinic space. UVA1 lights boxes are located at both E12 and Midvalley locations. Personnel involved in the study will include the PI, the co-investigators, and the study coordinators. Approximately 27 patients will be enrolled to account for a 25% drop-out rate. The number needed to treat to show a difference in the treatment vs. control hands is 21.
Screening:
For screening, subjects with qualifying scleroderma involving both hands will be asked to read and sign the informed consent document. They will be reminded that they are to take their time and, if necessary, take it home for further consideration. Questions will be answered. Those meeting inclusion / exclusion criteria who have signed informed consent will be enrolled.
After answering questions and prior to the first treatment the Principal Investigator (PI) will examine the entire patient and assess for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis with bilateral hand involvement and perform the following assessments: HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer measurements, and mRSS. (Please see efficacy assessment section for details of HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer, and mRSS). Photographs of the hands and other affected areas will be taken. The patient will be asked to identify their dominant (writing) hand and their answer will be noted. Using a random number generator, the patient will be randomized to undergo UVA1 treatment vs UV-blocking glove (control) on the dominant hand. The non-dominant hand will receive the other modality. A study coordinator will perform the randomization on the day of first treatment and the PI will be blinded to the treatment assignment.
UVA1 Treatments:
Blinding:
A UV-blocking glove will be placed on the control hand as determined by the randomization process. Subjects will wear eyewear that occludes external light.
Evaluations for adverse effects will be carried out by the UVA1 operator (a nurse not involved in any assessments) and the blinded investigator at prescribed intervals. Evaluation of UVA1 efficacy on hand scleroderma will be assessed by a trained and experienced evaluator who is blinded as to the UVA1-treated side (covered / not covered). The efficacy evaluations will be carried out prior to treatments on days both evaluations and treatments are completed. After participants have been evaluated at the 3-month post-treatment study visit the blinded evaluator will become unblinded to the UVA1-treated side for the purpose of allowing participants to receive standard of care therapy. Therefore, participants will be allowed to receive additional UVA-1 treatments to one or both hands in addition to any other necessary standard of care treatments after the 3-month post-treatment visit.
Dosing Schedule:
Prior studies with UVA1 have shown that high and medium dose protocols (>40-120 J/cm2) are more effective than low dose (20-40 J/cm2) to treat sclerosing skin conditions. (Hassani, 2016) Thus, we will set the initiation dose at 50 J. The hands will be positioned approximately 9 inches from the bulbs. The palmar surface of the hand will be exposed for half the treatment and the dorsal surface for half the treatment. If tolerating well after three treatments, the dose will be increased to 60 J for three treatments and then 70 J for the remaining treatments.
Patients will return to clinic two-to-three times per week for 30 treatments over a 100-day period to receive UVA1 treatments. If the patient experiences redness, burning, pain, or blistering at the treatment site, treatment will be held if active symptoms persist at the time of the next scheduled treatment. If the symptoms have resolved and the patient has healed by the next scheduled treatment, the UVA1 energy will be reduced by 10 J of the previously delivered dose. Dose escalation will then proceed by increasing the UVA1 energy after three well tolerated treatments.
Efficacy Evaluations:
1. Efficacy evaluations will be performed at baseline, after 15 UVA1 treatment sessions, after 30 UVA1 treatment sessions, and at 3 and 12 months after completion of all UVA1 treatments. For each evaluation prior to the 12-month evaluation, one of the sub-Investigators who is blinded to the treatment assignments will generate and record the HAMIS, CHFDS, Durometer, and mRSS. Hands will be photographed. Patients will complete all PROM including using Skindex-16, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis - Digital Ulcers(HDISS-DU), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The blinded evaluator will also perform safety evaluation and document study-related adverse events.
Endpoint measure descriptions:
HAMIS is a hand function test developed for adults with systemic sclerosis. HAMIS consists of 9 items designed to measure all movements assessed in an ordinary range of motion (ROM)-measured hand test. Specific items test finger flexion and extension, thumb abduction, pincer grip, finger abduction/swelling, dorsal extension and volar extension of the wrist, and pronation and supination. Each item is graded on a 0-3 scale, where 0 corresponds to normal function and 3 denotes that the individual is unable to perform the item. Each hand is assessed separately. The minimum score for HAMIS is 0, representing normal hand function. The maximum score of HAMIS is 27, representing a high degree of dysfunction. (Sandqvist, 2000)
310 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse; 76 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 38 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse.
Browse Scleroderma, Diffuse studies →University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 994 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.
Of its 114 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (61%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
All participants received both intervention conditions in a randomized, split-person (intra-patient) design. One hand was randomized to receive UVA1 phototherapy, and the contralateral hand served as the control and was covered with a UV-blocking glove during UVA1 treatment sessions. Treatment-hand assignment was determined using a random number generator.
Device: UVA-1 Phototherapy · Other: UV-Blocking Glove
UVA-1 Phototherapy treatments
A UV-blocking glove was placed over the hand randomized to the control condition during UVA1 phototherapy sessions. The glove prevented UVA1 exposure to the control hand, allowing within-participant comparison of the UVA1-treated hand with the contralateral control hand. Each participant had one hand assigned to UVA1 treatment and the other hand assigned to the UV-blocking glove control condition.
Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30
The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test assesses hand mobility in systemic sclerosis. Each hand is assessed separately using 9 items evaluating hand and wrist movements. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27 for each hand, with 0 representing normal hand function and higher scores indicating greater hand dysfunction.
Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a 37-item validated instrument assessing six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction with hand function. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better performance for all domains except pain, for which higher scores indicate greater pain. Hand function, activities of daily living, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction were analyzed separately by hand.
Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and Fingers
The modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) assesses skin thickness by palpation. In this study, the hand and fingers were scored separately. The hand score ranges from 0 to 3 and the finger score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates normal skin thickness, 1 indicates mild skin thickening, 2 indicates moderate skin thickening, and 3 indicates severe skin thickening. Lower scores indicate less skin thickening and therefore a better outcome.
Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Skindex-16 Scores
Skindex-16 is a 16-item validated patient-reported assessment measuring the impact of skin disease on quality of life across three domains: symptoms, emotions, and physical functioning. Scores are normalized to a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 represents no impact on quality of life and 100 represents maximal impact. Lower scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Score
PROMIS Physical Function is a computer-adaptive patient-reported assessment of physical functioning. Results are reported as standardized T-scores, with 50 representing the national population mean. Scores greater than 50 indicate higher physical function and scores below 50 indicate lower physical function.
Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score
The Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms and disability related to digital ulcers. Individual items are scored from 1 to 6, and the overall score is calculated as the mean of non-missing item scores when sufficient items are available. Overall scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
| Milestone | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Started | 9 |
| Received uva1 phototherapy | 9 |
| Received uv-blocking glove control | 9 |
| Completed | 7 |
| Not completed | 2 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 |
The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test assesses hand mobility in systemic sclerosis. Each hand is assessed separately using 9 items evaluating hand and wrist movements. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27 for each hand, with 0 representing normal hand function and higher scores indicating greater hand dysfunction.
| HAMIS score | Control Hand | UVA-1 Treated Hand |
|---|---|---|
| Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30 | 11.0 (4.0 to 16.0) | 11.0 (3.0 to 13.0) |
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a 37-item validated instrument assessing six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction with hand function. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better performance for all domains except pain, for which higher scores indicate greater pain. Hand function, activities of daily living, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction were analyzed separately by hand.
| MHQ Score | Control Hand | UVA-1 Treated Hand |
|---|---|---|
| Function | 65.0 (45.0 to 75.0) | 65.0 (60.0 to 95.0) |
| ADL | 85.0 (35.0 to 90.0) | 60.0 (25.0 to 90.0) |
| Pain | 20.0 (10.0 to 40.0) | 10.0 (5.0 to 30.0) |
| Aesthetics | 81.2 (75.0 to 93.8) | 75.0 (56.2 to 87.5) |
| Satisfaction | 58.3 (12.5 to 70.8) | 66.7 (33.3 to 79.2) |
The modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) assesses skin thickness by palpation. In this study, the hand and fingers were scored separately. The hand score ranges from 0 to 3 and the finger score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates normal skin thickness, 1 indicates mild skin thickening, 2 indicates moderate skin thickening, and 3 indicates severe skin thickening. Lower scores indicate less skin thickening and therefore a better outcome.
| scores on a scale | Control Hand | UVA-1 Treated Hand |
|---|---|---|
| Hand | 1.0 (1.0 to 2.0) | 1.0 (1.0 to 2.0) |
| Fingers | 2.0 (1.0 to 2.0) | 2.0 (2.0 to 2.0) |
Skindex-16 is a 16-item validated patient-reported assessment measuring the impact of skin disease on quality of life across three domains: symptoms, emotions, and physical functioning. Scores are normalized to a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 represents no impact on quality of life and 100 represents maximal impact. Lower scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
| Skindex-16 Score | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Emotions - baseline | 38.0 (29.0 to 48.5) |
| Emotions - After 15 Treatments | 21.0 (14.0 to 36.0) |
| Emotions - After 30 Treatments | 7.0 (5.0 to 14.0) |
| Emotions - 3 Months Post-Treatment | 10.0 (7.0 to 17.0) |
| Emotions - 12 Months Post-Treatment | 14.0 (7.0 to 31.0) |
| Symptoms - Baseline | 46.0 (37.5 to 54.0) |
| Symptoms - After 15 Treatments | 29.0 (17.0 to 42.0) |
| Symptoms - After 30 Treatments | 13.0 (8.0 to 25.0) |
| Symptoms - 3 months post-treatment | 17.0 (13.0 to 58.0) |
| Symptoms - 12 Months Post-Treatment | 25.0 (8.0 to 42.0) |
| Function - Baseline | 21.5 (10.0 to 28.0) |
| Function - After 15 Treatments | 10.0 (10.0 to 20.0) |
| Function - After 30 Treatments | 10.0 (7.0 to 13.0) |
| Function - 3 months Post-Treatment | 13.0 (10.0 to 20.0) |
| Function - 12 Months Post-Treatment | 10.0 (7.0 to 30.0) |
PROMIS Physical Function is a computer-adaptive patient-reported assessment of physical functioning. Results are reported as standardized T-scores, with 50 representing the national population mean. Scores greater than 50 indicate higher physical function and scores below 50 indicate lower physical function.
| PROMIS-PF T-score | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Baseline | 41.2 (37.8 to 45.7) |
| Treatment 15 | 40.1 (34.0 to 44.7) |
| Treatment 30 | 40.8 (34.7 to 45.7) |
| 3 months post-treatment | 41.6 (35.4 to 45.7) |
| 12 months post-treatment | 40.8 (38.1 to 45.7) |
The Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms and disability related to digital ulcers. Individual items are scored from 1 to 6, and the overall score is calculated as the mean of non-missing item scores when sufficient items are available. Overall scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
| HDISS-DU score | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Baseline | 1.2 (0.5 to 2.0) |
| Treatment 15 | 1.6 (0.8 to 2.0) |
| Treatment 30 | 1.5 (0.8 to 3.4) |
| 3 months post-treatment | 1.2 (0.2 to 1.4) |
| 12 months post-treatment | 1.0 (0.2 to 1.2) |
Collected over 14 months (participants were monitored from time of signed consent to 12 months post-treatment). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Study Participants | 0/9 (0%) | 0/9 (0%) | 4/9 (44.4%) |
| Event | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/9 |
| Palm PainSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/9 |
| COVID-19 InfectionInfections and infestations | 1/9 |
| Stinging in PalmSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/9 |
| Burning in PalmSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/9 |
| ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/9 |
| Claustrophobia FlarePsychiatric disorders | 1/9 |
9 participants completed the baseline visit.
| Age, Continuous(years) | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Mean | 53.29 (28 to 72) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| Female | 9 |
| Male | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 |
| White | 8 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | All Study Participants |
|---|---|
| United States | 9 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.