ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04875078Updated Nov 2, 2026Results posted

UVA-1 for Treatment of Skin Tightening and Improvement of Hand Function in Scleroderma

An interventional study of UVA-1 Phototherapy and UV-Blocking Glove in Scleroderma, sponsored by University of Utah. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by University of Utah · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2020, registered Apr 2021).
Updated Nov 2, 2026Now CompletedResults posted+6 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in scleroderma in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with scleroderma for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)

In this trial patients will be randomized to have their dominant or non-dominant hand undergo 30 sessions of UVA1 therapy. We will assess patient's hand mobility, hand function, skin hardening (assessed by durometer measurements), skin thickness, as well as patient reported outcomes to determine efficacy.

This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.

Read the detailed description

Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also called scleroderma, is a rare chronic autoimmune disease that can have a wide range of cutaneous, joint, and internal organ involvement. In the skin, SSc is characterized by enhanced fibroblast activity leading to hypertrophic dermal collagen that results in thickened, less flexible skin. (Hassani, 2016) SSc is often divided into two types based on extent of cutaneous involvement: diffuse SSc and limited SSc. The hand is a frequent area of involvement in both subtypes of SSc. Hand disability in SSc leads to a high burden on quality of life for patients as it limits both work and activities of daily living. Treatment for hand sclerosis remains limited with generally progressive disease despite aggressive treatment with anti-fibrotic medications, immunosuppressive agents, and topical approaches. Specific hand therapies include physiotherapy and injections of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction into the fingers with some success. (Guillaume-Jugnot, 2016; Liem, 2019)

Ultraviolet therapy has been used in dermatology for several decades. UVA-1 is a form of phototherapy that utilizes the longest wavelengths in the UV spectrum from 340-400 nm. It is able to penetrate deeper in the skin than other types of phototherapy and target different types of cells including fibroblasts. In sclerosing skin conditions UVA-1 appears to be superior to other forms of UV light. Medium to high dose UVA-1 also appears to be superior to low dose UVA-1 for sclerosing conditions. (Kreuter 2006).

UVA-1 has been reported to be beneficial to skin changes in SSc in several case reports and a few small studies. (Jacobe 2020) Interpretation of these reports has been difficult based on the small numbers of subjects involved and the non-blinded non-randomized nature of the reports. In a single controlled study with half-side comparison of 9 patients, the investigators could not demonstrate improvement with UVA-1 in the treated hand. (Thomas 2007) This study was limited by a small number of patients and the long disease duration prior to treatment (mean of 13 years). A more recent report of a patient with SSc for 2.5 years and severe acrosclerosis that responded to 21 sessions of UVA-1 with improved mobility and functionality renews interest in this treatment modality. (Cuenca-Barrales 2019)

If UVA1 therapy can significantly improve hand involvement in SSc with regards to functionality and disability, it may be a cost-effective and beneficial treatment for this patient segment with debilitating disease.

Purpose and Objectives:

1. To assess the efficacy of 30 sessions of ultraviolet-1 (UVA1) therapy in treating hand involvement of SSc in a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled, clinical trial.

a. To compare improvement in hand function as measured by the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test, in the UVA1-treated hand compared to control hand (gloved).

Study Design:

This study will use a single-blind, prospective, randomized (dominant/non-dominant hand) comparator design to assess the effect of high dose (80-120 J/cm2) UVA1 therapy on hand function in scleroderma in a paired t-test design. This study is a randomized, investigator-blinded, intra-patient, UV-blocking glove-controlled clinical trial. A follow up period of 12 months following completion of UVA1 therapy will prospectively follow patients to monitor for relapse of their disease to assess the durability of the clinical response to UVA1 therapy on hand scleroderma.

Procedures:

This is a single-blinded, randomized, UV-blocking glove controlled, dominant/non-dominant hand, study to determine the efficacy of UVA1 in the treatment of hand scleroderma. Each participant will have at least one hand treated with UVA1 during the active treatment period of the study. The study will be performed at the University of Utah Dermatology Department using both the University of Utah E12 Clinic space as well as the Midvalley Clinic space. UVA1 lights boxes are located at both E12 and Midvalley locations. Personnel involved in the study will include the PI, the co-investigators, and the study coordinators. Approximately 27 patients will be enrolled to account for a 25% drop-out rate. The number needed to treat to show a difference in the treatment vs. control hands is 21.

Screening:

For screening, subjects with qualifying scleroderma involving both hands will be asked to read and sign the informed consent document. They will be reminded that they are to take their time and, if necessary, take it home for further consideration. Questions will be answered. Those meeting inclusion / exclusion criteria who have signed informed consent will be enrolled.

After answering questions and prior to the first treatment the Principal Investigator (PI) will examine the entire patient and assess for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis with bilateral hand involvement and perform the following assessments: HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer measurements, and mRSS. (Please see efficacy assessment section for details of HAMIS, CHFDS, durometer, and mRSS). Photographs of the hands and other affected areas will be taken. The patient will be asked to identify their dominant (writing) hand and their answer will be noted. Using a random number generator, the patient will be randomized to undergo UVA1 treatment vs UV-blocking glove (control) on the dominant hand. The non-dominant hand will receive the other modality. A study coordinator will perform the randomization on the day of first treatment and the PI will be blinded to the treatment assignment.

UVA1 Treatments:

Blinding:

A UV-blocking glove will be placed on the control hand as determined by the randomization process. Subjects will wear eyewear that occludes external light.

Evaluations for adverse effects will be carried out by the UVA1 operator (a nurse not involved in any assessments) and the blinded investigator at prescribed intervals. Evaluation of UVA1 efficacy on hand scleroderma will be assessed by a trained and experienced evaluator who is blinded as to the UVA1-treated side (covered / not covered). The efficacy evaluations will be carried out prior to treatments on days both evaluations and treatments are completed. After participants have been evaluated at the 3-month post-treatment study visit the blinded evaluator will become unblinded to the UVA1-treated side for the purpose of allowing participants to receive standard of care therapy. Therefore, participants will be allowed to receive additional UVA-1 treatments to one or both hands in addition to any other necessary standard of care treatments after the 3-month post-treatment visit.

Dosing Schedule:

Prior studies with UVA1 have shown that high and medium dose protocols (>40-120 J/cm2) are more effective than low dose (20-40 J/cm2) to treat sclerosing skin conditions. (Hassani, 2016) Thus, we will set the initiation dose at 50 J. The hands will be positioned approximately 9 inches from the bulbs. The palmar surface of the hand will be exposed for half the treatment and the dorsal surface for half the treatment. If tolerating well after three treatments, the dose will be increased to 60 J for three treatments and then 70 J for the remaining treatments.

Patients will return to clinic two-to-three times per week for 30 treatments over a 100-day period to receive UVA1 treatments. If the patient experiences redness, burning, pain, or blistering at the treatment site, treatment will be held if active symptoms persist at the time of the next scheduled treatment. If the symptoms have resolved and the patient has healed by the next scheduled treatment, the UVA1 energy will be reduced by 10 J of the previously delivered dose. Dose escalation will then proceed by increasing the UVA1 energy after three well tolerated treatments.

Efficacy Evaluations:

1. Efficacy evaluations will be performed at baseline, after 15 UVA1 treatment sessions, after 30 UVA1 treatment sessions, and at 3 and 12 months after completion of all UVA1 treatments. For each evaluation prior to the 12-month evaluation, one of the sub-Investigators who is blinded to the treatment assignments will generate and record the HAMIS, CHFDS, Durometer, and mRSS. Hands will be photographed. Patients will complete all PROM including using Skindex-16, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis - Digital Ulcers(HDISS-DU), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

The blinded evaluator will also perform safety evaluation and document study-related adverse events.

Endpoint measure descriptions:

HAMIS is a hand function test developed for adults with systemic sclerosis. HAMIS consists of 9 items designed to measure all movements assessed in an ordinary range of motion (ROM)-measured hand test. Specific items test finger flexion and extension, thumb abduction, pincer grip, finger abduction/swelling, dorsal extension and volar extension of the wrist, and pronation and supination. Each item is graded on a 0-3 scale, where 0 corresponds to normal function and 3 denotes that the individual is unable to perform the item. Each hand is assessed separately. The minimum score for HAMIS is 0, representing normal hand function. The maximum score of HAMIS is 27, representing a high degree of dysfunction. (Sandqvist, 2000)

02

Conditions studied

  • Scleroderma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Scleroderma, Diffuse

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 38 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Scleroderma, Diffuse.

Browse Scleroderma, Diffuse studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 994 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Of its 114 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be able to understand and provide written
  • Scleroderma skin involvement affecting both hands approximately equally
  • Age of at least 18-years-old
  • Male or female
  • Ability to engage in twice weekly UVA1 sessions
  • No changes in systemic therapy during the first 100 days of the study period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On photosensitizing medication
  • Inability to complete study visits
  • UV light therapy in the 4 weeks prior to entering the study
  • Commercial tanning or excessive sun exposure in the 4 weeks prior to entering the study
  • Current pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period
  • Use of topical therapies other than emollients (suprapotent ) in the 2 weeks prior to entering the study
  • History of intolerance to ultraviolet light
  • Any other condition that will disqualify the patient from the study in the opinion of the investigator
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All Study Participants

    All participants received both intervention conditions in a randomized, split-person (intra-patient) design. One hand was randomized to receive UVA1 phototherapy, and the contralateral hand served as the control and was covered with a UV-blocking glove during UVA1 treatment sessions. Treatment-hand assignment was determined using a random number generator.

    Device: UVA-1 Phototherapy · Other: UV-Blocking Glove

Interventions

  • DeviceUVA-1 Phototherapy

    UVA-1 Phototherapy treatments

  • OtherUV-Blocking Glove

    A UV-blocking glove was placed over the hand randomized to the control condition during UVA1 phototherapy sessions. The glove prevented UVA1 exposure to the control hand, allowing within-participant comparison of the UVA1-treated hand with the contralateral control hand. Each participant had one hand assigned to UVA1 treatment and the other hand assigned to the UV-blocking glove control condition.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30

    The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test assesses hand mobility in systemic sclerosis. Each hand is assessed separately using 9 items evaluating hand and wrist movements. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27 for each hand, with 0 representing normal hand function and higher scores indicating greater hand dysfunction.

    Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores

    The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a 37-item validated instrument assessing six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction with hand function. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better performance for all domains except pain, for which higher scores indicate greater pain. Hand function, activities of daily living, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction were analyzed separately by hand.

    Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)

  2. Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and Fingers

    The modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) assesses skin thickness by palpation. In this study, the hand and fingers were scored separately. The hand score ranges from 0 to 3 and the finger score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates normal skin thickness, 1 indicates mild skin thickening, 2 indicates moderate skin thickening, and 3 indicates severe skin thickening. Lower scores indicate less skin thickening and therefore a better outcome.

    Time frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)

  3. Skindex-16 Scores

    Skindex-16 is a 16-item validated patient-reported assessment measuring the impact of skin disease on quality of life across three domains: symptoms, emotions, and physical functioning. Scores are normalized to a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 represents no impact on quality of life and 100 represents maximal impact. Lower scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)

  4. PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Score

    PROMIS Physical Function is a computer-adaptive patient-reported assessment of physical functioning. Results are reported as standardized T-scores, with 50 representing the national population mean. Scores greater than 50 indicate higher physical function and scores below 50 indicate lower physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)

  5. Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score

    The Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms and disability related to digital ulcers. Individual items are scored from 1 to 6, and the overall score is calculated as the mean of non-missing item scores when sufficient items are available. Overall scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

    Time frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Study Participants
Started9
Received uva1 phototherapy9
Received uv-blocking glove control9
Completed7
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryHand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30

The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test assesses hand mobility in systemic sclerosis. Each hand is assessed separately using 9 items evaluating hand and wrist movements. Each item is scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27 for each hand, with 0 representing normal hand function and higher scores indicating greater hand dysfunction.

Time frame:
After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)
Reported as:
Median · HAMIS score
Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30
HAMIS scoreControl HandUVA-1 Treated Hand
Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 3011.0 (4.0 to 16.0)11.0 (3.0 to 13.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Hand vs UVA-1 Treated Hand · Mean difference (final values): -1.85 · 95% CI -4.70 to 1.01Baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects regression with a random intercept for participant was used to account for the paired, within-participant hand measurements.
SecondaryMichigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores

The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a 37-item validated instrument assessing six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction with hand function. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better performance for all domains except pain, for which higher scores indicate greater pain. Hand function, activities of daily living, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction were analyzed separately by hand.

Time frame:
After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Reported as:
Median · MHQ Score
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores
MHQ ScoreControl HandUVA-1 Treated Hand
Function65.0 (45.0 to 75.0)65.0 (60.0 to 95.0)
ADL85.0 (35.0 to 90.0)60.0 (25.0 to 90.0)
Pain20.0 (10.0 to 40.0)10.0 (5.0 to 30.0)
Aesthetics81.2 (75.0 to 93.8)75.0 (56.2 to 87.5)
Satisfaction58.3 (12.5 to 70.8)66.7 (33.3 to 79.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Hand vs UVA-1 Treated Hand · Mean difference (final values): 16.0 · 95% CI 8.31 to 25.6This analysis corresponds to the MHQ Function domain. Baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects regression with a random intercept for participant was used to account for paired, within-participant hand measurements.
SecondaryModified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and Fingers

The modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) assesses skin thickness by palpation. In this study, the hand and fingers were scored separately. The hand score ranges from 0 to 3 and the finger score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates normal skin thickness, 1 indicates mild skin thickening, 2 indicates moderate skin thickening, and 3 indicates severe skin thickening. Lower scores indicate less skin thickening and therefore a better outcome.

Time frame:
After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and Fingers
scores on a scaleControl HandUVA-1 Treated Hand
Hand1.0 (1.0 to 2.0)1.0 (1.0 to 2.0)
Fingers2.0 (1.0 to 2.0)2.0 (2.0 to 2.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Hand vs UVA-1 Treated Hand · Odds ratio (or): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.09 to 4.63This analysis corresponds to the hand mRSS measure. A proportional odds model was used because mRSS is an ordinal measure. An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates greater odds of a higher mRSS score in the UVA1-treated group.
  • Control Hand vs UVA-1 Treated Hand · Odds ratio (or): 1.83 · 95% CI 0.22 to 15.6This analysis corresponds to the finger mRSS measure. A proportional odds model was used because mRSS is an ordinal measure. An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates greater odds of a higher mRSS score in the UVA1-treated group.
SecondarySkindex-16 Scores

Skindex-16 is a 16-item validated patient-reported assessment measuring the impact of skin disease on quality of life across three domains: symptoms, emotions, and physical functioning. Scores are normalized to a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 represents no impact on quality of life and 100 represents maximal impact. Lower scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Reported as:
Median · Skindex-16 Score
Skindex-16 Scores
Skindex-16 ScoreAll Study Participants
Emotions - baseline38.0 (29.0 to 48.5)
Emotions - After 15 Treatments21.0 (14.0 to 36.0)
Emotions - After 30 Treatments7.0 (5.0 to 14.0)
Emotions - 3 Months Post-Treatment10.0 (7.0 to 17.0)
Emotions - 12 Months Post-Treatment14.0 (7.0 to 31.0)
Symptoms - Baseline46.0 (37.5 to 54.0)
Symptoms - After 15 Treatments29.0 (17.0 to 42.0)
Symptoms - After 30 Treatments13.0 (8.0 to 25.0)
Symptoms - 3 months post-treatment17.0 (13.0 to 58.0)
Symptoms - 12 Months Post-Treatment25.0 (8.0 to 42.0)
Function - Baseline21.5 (10.0 to 28.0)
Function - After 15 Treatments10.0 (10.0 to 20.0)
Function - After 30 Treatments10.0 (7.0 to 13.0)
Function - 3 months Post-Treatment13.0 (10.0 to 20.0)
Function - 12 Months Post-Treatment10.0 (7.0 to 30.0)
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants · Regression coefficient (beta): -30.2 · 95% CI -43.6 to -16.7
  • All Study Participants · Regression coefficient (beta): -26.4 · 95% CI -38.0 to -14.8
  • All Study Participants · Regression coefficient (beta): -11.7 · 95% CI -19.5 to -3.92
SecondaryPROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Score

PROMIS Physical Function is a computer-adaptive patient-reported assessment of physical functioning. Results are reported as standardized T-scores, with 50 representing the national population mean. Scores greater than 50 indicate higher physical function and scores below 50 indicate lower physical function.

Time frame:
Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Reported as:
Median · PROMIS-PF T-score
PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Score
PROMIS-PF T-scoreAll Study Participants
Baseline41.2 (37.8 to 45.7)
Treatment 1540.1 (34.0 to 44.7)
Treatment 3040.8 (34.7 to 45.7)
3 months post-treatment41.6 (35.4 to 45.7)
12 months post-treatment40.8 (38.1 to 45.7)
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants · Regression coefficient (beta): 1.02 · 95% CI -1.69 to 3.72Comparison of final PROMIS-PF score with baseline using the analysis of global participant-level measures.
SecondaryHand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score

The Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms and disability related to digital ulcers. Individual items are scored from 1 to 6, and the overall score is calculated as the mean of non-missing item scores when sufficient items are available. Overall scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

Time frame:
Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
Reported as:
Median · HDISS-DU score
Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) Score
HDISS-DU scoreAll Study Participants
Baseline1.2 (0.5 to 2.0)
Treatment 151.6 (0.8 to 2.0)
Treatment 301.5 (0.8 to 3.4)
3 months post-treatment1.2 (0.2 to 1.4)
12 months post-treatment1.0 (0.2 to 1.2)
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants · Regression coefficient (beta): 0.37 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.94Comparison of final HDISS-DU score with baseline using the analysis of global participant-level measures.

Adverse events

Collected over 14 months (participants were monitored from time of signed consent to 12 months post-treatment). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Study Participants0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)4/9 (44.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAll Study Participants
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/9
Palm PainSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/9
COVID-19 InfectionInfections and infestations1/9
Stinging in PalmSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/9
Burning in PalmSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/9
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/9
Claustrophobia FlarePsychiatric disorders1/9

Baseline characteristics

9 participants completed the baseline visit.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Mean53.29 (28 to 72)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female9
Male0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Study Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White8
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)All Study Participants
United States9
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Utah MidValley Dermatology
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hassani J, Feldman SR. Phototherapy in Scleroderma. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):519-553. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0136-3. Epub 2016 Aug 12. PubMed 27519050 ↗
  • Sandler RD, Matucci-Cerinic M, Hughes M. Musculoskeletal hand involvement in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Apr;50(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 9. PubMed 31812353 ↗
  • Guillaume-Jugnot P, Daumas A, Magalon J, Jouve E, Nguyen PS, Truillet R, Mallet S, Casanova D, Giraudo L, Veran J, Dignat-George F, Sabatier F, Magalon G, Granel B. Autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in patients with systemic sclerosis: 12-month follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):301-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev323. Epub 2015 Sep 8. PubMed 26350489 ↗
  • Liem SIE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Schoones JW, de Vries-Bouwstra JK. The effect and safety of exercise therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019 Dec 9;3(2):rkz044. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkz044. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31858074 ↗
  • Connolly KL, Griffith JL, McEvoy M, Lim HW. Ultraviolet A1 phototherapy beyond morphea: experience in 83 patients. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2015 Nov;31(6):289-95. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12185. Epub 2015 Jun 26. PubMed 26052743 ↗
  • Kroft EB, van de Kerkhof PC, Gerritsen MJ, de Jong EM. Period of remission after treatment with UVA-1 in sclerodermic skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jul;22(7):839-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02576.x. Epub 2008 Apr 30. PubMed 18452527 ↗
  • Bongi SM, Del Rosso A, Galluccio F, Sigismondi F, Miniati I, Conforti ML, Nacci F, Cerinic MM. Efficacy of connective tissue massage and Mc Mennell joint manipulation in the rehabilitative treatment of the hands in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;28(10):1167-73. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1216-x. Epub 2009 Jun 25. PubMed 19554274 ↗
  • Sandqvist G, Eklund M. Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test: the reliability of a novel hand function test. Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Dec;13(6):369-74. PubMed 14635312 ↗
  • Khanna D, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Allanore Y, Baron M, Czirjak L, Distler O, Foeldvari I, Kuwana M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Mayes M, Medsger T Jr, Merkel PA, Pope JE, Seibold JR, Steen V, Stevens W, Denton CP. Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231. PubMed 28516167 ↗
  • Prasad S, Coias J, Chen HW, Jacobe H. Utilizing UVA-1 Phototherapy. Dermatol Clin. 2020 Jan;38(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.08.011. PubMed 31753195 ↗
  • Kreuter A, Hyun J, Stucker M, Sommer A, Altmeyer P, Gambichler T. A randomized controlled study of low-dose UVA1, medium-dose UVA1, and narrowband UVB phototherapy in the treatment of localized scleroderma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Mar;54(3):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1063. Epub 2006 Jan 30. PubMed 16488295 ↗
  • Mouthon L, Poiraudeau S, Vernon M, Papadakis K, Perchenet L, Khanna D. Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU(R)) patient-reported outcome instrument. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jan 6;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4. PubMed 31907061 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Enrolling by invitation→Completed
changed Nov 2, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Nov 2, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2025→Mar 31, 2023 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Study completion
Dec 2025→Dec 31, 2024 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Enrollment
30 (estimated)→9 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Interventions
Added UV-Blocking Glove. Arms added: All Study Participants; arms removed: UVA-1 Treated hand·The untreated hand
Nov 2, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore HAMIS score of treated hand compared to the HAMIS score of the untreated hand after 30 UVA-1 treatments have been completed.Now Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30Time frame: Approximately 100 days → After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)
Nov 2, 2026
Secondary outcomes
5 added, 8 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedMichigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) ScoresTime frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
  • AddedModified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and FingersTime frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
  • AddedSkindex-16 ScoresTime frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
  • AddedPROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) ScoreTime frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
  • AddedHand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) ScoreTime frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
  • RemovedChange in HAMIS score from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in CHFDS score from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in skin hardness from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in skin thickness from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in Skindex-16 score from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in MHQ scores from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in HDISS-DU from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
  • RemovedChange in PROMIS-PF scores from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    Enrolling by invitation→Completed
    Results posted
    Primary completion Dec 2025→Mar 31, 2023 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 2025→Dec 31, 2024 (now actual)
    Enrollment 30 (estimated)→9 (actual)
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore HAMIS score of treated hand compared to the HAMIS score of the untreated hand after 30 UVA-1 treatments have been completed.Now Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) Score at Treatment 30Time frame: Approximately 100 days → After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (approximately 100 days from baseline)
    Secondary outcomes 5 added, 8 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedMichigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) ScoresTime frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
    • AddedModified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of the Hands and FingersTime frame: After 30 UVA1 treatment sessions (up to 100 days from baseline)
    • AddedSkindex-16 ScoresTime frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
    • AddedPROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) ScoreTime frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
    • AddedHand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) ScoreTime frame: Baseline; after 15 UVA1 treatments (up to approximately 50 days); after 30 UVA1 treatments (up to 100 days); 3 months post-treatment (up to approximately 6 months from baseline); and 12 months post-treatment (up to approximately 15 months from baseline)
    • RemovedChange in HAMIS score from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in CHFDS score from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in skin hardness from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in skin thickness from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in Skindex-16 score from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in MHQ scores from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in HDISS-DU from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    • RemovedChange in PROMIS-PF scores from baseline to after 30 UVA-1 treatments of treated hand.Time frame: Approximately 100 days
    Interventions Added UV-Blocking Glove. Arms added: All Study Participants; arms removed: UVA-1 Treated hand·The untreated hand
    + 6 other changes: index terms, identifiers, verification date, oversight details, description and design details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04875078
Lead sponsor
University of Utah
Responsible party
Christopher B Hansen (Dr., University of Utah) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2021
Start date
Dec 12, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Results posted
Nov 2, 2026
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion