ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02676193CASAUpdated Jan 8, 2025

Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior

An interventional study of Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior in Smoking and Tobacco Smoking, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-08.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
359
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators are addressing two critical areas identified by the FDA: the impact of cigarette packaging and labeling on consumer perceptions and on smoking behavior; and the effectiveness of graphic warning labels on communicating risk of tobacco products. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), investigators will enroll committed smokers who have no intention of quitting in the next 6-months. The three study arms will be: a) a blank pack with all marketing materials removed (PP); b) The Australian graphic warning images (Australian model-AM); or c) a standard pack with all marketing materials unaltered (ST). The study includes a three month purchasing intervention and continued follow-up through 12 months. Throughout the study interactive text messaging assessments will be used to measure acute and persistent impact of labeling and marketing on perceptions of tobacco products, subjective effects of consumption, awareness of tobacco-related harms, tobacco use behavior, and quitting motivation. At three separate time points, participants will: a) complete a web-based questionnaire b) provide a saliva sample for cotinine analysis. The rigorous design and extensive objective measurements are significant innovations on the currently published research in this field and should lead to significant advances in tobacco regulatory science.

Read the detailed description

Smokers handle their packs frequently. Product packaging is a crucial medium by which the tobacco industry communicates product attributes, including reassurances about risk. The industry uses branded imagery on packs to influence consumer perceptions of their product, while at the same time the tobacco control community uses health warning labels to communicate harmful and potentially harmful constituents and risks of tobacco products. The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) is a treaty enacted to ensure that every person is informed of the health consequences and addictive nature of tobacco consumption. Article 11 of the treaty requires Parties to implement large, rotating health warnings and urges governments to restrict or prohibit the use of Industry logos, colors, brand images or promotional information on packaging other than brand names and product names displayed in a standard color and font style. Study Objective: To conduct a randomized trial of the effect of cigarette pack design on 450 smokers of popular cigarette brands aged 21-65, who are committed to continue smoking (no intention to quit in the next 6-months). These committed smokers will be randomized to have their cigarettes packaged in one of 3 study arms: a) blank pack design with all marketing materials removed (BP), b) blank pack with a large graphic warning label (AM: Australian model) and c) standard pack with marketing materials intact (ST: US model).

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking
  • Tobacco Smoking

Keywords

  • Tobacco Smoking
  • Cigarettes
  • Packaging
  • Text messaging
  • Graphic Images
  • Sensor-Based Assessments
03

In context

Smoking

325 studies on the registry are indexed under Smoking; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 359 is above the median of 117 across 250 interventional studies indexed under Smoking.

Browse Smoking studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 975 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 71 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 21-65 years of age
  • A current resident of San Diego County
  • Daily smokers of at least 5 cigarettes/day who are classified as in the pre-contemplator stage of change (i.e. do not intend to quit smoking in the next 6-months)
  • Regular smokers of popular U.S. cigarette brands
  • Have a cell phone with a text messaging service plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Daily cigarette smokers and daily smokers of alternative brand cigarettes
  • Marked organic impairment or unstable medical problems (such as a seizure disorder)
  • Current pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the next 12 weeks
  • Prisoners, incarcerated or institutionalized individuals
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
359 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Australian Packs

    The intervention to be administered to participants randomized to this group is the purchase of their US brand of cigarettes packaged using standard Australian marketing for three months.

    Behavioral: Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior

  • Experimental
    Blank Packs

    The intervention to be administered to participants randomized to this group is the purchase of their US brand of cigarettes packaged using blank packaging for three months. Blank packaging will indicate participants brand and will not have any brand-related images or labels.

    Behavioral: Effect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior

  • No intervention
    American Packs

    Participants assigned the nonintervention group will purchase their US brand of cigarettes in the standard American packaging for three months.

Interventions

  • BehavioralEffect of Packaging on Smoking Perceptions and Behavior

    The intervention is the use of the assigned pack design.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceptions of Risk From Tobacco Use and Perceptions of Pack Appeal

    Changes in perceptions of risk from tobacco use and appeal of tobacco packs

    Time frame: Assessed over 4-months and 12-months

  2. Changes in Awareness and Concern about Health Hazards

    Changes in perceptions of harm and potential risks

    Time frame: Assessed over 4-months and 12-months

  3. Changes in routinized behavior and persistence over time.

    Decreased willingness to display the pack in public.

    Time frame: Assessed over 4-months and 12-months

  4. Changes in cigarette smoking behaviors.

    Changes in the percent smokers, consumption per smoker, and recent quit attempts validated with saliva cotinine.

    Time frame: Assessed over 4-months and 12-months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pierce JP, Kealey S, Leas EC, Pulvers K, Stone MD, Oratowski J, Brighton E, Villasenor A, Strong DR. Effect of Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Pack-Hiding Behavior Among Smokers: The CASA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214242. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14242. PubMed 35653155 ↗
  • Strong DR, Pierce JP, Pulvers K, Stone MD, Villasenor A, Pu M, Dimofte CV, Leas EC, Oratowski J, Brighton E, Hurst S, Kealey S, Chen R, Messer K. Effect of Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs on US Smokers' Cognitions and Smoking Behavior After 3 Months: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121387. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21387. PubMed 34347057 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Sep 2022, 79 months.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Smoking, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 60. This study's 79 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 155 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 59.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 28, 2016
First posted
Feb 8, 2016
StartActual
Feb 2016
Primary completionActual
Sep 2022
CompletionActual
Sep 2022
Last update
Jan 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02676193
Responsible party
David Strong (Associate Professor, University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 8, 2016
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Sep 2022
Completion
Sep 2022
Last update
Jan 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion