ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02672982FUSAMUpdated Mar 25, 2022

Follow Up of Severely Malnourished Children (FUSAM)

An interventional study of NUTPSY treatment and NUT treatment in Severe Acute Malnutrition, sponsored by Action Contre la Faim. Completed at 1 site in Nepal. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 23 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-25.

Sponsored by Action Contre la Faim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
427
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 23 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of the research is to assess the long-term and cost-effectiveness of a combined nutrition psychosocial intervention to a stand-alone nutritional treatment of children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) aged 6 to 24 months in the Saptari District of Nepal.

Read the detailed description

In Nepal, the majority of SAM children are treated with therapeutic food in community/home-based care, and little is known about the long-term sustainability of the nutritional and health benefits of treatment after rehabilitation. The two treatments will be compared in terms of costs of treatment and convened health benefits (child nutritional status and development, cured rate and relapse, maternal mental health, and family care practices) at both short and long-term periods after admission. The proposed complementary psychosocial intervention focuses directly on the key underlying determinants of acute malnutrition within children's early years, such as child care practices and stimulation, parent-child relationships and maternal mental health. It includes the mother/caregiver as patient of psychosocial support, but also empowers her as the key ally in the treatment of the undernourished child. Adding a brief psychosocial component to the standard medico-nutritional treatment is expected to pay off in terms of sustainable recovery, health, and development outcomes of children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Acute Malnutrition

Keywords

  • Severe acute malnutrition
  • Psychosocial intervention
  • Child
  • Stimulation
  • CMAM
  • Nepal
03

In context

Severe Acute Malnutrition

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Severe Acute Malnutrition; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 427 is close to the median of 400 across 69 interventional studies indexed under Severe Acute Malnutrition.

Browse Severe Acute Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Action Contre la Faim is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 23 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 6-23 months
  • 2 sexes
  • Diagnosis: uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition requiring follow-up outpatient therapeutic feeding unit (OTPs), supported by Action Contre la Faim in Saptari district
  • Weight-for-height (WH) \<-3 Standard Deviation compared to the WHO reference and/or MUAC \<115 mm
  • And / or nutritional oedema moderate (+ or + +)
  • And successful test of appetite
  • And no medical complications
  • New cases
  • Presence of mother / father or legal guardian aged > 18 years.
  • Understanding of the consent and information letter
  • Follow-up possible

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<6 months or> 24 months
  • Moderate Acute Malnutrition
  • Severe Acute Malnutrition complicated
  • Weight for height \<-3 Standard Deviation compared to the WHO reference and / or MUAC \<115mm but failure to test appetite OR medical complications OR severe oedema + + + OR kwashiorkor, marasmus (malnutrition with the same criteria, with oedema mild or severe).
  • Relapse or if already registered in the past two months;
  • Any child with developmental anomalies, known chronic illnesses like epilepsy, twins and multiple births, parents not consenting,
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
427 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    new combined NUTPSY treatment

    2-month combined nutrition and psychosocial intervention

    Other: NUTPSY treatment

  • Active comparator
    standard NUT treatment

    2-month of standard nutritional treatment only

    Other: NUT treatment

Interventions

  • OtherNUTPSY treatment

    The psychosocial component of the new combined treatment involves seven weekly counselling sessions with mothers focused on feeding, emotional attachment, stages of child development, stimulation, emotional responsiveness and interaction, and on concerns/strategies of child care and parenting.

  • OtherNUT treatment

    Only the standard nutritional treatment in the form of Ready-to-use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) is administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Child motor, cognitive, emotional and social development assessed with Ages and Stages Questionnaire

    The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (Squires et al, 1999), is a low-cost, easily administered, parent-report screening test of development in communication, motor, problem-solving and personal-social domains. The questionnaire has been adapted and used in low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where it has demonstrated sensitivity to child nutritional status and psychosocial stimulation. While it is not a diagnostic test, it offers an opportunity to systematically obtain information about children's development with an instrument that does not require extensive training

    Time frame: up to 11 months after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Child Care Practices

    The quality of care practices is measured by assessing the level of knowledge and the practices. It comprises sub-thematics: care for women, pregnancy and delivery, care for the newborn, breastfeeding and feeding, access to resources for care, as well as child development and psychosocial care. The Child Care Knowledge \& Practices Questionnaire has been developped by Action Contre la Faim.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  2. Mother-child interaction

    Action Contre la Faim's Mother-Child Interaction Grid will be used for assessing the quality of mother-child interactions and interpersonal sensitivity and responsiveness.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  3. Child stimulation

    Family Care Indicators (FCI) (Frongillo et al, 2003) is used to assess the quality of child stimulation

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  4. Maternal perinatal mental health

    The Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (Cox et al, 1987) is a valuable and efficient way of identifying mothers at risk for "perinatal" depression.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  5. Perceived Social Support

    The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al, 1988) measures perceived support from 3 sources: family, friends and significant others.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  6. Maternal self-esteem

    The Rosenberg self-esteem scale (Rosenberg, 1965) assesses maternal self-esteem.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  7. Maternal mental health

    The WHO Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) (WHO, 1994) assesses the frequency of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and psychosomatic complaints in the past month. The measure has been shown to be an accurate predictor of common mental disorder and has been successfully used in several studies in developing countries.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  8. Child growth (height)

    Child growth measures change in height

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  9. Child nutritional status defined by Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC)

    Comparison of the mean MUAC adjusted to age, sex and height

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  10. Child nutritional status defined by Weight-For-Height Z-score

    Comparison of the mean Weight-For-Height Z-score

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  11. Child nutritional status defined by height-for-Age Z score

    Comparison of the mean height-for-Age Z score

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  12. Child health status (morbidity rate)

    Follow-up of morbidity rate

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

  13. Child death (mortality rate)

    Follow-up of mortality rate

    Time frame: Up to 11 months after inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • ACF, Nepal
    Kathmandu, Nepal
08

References and documents

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2014 to primary completion in Jan 2017, 25 months.

Of 32 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Severe Acute Malnutrition, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 28. This study's 25 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 32 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2015
First posted
Feb 3, 2016
StartActual
Dec 8, 2014
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2017
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2017
Last update
Mar 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02672982
Lead sponsor
Action Contre la Faim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2016
Start date
Dec 8, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2017
Completion
Jan 31, 2017
Last update
Mar 25, 2022

Study contacts

Cecile Bizouerne, PhD
principal investigator · Action Contre la Faim

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion