An interventional study of Click-MUAC prototype & regular MUAC tape in Malnutrition, sponsored by Action Contre la Faim. Status unknown at 1 site in Kenya. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-31.
Sponsored by Action Contre la Faim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The Click-Mid-Upper Arm Circumference study aims to describe and compare the performance of a set of three simplified mid-upper arm circumference classification devices ("Click-MUAC") for use by mothers and caregivers to screen for acute malnutrition in young children. The study will be conducted in Isiolo County, Kenya. The study builds on the recent approach of training mothers to screen for acute malnutrition in their own children (mother MUAC approach).
The primary aim of the study is to describe and compare the performance of a set of three prototype Click-MUAC devices against a gold standard of classification, in terms of measures of agreement (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Cohen's Kappa, Youden's J) for the classification (diagnosis) of acute malnutrition. A secondary aim of the study is to determine the difference in agreement with the gold standard classification amongst mothers/caregivers using a Click-MUAC prototype versus mothers/caregivers using a regular MUAC tape. The hypothesis of the study is that at least one of the Click-MUAC prototypes is equal to the gold standard of classification in terms of measures of agreement for the classification of acute malnutrition. A secondary hypothesis of the study is that agreement with the gold standard classification is better amongst mothers/caregivers using a Click-MUAC prototype compared to mothers/caregivers using a regular MUAC tape. The outcomes of the study will be used to decide on whether production of a Click-MUAC device is desirable and, if this is the case, to select a design based on the performance of the prototype devices and the stated preferences of intended users.
The study will be a non-randomised, non-blinded, clinical diagnostic trial describing and comparing performance that will be conducted in two phases: (i) calibration of the devices, (ii) testing of Click-MUAC prototypes against "gold standard" classification.
The study will take place at designated health facilities within Isiolo County that already have an IMAM programme running. The investigators expect that the health facilities with the highest number of acute malnutrition admissions will be selected as study sites in order to be able to test the prototypes on a large number of attending Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM)/Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) children.
The first phase of work will concentrate on the calibration of Click-MUAC prototypes. The performance of the Click-MUAC prototypes with regard to accuracy of classification will be assessed in children with a measured MUAC at or close to the 115 mm and 125 mm case-defining thresholds. This phase of work is required as prior testing of the Click-MUAC prototypes will only have been performed on semi-rigid testing tubes.
The second phase of work will test the Click-MUAC prototypes. Three sets of measurements/classifications will be taken during the Click-MUAC testing trial: (i) Mother/caregiver MUAC classification performed by the mother/primary caregiver on their own child, using each of the three Click-MUAC prototypes and a regular MUAC tape; (ii) IMAM staff MUAC classification performed by the Integrated Management of Acute malnutrition (IMAM) staff on the same child, using each of the three Click-MUAC prototypes and a regular MUAC tape; (iii) Gold standard MUAC measurement performed by the study coordinator and/or data collection team members trained in the measurement of MUAC and selected for their accuracy (i.e. against the study supervisor) and precision of measurement, following a validation exercise using the Habicht method, on the same child. In addition, mothers/caregivers and IMAM staff will also be asked to state their preference of Click-MUAC prototype and asked to give reasons for their preference.
The Click-MUAC devices are screening/diagnostic devices. Appropriate measures of agreement between the different measurer groups (mothers/primary caregivers, IMAM staff, gold standard) can be calculated from two-by-two contingency tables. The following appropriate measures of agreement will be calculated from these tables: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Cohen' s Kappa, Younden's J. The analysis (i.e. two-by-two contingency table and estimation of appropriate measures of agreement) will be performed for each prototype Click-MUAC device. A discordancy analysis will also be performed. The aim of the discordancy analysis is to describe misclassifications in terms of the range, interquartile range, and median MUAC at each type of discordancy. This analysis provides further calibration information that may inform design changes that avoid/minimize gross misclassifications and to minimize the frequency of errors made at or close to class boundaries.
AND informed consent of mother / caregiver
Exclusion Criteria:
Each child will have nutritional status classified 11 times: * 3 times with each of the 3 Click-MUAC prototypes by the mother/caregiver * 1 time with a regular MUAC tape by the mother/caregiver * 3 times with each of the 3 Click-MUAC prototypes by the case-finding/programme staff * 1 time with a regular MUAC tape by the case-finding/programme staff * 3 times with a regular MUAC tape by the data collection team ("gold standard")
Device: Click-MUAC prototype & regular MUAC tape
Screening of children using Click-MUAC and regular MUAC tape
Youden's J
Youden's J is a chance-corrected measure of agreement that can be interpreted as the probability of making an informed decision using a given method of ascertaining case-status. The measure is estimated as: J = Sensitivity + Specificity - 1 Sensitivity is defined as the ability of the Click-MUAC device to correctly detect patients who do have the condition (i.e. either severe wasting or moderate wasting or any wasting). The measure is mathematically defined as: sensitivity = a/(a+b) where a= true positive and b= false negative Specificity is defined as the ability of the Click-MUAC device to correctly detect patients who do not have the condition (i.e. either severe wasting or moderate wasting or any wasting). The measure is mathematically defined as specificity= d/(c+d) where d=true negative and c=false positive
Time frame: Immediate (i.e. this measure can be calculated immediately upon data collection). The measure will be collected throughout study implementation for up to 3 months, for completion as planned for October 2016.
Accuracy
The term "accuracy" best applies to agreement between true case status (from the gold standard measurement procedure) and classification by mothers or program staff. The measure is mathematically defined as accuracy= (a+d)/(a+b+c+d) where a= true positive, b= false negative, c=false positive and d=true negative
Time frame: Immediate (i.e. this measure can be calculated immediately upon data collection). The measure will be collected throughout study implementation for up to 3 months, for completion as planned for October 2016.
Cohen's Kappa
Cohen's Kappa is defined mathematically as: Cohen's Kappa= (p_o-p_e)/(1-p_e ) The term p_o is observed agreement (calculated from the two-by-two contingency table) and the term p_e is expected agreement (also calculated from the two-by-two contingency table). Cohen's Kappa can be used with square contingency tables larger than the two-by-two case. The measure is useful for evaluating a Click-Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) device for more than two classes (e.g. severe wasting, moderate wasting, no wasting).
Time frame: Immediate (i.e. this measure can be calculated immediately upon data collection). The measure will be collected throughout study implementation for up to three months, for completion as planned for October 2016.
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Action Contre la Faim