ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02486523OUADINUTUpdated Sep 7, 2016

Benefits of a Household WASH Package to Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) Program, Chad

An interventional study of Hygiene promotion sessions and Household WASH package in Severe Malnutrition, sponsored by Action Contre la Faim. Completed at 1 site in Chad. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-07.

Sponsored by Action Contre la Faim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,572
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the research is to assess the effectiveness of adding a Household WASH component to the standard outpatient treatment of severe acute malnutrition.

Study design: cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing two interventions:

  1. Control group: outpatient management of children diagnosed for severe acute malnutrition only
  2. Intervention group: outpatient management of children diagnosed for severe acute malnutrition + "household WASH package"

2000 children, aged between 6 and 59 months, admitted to 20 OTP (Outpatient Therapeutic Program) centers for SAM will be included into the study and followed for 8 months (2 months of treatment, and 6 months after successful discharge).

Read the detailed description

The Action Contre la Faim (ACF) nutrition project in Kanem started in 2008, and now is set up in 35 health facilities divided across 2 health districts: Mao and Mondo. The management of severe acute malnutrition is done in both OTP (Outpatient Therapeutic Programme) and in TFC (Therapeutic Feeding Center). Between the treatment of SAM in OTPs and TFCs, and the number of curative consultations, the total number of beneficiaries is expected to be 45,065 in 2014 (without double counting).

Clear evidence exists that some Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) interventions can successfully prevent diarrhea. For instance, interventions aiming at improving water quality at household level or at promoting hand washing with soap do reduce significantly diarrhea incidence. Estimations showed that WASH interventions have a small but measurable benefit on length growth, but not on weight or weight/height. Yet, to our knowledge, no impact of WASH interventions has been assessed, neither during nutritional rehabilitation where children are particularly vulnerable to infections, nor after discharge where immune recovery is still incomplete.

In the context of nutritional rehabilitation of SAM (Severe Acute Malnutrition), the investigators hypothesize that improving water quality and hygiene-related care practices at household level would decrease incidence of WASH-related infections, such as diarrhea, nematode and environmental enteropathy. As such, it would improve weight gain, decrease relapses after successful discharge, and overall, could decrease over time the incidence of acute malnutrition in the community.

The proposed WASH intervention will be added to already existing nutritional activities and it will include: i/ Household water treatment and hygiene kit (water container, water disinfection consumables, soap, cup, hygiene promotion leaflet) provided at beginning of SAM treatment; ii/ sessions of Hygiene promotion provided weekly at health center level iii/ Household visits and hygiene sessions made during the treatment; // group discussion on hygiene and care practices made with mother at community level after successful discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Malnutrition

Keywords

  • SAM, severe acute malnutrition
03

In context

Malnutrition

1,277 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,572 is above the median of 118 across 843 interventional studies indexed under Malnutrition.

Browse Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Action Contre la Faim is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged between 6 to 59 months
  • New admission:

    • Weight for Height Z-score (WHZ) \< -3 (WHO2006) or
    • MUAC \<115 mm or
    • Presence of bilateral oedema (+ or ++ at OTP admission)
  • Other admission:

    • Relapse: after a successful discharge or ≥ 2 months since last visit
    • Re-admission: defaulter \< 2 months since last visit
    • Transfer from a stabilization center (SC)
  • Caretakers' agreement to participate (through an )

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of medical complications requiring inpatient management,
  • Bilateral oedema (+++),
  • Transfer from another OTP: treatment already started and child has a identification number (ID) for SAM
  • Refusal of caretaker to participate
  • Children from families outside the health center coverage
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,572 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Outpatient management of children diagnosed with severe acute malnutrition. Interventions allocated: Behavioral: Group discussions after successful discharge Procedure/Surgery: Outpatient Therapeutic Programme

    Behavioral: Group discussions after successful discharge · Procedure: Outpatient Therapeutic Programme

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Outpatient management of children diagnosed with severe acute malnutrition + "household WASH package" Interventions allocated: Behavioral: Hygiene promotion sessions Device: Household WASH package The content of the kit: soap and aquatab for 3 months, 20 liters Jerry can, a cup, a plastic kettle for hand washing and the instructions leaflet. Behavioral: Household visits during the OTP phase Behavioral: Group discussions after successful discharge Procedure/Surgery: Outpatient Therapeutic Programme

    Behavioral: Hygiene promotion sessions · Device: Household WASH package · Behavioral: Household visit · Behavioral: Group discussions after successful discharge · Procedure: Outpatient Therapeutic Programme

Interventions

  • BehavioralHygiene promotion sessions

    Hygiene promotion sessions are provided weekly to the caretakers at the health center level. They contain 7 main messages this study is trying to get across: Allocate a protected space for children to play, limiting the likelihood of them ingesting soil or animal feces; Wash the child with soap (hand, face) when outside the protected area; Cleaning and rapid burial of children's stools; Key times for hand washing with soap for the child caretaker; Store drinking water in a closed container located in an elevated place out of reach of animals; Drinking water provided to the child should be treated with chlorine or boiled; Once weaned, avoid giving to the child leftover food, or only after warming it again.

  • DeviceHousehold WASH package

    The content of the kit: 200 g soap, aquatab 67 g, 20 liters Jerry can, a cup, a plastic kettle for hand washing and the instructions leaflet.

  • BehavioralHousehold visit

    A household visit conducted by village's community health volunteers and ACF intervention staff during and after the treatment, to provide refresh training on the messages and the use of the kit.

  • BehavioralGroup discussions after successful discharge

    Group discussions on hygiene and care practices with mothers at the community level after successful discharge.

  • ProcedureOutpatient Therapeutic Programme

    Home-based treatment and rehabilitation using Ready-to-use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) for children with severe acute malnutrition

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in the proportion of post-recovery relapse cases

    This is a dichotomous variable based on whether a child discharged as cured from the OTP program has a new event of acute malnutrition during the 6 months following the discharge. The relapse proportion for each group = \[Total number of relapsing children\] / \[total number of discharged children that have been followed up\] Relative reduction of 42% (from 12% to 7%) is expected.

    Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after successful OTP discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in the average weight gain at the OTP discharge

    The weight gain (g/kg/day) = \[weight (g) at discharge - minimum weight (g)\] / \[Duration from minimum weight to discharge\] \* \[minimum weight (kg)\]. The average weight gain (g/kg/day) for each group = \[Sum of weight gains of cured children\] / \[total number of cured children\]. Increase of 3 g/kg/day is expected.

    Time frame: an expected average is between 7 and 8 weeks

  2. Difference in the anthropocentric measurements (WHZ, HAZ, WAZ)

    Weight for Height Z-score (WHZ), Height for age Z-score (HAZ) and Weight for age Z-score (WAZ) and Mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) Increase of 0,2 Z-score 6 months after OTP discharge is expected.

    Time frame: up to 6 months after OTP discharge

  3. Diarrhoea Incidence

    Loose or watery stools at least three times per day during the week/month prior to the consultation or visit.

    Time frame: up to 6 months follow up

  4. Difference in the length of stay in the OTP

    The OTP length of stay is the total number of days spent in the program, from admission of the child to the discharge of a cured child. The average length of stay for all children in each group = \[total number of days of cured children\] / \[number of cured children\]. Reduction of 5 days is expected.

    Time frame: an expected average is between 7 and 8 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Health centers
    Mao, Kanem, Chad
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2015, a primary completion of May 2016 and a completion of May 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 26, 2015
First posted
Jul 1, 2015
Start
Apr 2015
Primary completionActual
May 2016
CompletionActual
May 2016
Last update
Sep 7, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02486523
Lead sponsor
Action Contre la Faim
Collaborators
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium, Association Sahélienne de Recherches Appliquées pour le Développement Durable
Responsible party
Mathias Altmann (Dr, Action Contre la Faim) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2015
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Sep 7, 2016

Study contacts

Mathias Altmann, Dr
principal investigator · ACTION CONTRE LA FAIM | ACF-France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion