ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07420062RSWITCHUpdated Feb 19, 2026

Reduced Dosage and/or Visitation Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Malnutrition in Kenya

An interventional study of WHO-reduced and WHO-full in Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Acute Malnutrition, Severe and Acute Malnutrition, Moderate, sponsored by International Food Policy Research Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Kenya. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-19.

Sponsored by International Food Policy Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,274
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) places children at significant risk of mortality. Outpatient treatment programs are effective but there is a need to increase treatment coverage and reduce costs of treatment. Reducing the dosage of therapeutic food products and/or reducing visitation required by caregivers may be beneficial but evidence is limited on the treatment outcomes and costs of these approaches.

This study will compare two dosage options (full vs reduced dosages) of the World Health Organization protocol for the treatment of SAM and high-risk moderate acute malnutrition (HR-MAM) to each other and to the Kenya national protocol (which involves reducing dosage, changing treatment product, and reducing visitation schedule during the course of the treatment once the SAM child reaches the criteria for moderate acute malnutrition before recovery), in terms of treatment performance and cost. We will conduct a cluster-randomized controlled trial including 45 facilities in Samburu, West Pokot, and Wajir sub-counties. Children 6-59 months old being admitted into outpatient treatment programs for SAM or HR-MAM will be enrolled. Outcomes will be recovery, default, death, transfer, and non-response rates; treatment adherence; mean amount of therapeutic products needed for recovery; mean length of stay; and anthropometry at discharge. We will conduct a costing study in which we will estimate the costs per child admitted into treatment and cost per treated child recovered. We will estimate the non-inferiority of each of the two WHO protocol dosage options (full vs reduced) compared to the Kenya national protocol, and of the two WHO protocol options compared to each other (full vs reduced). Enrollment will begin in early 2026, and continue for 10 months. We will also conduct an observational sub-study documenting outcomes on children with MAM but who are not considered high risk in a sub-set of study facilities.

Evidence generated from the study will identify the optimal treatment strategy for better treatment performance and lower cost, providing policymakers in Kenya and across the globe with high-quality evidence to inform policy change.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Malnutrition in Childhood
  • Acute Malnutrition, Severe
  • Acute Malnutrition, Moderate
  • Wasting
03

In context

Severe Acute Malnutrition

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Severe Acute Malnutrition; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,274 is above the median of 400 across 69 interventional studies indexed under Severe Acute Malnutrition.

Browse Severe Acute Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

International Food Policy Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 6-59.9 months of age at admission into treatment
  • Child admitted to the national treatment program according to the following criteria:

    • For SAM: WHZ \<-3 or MUAC \<115 mm or presence of bilateral oedema, absence of clinical complications, pass the appetite test
    • For high-risk MAM: -3 ≥ WHZ \<-2 or 115mm ≥ MUAC \<125 mm, and one or more of the following factors: MUAC of 115-119 mm, weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) \< -3, age \< 24 months, failing to recover from MAM after receiving other interventions (e.g. counselling, nutrient dense diet), relapse, history of SAM, co-morbidity (medical problems needing mid- or long-term follow-up care, and with a significant association with nutritional status, such as , tuberculosis, or a physical or mental disability)
  • Accompanied by caregiver or legal guardian
  • Caregiver or legal guardian consents to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • SAM requiring hospitalization (presence of clinical complications, failure to pass the appetite test, or presence of bilateral pitting edema)
  • Enrolled in MAM or SAM treatment program before implementation of the treatment protocols to which the facilities were randomized
  • Presence of physical abnormalities that make measurement of anthropometry impossible
  • Caregiver has intention to move out of the study area within the next 3 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,274 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    WHO-reduced

    Children will receive the full, weight-based dosage of RUTF (150-185 kcal/kg/day) until the resolution of severe wasting, followed by a shift to reduced dosage (100-130 kcal/kg/day) until recovery. Treatment visits will be weekly until recovery.

    Other: WHO-reduced

  • Experimental
    WHO-full

    Children will receive the continuous full, weight-based dosage of 150-185 kcal/kg/day until recovery. Visits will be weekly until recovery.

    Other: WHO-full

  • Active comparator
    Kenya-IMAM

    Children will receive the Kenya Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition protocol for treatment. In this protocol, children will receive the weight-based dosing RUTF during treatment while they meet the SAM criteria (150-185 kcal/kg/day) and then 1 sachet RUSF for SAM children meeting the MAM criteria on the recovery period. Visits will be weekly during the SAM phase, and bi-weekly during the MAM phase.

    Other: Kenya-IMAM

Interventions

  • OtherWHO-reduced

    Children will receive the full, weight-based dosage of RUTF (150-185 kcal/kg/day) until the resolution of severe wasting, followed by a shift to reduced dosage (100-130 kcal/kg/day) until recovery. Treatment visits will be weekly until recovery.

  • OtherWHO-full

    Children will receive the continuous full, weight-based dosage of 150-185 kcal/kg/day until recovery. Visits will be weekly until recovery.

  • OtherKenya-IMAM

    Children will receive the Kenya Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition protocol for treatment. In this protocol, children will receive the weight-based dosing RUTF during treatment while they meet the SAM criteria (150-185 kcal/kg/day) and then 1 sachet RUSF for SAM children meeting the MAM criteria on the recovery period. Visits will be weekly during the SAM phase, and bi-weekly during the MAM phase.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anthropometric recovery

    The number of discharges considered cured (WHZ ≥ -2 and MUAC ≥ 125 mm and absence of bilateral edema for two consecutive visits, within 12 weeks of enrollment in the program) divided by the total number of discharges recorded.

    Time frame: Within 12 weeks of enrollment in the treatment program

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non-response

    the number of children who failed to meet recovery criteria after 4 months in the program, divided by the total number of children admitted into treatment

    Time frame: Within 12 weeks of enrollment in the treatment program

  2. Transfer

    the number of children transferred to inpatient care or outpatient therapeutic care during the course of treatment, divided by the total number of children admitted into treatment

    Time frame: within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program

  3. Default rate

    the number of children who were absent from three consecutive weekly visits during treatment, divided by the total number of children admitted into treatment

    Time frame: Within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program

  4. Relapse

    admission for a new episode of either MAM or SAM within 2 months of recovery from a previous episode.

    Time frame: Within 2 months of recovery from a previous episode

  5. Weight gain velocity

    grams per kilogram of body weight per day gained during treatment

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the treatment program and discharge (which is up to 12 weeks after enrollment into the treatment program)

  6. Length of stay

    number of days spent on treatment (days between admission and discharge) among children who reached anthropometric recovery

    Time frame: between enrollment into the program and discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the program)

  7. Treatment adherence

    the number of children enrolled for treatment who attended all study visits (i.e., who did not miss any visits) divided by the number of children admitted into treatment, among children who reached anthropometric recovery

    Time frame: within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program

  8. Weight at discharge

    Weight at the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: At discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program

  9. Length/height at discharge

    Length/height at the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: At discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

  10. Weight-for-length/height-zscore at discharge

    Weight-for-length/height-zscore at the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: At discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

  11. Middle upper arm circumference at discharge

    Middle upper arm circumference at the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: At discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

  12. Length/height-for-age z-score at discharge

    Length/height-for-age z-score at the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: At discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

  13. Change in length/height at discharge

    Change in length/height between enrollment and the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

  14. Weight-for-age z-score at discharge

    Weight-for-age z-score at the time of discharge from treatment

    Time frame: At discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

  15. Change in weight at discharge

    Change in weight between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

  16. Change in weight-for-length/height z-score at discharge

    Change in weight-for-length/height-zscore between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

  17. Change in middle upper arm circumference at discharge

    Change in middle upper arm circumference between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

  18. Change in length/height-for-age z-score at discharge

    Change in length/height-for-age z-score between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

  19. Change in weight-for-age z-score at discharge

    Change in weight-for-age z-score between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

    Time frame: Between enrollment into the program and at discharge, which is up to 12 weeks within enrollment into the program

Other outcomes

  1. Amount of product needed for recovery

    number of sachets of RUTF or RUSF provided to children during the course of treatment among children who reached anthropometric recovery

    Time frame: between enrollment into treatment and discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

  2. Mortality

    the number of children who died during the treatment course, divided by the total number of children admitted into treatment

    Time frame: between enrollment into treatment and discharge (within 12 weeks of enrollment into the treatment program)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • West Pokot, Wajir, and Samburu counties
    Kitale, West Pokot County, Kenya
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All data will be fully anonymized and de-identified. No names, GPS coordinates, dates of birth or other identifying data will be stored in the databases. At the time of publication of scientific articles presenting primary results, the fully anonymized databases will become a public good and will be made available to the scientific community, government, and partners.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: At the time of publication of scientific articles presenting primary results.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07420062
Lead sponsor
International Food Policy Research Institute
Collaborators
Kenyatta University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2026

Study contacts

Rebecca Brander, PhD
Contact
r.brander@cgiar.org
202-862-5600
Sophie Ochola, PhD
Contact
ocholasa55@gmail.com
+254721449803

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion