CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02647775Updated Jan 22, 2020

Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Responses in Thoracic Surgery

An interventional study of multi-port VATS and single-port VATS in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-22.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for thoracic surgery is practical, has been shown to reduce postoperative discomfort, and has improved cosmetic results when compare to open thoracotomy. The specific aims of this project are: to clarify the physiologic and immunologic effects of different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: (1) multiple-port VATS; (2) single-port VATS

Read the detailed description

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was first reported in the early 1990s. Since then, the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopy for diagnosing and treating pleural, pulmonary, and mediastinal disease has been demonstrated with similar oncological results, which were confirmed by multiple clinical studies. Although VATS for thoracic surgery is practical, has been shown to reduce postoperative discomfort, and has improved cosmetic results when compare to open thoracotomy, unfortunately chronic thoracic wound discomfort and postoperative neuralgia were found in a significant portion of patients .

Recently, a minimally invasive approach that is different from the conventional multiport thoracoscopic technique is gradually becoming of great interest in the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic surgical disease. Single-port VATS is one of the most promising emerging surgical techniques which allows the surgeon to perform a majority of thoracic surgeries and with similar perioperative outcomes that are comparable with the conventional multiport technique. However, a very limited number of clinical studies have demonstrated the advantages of single port VATS in postoperative pain reduction, when comparing to the traditional multiport thoracoscopic approach.

To clarify the physiologic and immunologic effects of different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery, investigators aim to compare the perioperative physiological changes, immunological responses, and postoperative pain between standard (multi-port) transthoracic thoracoscopic and single-port transthoracic thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Thoracoscopic surgery
03

In context

Aortic Dissection

386 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is below the median of 84 across 198 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,064 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with thoracic surgical diseases(lung cancer. mediastinal tumor. solitary pulmonary lesion. pneumothorax) who will be underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unresectable mediastinal tumor
  • Previous history of ipsilateral pulmonary resection
  • Patients with complex cardiopulmonary dysfunction
  • Unresectable pulmonary hilar tumor
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    multi-port VATS

    Multi-port VATS is an operative method

    Procedure: multi-port VATS

  • Other
    single-port VATS

    Single-port VATS is an operative method

    Procedure: single-port VATS

Interventions

  • Proceduremulti-port VATS

    Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

  • Proceduresingle-port VATS

    Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or Wong-Baker Face Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: beginning at 3 hours after surgery until 5 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication

    Yes/No

    Time frame: beginning at 3 hours after surgery until 30 days

  2. Mean arterial pressure

    MAP; mmHg

    Time frame: beginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.

  3. Heart rate

    HR; beats per min \[bpm\]

    Time frame: beginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.

  4. Cardiac index

    CI; L/\[min·m2\]

    Time frame: beginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.

  5. Systemic vascular resistance index

    SVRI; \[dyn·s\]/\[cm-5·m2\]

    Time frame: beginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.

  6. Global end-diastolic volume index

    GEDVI; mL/m2

    Time frame: beginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.

  7. Leukocyte subset analysis

    10\^3/ul

    Time frame: preoperation till 5 days after surgery

  8. Intracellular oxidative activity of neutrophils

    ratio compared with preoperation

    Time frame: preoperation till 5 days after surgery

  9. Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in monocytes

    Arbitrary intensity

    Time frame: preoperation till 5 days after surgery

  10. Interleukin-6

    pg/ml

    Time frame: preoperation till 5 days after surgery

  11. C-reactive protein

    ng/ml

    Time frame: preoperation till 5 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):362-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02804-1. PubMed 11515867 ↗
  • Flores RM, Park BJ, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk NP, Bains M, Downey RJ, Rusch VW. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.030. PubMed 19577048 ↗
  • Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS, Toloza E, Burfeind WR, Harpole DH Jr, D'Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):420-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234892.79056.63. PubMed 16926568 ↗
  • Sihoe AD, Au SS, Cheung ML, Chow IK, Chu KM, Law CY, Wan M, Yim AP. Incidence of chest wall paresthesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jun;25(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.018. PubMed 15145009 ↗
  • Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb;77(2):726-8. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01219-0. PubMed 14759479 ↗
  • Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Mendez L, Garcia J. Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy and right upper lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Dec;42(6):e169-71. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs482. Epub 2012 Aug 24. PubMed 22922693 ↗
  • Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R, Garcia J. Video: Single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic right pneumonectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):2078-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2127-x. Epub 2012 Jan 11. PubMed 22234590 ↗
  • Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, de la Torre M, Mendez L, Fernandez R. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy and other complex resections. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 6):S674-81. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.09.17. PubMed 25379210 ↗
  • Wang BY, Liu CY, Hsu PK, Shih CS, Liu CC. Single-incision versus multiple-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy: a propensity-matched analysis. Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):793-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000712. PubMed 24836148 ↗
  • Ocakcioglu I, Alpay L, Demir M, Kiral H, Akyil M, Dogruyol T, Tezel C, Baysungur V, Yalcinkaya I. Is single port enough in minimally surgery for pneumothorax? Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4161-6. Epub 2015 Mar 24. PubMed 25801108 ↗
  • Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Bhayani N, Rieder E. Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):659-67. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826b5212. PubMed 22982946 ↗
  • Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042. PubMed 24074429 ↗
  • Liu YH, Chu Y, Wu YC, Yeh CJ, Liu CY, Hsieh MJ, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu HP. Natural orifice surgery in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jan;6(1):61-3. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.02. No abstract available. PubMed 24455178 ↗
  • Takata M, Watanabe G, Ushijima T, Ishikawa N. A novel internal thoracic artery harvesting technique via subxiphoid approach--for the least invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;9(5):891-2. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.212282. Epub 2009 Aug 31. PubMed 19720658 ↗
  • St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Sharp RJ. Use of a subxiphoid incision for pectus bar placement in the repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jun;45(6):1361-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.115. PubMed 20620345 ↗
  • Taniguchi Y, Suzuki Y, Suda T, Inoue T, Araki K, Ito N, Okada K, Ishiguro K, Nakamura H, Ohgi S. Video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral lung metastasectomy with a subxiphoid access port. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Sep;130(3):916-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.039. No abstract available. PubMed 16153963 ↗
  • Suda T, Ashikari S, Tochii S, Sugimura H, Hattori Y. Single-incision subxiphoid approach for bilateral metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):718-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.123. PubMed 24484826 ↗
  • Liu CC, Wang BY, Shih CS, Liu YH. Subxiphoid single-incision thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):3250-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.033. Epub 2014 Aug 23. No abstract available. PubMed 25240526 ↗
  • Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Sep;20(3):455-63. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00841-7. PubMed 11509263 ↗
  • Martins PS, Kallas EG, Neto MC, Dalboni MA, Blecher S, Salomao R. Upregulation of reactive oxygen species generation and phagocytosis, and increased apoptosis in human neutrophils during severe sepsis and septic shock. Shock. 2003 Sep;20(3):208-12. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000079425.52617.db. PubMed 12923490 ↗
  • Haugen TS, Skjonsberg OH, Kahler H, Lyberg T. Production of oxidants in alveolar macrophages and blood leukocytes. Eur Respir J. 1999 Nov;14(5):1100-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.14511009. PubMed 10596697 ↗
  • Romeo C, Impellizzeri P, Antonuccio P, Turiaco N, Cifala S, Gentile C, Passaniti M, Marini H, Squadrito F, Altavilla D. Peritoneal macrophage activity after laparoscopy or laparotomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jan;38(1):97-101; discussion 97-101. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50019. PubMed 12592628 ↗
  • Ni Choileain N, Redmond HP. Cell response to surgery. Arch Surg. 2006 Nov;141(11):1132-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1132. PubMed 17116807 ↗
  • Wichmann MW, Huttl TP, Winter H, Spelsberg F, Angele MK, Heiss MM, Jauch KW. Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg. 2005 Jul;140(7):692-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.7.692. PubMed 16027336 ↗
  • Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, Stosslein R, Muller JM. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):600-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640090032. Epub 2001 Apr 3. PubMed 11591950 ↗
  • Ng CS, Wan S, Hui CW, Lee TW, Underwood MJ, Yim AP. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for early stage lung cancer - can short-term immunological advantages improve long-term survival? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;12(5):308-12. PubMed 17095971 ↗
  • Ng CS, Whelan RL, Lacy AM, Yim AP. Is minimal access surgery for cancer associated with immunologic benefits? World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):975-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0029-6. PubMed 15981046 ↗
  • Natsume T, Kawahira H, Hayashi H, Nabeya Y, Akai T, Horibe D, Shuto K, Akutsu Y, Matsushita K, Nomura F, Matsubara H. Low peritoneal and systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Mar-Apr;58(106):659-62. PubMed 21661448 ↗
  • von Delius S, Wilhelm D, Feussner H, Sager J, Becker V, Schuster T, Schneider A, Schmid RM, Meining A. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: cardiopulmonary safety of transesophageal mediastinoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):405-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243948. Epub 2010 Mar 4. PubMed 20205072 ↗
  • von Delius S, Schorn A, Grimm M, Schneider A, Wilhelm D, Schuster T, Stangassinger M, Feussner H, Schmid RM, Meining A. Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is sufficient and is associated with an improved cardiopulmonary response (PressurePig Study). Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):808-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256559. Epub 2011 Jul 5. PubMed 21732271 ↗
  • Navarro-Ripoll R, Martinez-Palli G, Guarner-Argente C, Cordova H, Martinez-Zamora MA, Comas J, Rodriguez de Miguel C, Beltran M, Rodriguez-D'Jesus A, Hernandez-Cera C, Llach J, Balust J, Fernandez-Esparrach G. On-demand endoscopic CO2 insufflation with feedback pressure regulation during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy induces minimal hemodynamic and respiratory changes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.015. PubMed 22817790 ↗
  • Chu Y, Liu CY, Wu YC, Hsieh MJ, Chen TP, Chao YK, Wu CY, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu YH, Liu HP. Comparison of hemodynamic and inflammatory changes between transoral and transthoracic thoracoscopic surgery. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e50338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050338. Epub 2013 Jan 3. PubMed 23300944 ↗
  • Lu HY, Chu Y, Wu YC, Liu CY, Hsieh MJ, Chao YK, Wu CY, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu YH, Liu HP. Hemodynamic and inflammatory responses following transumbilical and transthoracic lung wedge resection in a live canine model. Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.027. Epub 2015 Mar 11. PubMed 25769396 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02647775
Lead sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2016
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2018
Completion
Dec 2018
Last update
Jan 22, 2020

Study contacts

Yun-Hen Liu
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Hung-Pin Liu
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Yi-Cheng Wu
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Ming-Ju Hsieh
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Wei-Hsun Chen
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Yen Chu
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Chien-Ying Liu
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion