CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02620150Updated May 7, 2024Results posted

SSRI Effects on Depression and Immunity in HIV/AIDS

A Phase 4 interventional study of Escitalopram and Placebo in Depression, HIV and AIDS, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-07.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 10 week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial to evaluate SSRI (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor) effects for treatment of depression in HIV/AIDS with a focus on innate immunity and inflammation. Depressed population is HIV + on cART (Combination Antiretroviral Therapy), not currently on pharmacotherapy for depression. Subjects will complete computerized cognitive behavior therapy, CCBT for their depression. Blood samples collected for virologic, neuroendocrine, and immunologic evaluation. Our overarching hypothesis is that SSRI treatment of depression and improvement of depressive symptoms leads to increased innate immunity and decreased inflammation, resulting in better control of HIV disease and decreased morbidity.

Read the detailed description

To pursue our long-term objective of successfully treating co-morbid mental and medical disorders in HIV/AIDS, this study aims to determine whether: 1) SSRI treatment significantly increases innate immunity and decreases chronic inflammation and immune activation, and 2) changes in depressive symptoms correlate with changes in immunity in HIV/AIDS.

HIV-seropositive, depressed subjects will be randomized to 10 weeks of double blind therapy with either escitalopram or placebo. All participants will concurrently begin CCBT (Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) using the program Good Days Ahead.

Subject visits will occur weekly for the first 6 weeks and then at weeks 8 and 10. The treating clinician will assess side effects, review symptomatic progress, and adjust the study medication as clinically appropriate. An independent clinical evaluator will assess patients at baseline, and weeks 1-6, 8 and 10. Blood samples collected at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 10 will be used to assay markers of innate immune suppression (lytic units of NK cells, LUNK, and intracellular IFN gamma in NK cells) and markers of inflammation (IL-6 and C-Reactive Protein). At the end of the 10-week treatment phase, all participants will be referred for appropriate clinical treatment of their depression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • HIV
  • AIDS

Keywords

  • HIV
  • AIDS
  • Depression
  • SSRI
  • Escitalopram
  • Immunity
03

In context

Depression

8,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,643 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 84 across 6,718 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women aged 18-70 years, of any race and ethnicity,
  2. HIV-seropositive by ELISA and Western Blot assays, infected by behavioral transmission (perinatal HIV excluded),
  3. Willing and able to comply with antidepressant medication regimen and scheduled follow-up visits,
  4. Currently on a documented regimen of cART for at least 3 months and Viral load less than 200 copies/ml,
  5. Current depressive symptoms (HAM-D-17 score ≥ 13 and a SCID diagnosis of either Major Depressive Disorder, Persistent Depressive Disorder (Dysthymia), Unspecified Depressive Disorder, or Other Specified Depressive Disorder)
  6. Able to understand and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute suicidal ideation, gestures, or attempts (e.g., HAM-D suicide item score of 3 "Ideas or gestures of suicide" or 4 "Attempts at suicide" at intake or HAM-D suicide item score of 4 "Attempts at suicide" during study),
  2. Significant cognitive impairment or dementia including HIV Associated Dementia (HAD),
  3. Use of a medication known to alter immune function within 4 weeks prior to randomization (the following are not excluded: a. acyclovir and related antiviral medications, b. topical corticosteroids, c. corticosteroid nasal sprays or inhalers, d) statin medications,),
  4. Immunization with HIV vaccine,
  5. Presence of psychotic symptoms or known diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder,
  6. Currently taking an anti-psychotic medication,
  7. Pregnant or within nine months post-delivery, lactation,
  8. Current or chronic medical condition that would likely preclude adherence to protocol or completion of the trial (per investigator judgment),
  9. Bipolar disorder (I or II) or schizophrenia,
  10. Current pharmacotherapy for treatment of depression,
  11. A history of intolerance or nonresponse to an adequate trial of escitalopram (or other SSRIs),
  12. Renal failure, including those who require dialysis,
  13. History of epilepsy or seizure disorder,
  14. Taken MAOIs within 14 days,
  15. On the antibiotic Linezolid and taking IV methylene blue,
  16. On a regular regime of medication known to have anticoagulant properties such as NSAID, aspirin or warfarin,
  17. A history of acute narrow/closed angle glaucoma,
  18. Currently taking CNS drugs (the following are not excluded: gabapentin, pregabalin, varenicline, antihistamines, and hypnotics (e.g. zolpidem, zaleplon, eszopiclone),
  19. On any triptan medications,
  20. Undergoing ECT.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    CCBT plus Escitalopram, oral, for 10 weeks, once daily, starting at 10mg/day. Tapered up or down, based on tolerability and clinical response, to 20mg/day max.

    Drug: Escitalopram

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    CCBT plus Placebo, oral, for 10 weeks, once daily, starting at 10mg/day. Tapered up or down, based on tolerability and clinical response, to 20mg/day max.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugEscitalopram

    10 week trial

  • OtherPlacebo

    10 week trial

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Natural Killer Cell Activity, Measured in Lytic Units [Bryant J, Day R, Whiteside TL, and Herbeman RB: Calculation of Lytic Units for the Expression of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 1992;146:91-103.]

    The outcome was determined by biological assays. Natural killer cells (NK cells) are white blood cells, a type of lymphocytes, that destroy infected and cancer cells through antigen independent recognition. Higher numbers indicate higher levels of cytotoxicity, that is, stronger cellular response. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

    Time frame: Post randomization to 10 weeks

  2. Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)

    The outcome was determined by biological assays, which determined the number of NK cells, and the number of these cells that produced IFN-g, and combined these to calculate the outcome. Higher numbers are associated with stronger cellular response. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

    Time frame: Post randomization to 10 weeks

  3. Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter

    The outcome was determined by biological assays, which determined the concentration of IL-6, expressed as pg/ml. Higher concentrations indicate greater inflammation. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

    Time frame: Post randomization to 10 weeks

  4. Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter

    The outcome was determined by biological assays, which determined the concentration of CRP, expressed as mg/l. Higher concentrations indicate greater inflammation. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

    Time frame: Post randomization to 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Natural Killer Cell Activity

    The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on Natural killer cell activity.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  2. Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)

    The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on the Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  3. Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter

    The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  4. Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter

    The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 7, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimentalPlacebo
Started5553
Completed4850
Not completed73

Outcome measures

PrimaryNatural Killer Cell Activity, Measured in Lytic Units [Bryant J, Day R, Whiteside TL, and Herbeman RB: Calculation of Lytic Units for the Expression of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 1992;146:91-103.]

The outcome was determined by biological assays. Natural killer cells (NK cells) are white blood cells, a type of lymphocytes, that destroy infected and cancer cells through antigen independent recognition. Higher numbers indicate higher levels of cytotoxicity, that is, stronger cellular response. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

Time frame:
Post randomization to 10 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Lytic Units
Natural Killer Cell Activity, Measured in Lytic Units [Bryant J, Day R, Whiteside TL, and Herbeman RB: Calculation of Lytic Units for the Expression of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 1992;146:91-103.]
Lytic UnitsExperimentalPlacebo
Natural Killer Cell Activity, Measured in Lytic Units [Bryant J, Day R, Whiteside TL, and Herbeman RB: Calculation of Lytic Units for the Expression of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 1992;146:91-103.]224.06 (155.81 to 358.33)252.02 (150.16 to 360.28)
PrimaryPercent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)

The outcome was determined by biological assays, which determined the number of NK cells, and the number of these cells that produced IFN-g, and combined these to calculate the outcome. Higher numbers are associated with stronger cellular response. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

Time frame:
Post randomization to 10 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of NK cells producing IFN-g
Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)
Percentage of NK cells producing IFN-gExperimentalPlacebo
Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)8.25 (3.50 to 16.00)5.40 (3.00 to 11.20)
PrimaryUnits of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter

The outcome was determined by biological assays, which determined the concentration of IL-6, expressed as pg/ml. Higher concentrations indicate greater inflammation. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

Time frame:
Post randomization to 10 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Concentration of IL-6 (pcg/mL)
Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter
Concentration of IL-6 (pcg/mL)ExperimentalPlacebo
Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter2.52 (1.57 to 3.71)3.17 (2.21 to 4.64)
PrimaryUnits of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter

The outcome was determined by biological assays, which determined the concentration of CRP, expressed as mg/l. Higher concentrations indicate greater inflammation. In the present summaries, we calculated the within-participant median value of the outcome over their available data at weeks 2, 4 and 10, and obtained overall and within-group summaries for these within-participant distributions.

Time frame:
Post randomization to 10 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Concentration of CRP (mg / l)
Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter
Concentration of CRP (mg / l)ExperimentalPlacebo
Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter3.75 (1.52 to 5.97)3.17 (2.21 to 4.64)
SecondaryCorrelation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Natural Killer Cell Activity

The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on Natural killer cell activity.

Time frame:
10 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Correlation coefficient
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Natural Killer Cell Activity
Correlation coefficientExperimentalPlacebo
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Natural Killer Cell Activity0.24-0.28
SecondaryCorrelation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)

The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on the Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)

Time frame:
10 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Correlation coefficient
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)
Correlation coefficientExperimentalPlacebo
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Percent of Natural Killer (NK) Cells Producing Intracellular Interferon Gamma (IFN-g)-0.010.12
SecondaryCorrelation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter

The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

Time frame:
10 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Correlation coefficient
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter
Correlation coefficientExperimentalPlacebo
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Expressed as Picograms Per Milliliter-0.160.16
SecondaryCorrelation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter

The outcome was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation between decrease in overall score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and decrease on Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

Time frame:
10 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Correlation coefficient
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter
Correlation coefficientExperimentalPlacebo
Correlation Between Change in Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Change in Units of Concentration of Plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Expressed as Milligrams Per Liter-0.33-0.04

Adverse events

Collected over 10 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental1/55 (1.8%)2/55 (3.6%)33/55 (60%)
Placebo0/53 (0%)1/53 (1.9%)36/53 (67.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventExperimentalPlacebo
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/551/53
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/551/53
Death due to fentanyl/cocaineInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/550/53
StrokeNervous system disorders1/550/53
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventExperimentalPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders11/557/53
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders5/557/53
PainGeneral disorders6/556/53
Worsening Psychiatric SymptomsPsychiatric disorders2/556/53
SinusitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/556/53
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders4/555/53
Influenza-like symptomsGeneral disorders1/555/53
SomnolencePsychiatric disorders4/554/53
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/554/53
Sexual DysfunctionGeneral disorders4/553/53

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ExperimentalPlaceboTotal
Mean49.95 ± 11.9949.87 ± 10.9749.91 ± 11.45
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)ExperimentalPlaceboTotal
Female202040
Male343266
Transgender Female112
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ExperimentalPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino4711
Not Hispanic or Latino504696
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ExperimentalPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American494796
White549
More than one race022
Unknown or Not Reported101
Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Overall Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(units on a scale)ExperimentalPlaceboTotal
Mean19.13 ± 4.9019.21 ± 5.0719.17 ± 4.96
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 9, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 10, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02620150
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2015
Start date
Feb 16, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2022
Completion
Mar 31, 2022
Results posted
May 7, 2024
Last update
May 7, 2024

Study contacts

Dwight L Evans, MD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion