CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02588872HA vs PRPUpdated Mar 14, 2023Results posted

Hyaluronic Acid vs Platelet Rich Plasma: Effects on Clinical Outcomes and Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) and Hyaluronic Acid in Osteoarthritis, Knee, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-14.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
111
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this, prospective, double-blind study, patients with mild to moderate symptomatic knee osteoarthritis will be randomized to receive either a series of leukocyte poor, platelet-rich plasma or hyaluronic acid injections under ultrasound guidance. Clinical data in the form of subjective outcome measures will be collected pre-treatment and at four time intervals across a 1-year period. Synovial fluid will also collected for analysis of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers pre-treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this double-blind prospective randomized clinical trial is to compare the effects of PRP to HA in patients with mild to moderate OA using biologic and clinical correlates of outcomes associated with the treatment of OA. The investigators will test the null hypothesis that there are no differences in clinical outcomes as measured by validated clinical scoring systems for OA, nor is there any difference in intra-articular biology between groups of patients treated with HA and those treated with PRP over time.

This study was a prospective, randomized, double blind, comparative clinical trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1 that underwent IRB approval at the principal institution. Between 2011 and 2014 patients will be screened for participation. All comers with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee between 18 and 80 years of age will be screened.

Treatment and Evaluation Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized via an electronic randomization process into two groups: one receiving intra-articular PRP and the other, intra-articular HA. Non-clinical staff will perform randomization, clinical staff performed the injections, and results and analyses will be performed by the primary research team. Patients and the primary research team performing analysis will be blinded to assignments. All patients will undergo a 10 ml blood draw for PRP preparation and a 3 ml peripheral blood draw for a complete blood count with leukocyte differential. This will be performed on patients who received HA to maintain patient blinding and to characterize the peripheral white blood cells (WBC) and platelet counts. A complete blood count (CBC) will be completed on PRP prior to injection to evaluate the fold increase in platelet concentration and to confirm rarity of red white blood cells. A synovial fluid aspirate of approximately 2cc will be performed under ultrasound guidance just prior to each PRP or HA injection for ELISA analysis of basal and post-treatment intra-articular environment. After treatment, patients will be instructed to limit the use of the leg for at least 24 hours and use cold therapy/icing for discomfort. During this treatment period rest or mild exertion activities (such as exercise bike, aquatic therapy) are recommended, followed by gradual return to sports or recreational activities as tolerated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

  • platelet-rich plasma
  • hyaluronic acid
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 111 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 394 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-80 years old
  • Mild to moderate unilateral, symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee
  • No recent (within 3 months) intra-articular intervention to the affected knee

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Knee instability
  • Varus/Valgus alignment >5 degrees
  • Bilateral knee osteoarthritis
  • Systemic inflammatory arthropathy
  • Known history of anemia, coagulopathy, or present use of blood thinners
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
111 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hyaluronic Acid (HA)

    Hyaluronic acid administered as an intra-articular injection under ultrasound guidance as a series of three weekly injections to the affected knee. 3 weekly injections are of ultra high molecular weight hyaluronan (16mg) in a 2mL injection.

    Biological: Hyaluronic Acid

  • Experimental
    Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)

    Platelet-rich plasma administered as an intra-articular injection under ultrasound guidance as a series of three weekly injections to the affected knee. 3 weekly injections are of leukocyte poor, buffer/additive free, singe spin, platelet-rich plasma averaging 4mL in volume.

    Biological: Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)

Interventions

  • BiologicalPlatelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
  • BiologicalHyaluronic Acid
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC

    This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being high function and 1 being very poor function that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

    Time frame: This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being the worst pain imaginable and 1 being no pain at all that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

    Time frame: This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment.

  2. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index

    This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being high function and 1 being very poor function that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

    Time frame: This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment. 6-weeks post-treatment, 6-months post treatment, and finally at 1-year post treatment will be documented for the purpose of trending data.

  3. Lysholm Knee Score

    This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being high function and 1 being very poor function that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

    Time frame: This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment.

  4. Biologic Testing of Synovial Fluid Via ELISA Assays

    ELISA analysis will be performed for the following biological markers: IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα

    Time frame: Primary outcome will be change from pre-treatment to 6-month post treatment.

07

Results

Posted May 18, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
Started5952
Completed5952
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryInternational Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC

This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being high function and 1 being very poor function that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

Time frame:
This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC
units on a scaleHyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC65.5 ± 3.655.8 ± 3.8
SecondaryVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)

This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being the worst pain imaginable and 1 being no pain at all that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

Time frame:
This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
units on a scaleHyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)57.3 ± 3.844 ± 4.6
SecondaryWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index

This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being high function and 1 being very poor function that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

Time frame:
This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment. 6-weeks post-treatment, 6-months post treatment, and finally at 1-year post treatment will be documented for the purpose of trending data.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
units on a scaleHyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index4 ± 0.63.02 ± 0.48
SecondaryLysholm Knee Score

This is a scale from 1-100, 100 being high function and 1 being very poor function that will be assessed via paper questionnaire at the delineated time intervals. The Primary outcome assessed will be at an average of 1-year post treatment.

Time frame:
This will be assessed as a change from pre-treatment visit to 1 year post treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Lysholm Knee Score
units on a scaleHyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
Lysholm Knee Score55.8 ± 3.865.5 ± 3.6
SecondaryBiologic Testing of Synovial Fluid Via ELISA Assays

ELISA analysis will be performed for the following biological markers: IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα

Time frame:
Primary outcome will be change from pre-treatment to 6-month post treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Biologic Testing of Synovial Fluid Via ELISA Assays
units on a scaleHyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)
Biologic Testing of Synovial Fluid Via ELISA Assays0.14 ± 0.0050.34 ± 0.16

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Hyaluronic Acid (HA)—0/59 (0%)0/59 (0%)
Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)—0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Hyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)Total
Mean56.8 ± 10.555.9 ± 10.456.3 ± 10.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Hyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)Total
Female302151
Male202848
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)Hyaluronic Acid (HA)Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP)Total
Mean29 ± 6.427.4 ± 3.928.2 ± 5.1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cole BJ, Karas V, Hussey K, Pilz K, Fortier LA. Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):339-346. doi: 10.1177/0363546516665809. Epub 2016 Oct 21. Erratum In: Am J Sports Med. 2017 Apr;45(5):NP10. doi: 10.1177/0363546517700110. PubMed 28146403 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02588872
Lead sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Collaborators
Cornell University
Responsible party
Carla Edwards (Clinical Trials Investigator, Rush University Medical Center, Rush University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2015
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Results posted
May 18, 2017
Last update
Mar 14, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion