A Phase 2 interventional study of CERC-301 and Placebo in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Avalo Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 13 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-28.
Sponsored by Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
There is a significant unmet medical need for rapidly acting treatment of subjects with severe major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not adequately responded to antidepressant therapy. Alternative therapies require weeks to achieve full efficacy, may have significant side effects, and still fail in a high percentage of subjects. Rapid reduction of severe depression by pharmacological therapy is important to reduce the need for hospitalization and risk of self-harm and mortality. CERC-301, a highly selective, orally bioavailable, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit 2B (NR2B), also referred to as Glutamate NMDA receptor subunit epsilon-2 (GluN2B) antagonist, would be a therapeutic breakthrough if it provides rapid onset of antidepressant effects and an effect size similar to that seen with experimental intravenous NMDA modulators.
The study will evaluate the antidepressant effect of one or two administrations of two doses of CERC-301 (12 mg and 20 mg) in subjects with MDD who are currently experiencing a severe depressive episode despite stable ongoing treatment with a selective serotonin- or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI or SNRI).
3,041 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 588 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 115 is above the median of 79 across 2,530 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.
Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The study includes two dose administrations 7 days apart (Day 0 and Day 7) followed by 14 days of observation for a total of 21 days.
Drug: CERC-301
The study includes two dose administrations 7 days apart (Day 0 and Day 7) followed by 14 days of observation for a total of 21 days.
Drug: CERC-301
The study includes two dose administrations 7 days apart (Day 0 and Day 7) followed by 14 days of observation for a total of 21 days.
Drug: Placebo
CERC-301, a highly selective, orally bioavailable, NMDA receptor subunit 2B (NR2B), also referred to as Glutamate NMDA receptor subunit epsilon-2 (GluN2B) antagonist
Change in Bech-6 from baseline
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 (12 or 20 mg) compared to placebo averaged between 2 and 4 days post-treatment with study drug assessed by the 6-item unidimensional subset (Bech-6) of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17)
Time frame: average of 2 and 4 days post-treatment
Change from baseline in Santen-7
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of a single dose of CERC-301 (12 or 20 mg) compared to placebo averaged between 2 and 4 days post-treatment with study drug assessed by the 7-item unidimensional subset of the HDRS-17, the Santen-7
Time frame: averaged between 2 and 4 days post treatment
Change from baseline in HDRS-17
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of a single dose of CERC-301 (12 or 20 mg) compared to placebo averaged between 2 and 4 days post-treatment with study drug assessed by the HDRS-17
Time frame: averaged between 2 and 4 days post treatment
Change from baseline in Bech-6
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Bech-6.
Time frame: 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in Santen-7
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Santen-7.
Time frame: 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in HDRS-17
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the HDRS-17.
Time frame: 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in CUDOS-A
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale-Anxiety (CUDOS-A).
Time frame: 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in SHAPS-SR
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale Self Report (SHAPS-SR)
Time frame: 2, 4, 7 days after each dose, and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in QIDS-SR
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 7 days after each dose and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QIDS-SR)
Time frame: 7 days after each dose and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in CGI-I
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 7 days after each dose and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)
Time frame: 7 days after each dose and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
Change from baseline in CGI-S
To evaluate the antidepressant effect of CERC-301 at 7 days after each dose and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Severity (CGI-S)
Time frame: 7 days after each dose and 14 days after last dose of study drug treatment
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Rislenemdaz
Avalo Therapeutics, Inc.