ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02384122OCEANUpdated May 24, 2023

Efficacy of Octreotide on Blood and Iron Requirements in Patients With Anemia Due to Angiodysplasias

A Phase 3 interventional study of Octreotide in Angiodysplasia, Vascular Malformations and Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 12 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-24.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether 40 mg octreotide long-acting release intramuscular every 28 days is effective in the treatment of patients with refractory anemia due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias. We hypothesize that octreotide is effective in reducing the transfusion requirements (consisting of red blood cell transfusions and intravenous iron infusions) of patients with angiodysplasia-related anemia.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias are a common source of intractable small bowel bleeding, especially in older patients. Endoscopic ablation of angiodysplasias has limited efficacy and rebleeding rates are substantial. Recurrent bleeding results in refractory anemia which is managed with blood transfusions and/or iron infusions. Transfusion dependency reduces quality of life and is associated with substantial cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Small cohort studies suggest a beneficial effect of octreotide in bleeding angiodysplasias, but evidence from rigorous, well-controlled studies are lacking.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of octreotide in reducing the transfusion requirements (consisting of blood transfusions and iron infusions) of patients with refractory anemia due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias despite endoscopic intervention.

Study design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label intervention study.

Study population: Patients aged 18 years or older with transfusion-dependent anemia due to endoscopically confirmed angiodysplasias. Transfusion units consist of iron infusions (of 500 milligrams [mg]) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. At least one endoscopic attempt to treat the angiodysplasias needs to be recorded unless contra-indications are present. Patients with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh C or liver failure, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (defined by a glycated hemoglobin >64 mmol/mL), symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, and pregnant or nursing women, are regarded as ineligible because of the pharmacological profile of octreotide. Patients with hereditary hemorrhagic diseases or hematological disorders on active treatment, other alternative causes of gastrointestinal bleeding, presence of left ventricular assist devices, as well as patients with cancer under active treatment, and those with a life expectancy \<1 year are excluded from enrolment

Intervention: Patients will be randomized (1:1) into two groups. The intervention group receives 40 mg octreotide long-acting release (Sandostatin LAR) every 28 days for a total period of 52 weeks as an adjunct to standard of care. The control group receives standard of care along. The last follow-up visit is in week 60.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is defined as the mean difference in blood (RBC transfusions per 500 ml or packed cells) and parenteral iron (IV iron infusions per 500 mg) requirements between the intervention and control group, corrected for baseline transfusion requirements and follow-up time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Angiodysplasia
  • Vascular Malformations
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • Anemia

Keywords

  • Angiodysplasias
  • Sandostatin LAR
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Somatostatin analogs
  • Octreotide
03

In context

Vascular Malformations

79 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Malformations; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 55 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Vascular Malformations.

Browse Vascular Malformations studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Endoscopically diagnosed angiodysplasias
  • Transfusion dependency: at least 4 red blood cell transfusions (per 500 ml or packed cells) and/or parental iron infusions (per 500 mg) in the year before inclusion
  • Failure of endoscopic therapy: at least one endoscopic attempt to coagulate the angiodysplasias or unsuitable for endoscopic procedures
  • Providing
  • Older than 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Liver cirrhosis C, liver failure or diagnosed portal hypertension
  • Previous treatment with octreotide for the same indication ( anemia due to angiodysplasias)
  • Current thalidomide treatment which is effective (no transfusion dependency)
  • \< 1 year
  • Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD's)
  • Hereditary hemorrhagic diseases or hematological disorders with active treatment
  • Pregnancy or nursing women
  • Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by >64 mmol/ml, despite adequate therapy
  • Known to somatostatin analogs
  • Symptomatic cholecystolithiasis
  • Systemic cancer under active treatment (chemotherapy or radiation therapy)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Octreotide

    Drug: Sandostatin LAR Sandostatin LAR 40 mg will be administered once every 4 weeks as a intramuscular injection

    Drug: Octreotide

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Patients receive standard of care without a placebo.

Interventions

  • Two injections of 20 mg will be given monthly.

    Also known as: Sandostatin LAR, RVG 18236, ATC H01CB02

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in blood and parenteral iron requirements (transfusion units)

    The mean difference in blood (RBC transfusions per 500 ml or packed cells) and parenteral iron (IV iron infusions per 500 mg) requirements between the intervention and standard of care arm, corrected for baseline transfusion requirements and follow-up time.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion with a good treatment response

    The proportion of patients in both groups that experienced a ≥50% (defined as a good response) and 100% (defined as a full response) reduction in the number of transfusion units received during the study year compared to baseline

    Time frame: During the study year (52 weeks) compared to the year (52 weeks) before randomization

  2. Use of concomitant care

    The proportion of patients in both groups that required concomitant care. Concomitant care consists of application of APC, discontinuation of antithrombotics, use of tranexamic acid, and starting octreotide in the control group.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  3. Difference in endoscopic procedures

    The mean difference in endoscopic procedures between both groups.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  4. Difference in bleeding episodes

    The mean difference in bleeding episodes between both groups. A bleeding episode is defined as each non-contiguous episode in which hospital care is sought for anemia.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  5. Difference in healthcare utilization

    The mean difference in healthcare utilization between both groups. Healthcare utilization consists of hospital admissions, ambulatory care, and emergency care.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  6. Difference in hemoglobin levels

    The mean difference in serum hemoglobin levels (mmol/L) between both groups.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  7. Difference in ferritin levels

    The mean difference in serum ferritin levels (ug/L) between both groups.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  8. Difference in fatigue levels

    The mean difference in fatigue levels between both groups. Fatigue is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), measured by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), which covers five dimensions of fatigue affect and -tolerability. MFI-20 scores range from 20 (best) to 100 (worst).

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  9. Difference in quality of life

    The mean difference in quality of life between both groups. Quality of life is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which uses eight subdomains to evaluate physical- and mental health. SF-36 scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  10. Difference in adverse events

    The proportion of patients in both groups that experienced at least one adverse event (AE).

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  11. Difference in serious adverse events

    The proportion of patients in both groups that experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE).

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  12. Difference in mortality

    The proportion of patients in both groups that died during the study.

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. Subgroup analyses on blood transfusion dependency

    Analyses include all patients that required at least one red blood cell transfusion (per 500 ml or packed cells) in the year before randomization (52 weeks).

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

  2. Subgroup analyses on use of antithrombotics

    Analyses include all patients that required at least one form of antithrombotics in the year before randomization (52 weeks).

    Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Gelre Hospital
    Apeldoorn, Gelderland 7334 DZ, Netherlands
  • Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc)
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525GA, Netherlands
  • Jeroen Bosch Hospital
    's-Hertogenbosch, Noord-Brabant 5200 ME, Netherlands
  • Catharina Hospital
    Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant 5623 EJ, Netherlands
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
    Tilburg, Noord-Brabant 5022 GC, Netherlands
  • St. Antonius Hospital
    Nieuwegein, Utrecht 3430 EM, Netherlands
  • Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
    Delft, Zuid-Holland 2625 AD, Netherlands
  • Rijnstate Hospital
    Arnhem, 6815AD, Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)
    Groningen, 9713GZ, Netherlands
  • Tjongerschans Hospital
    Heerenveen, 8441 PW, Netherlands
  • Maasstad Hospital
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Bernhoven Hospital
    Uden, 5406 PT, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grooteman KV, van Geenen EJ, Drenth JP. Multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the efficacy of octreotide therapy 40 mg monthly versus standard of care in patients with refractory anaemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding from small bowel angiodysplasias: a protocol of the OCEAN trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 12;6(9):e011442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011442. PubMed 27619827 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data and a data dictionary defining each field in the set will be available, upon reasonable request to Lia Goltstein and subjected to an appropriate data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Access criteria: Data sharing agreement

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2015 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 82 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2015
First posted
Mar 10, 2015
StartActual
Sep 2015
Primary completionActual
Jul 2022
CompletionActual
May 2023
Last update
May 24, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02384122
Collaborators
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Bernhoven Hospital, Tjongerschans hospital, Gelre Hospitals, Maasstad Hospital, Reinier de Graaf Groep, University Medical Center Groningen, Rijnstate Hospital, St. Antonius Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2022
Completion
May 2023
Last update
May 24, 2023

Study contacts

Joost Drenth, MD. PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Octreotide

Start the discussion