A Phase 2 interventional study of Trametinib in Ras/MAPK Pathway Vascular Anomalies, Vascular Anomalies and Vascular Anomaly, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Months to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.
Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of Trametinib (the "Study Drug") in patients with Ras/MAPK pathway driven vascular anomalies (VA). Trametinib has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Its use in this study is considered experimental because the FDA has not approved the study drug for treating people with VAs.
The study will enroll participants 2 months of age up to 30 years of age that have been diagnosed with Ras/MAPK pathway driven vascular anomalies.
Study participation will last up to 3 years and will involve regular study visits to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Philadelphia Campus. Participants will need to take the study drug Trametinib for at least 2 years, or up to 3 years in total, if there is a positive response. Participating in this research means you will attend up to 16 clinic visits. Most visits will take approximately 30 minutes, but some visits will take approximately 2 hours, because you will be asked to complete questionnaires about your experience. Participating in this research also means taking the study drug, having pictures taken, and completing study drug diaries. There is also an optional portion to this study that involves collecting blood for biomarker testing.
79 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Malformations; 33 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 55 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Vascular Malformations.
Browse Vascular Malformations studies →Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is the lead sponsor of 489 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.
Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
bleeding related to VA: Grade 2 within 14 days or Grade 3 and more within 28 days before study treatment start as per v. 5.0.
Sclerotherapy/embolization for vascular complications performed within 14 days before informed consent.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.
Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.
“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Karnofsky performance status (KPS)
A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.
Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
CTCAE grade
The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.
“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
This arm will determine the proportion of subjects with an objective beneficial response to trametinib at the end of cycle 6 using an individualized response criterion based on radiologic assessment, Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Clinical Benefit Assessment (CBA). It will also determine the safety of oral trametinib in children and young adults with Ras/MAPK pathway driven vascular anomalies through various laboratory testing and clinical observations.
Drug: Trametinib
Subjects will receive oral trametinib daily in continuous 28-day cycles at 0.025 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 2 mg. A single dose reduction will be permitted in individual subjects who experience toxicity while still having evidence of clinical benefit and is assessed per the investigator.
Also known as: TMT212, GSK1120212
Percentage of subjects with a Substantial Response or Intermediate Response to Trametinib using an Individualized Response Criteria
Individualized Response is a composite outcome determined by the combined results of the following 3 distinct study assessments after cycle 6: Radiologic evaluation, PROMIS Patient reported outcome (PRO) measurements, and Clinical Benefit Assessments (CBA). The results of these 3 distinct assessments will be evaluated using a set of specific criteria to determine the Individualized Response to treatment (i.e. "Substantial Response" = Improvement in Radiologic assessment by 20%, AND improvement in Global Health PROs by 3T-score points, AND improvement in at least 1 CBA, AND no clinically meaningful worsening of disease). Each subject will be determined to have: 1) Substantial Response, or 2) Intermediate Response, or 3) Stable disease, or 4) Worsening disease. A subject that is found to have a Substantial Response or Intermediate Response is considered to have a "beneficial response." Statistical analyses will be run to determine the percentage of subjects with a beneficial response.
Time frame: Individualized Response Criteria will be evaluated after 6 cycles (each cycle is 28 days) and then every 6 months until the end of the study (approximately 1.5 years)
Relative size of target lesion(s) as determined by radiologic assessment
\*\*For subjects with radiologically evaluable disease only\*\* The target lesion(s) will be measured at screening using imaging modality of choice based on underlying vascular anomaly (e.g. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography (MRL), US, X-rays, CT scan). MRI or MRL imaging will be recommended as primary imaging modality. For subjects with disease manifestation better characterized by alternative quantitative imaging modality (e.g. X-ray or ultrasound) this may be substituted and used as alternative imaging. Up to 3 lesions will be identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at screening. The same method of assessment and the same technique will be used to characterize each target lesion at the specified follow-up timepoints. CBA can be substituted for radiologic evaluation in subjects without radiologically evaluable disease.
Time frame: Measured at screening and after cycles 6, 12, and 24. Each cycle is 28 days.
Quality of life as evaluated by PROMIS Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire T-scores
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires will be distributed to subjects and caregivers (if applicable.) A raw score will be calculated for each PROMIS subscale. Raw scores will then be translated into a T-score metric with mean of 50 (standard deviation of 10). A higher T-score means more of the outcome being measured. Global health measures will be used as the primary outcome. Change in quality of life will be evaluated \& applied to the Individualized Response Criteria using the PROMIS global health T-scores.
Time frame: Begin at screening and after cycles 6, 12, and 24. If subject enters extension phase, will continue to measure every 6 cycles until end of therapy (approximately 1 year). Each cycle is 28 days.
Plan to share: No
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Trametinib
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia →