CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02373501EKAMUpdated Dec 4, 2018

Extra - Abdominal Versus Intra - Abdominal Repair of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section

An interventional study of Intra-abdominal repair and Extra-abdominal repair in Cesarean Wound Repair, sponsored by Sheba Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 42 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-04.

Sponsored by Sheba Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 42 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To evaluate the effects of extra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision compared to intra-abdominal repair, and to study is there superiority of one technique over the other in terms of primary outcomes - operative( up to 4 hours after beginning of anesthesia) and post operative ( until day 4 after operation ) measurements , secondary outcomes, long-term outcomes and subjective outcomes.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES:

Intra - operative ( during the operation up to 4 hours from anesthesia )

  • nausea and vomiting
  • intraoperative hypotension
  • intraoperative pain

Post operative ( 4 hours from anesthesia and until release from hospital )

  • Blood transfusion
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Febrile Morbidity
  • Endometritis
  • Wound Infection
  • Death

Subjective measures:

  • complain of pain 1-10 on day 1 post operative
  • time until walking
  • number of Days until having bowel movement
  • overall satisfactory

SECONDARY OUTCOMES:

  • Operative time
  • Estimated blood loss ( ebl ) - hemoglobin levels
  • Hospital stay
Read the detailed description

Cesarean section (CS) delivery is one of the most frequent surgical procedures to be performed worldwide and rates of CS delivery are increasing. In the late 80's, the rate of caesarean deliveries was 10-13 % in most of the big hospitals in Israel, and today it reaches up to 20-25% of all deliveries.

Numerous different surgical techniques for caesarean section delivery have been described, and the debate about the optimal caesarean technique to minimize surgical morbidity is ongoing.

One of the more controversial issues regarding caesarean technique is the manner by which uterine repair is conducted after delivery of the infant(s) and placenta.

Two techniques are being used depending on the uterus position during repairmen : In situ within the peritoneal cavity (intra- abdominal repair) or temporarily exteriorized onto the mother's abdomen (extra- abdominal repair).

Arguments in favor of temporary exteriorization include better visualization of any uterine extensions and more rapid uterine repair with consequent reductions in both operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Opponents of extraabdominal repair argue that this technique increases rates of intraoperative nausea and vomiting, adnexal trauma on replacement, possible infection, and venous air embolism (VAE) .

On this study the investigators prospectively recruit women who are about to be electively operated. The patients will be randomized into two groups - extra- abdominal versus intra-abdominal uterine repair using computer randomization. Different charts will be for first CS delivery versus recurrent CS delivery. The patient won't know to which group she was designated . On day three after operation - she will be asked to fill out questionnaire with one of the investigators for subjective measurements

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Wound Repair

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • caesarean delivery
  • uterine incision repair
03

In context

Surgical Wound

519 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 95 is above the median of 80 across 412 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Sheba Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 660 studies on the registry; 63 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 42 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • singleton pregnancy
  • term pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chorioamnionitis
  • uterine rupture
  • hysterotomy - adhesiolysis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    intra-abdominal repair

    intra-abdominal repair of uterine incision, after delivery of the fetus and the placenta.

    Procedure: Intra-abdominal repair

  • Experimental
    extra-abdominal repair

    extra-abdominal repair of uterine incision, after delivery of the fetus and the placenta.

    Procedure: Extra-abdominal repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntra-abdominal repair

    Intra abdominal repair of uterine incision

  • ProcedureExtra-abdominal repair

    Extra abdominal repair of uterine incision

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. nausea and vomiting

    Time frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia

  2. intraoperative hypotension

    Time frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia

  3. intraoperative pain

    Time frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia

  4. Blood transfusion

    Time frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia

  5. Venous thromboembolism

    Time frame: durind operation - 4 hours from anasthesia

  6. Febrile Morbidity

    Time frame: post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4

  7. Endometritis

    Time frame: post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4

  8. Wound Infection

    Time frame: post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4

  9. Death

    Time frame: post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    Time frame: operative time - since anasthesia untill closure of skin

  2. Estimated blood loss ( ebl ) - HGB levels

    Time frame: operative- 4 hours from anasthesia

  3. Hospital stay

    Time frame: post operative

Other outcomes

  1. complain of pain 1-10 on day 1 post operative

    Time frame: post operative - on day 3 post operative

  2. time from surgery until first walking

    Time frame: post operative - during hospitalization

  3. number of Days until having bowel movement,

    Time frame: post operative - during hospitalization

  4. overall satisfactory

    Time frame: post operative - during hospitalization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sheba Medical Center
    Ramat - Gan, Israel
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jacob CE, Pasquier JC. Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):e10-1; author reply e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.879. Epub 2009 Dec 22. No abstract available. PubMed 20022585 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02373501
Lead sponsor
Sheba Medical Center
Responsible party
Dr. Elias Castel, Senior Resident Obstetrics and Gynocology (Dr. Elias Castel, Sheba Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2015
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2018
Completion
Dec 1, 2018
Last update
Dec 4, 2018

Study contacts

Elias Castel, MD
principal investigator · Sheba Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion