CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07636252Updated Jun 23, 2026

Ex Vivo Drug Response Profiling and Outcome Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma

An observational study in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Malignant Pleural Effusions (Mpe), sponsored by Sheba Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by Sheba Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study evaluates if ex-vivo lung cancer drug sensitivity testing results correlate with the driver mutations found by genetic sequencing and if it can predict treatment response.

Read the detailed description

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment decisions often rely on DNA sequencing, which only partially captures the tumor's mutational landscape and may miss other complex resistance mechanisms. Consequently, an unbiased functional drug screen is essential to rapidly identify optimal next-line therapies. Current drug sensitivity testing (DST) is limited by inefficient live tumor cells isolation. To address this, a rapid, unbiased DST platform utilizing FDA-approved targeted therapies was developed. Our approach uses malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) as a rich source of viable tumor cells. Because MPEs are highly heterogeneous, tumor cells are first identified via EpCAM flow cytometry, and the sample is enriched for tumor cells by depleting CD45+ immune cells using antibody-coated magnetic beads. These enriched tumor cells are then seeded into drug-containing plates. Following 72-hour incubation, cell viability is assessed using the CellTiter-Glo assay. Treatment efficacy is determined by the degree of reduction in cell viability at a range of drug concentrations, where the most effective treatment is the drug that reduces cell viability at the lowest concentration range.

To link clinical outcome and ex-vivo drug response assays, the investigators systematically measure drug sensitivity and resistance of primary tumor cells ex-vivo using a diverse compound library for individual patients in need of treatment. By systematically analyzing ex-vivo drug response patterns, tumors should be functionally grouped, by response phenotype. While for the purpose of this study selection of a specific treatment will not be based on ex-vivo drug response assays, clinical response- and follow-up data of patients will be prospectively collected in parallel.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Adenocarcinoma
  • Malignant Pleural Effusions (Mpe)

Keywords

  • Drug sensitivity testing, malignant pleural effusion, lung cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with pleural effusion with a diagnosis of a lung cancer or suspected to be diagnosed with lung cancer according to their CT imaging, who are in need for pleural effusion drainage due to shortness of breath, and are willing to donate effusion for ex-vivo drug sensitivity testing.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of pleural effusion in patient with a diagnosis of a lung cancer or suspected to be diagnosed with lung cancer according to their CT imaging, who are in need for pleural effusion drainage due to shortness of breath, and are willing to donate effusion for ex-vivo drug sensitivity testing.
  • Patient's written informed consent present.
  • Ability to understand the nature of the trial and the trial related procedures and to comply with them.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • negative cytology for malignancy in the last 6 months
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with diagnosis of a Lung adenocarcinoma with the need of pleural drainage due to MPE

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

Interventions

  • OtherNon-Interventional Study

    Non-Interventional Study, patients go through pleural drainage due to shortness of breath

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Statistically significant correlation between patients' drug response by ex-vivo drug profiling and expected drug sensitivity according to genetic sequencing

    Ex-vivo drug sensitivity categorizes drugs as sensitive/not sensitive. Results will be compared with the expected sensitivity of drugs according to the driver mutation found be genetic sequencing. For example, in EGFR-driven lung cancer, the tumor cells are expected to be more sensitive to EGFR-targeting drugs than to ALK-targeting drugs.

    Time frame: From enrollment until results of clinical genetic sequencing and drug sensitivity testing are obtained (within 3 weeks).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of patients' drug response prediction by ex-vivo drug profiling

    Ex-vivo drug sensitivity categorizes drugs as sensitive/not sensitive. Results will be compared with clinical outcome of patient (response vs. progressive disease as defined by RECISET score)

    Time frame: from date of enrollment until progression (latest 24 months)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07636252
Lead sponsor
Sheba Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
Jun 14, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion