CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02297581Updated Jun 4, 2020

Geriatric Fracture Centers - Evaluation of a Geriatric Co-management Program

An observational study in Hip Fractures, sponsored by AO Innovation Translation Center. Completed at 12 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-04.

Sponsored by AO Innovation Translation Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
282
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will assess patients with at least one major AE related to treatment / hospitalization / immobilization in the Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) group compared to the usual care group.

Read the detailed description

Patients aged ≥ 70 years or older with an osteoporotic hip fracture treated with an osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis will be included in this study.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the difference in the numbers of pre-defined major adverse events (AE) which are related to the treatment, hospitalization and/or immobilization between patients who were treated in a geriatric fracture center or in a usual care center.

As a secondary objective, health economic implications and cost-effectiveness comparison analyses will be performed.

In order to be able to analyze data based on the geographic regions as well as globally, in each participating country, both a Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) and a Usual Care Center (UCC) will be included.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Fractures

Keywords

  • Geriatrics [MeSH]
  • Osteoporotic fractures [MeSH]
  • Hip fractures [MeSH]
  • Cost benefit analysis [MeSH]
  • Quality of life [MeSH]
  • Mortality [MeSH]
  • Complications
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 282 is above the median of 100 across 675 observational studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

AO Innovation Translation Center is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Primary care clinic (Usual Care clinic) Geriatric center

Eligibility criteria

Preoperative Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 70 years
  • Geriatric patients with hip fractures Treated either with oOsteosynthesis or oEndoprosthesis
  • Ability of the patient or assigned representative to understand the content of the patient information / Informed Consent Form
  • Signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB) / Ethics Committee (EC)-approved written informed consent

Preoperative Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment
  • Prisoner
  • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
282 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • GFC: Geriatric Fracture Center

    Patient treatment in a geriatric fracture center A GFC is defined as follows: * General geriatrician or ortho-geriatrician available in trauma/orthopaedic department * Geriatrician sees the patient prior to surgery (except if the patient is admitted over night or during weekends) * Local medical guidelines, consented by orthopedic surgeons and geriatrician * Pre-defined order set for assessing laboratory values * Pre-defined patient pathway to guarantee a fast track in the emergency room * Daily communication among involved specialists * Postoperative phase up to discharge from orthopaedic / trauma department (i.e. Discharge 1): * Daily patient visit by geriatrician * Daily patient visit by orthopedic surgeon in combination with nurse * Daily therapy by physiotherapists, except for weekends * Access to social workers, if required

  • UCC: Usual Care Center

    Patient treatment in an usual care center A UCC is defined as follows: * No geriatrician available in trauma/orthopaedic department * No pre-operative visit by a geriatrician as a standard * No pre-defined medical guidelines for geriatric fracture patients * Postoperative phase up to discharge from orthopaedic / trauma department (i.e. Discharge 1): * No daily patient visits by a geriatrician as a standard

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major Adverse Events related to treatment / residential status / immobilization

    Major AEs related to treatment / residential status / immobilization: * Delirium * Congestive heart failure * Pneumonia * Deep venous thrombosis * Pulmonary embolism * Pressure ulcers * Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: From surgery up to 1 year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Any other AEs not mentioned under primary outcome measure(s) as well as its relationship to the treatment / residential status / immobilization

    Time frame: From surgery up to 1 year follow-up

  2. Activities of daily living

    Modified Barthel index pre-injury, at 12 weeks and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 1 year postoperative

  3. Number of re-admissions to an acute hospital

    Time frame: From surgery up to 1 year follow-up

  4. Timed up and go test (TUG)

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up

  5. Parker Mobility Score

    Parker Mobility Score pre-injury, at 12 weeks and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up

  6. Mortality

    Time frame: From surgery up to 1 year follow-up

  7. Quality of Life

    Quality of life using the EuroQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 1 year postoperative

  8. Pain

    Pain using the numeric rating scale

    Time frame: From surgery up to1 year follow-up

  9. Direct and indirect costs

    All direct and indirect costs will be documented for a cost-effectiveness analysis (medication, treatment, physiotherapy, postoperative care etc)

    Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year follow-up

  10. Time from admission to start of pain medication

    Time frame: Baseline (admission to surgery), about 1-2 days

  11. Time from admission to start of fluid management

    Time frame: Baseline (admission to surgery), about 1-2 days

  12. Time from admission to surgery

    Time frame: Baseline (admission to surgery), about 1-2 days

  13. Time from surgery to discharge 1 and 2

    Discharge 1 is defined as discharge from orthopaedic / trauma department Discharge 2 is defined as the timepoint when the patient is discharged to their definite residential status, i.e. residential status where no further change in residential status is planned . Discharge 1 and 2 may occur on the same date.

    Time frame: Baseline (admission to discharge), about 1-2 weeks

  14. Residential status

    Pre-injury, at discharge 1 and 2, at 12 weeks and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year follow-up

  15. Falls

    Numbers of falls

    Time frame: From surgery up to 1 year follow-up

  16. Medication

    Number of different types of medication at admission, discharge 1, 12 weeks, 12 months and information whether analgesics, osteoporosis and other medications are administered at all study visit time points

    Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year follow-up

  17. Number of patients receiving adequate secondary fracture prevention

    Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year follow-up

  18. Number of patients for which the nutrition status was evaluated / adapted

    Time frame: Baseline (admission to discharge), about 1-2 days

  19. Occurrence of a contralateral hip fracture

    Time frame: Retrospective assessment of pre-injury status up to 1 year follow-up

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Saint Louis University
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63104, United States
  • Elmhurst Medical Center
    New York, New York 11373, United States
  • Medical University of Innsbruck
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • AKH Linz
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Ziekenhuisgroep Twente
    Almelo, 7609 SZ, Netherlands
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
    Maastricht, 6202 AZ, Netherlands
  • General Hospital Singapore
    Singapore, 169608, Singapore
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
    Singapore, 308433, Singapore
  • Hospital Son LLatzer
    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Island 07198, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Costa del Sol
    Marbella, 29603, Spain
  • Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital
    Bangkok, 10220, Thailand
  • Hospital Medical Center Bangkok
    Bangkok, 10310, Thailand
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blauth M, Joeris A, Rometsch E, Espinoza-Rebmann K, Wattanapanom P, Jarayabhand R, Poeze M, Wong MK, Kwek EBK, Hegeman JH, Perez-Uribarri C, Guerado E, Revak TJ, Zohner S, Joseph D, Gosch M. Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e039960. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960. PubMed 33972329 ↗
  • Hurtado-Chong A, Joeris A, Hess D, Blauth M. Improving site selection in clinical studies: a standardised, objective, multistep method and first experience results. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e014796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014796. PubMed 28706090 ↗
  • Joeris A, Hurtado-Chong A, Hess D, Kalampoki V, Blauth M. Evaluation of the geriatric co-management for patients with fragility fractures of the proximal femur (Geriatric Fracture Centre (GFC) concept): protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e014795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014795. PubMed 28706089 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02297581
Lead sponsor
AO Innovation Translation Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2014
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2019
Completion
May 2020
Last update
Jun 4, 2020

Study contacts

Michael Blauth, Professor
principal investigator · Medical University of Innsbruck

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion