CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02297334Updated Aug 29, 2017

Removal of Cytokines During Extracorporeal Circulation in Cardiac Surgery

An interventional study of CytoSorb device in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Valve Diseases, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-29.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to prove that using a CytoSorb(TM) filter in the cardiopulmonary circuit attenuates the inflammatory response to extracorporeal circulation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The hypothesis is that removing cytokines from patients' blood by the CytoSorb device significantly improves circulation and outcome in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.

Read the detailed description

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces an inflammatory response due to contact of patients' blood with foreign surfaces like tubes or the oxygenator, ischemic-reperfusion injury and surgical trauma. Inflammation is modulated by cytokines, especially, interleukins. The extent of cytokine release is further related to the duration of bypass and the amount of operating field suction. This results in a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with the risk of multiple organ dysfunction (MOD). Also in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) an activation of the inflammation system is seen and accompanied with an increase of cytokine levels. The cytokine concentration correlates with the severity of the immune reaction and can be a predictor of the outcome of the patient. As severe SIRS and MOD significantly increase mortality, the attenuation of the inflammatory response is supposed to reduce morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery.

For adult cardiac surgery and patients who are treated with an extracorporal assist device, a tool for cytokine elimination and attenuation of the inflammatory response seems to be beneficial.

In our study we are going to investigate if the use of the CytoSorb device can improve the outcome of patients undergoing elective coronar artery bypass and heart valve surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Heart Valve Diseases

Keywords

  • CytoSorb(TM)
  • cytokines
  • inflammation
  • cardiac surgery
  • extracorporeal bypass
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 83 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing elective coronar bypass AND heart valve surgery
  • expected duration of bypass more than 120 min

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 18 years of age
  • pregnancy
  • medication that interacts with the immune system (e.g. steroids, immune suppressors)
  • patients with diagnosed immunodeficiency (e.g. HIV/AIDS)
  • heparin induced thrombocytopenia type II
  • patients that decline participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    With CytoSorb device

    Patients randomised to this arm are treated with the CytoSorb device during bypass.

    Device: CytoSorb device

  • No intervention
    Withouot device

    Patients randomised to this arm are treated without the CytoSorb device during bypass.

Interventions

  • DeviceCytoSorb device

    In 20 patients the CytoSorb device will be installed into the extra corporeal circuit. A blood flow of 400ml/min is provided by an roller pump of the heart lung machine in a parallel stream to the main circulation.

    Also known as: polymer beads adsorbent

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of levels of cytokines during procedure compared to baseline

    parameters to be measured are: interleukin (IL) 1, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, interleukin 10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha

    Time frame: 1) 5 minutes before bypass 2) 2 hours after begin of bypass, 3) at the end of bypass, approximately 3 hours after begin of bypass, 4) 6 hours after bypass 5) 24 hours after bypass

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of hemodynamic parameters during procedure compared to baseline

    Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters such as mean arterial pressure, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation are recorded. In addition thermodilution parameters (stroke volume variability, global end diastole volume, extravascular lung water index, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance) are measured. Volume and catecholamine therapies are managed by an algorithm based on thermodilution parameters.

    Time frame: 1) 5 kinutes before bypass 2) 2 hours after begin of bypass, 3) at the end of bypass, approximately 3 hours after begin of bypass, 4) 6 hours after bypass 5) 24 hours after bypass

  2. Thromboelastometry

    At the end of extracorporeal circulation a rotation thromboelastometry analysis is performed and the clotting time (CT), the clot formation time (CFT), the maximum clot firmness (MCF) in In- and Ex-Tem and the MCF in Fib-Tem are measured. Based on an institutional algorithm the coagulation therapy is performed according to the results of the thromboelastometry.

    Time frame: at the end of bypass, approximately 3 hours after begin of surgery

  3. Change of cognitive and emotional state in comparison to condition before surgery

    To evaluate, if the use of the cytokine-filter has any influence on cognitive function or the emotional state, the patients perform the mini-mental state examination and answer questions of the Geriatric Depression Scale questionaire. Results before and 24 hours after end of bypass are recorded.

    Time frame: 1)one day before surgery 2) 24 hours after bypass

Other outcomes

  1. Amount of administered fluids

    The amount of fluids administered during operation is recorded.

    Time frame: at the end of surgery, approximately 3 hours after begin of surgery

  2. Amount of administered catecholamines.

    The amount of catecholamines administered during operation is recorded.

    Time frame: at the end of surgery, approximately 3 hours after begin of surgery

  3. Amount of administered catecholamines

    The amount of catecholamines administered during operation is recorded.

    Time frame: after discharge from ICU, approximately 24 hours after surgery

  4. Change of a set of general laboratory parameters during procedure

    In laboratory tests we measure the whole blood count (red blood cells, white blood cells, thrombocytes), C-reactive protein, liver enzymes (GOT, GPT), kidney parameters (creatinine, glomerular filtration rate) and electrolytes (sodium, potassium, calcium) are measured.

    Time frame: 1) 5 minutes before bypass 2) 2 hours after begin of bypass, 3) at the end of bypass, approximately 3 hours after begin of surgery 4) 6 hours after bypass 5) 24 hours after bypass

  5. Intensive care durations

    After discharge from ICU the duration of stay and postoperative ventilation is recorded.

    Time frame: after discharge from ICU, approximately 24 hours after admission

  6. complication and adverse events

    Any complications or adverse events, like death, bleeding, rethoracotomy or malignant arrhythmias are recorded.

    Time frame: 24 hours after admission to ICU

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anaesthesiology Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University of Hamburg
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02297334
Lead sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2014
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Completion
Aug 2017
Last update
Aug 29, 2017

Study contacts

Jens C. Kubitz, MD PhD
study director · Department of Anaesthesiology Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University of Hamburg
Daniel A. Reuter, MD PhD
study chair · Department of Anaesthesiology Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University of Hamburg
Alexander März, MD
principal investigator · Department of Anaesthesiology Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University of Hamburg
Ingo Garau, MD
principal investigator · Department of Anaesthesiology Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf University of Hamburg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion