ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07794306BALANCEUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Intraannular TAVI in Small Aortic Annuli

An interventional study of Meril Octapro+ THV System and Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system in Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-31.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
510
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 190 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in Germany — 38 open to participants now, 57 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Aortic Valve Stenosis · Germany.

Planned enrollment
25th of 92
510 · median 217
Started
2026
with 4 others
No phase
81 of 190
12 open now
Primary completion
2028-07
later than 44 of 56 live
Registered
188th of 190
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 190
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Among the 190 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in Germany, this one is the 25th largest by planned enrollment of the 92 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 81 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 44 of the 56 other live ones, and was the 188th registered.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 510 is above the median of 126 across 554 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Open to participants now

38 of the 190 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in Germany are open now.

All 38 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Germany have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Germany →

Who these studies take

Of the 209 Aortic Valve Stenosis studies recruiting now, 163 (78%) set no upper age limit and 9 (4%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 190 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In Europe TAVI is now recommended for treatment of aortic valve stenosis from the age of 70 years. When performing TAVI in young patients, lifetime management becomes important in terms of anticipated TAVI-in-TAVI procedures when valve deterioration occures. Especially small aortic annuli represent a special challenge in terms of postprocedural hemodynamics, however intra-annular transcatheter heart valve designs should be the devices of choice to facilitate future TAVI-in-TAVI procedures. Which intra-annular valve design offers ideal clinical and hemodynamic efficacy is unclear. Therefore, an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial (BALANCE trial: Balloon- vs. Self-expanding intraannular TAVI in small aortic annuli) was created to elucidate this topic.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, national, randomized controlled, post-market trial.

The primary objectives of the trial are to demonstrate clinical and hemodynamic non-inferiority of the Octapro+ System when compared to subjects treated with the Navitor System at 30 days and12 months post-procedure.

Subjects will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive TAVI with either a Meril Balloon-expanding (BE) intraannular Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) or an Abbott Self-expanding (SE) intraannular THV. Data will be collected at pre- and post-procedure, at discharge, at 30 days, and once a year until the 5-year follow-up is completed.

Product Names:

  • Meril Octapro+ THV System, (Commercially available in Germany)
  • Abbott Navitor/ Navitor Vision THV System (Commercially available in Europe/US.)

Currently, there is no comparative evidence for clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of the two available intra-annular THV principles (BE vs. SE) for treatment of AS in patients with small aortic annuli.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

  • TAVI
  • TAVR
  • Aortic valve stenosis
  • Bioprostheses
  • Transcatheter Heart Valves
  • Balloon-expanding
  • Self-expanding
  • Aortic annulus
  • Hemodynamics
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants 18 years of age or older
  • Heart team consensus that isolated transfemoral TAVI is medically justified and advisable
  • Diagnosis of severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and aortic annulus ≤ 430 mm² as seen in preoperative CT diagnostic
  • Anatomy is suitable for both BE and SE THVs according to Heart Team judgement
  • Participant provided written to participate in the trial
  • Ability of participant to understand patient information and to personally sign and date informed consent to participate in trial, before performing any trial-related procedures
  • Participant and treating physician agree that participant will return for all required postprocedural follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uni- or bicuspid aortic valve pathology
  • Severe Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification with prohibitive risk for BE THV as determined by heart team
  • Non-calcified aortic valve pathology or endocarditis
  • Expected \<12 months due to associated non-cardiac comorbidities
  • Currently participating in another drug or device trial
  • Urgent or emergency TAVI
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
510 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intra-annular Balloon-expanding THV

    Device: Meril Octapro+ THV System

  • Experimental
    Intra-annular Self-expanding THV

    Device: Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system

Interventions

  • DeviceMeril Octapro+ THV System

    TAVI treatment with Meril Octapro+ THV System

    Also known as: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

  • DeviceAbbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system

    TAVI treatment with Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision System

    Also known as: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Early Safety according to VARC-3 Criteria

    * Freedom from all-cause mortality * Freedom from all stroke * Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding * Freedom from major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication * Freedom from acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4 * Freedom from moderate or severe aortic regurgitation * Freedom from new permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device

    Time frame: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemodynamic performance (Mean aortic gradient)

    \- Transvalvular mean pressure gradient ( mmHg, Continuous Variable)

    Time frame: 12 Months and 5 Years

  2. Paravalvular leakage ≥ moderate

    Rate of significant paravalvular leakage (≥ moderate)

    Time frame: 12 months and 5 years

  3. Freedom from All-cause mortality, Disabling stroke and Rehospitalization

    Composite Endpoint

    Time frame: 5 Years

  4. Rate of Bioprosthetic valve failure and dysfunction (Combined endpoint)

    * Valve mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or higher * Incidence of Nonstructural valve dysfunction, defined as severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or at least moderate aortic regurgitation * Incidence of Clinical valve thrombosis; endocarditis * Incidence of Aortic-valve reintervention

    Time frame: 5 Years

  5. Rate of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

    Implantation of a Permanent Pacemaker due to Conduction disturbances

    Time frame: 5 Years

  6. Rate of Any Stroke

    Minor, Major and Disabling Stroke

    Time frame: 5 Years

  7. New York Heart Association functional class compared to baseline

    Symptom relief (Dyspnea)

    Time frame: 5 Years

  8. Left ventricular ejection fraction compared to baseline

    Left Ventricular Function parameter

    Time frame: 5 Years

  9. Length of hospital stay at discharge

    Length of hospital stay at discharge

    Time frame: 30 Days

  10. Technical success according to VARC-3 criteria

    * Freedom from mortality * Successful access, delivery of device and retrieval of the delivery system * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication

    Time frame: 30 Days

  11. Device success according to VARC-3 criteria

    * Technical success * Freedom from mortality * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication * Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \< 20 mm Hg, peak velocity \< 3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥ 0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation

    Time frame: 30 Days

  12. Rate of New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

    New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

    Time frame: 30 Days

Other outcomes

  1. Freedom from All-cause mortality, Disabling stroke and Rehospitalization

    Composite endpoint

    Time frame: 12 Months and 5 Years

  2. Rate of Bioprosthetic valve failure and dysfunction (Combined endpoint)

    * Valve mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or higher * Incidence of Nonstructural valve dysfunction, defined as severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or at least moderate aortic regurgitation * Incidence of Clinical valve thrombosis; endocarditis * Incidence of Aortic-valve reintervention

    Time frame: 12 Months and 5 Years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg
    Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg 20249, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jul 2028, 21 months later.

Of 177 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Aortic Valve Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 288 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 72.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 27, 2026
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2033
Last update
Aug 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07794306
Responsible party
Andreas Schäfer (PD. Dr. med. Andreas Schäfer, MHBA, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
Start date
Oct 26, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 31, 2026

Study contacts

Andreas Schaefer, PD Dr. med.
Contact
and.schaefer@uke.de
+4915222816250

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion