A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Subcutaneous testosterone in Gender Dysphoria, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to male participants aged 19 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-06.
Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
For people who identify as transgender, there is a strong sense that they were born into the wrong body and that their outward looking body does not match how they truly feel about themselves. They feel male, not female and have always felt that way. There is a great deal of discomfort or dysphoria about looking and feeling female, and there is a strong desire to achieve a more masculine appearance. While surgery, clothing and hair for example, can help a person appear more like a male, many transgender males will want to take testosterone to make them feel and look more masculine.
This usually involves injecting testosterone into a muscle every 1-2 weeks for many years. Intramuscular injections can often be uncomfortable or painful, and requires the patient to be taught how to inject themselves. Or somebody else has to do it. There is a growing trend in some transgender men to give their injection just below the skin or subcutaneously (like insulin in a diabetic), because it is less uncomfortable but we don't really know if testosterone gets into the blood in the same way. At least one clinic in the US already suggests that patients can use the subcutaneous method but there is almost no research to show it's the same as intramuscular.
Our project will be looking at a small group of transgender males who are already on intramuscular testosterone and then switch them over to the same dose of subcutaneous testosterone, and then compare their levels of testosterone. If those levels are similar, then patients may chose the less uncomfortable subcutaneous injection.
Rationale:
In caring for transgender males (born female but identify as male), intramuscular (IM) testosterone is considered standard of care if they elect therapy to transition. Yet, IM testosterone has limitations: discomfort; a modest amount of teaching; bleeding concerns if the patient is on anticoagulants; and fluctuations in circulating serum testosterone. Erratic absorption may also led to variability in mood and energy. Due to these limitations, there is a trend, especially in younger patients, to use the more comfortable subcutaneous (SC) route. However, there are little data suggesting equivalency of SC to IM testosterone and virtually no data in transgender males.
Hypothesis:
In transgender males, SC testosterone will yield similar pharmacokinetics and better tolerability when compared to IM testosterone.
Objectives:
Research Plan:
Patients (19-59 years old) on a weekly self-injection schedule of either T cypionate or enanthate will be included. Patients with medical instability, recent or imminent surgery will be excluded. Twenty-five patients will be recruited from the 6 local Vancouver Coastal HealthTrans Primary Care physicians' clinics.
Using a cross-over design, trough serum testosterone levels from the IM technique will be determined weekly for 3 weeks. Patients will then switch to SC injection of the same testosterone ester and dosage, and weekly trough levels measured for another 8 weeks. These trough measurements will allow us to determine attainment of steady-state testosterone levels. During the 3rd and 11th week, serial testosterone levels will be collected to generate noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, which will be compared between the two techniques. Patients will complete a validated pain analogue questionnaire during the initial 3-week IM phase, and again during weeks 2 and 8 of the SC phase and maintain a diary throughout the study. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be used with p\<0.05 denoting significance.
Significance: If SC testosterone yields similar pharmacokinetics and better tolerability than IM testosterone, it will reduce the perceived barrier of IM injections and mitigate non-compliance. There are potential cost savings as patients will not require a clinician to inject. The findings may also be generalized to hypogonadal males. Ultimately, results are crucial to designing a larger multi-center study to provide definitive dosing recommendations.
83 studies on the registry are indexed under Gender Dysphoria; 37 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 55 across 29 interventional studies indexed under Gender Dysphoria.
Browse Gender Dysphoria studies →University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
We will take a group of transgender males, already on a stable dosage of intramuscular testosterone, and then using their same type and dosage, switch them to the subcutaneous injection route. Weekly trough (just before their weekly injection) levels of total serum testosterone will be taken to compare the steady states of those two injection routes.
Drug: Subcutaneous testosterone
Also known as: Testosterone cypionate, Testosteron enanthate
Serum Testosterone (Total)
To compare the steady state levels of total serum testosterone using the Subcutaneous (SC) and Intramuscular (IM) injection routes in a group of transgender males who are already on stable IM dosages.
Time frame: 11 weeks
Pharmacokinetics of serum testosterone
We will be measuring alternate day serum testosterone levels during the subjects final week of IM testosterone injections (week #3) and the final week of SC testosterone injections (week #11).
Time frame: 2 weeks
Tolerability and discomfort assessment
Study participants will complete a weekly questionnaire regarding tolerability and discomfort, as well as a final questionnaire asking for preferred method of injection.
Time frame: 11 weeks
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of British Columbia