ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02115269PRESTOUpdated Nov 6, 2017Results posted

IndoProCaf Effervescent Tablets Effectiveness in Acute Treatment of Migraine and/or Episodic Tension-type Headache and Patients' Satisfaction With the Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice

An observational study in Headache Disorders, Primary, Migraine With Aura and Migraine Without Aura, sponsored by Abbott. Completed at 30 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-06.

Sponsored by Abbott · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
759
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Headaches are a common medical problem that physicians frequently encounter in their practice. One of key findings of The Atlas of Headache Disorders prepared by World Health Organization (WHO) is: headache disorders, including migraine and tension-type headache (TTH), are among the most prevalent disorders of mankind. The fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine and caffeine (IndoProCaf) showed efficacy and safety in acute treatment of migraine and episodic tension-type headache attacks. IndoProCaf (Difmetre®) is widely used in common daily practice only in Italy from early 1970s, is available at the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) pharmaceutical market now. There are limited data regarding IndoProCaf usage from post-marketing settings. This will be a first post-marketing observational study which aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and patients' satisfaction of primary headaches acute treatment in routine clinical settings in Ukraine and Kazakhstan.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed as a prospective, multicentre, observational, non-interventional, non-randomized, non-controlled, single arm, post-marketing study where IndoProCaf will be prescribed in the usual manner per standard clinical practice of the treating physician and in accordance with the terms of the locally approved instruction for medical use. No additional procedures (other than the standard of care) shall be applied to the patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Headache Disorders, Primary
  • Migraine With Aura
  • Migraine Without Aura
  • Tension-Type Headache

Keywords

  • Indoprocaf
  • Indomethacin
  • Caffeine
  • Prochlorperazine
  • Migraine with Aura
  • Migraine without Aura
  • Tension-Type Headache
03

In context

Headache Disorders, Primary

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache Disorders, Primary; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 759 is above the median of 120 across 21 observational studies indexed under Headache Disorders, Primary.

Browse Headache Disorders, Primary studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott is the lead sponsor of 361 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with migraine (with or without aura) and/or episodic TTH

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of primary headache (migraine with or without aura and/or episodic TTH) and whose headache attacks required acute pharmacological treatment.
  • Were administered IndoProCaf (Difmetre®) effervescent tablets therapy according to the local product labelling.
  • Adults 18 years and older (male, female).
  • Provide Authorization to the investigator to use and/or disclose personal and/or health data.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meet for treatment with IndoProCaf (Difmetre®) effervescent tablets as outlined in the latest version of local product labelling.
  • Patients who are required prescription by physician of IndoProCaf and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-containing products at the same time for acute headache attacks treatment.
  • Previous discontinuation of IndoProCaf treatment due to safety (i.e. ) events, lack of efficacy.
  • Female patients who are pregnant or are breast-feeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
759 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • primary headaches

    Adults taking IndoProCaf for acute treatment of their primary headache attacks (migraine and/or episodic tension-type headache) as per routine clinical practice

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction

    significant pain reduction defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

    Time frame: up to 2 hours

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With IndoProCaf Treatment

    Patients are asked to evaluate their satisfaction with headache pain reduction after treatment by selecting the options: =very poor, =poor, =no opinion, =good, =very good. The satisfied patients are defined as those with =good and = very good answers.

    Time frame: up to 24 hours post dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Significant Pain Reduction

    Time to significant pain reduction at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose period are summarized with number of patients in each category; significant pain reduction is defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

    Time frame: up to 24 hours post-dose

  2. Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of First Dose no Response

    significant pain reduction defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

    Time frame: up to 2 hours

  3. Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of Headache Relapse

    significant pain reduction defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

    Time frame: up to 48 hours

  4. Percentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With Different Medicines Previously Used for Headache Attack

    Defined as good and very good by Likert-type scale (e.g. very poor, poor, no opinion, good, very good)

    Time frame: baseline

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePrimary Headaches
Started759
Completed702
Not completed57
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up43
Withdrew: Did not complete patient diary3
Withdrew: Moved to another city7
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2
Withdrew: Didn't take study drug2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction

significant pain reduction defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

Time frame:
up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction
percentage of participantsPrimary Headaches
Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction90.3
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With IndoProCaf Treatment

Patients are asked to evaluate their satisfaction with headache pain reduction after treatment by selecting the options: =very poor, =poor, =no opinion, =good, =very good. The satisfied patients are defined as those with =good and = very good answers.

Time frame:
up to 24 hours post dose
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With IndoProCaf Treatment
percentage of participantsPrimary Headaches
Percentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With IndoProCaf Treatment91.3
SecondaryTime to Significant Pain Reduction

Time to significant pain reduction at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose period are summarized with number of patients in each category; significant pain reduction is defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

Time frame:
up to 24 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Time to Significant Pain Reduction
participantsSignificant Pain Reduction at 1 Hour Post DoseSignificant Pain Reduction at 2 Hours Post DoseSignificant Pain Reduction at 4 Hour Post DoseSignificant Pain Reduction at 6 Hours Post DoseSignificant Pain Reduction at 24 Hours Post Dose
Time to Significant Pain Reduction4642521765015
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of First Dose no Response

significant pain reduction defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

Time frame:
up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of First Dose no Response
percentage of participantsPrimary Headaches
Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of First Dose no Response55.6
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of Headache Relapse

significant pain reduction defined as improvement to mild or no pain 2 hours post-dose by 4-point pain severity scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild headache, allowing normal activities; 2 = moderate headache, disturbing normal activities; 3 = severe headache, disabling activities, requiring bed-rest

Time frame:
up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of Headache Relapse
percentage of participantsPrimary Headaches
Percentage of Patients With Significant Pain Reduction in Case of Headache Relapse90.0
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With Different Medicines Previously Used for Headache Attack

Defined as good and very good by Likert-type scale (e.g. very poor, poor, no opinion, good, very good)

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With Different Medicines Previously Used for Headache Attack
percentage of participantsPatients With Primary Headaches and Took Triptans in the PastPatients With Primary Headaches Who Took NSAIDs and AnalgesicsPatients Who Took Combined AnalgesicsPatients Who Took Ergotamine-based DrugsPatients Who Took AntiemeticsPatients Who Took Opioid Analgesics
Percentage of Patients Who Are Satisfied With Different Medicines Previously Used for Headache Attack48.422.129.235.323.527.3

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Primary Headaches—3/702 (0.4%)16/702 (2.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPrimary Headaches
Hypertension crisisVascular disorders1/702
Face oedemaGeneral disorders1/702
Loss of consiousnessNervous system disorders1/702
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventPrimary Headaches
DizzinessNervous system disorders5/702
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/702
Visual impairmentEye disorders3/702
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders2/702
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders2/702
Blood pressure increasedInvestigations2/702
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/702
HypoaesthesiaNervous system disorders1/702
PresyncopeNervous system disorders1/702
TremorNervous system disorders1/702

Baseline characteristics

Safety set included all enrolled patients who have taken at least one dose of IndoProCaf

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Primary Headaches
Mean39.6 ± 11.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Primary Headaches
Female542
Male160
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Primary Headaches
Ukraine432
Kazakhstan270
08

Study locations

30 sites
  • Research facility ID ORG-000986
    Aktobe, 030000, Kazakhstan
  • LLP Medical Centre "Medical Assistance Group"
    Almaty, 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Research facility ID ORG-000994
    Almaty, 050000, Kazakhstan
  • Research facility ID ORG-000990
    Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
  • Research facility ID ORG-000991
    Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
  • Research facility ID ORG-000992
    Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
  • State enterprise on the right of business City Clinic №1
    Astana, 10000, Kazakhstan
  • LLP "State Center for Primary Health Care"
    Karaganda, 100008, Kazakhstan
  • LLP Clinic "Alanda"
    Karaganda, 100008, Kazakhstan
  • State enterprise on the right of business City Clinic №2
    Karaganda, 90005, Kazakhstan
  • Branch of the JSC " Railway Hospital of the medical catastrophes" "Kostanay railway hospital"
    Kostanay, 110000, Kazakhstan
  • LLP "Aksim-plus"
    Kostanay, 110000, Kazakhstan
  • State enterprise on the right of business "Consultative-diagnostic center Semey"
    Semey, 71400, Kazakhstan
  • Research facility ID ORG-000989
    Shymkent, 160000, Kazakhstan
  • State communal enterprise " City emergency health care hospital"
    Shymkent, 160000, Kazakhstan
  • Research facility ORG-001131
    Dnipropetrovsk, 49000, Ukraine
  • Research facility ORG-001127
    Kharkiv, 61068, Ukraine
  • Research facility ID ORG-000999
    Kharkiv, 61176, Ukraine
  • Research facility ID ORG-000335
    Kiev, 04112, Ukraine
  • "Public Institution ""Kyiv City Clinical Hospital №4"", Neurology Department №1 and №2;
    Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine
  • "Public Institution 'Volyn Regional Clinical Hospital',
    Lutsk, 43005, Ukraine
  • Research facility ID ORG-001001
    Lviv, 79010, Ukraine
  • Research facility ID ORG-001004
    Lviv, 79010, Ukraine
  • Research facility ID ORG-001000
    Mukachevo, 89600, Ukraine
  • Research facility ID ORG-000340
    Mykolaiv, 54001, Ukraine
  • Research facility ORG-001130
    Odesa, 65080, Ukraine
  • Research faciity ID ORG-001003
    Odesa, 65113, Ukraine
  • Research facility ORG-001129
    Poltava, 36011, Ukraine
  • Education and Research Medical Center "University Hospital of Zaporizhzhia State Medical University", Neurology Department
    Zaporizhzhia, 69063, Ukraine
  • Public Institution "Zaporizhzhia City Multispecialty Clinical Hospital №9", Neurology Department
    Zaporizhzhia, 69065, Ukraine
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2014, a primary completion of Nov 2015 and a completion of Nov 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Sep 2017, 1 year 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2014
First posted
Apr 16, 2014
Start
Jun 2014
Primary completionActual
Nov 2015
CompletionActual
Nov 2015
Results first posted
Sep 25, 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02115269
Lead sponsor
Abbott
Collaborators
Almedis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Results posted
Sep 25, 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017

Study contacts

Jean-Pascal Berrou, MD
study director · Abbott

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion