ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07309874Updated Sep 9, 2026

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling Targeting Rectus Capitus Posterior Major on Individuals With Headaches

An interventional study of Dry needling in Headache Disorders, Primary and Headache, Cervicogenic, sponsored by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Headaches such as tension-type, migraine, and cervicogenic (neck-related) headaches are among the most common and disabling conditions worldwide. and are often associated with tight or sensitive muscles at the base of the skull, which can contribute to headaches. Dry needling involves inserting a very thin, sterile needle into tight muscle areas known as trigger points to relieve pain and muscle tension. When applied to the deep neck muscles, including those beneath the skull, dry needling may reduce headache symptoms. The suboccipital region contains important structures such as the vertebral artery, greater occipital nerve, and spinal cord, which requires precise needle placement to maintain safety. Many needling techniques used in this region have not been validated for accuracy or safety in living subjects. This study will use real-time ultrasound imaging to guide dry needling of the rectus capitis posterior major muscle and directly visualize nearby structures to minimize risk.

The main goals of this research are to examine the effects of a single session of ultrasound-guided dry needling on headache symptoms and to confirm the safety, accuracy, and consistency of the proposed needling technique using ultrasound imaging.

Read the detailed description

RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm, repeated-measures interventional study with secondary observational ultrasound validation of two insertion angles and intra-rater test-retest reliability of ultrasound assessments at \~6 months.

PROCEDURE: Each participant will complete one study visit lasting approximately 60 minutes. During each data collection session:

  1. Screening: Participants will undergo screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    o Eligible participants will then complete: A Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) of their headache pain on a scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worse pain) including: Current rating; Best rating; Worst rating in the past 6 months; Complete the Headache Disability Index (HDI)

  2. Positioning: Participants will be positioned prone on a treatment table with cervical spine alignment monitored using an inclinometer to ensure cervical lordosis is under 10°.
  3. Landmark Identification \& Needle Insertion:

    • Landmark Identification: The PI will palpate and mark two bony landmarks in the upper neck including: 1. The C2 Spinous process, a distinct bone that can be felt at the top of the spine below the skull, and 2. The C1 Transverse process, a bony ridge located just below and slightly to the side of the base of the skull at \~45-degree angle from the ear. (These landmarks will help determine the correct location for the needle insertion.)
    • Needle Insertion: Sterile, 0.25 gauge/diameter, 40 mm needles will be used. A new needle will be used for each individual needle insertion before being discarded in a sharps container. The needle will be inserted just below the base of the skull, slightly off the center line of the neck. Each participant will have two separate needle insertions during the single data collection visit. Two dry needle insertion techniques will be performed in a randomized order: Method 1: 30° (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput, and Method 2: 45° (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput.
    • Needle Target: The target of the needle is a deep muscle (Rectus Capitus Posterior Major) that attaches to the base of the skull (occiput). For both methods, the needle will be advanced until bony contact is achieved, and then slightly pulled in/out within the muscle to visualize needle placement on ultrasound
    • Randomization of technique order (Method 1 vs. Method 2) will be generated using the list randomizer from https://www.random.org/lists/
  4. Ultrasound Imaging: An investigator will use a Sonosite PX ultrasound device to capture still images and 3-second video clips of needle placement relative to the RCPMaj and surrounding anatomy. Participants may be asked to laterally deviate their eyes to assist in muscle visualization.
  5. Data Collection: Investigators will record whether a bony backdrop was felt, if the needle reached the RCPMaj, and the length of unused needle remaining outside the skin as well as if the needle pierce through the vertebral artery.

IMMEDIATE POST-PROCEDURE: Participants will be asked to rate their current level of pain immediately following the intervention on the NPRS from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worse pain)

POST-PROCEDURE FOLLOW UP VISIT: 24-48 hours following data collection, participants will be asked to complete the following via a secure, anonymous online survey link to the electronic platform Qualtrics®. Participants will be sent an email with the secure survey link and reminder of their unique study ID. Participants will only use their unique assigned study ID. No identifying information (name, email address, or IP address) will be collected in Qualtrics® survey responses. Participants will report: 1) Post-needling soreness (Yes/No), 2) NRPS including Current rating, Best rating and Worst rating in the last 24-48 hours, and 3) Headache Disability Index

02

Conditions studied

  • Headache Disorders, Primary
  • Headache, Cervicogenic

Keywords

  • Headache
  • cervical spine
  • suboccipital muscles
  • needle placement
03

In context

Headache Disorders, Primary

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache Disorders, Primary; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Headache Disorders, Primary.

Browse Headache Disorders, Primary studies →

Lead sponsor

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Reports of a headache within the last 6 months (no minimum or maximum frequency or duration)
  • Current reports of headache
  • Tenderness to palpation of suboccipital muscles with Numeric Pain Rating Scale score ≥ 2/10
  • No history of cervical spine surgery or neurological disorders

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cervical spine trauma or surgery
  • Diagnosed bleeding disorder
  • Currently using anticoagulant medications
  • Currently using anti- medications
  • Diagnosed systemic joint diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
  • Active infection
  • Diabetes
  • Cancer
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Inability to tolerate prone positioning for the duration of the procedure.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dry needling

    Other: Dry needling

Interventions

  • OtherDry needling

    Each subject will receive two separate dry needle insertions targeting the rectus capitus posterior major. Method 1 will be 30 degrees (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput. Method 2 will be 45 degrees (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-needling soreness

    Subjective outcome measures: • Post-data collection reports of post-needling soreness (Dichotomous report: Yes or No)

    Time frame: 24-48 hours post-data collection

  2. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain): Pre-data collection will include Current rating, Best rating in past 6 months, and Worst rating in past 6 months. Post-data collection will include Current rating, Best rating in past 24-48 hours, and Worst rating in past 24-48 hours

    Time frame: Baseline immediately pre-data collection and then again 24-48 hours post-data collection

  3. Headache Disability Index

    Headache Disability Index: Scores range from 0 to 100. A total score of 10-28 is considered mild disability. A total score of 30-48 is considered moderate disability. A total score of 50-68 is severe disability. A total score of 72-100 is considered complete disability. Participants will complete the Headache Disability Index immediately pre-data collection and then 24-48 hours post-data collection

    Time frame: Baseline immediately pre-data collection and then again 24-48 hours post-data collection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of needle placement reaching a bony structure

    For each needle insertion, a dichotomous decision (Yes vs. No) will be made via ultrasound imaging if the needle reached the occiput (bony structure)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Frequency of successful needle placement into the Rectus Capitus Posterior Major

    For each needle insertion, a dichotomous decision (Yes vs. No) will be made via ultrasound imaging if the needle reached the Rectus Capitus Posterior Major

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Length of unused needle at the point of bony contact

    For each needle insertion, the length of needle remaining outside the skin will be measured in millimeters for each time the needle reaches the occiput (bony contact)

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Intra-rater Reliability: Frequency of needle placement reaching a bony structure

    Intra-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa) will be calculated for identification of needle placement at time 0 and 6-month follow-up review. Investigators will assess secondary outcomes of frequency of needle placement reaching a bony structure at time 0 (baseline) and then again at 6 months post-data collection. The 6 month post-data collection decisions will be made from a 10 second video clip taken during primary data collection

    Time frame: Baseline during primary data collection and then again 6 months post-data collection

  2. Intra-rater Reliability: Frequency of Needle Placement into Rectus Capitus Posterior Major

    Intra-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa) will be calculated for identification of needle placement at time 0 and 6-month follow-up review. Investigators will assess secondary outcomes of frequency of successful needle placement into the Rectus Capitus Posterior Major at time 0 (baseline) and then again at 6 months post-data collection. The 6 month post-data collection decisions will be made from a 10 second video clip taken during primary data collection

    Time frame: Baseline during primary data collection and then again 6 months post-data collection

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kearns GA, Lierly M, Gilbert KK, Dommerholt J. Guidelines to minimize risk when dry needling the rectus capitus posterior major muscle. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2025 Apr;76:103260. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103260. Epub 2025 Jan 10. PubMed 39823665 ↗
  • Kearns GA, Hooper TL, Brismee JM, Allen B, Lierly M, Gilbert KK, Pendergrass TJ, Edwards D. Influence of clinical experience on accuracy and safety of obliquus capitus inferior dry needling in unembalmed cadavers. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Dec;38(12):2052-2061. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1901326. Epub 2021 Mar 15. PubMed 33719823 ↗
  • Kearns G, Fernandez-De-Las-Penas C, Brismee JM, Gan J, Doidge J. New perspectives on dry needling following a medical model: are we screening our patients sufficiently? J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Jul;27(3):172-179. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1567011. Epub 2019 Jan 19. PubMed 30935332 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):954-976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3. PubMed 30353868 ↗
  • Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Linde M, Steiner TJ. The global prevalence of headache: an update, with analysis of the influences of methodological factors on prevalence estimates. J Headache Pain. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2. PubMed 35410119 ↗
  • Jung A, Carvalho GF, Szikszay TM, Pawlowsky V, Gabler T, Luedtke K. Physical Therapist Interventions to Reduce Headache Intensity, Frequency, and Duration in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2024 Feb 1;104(2):pzad154. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad154. PubMed 37941472 ↗
  • Pourahmadi M, Dommerholt J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Koes BW, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mansournia MA, Delavari S, Keshtkar A, Bahramian M. Dry Needling for the Treatment of Tension-Type, Cervicogenic, or Migraine Headaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 May 4;101(5):pzab068. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab068. PubMed 33609358 ↗
  • Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Martin-Casas P, Plaza-Manzano G. Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Neck Pain Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 14;9(10):3300. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103300. PubMed 33066556 ↗
  • Chys M, De Meulemeester K, De Greef I, Murillo C, Kindt W, Kouzouz Y, Lescroart B, Cagnie B. Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain-An Umbrella Review. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):1205. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031205. PubMed 36769852 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no need to share IPD with other investigators. Once completed, there will be no need to access any IPD in the future.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 9 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2025
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
StartActual
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2027
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07309874
Collaborators
Texas Woman's University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Gary A Kearns, PT, ScD
Contact
gary.kearns@ttuhsc.edu
12142448398
Jace A Brown, PT, PhD
Contact
jbrown34@twu.edu
9406897716
Gary A Kearns, PT, ScD
principal investigator · Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion