An interventional study of PSV mode and PAV mode in Acute Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Pierre and Marie Curie University. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-05.
Sponsored by Pierre and Marie Curie University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
In spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients, the adequacy between the patient's demand and the level of respiratory support delivered by the ventilator is a major clinical issue. Neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV) have been developed to adapt the level of assistance to the patient's demand. These two modes have been compared to pressure support ventilation (PSV) but have not been compared to each other.
1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 16 is below the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.
Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →Pierre and Marie Curie University is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intubated patients: The three modes (PSV, PAV, NAVA) will be applied in random order to each mechanically ventilated patient included in the study.
Device: PSV mode · Device: PAV mode · Device: NAVA
Application of PSV in all patients
Application of PAV mode in all patients
Breathing pattern variability
The coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by the mean) of the tidal volume (expressed in %)
Time frame: February 2014
Patient-ventilator asynchrony
Prevalence of ineffective efforts and double triggering (expressed as a number of events per minute)
Time frame: February, 2014
Electrical diaphragm activity Gas exchange
measured by the NAVA probe
Time frame: February 2014
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Pierre and Marie Curie University