CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02033161Updated Jan 10, 2014

Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: a Pilot Study

An interventional study of Internet-delivered CBT in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-10.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
13 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot-study aims to evaluate the treatment effects and feasibility of an internet-delivered CBT-program for adolescents with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Read the detailed description

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID), including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional dyspepsia (FD) and functional abdominal pain (FAP), are common in adolescents and associated with impaired quality of life. In adults with IBS, internet-delivered CBT leads to reduced symptoms and increased quality of life, but studies in children are lacking. This pilot-study aim to evaluate the treatment effects and feasibility of an internet-delivered CBT-program for adolescents with FGID.

Method: Pilot study with a pre-post-design and no control group. The internet-delivered CBT-program lasted for 8 weeks and included weekly therapist support, consisting of online messages and telephone calls. Assessment points were baseline, post-treatment and 6 months follow-up.

Analysis: Effect sizes and within-group differences were calculated in an intent-to-treat analysis using Cohens' d and Student's t-test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Keywords

  • Functional gastrointestinal disorders
  • FGID
  • Recurrent abdominal pain
  • Abdominal pain
  • pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,062 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 71 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,113 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age between 13 and 17 years old.
  • a diagnosis of a functional gastrointestinal disorder by treating physician, e.g. IBS, FD or FAP.
  • adolescent and one parent should have easy access to the Internet, some computer experience and good Swedish language skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concurrent serious medical conditions or gastrointestinal symptoms likely caused by an organic disorder.
  • psychiatric diagnosis more urgent to treat than the abdominal pain.
  • on-going psychological treatment.
  • absence from school more than 20%.
  • on-going maltreatment, violence or severe parental psychiatric illness in the family.
  • pronounced language and learning difficulties depending on whether the youth was expected to benefit from the treatment or not.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Internet-delivered CBT

    Behavioral: Internet-delivered CBT

Interventions

  • BehavioralInternet-delivered CBT

    The internet-treatment consisted of six modules during 8 weeks. Part 1: education about FGID and the treatment model. Part 2: individual symptom behavior. Part 3: toilet habits, or other common symptom behavior. Part 4 and Part 5: Exposure during 4 weeks. Part 6: relapse prevention. Parents received four modules over 8 weeks consisting of psycho-education about FGID and the treatment model, increased positive time with the child in order to reduce attention to pain, parental symptom behavior, support child exposure and relapse prevention. The therapists gave feedback weekly . All participants had at least 1 telephone call from their therapist during the fifth and sixth week of treatment.

    Also known as: Internet-delivered Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in gastrointestinal symptoms from baseline to 8 weeks, and from baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured with a self-report scale, GSRS-IBS, that have 13 items about weekly gastro-intestinal symptoms like bloating, hard stool, abdominal pain etc. It is a seven-point Likert scale, from 1 ("no trouble at all") to 7 ("very severe discomfort"). The GSRS-IBS has excellent psychometric properties with internal consistency between α = .74 (for abdominal pain) to α = .85 (for satiety).

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks, baseline to 8 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in pain reactivity from baseline to 8 weeks, and from baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured with a self-report scale, pain reactivity scale (PRS), that have 5 items about reactivity to and worry about pain. Three items are about emotional reactions to current pain. Two items affect frequency of worry about not being able to do things now, and in the future because of the pain. Questions are answered on a 6-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 6 ("very much"). PRS has been reported to have satisfactory psychometric properties (Wicksell et al, 2011).

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks, baseline to 8 months.

  2. Change in pain interference on activities from baseline to 8 weeks, and baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured with a self-report scale, pain interference index (PII), that have 6 items about interference on various activities because of pain. Questions are answered on a 6-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 6 ("very much"). According to preliminary analysis, the instrument has satisfactory psychometric properties (Wicksell et al., 2011)

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks, baseline to 8 months.

  3. Change in function from baseline to 8 weeks and from baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured with a self-report scale, functional disability index (FDI), with 15 items on daily activities. Questions are related to specific activities such as climbing stairs, running 100 meters and to go shopping, and general activities such as eating meals and being in school all day. The scale ranges from 1 (no problem at all) to 5 (impossible). It is validated for children and adolescents with chronic abdominal pain with high internal consistency, α = .86 for boys and α = .91 for girls (Claar and Walker, 2006). FDI is the scale that is recommended in pediatric pain studies to measure the influence of pain on function (McGrath et al., 2008).

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks, baseline to 8 months.

  4. Change in sensitivity to symptoms of anxiety from baseline to 8 weeks, and from baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured by a self-report scale called Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index (CASI) with 18 items. It is a 3-point scale (1-3), which measures sensitivity to internal sensations that could be symptoms of anxiety. The questions include items such as "I get scared when I feel shaky" or "I get scared when my heart beats fast" but also items that could be gastro-intestinal symptoms, such as "When my stomach hurts, I worry that i might be really sick "(Silverman, Fleisig, Rabian, \& Peterson, 1991). CASI has been reported to have high reliability, α = .84 (Silverman et al. 1991).

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks, baseline to 8 months.

  5. Change in level of depression from baseline to 8 weeks and from baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured by the self-report scale Child depression Inventory (CDI) that consists of 27 items on a 3-graded scale (0-2). The scale's psychometric properties have been validated in a study by Smucker, Craighead and Green (1986), which found that the internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha was acceptable, between α = .83 and α = .89.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 8 months.

  6. Change in level of perceived stress from baseline to 8 weeks and from baseline to 6 months after treatment.

    Measured by a four-item short version of a self-report scale, Percieved Stress Scale (PSS-4). PSS-4 consists of four statements about the feeling of being able to control and sort out problems that need to be managed. Responses are rated from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often"). Reliability for the version with 4 items is α = .72 (Cohen et al., 1983).

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 8 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    Stockholm, Sweden
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02033161
Lead sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Responsible party
Brjann Ljotsson (PhD, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2014
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Last update
Jan 10, 2014

Study contacts

Brjánn Ljótsson, PhD
principal investigator · Departement of clinical neuropsychology, Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion