ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07000227BRIDGEUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Mechanism of FODMAP Restriction on FGID Patients

An interventional study of Low FODMAP diet and Gentle FODMAP diet in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs), Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Functional Dyspepsia, sponsored by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre. Recruiting at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Primary conditionIrritable Bowel SyndromeRegistry: Gastrointestinal DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Gastrointestinal Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Irritable Bowel Syndrome, a narrower term within Gastrointestinal Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary :

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effects of differing FODMAP diets on gut microbiota, gut barrier function, symptom severity, quality of life, and psychological status in FGID patients. The main question it aims to answer is :

How does diets with differing FODMAP content affect the gut microbiota, gut barrier function, symptom severity, psychological status and quality of life in patients with FGID ? Researchers will compare low FODMAP diet, Gentle FODMAP diet and Traditional Dietary Advice (NICE guidelines) to see which diet is more suitable and effective for Malaysian FGID patients.

Participants will :

Be given either low FODMAP diet, Gentle FODMAP diet or Traditional Dietary Advice intervention and will be required to follow the intervention for two weeks.

Be required to provide stool and blood samples during baseline and intervention Record 4 day food diary and complete assessing questionnaires during baseline and intervention

Read the detailed description

Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder (FGIDs), including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD), are prevalent conditions that effects about 40% of world population and 21% of Malaysian population. They represent a significant health burden, impacting patients' quality of life. While the low FODMAP diet is effective in managing FGID around the western region, there is limited research done on comparing the impacts of diets with differing FODMAP content on symptom severity, quality of life, gut microbiota and gut barrier function of FGID patients in the Asian region as low FODMAP is restrictive. Therefore, conducting a randomised controlled trial is vital in measuring the effectiveness of diet with differing FODMAPs on FGID patients.

The objectives of this study are :

  • To determine the effect of FODMAPs restriction on the gut microbiota abundance and diversity in FGID patients
  • To determine the effect of FODMAPs restriction on gut barrier function after dietary intervention among FGID patients
  • To determine the effect of FODMAPs restriction on the symptom severity, quality of life and psychological status in FGID patients

This study would be able to provide significant understanding of dietary management of FGID. Conducting this study would provide critical insights into the role of gut microbiota and gut barrier function in the pathophysiology of FGID, highlighting how dietary modulation can impact overall symptom management.

The study design involve screening and recruiting participants, followed by baseline data collection, randomisation, group allocation, and intervention with data collection.

First Visit (Day 1) During baseline, vital information such as socio demographic data will be gathered and FGID screening will be conducted using the ROME III Asian Diagnostic Questionnaire for Adults which consists of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome module and the Gastroduodenal Disorders module. A total of 5 questionnaires will be provide to the participants. These are Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Food avoidance and Dietary trigger questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

Body weight and composition of participants will be assessed using the Tanita Body Composition scale, whereas height of participants will be measured using a stadiometer. Dietary and FODMAPs will be estimated using a 4-day food diary (3 weekdays, 1 weekend). Additionally, blood sample will be collected from participants for further assessment. 10 ml blood will be drawn from each participant to detect serum biomarkers. Stool bottle will be provided to participants for stool collection upon the next visit. Stool collection is implemented to assess participants' gut integrity and gut microbiota. After concluding the baseline assessments, patients will be randomised into three groups. Groups A, B and C will follow a restricted FODMAP diet (LFD), Gentle FODMAP diet and traditional dietary advice (TDA), respectively. Participants will be randomly assigned to a study arm by a computer-generated randomisation program using the open-access website www.randomization.com at a ratio of 1:1:1.

Second Visit (Day 8) Participants will return their stool sample and completed diary. The diary will be assessed for completion, and the stool sample will be collected and frozen per protocol. Based on randomisation, participants in the LFD group will be provided with restricted FODMAP advice. In contrast, those in the GFD group will be given general healthy advice by dietitians/researchers trained in delivering the diet. Meanwhile, participants in the TDA group will be given an overall healthy dietary intervention and counselling. All three groups will be advised to follow their respective diets for two weeks. A food diary and another stool collection bottle will be provided.

Phone follow up (Day 15) A phone follow-up is scheduled after a week to remind participants to complete their food diary, answer any doubts or questions relating to their allocated intervention and subsequently plan their next visit.

Final visit (Day 22) Visit 3 will be scheduled after 2 weeks of intervention. Participants will return their stool samples, food diary, and questionnaire. They will also complete two symptom severity questionnaires, food avoidance and dietary trigger questionnaire, with questionnaires to assess quality of life and psychological status and provide a non-fasting blood sample. Additionally, participants in the LFD group will be provided advice on reintroduction. Those who have completed the study will be given an inconvenience allowance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs)
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
  • Functional Dyspepsia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Functional Dyspepsia
  • FODMAP Restriction
  • Gentle FODMAP
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome Reclassified

1,116 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 70 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Compared within Irritable Bowel Syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Gastrointestinal Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 and above
  • Able to provide
  • Those with pre-existing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional dyspepsia (FD) or both screened by gastroenterologists
  • Meet the ROME III- Asian criteria for FGID
  • Able to communicate in Malay or English language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • History declared by the participant of pre-existing gastrointestinal disorder, including but not limited to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Coeliac Disease, Pancreatitis, Gallstone disease (biliary colic, cholecystitis), Diverticulitis
  • Cancer of any kind
  • Patients with reported history of previous resection of any part of the GI tract other than appendix or gall bladder, intestinal stoma
  • Habitual use of opiate analgesics likely to alter bowel function e.g. morphine
  • Use of antibiotics in the preceding two weeks and/or in the past one month
  • Consumption of probiotics, prebiotics or fibre supplements in the past one month
  • Enteral feeding or texture modified diet patients
  • Those with cognitive impairment or severe mental disorder (Alzheimer's, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder. etc)
  • Shift workers (e.g. Nurse, doctors)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Low FODMAP diet

    Low FODMAP diet will be administered for two weeks

    Behavioral: Low FODMAP diet

  • Active comparator
    Gentle FODMAP diet

    Gentle FODMAP diet will be administered for two weeks

    Behavioral: Gentle FODMAP diet

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Dietary Advice

    Traditional Dietary advice will be administered for two weeks

    Behavioral: Traditional Dietary Advice

Interventions

  • BehavioralLow FODMAP diet

    High FODMAP foods are swapped for low FODMAP alternatives, for two weeks (Elimination phase)

  • BehavioralGentle FODMAP diet

    Key High FODMAP foods will be identified from patients' food diaries and swapped with low FODMAP alternatives. (Elimination phase)

  • BehavioralTraditional Dietary Advice

    Subjects are required to follow a set of healthy eating guidelines set by NICE guidelines for IBS for two weeks a. Have regular meals and take time to eat b. Avoid missing meals or leaving long gaps between eating c. Drink at least eight cups of fluid a day, especially water or other non-d. caffeinated drinks, such as herbal teas d. Restrict tea and coffee to three cups a day e. Reduce intake of alcohol and fizzy drinks . Limit intake of high-fibre food g. Reduce intake of resistant starch h. Limit fresh fruit to three portions a day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of FODMAP restrictions on Gut Microbiota Abundance and Diversity

    16s RNA gene seqeuncing will be conducted on the stool samples at both baseline and post-intervention timelines. This test would target the microbial diversity by assessing the abdundance of key bacterial taxa.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  2. Effect of FODMAP restrictions on Gut Barrier Function

    The stool samples collected would be subjected to zonulin test and short-chain fatty acid quantification (SCFA) in order to assess gut barrier function of subjects at baseline and post-intervention timelines. Zonulin is a protein that reversibly modulates the intestinal permeability, while SCFA such as butyrate are by-products of the carbohydrate fermentation facilitated by gut microbiome that enhances the integrity of tight junction of the intestinal barrier

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of 2 week FODMAP restrictions on Symptom Severity (IBS-SSS questionnaire)

    Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) will be filled out by subjects during baseline and post-intervention to assess symptom severity. For IBS-SSS, Four out of five items have visual analogue scales to describe the level of severity of abdominal pain, bloating or distension, disturbance of bowel habits and life impact of IBS symptoms. The level of severity will be categorised based on their total scores. A score of less than 25% is considered no pain, 25 to 50% is considered mild, 50 to 75% is considered moderate, and the score of 100% is very severe.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  2. Effect of 2-week FODMAP restriction on Psychological Status

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be filled out by subjects during baseline and post-intervention to assess symptom severity. This self-reported questionnaire contains 14 items that are scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 to 3, and are classified into two subscales measuring cognitive and emotional symptoms of depression (HADS-D) and anxiety (HADS-A). The total score on each subscale ranges from 0 to 21, and a higher score represents worse symptoms. A score equal to or greater than eight on either HADS-D or HADS-A is considered a 'possible case', and above 11 a 'probable case'.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  3. Effect of 2-week FODMAP restriction on Quality of Life

    European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) will be filled out by subjects during baseline and post-intervention to assess quality of life. This validated questionnaire consists of five items capturing different aspects of health, including mobility, self-care, ability to carry out usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each item has five levels of responses, where the minimum level being 'no problems' and maximum level being 'unable to do' things mentioned.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  4. Effect of 2-week FODMAP restriction on Food Avoidance

    A validated food avoidance and dietary trigger questionnaire will be filled out by subjects during baseline and post-intervention to assess food avoidance. This questionnaire is a 10-item tool in which question 1 is to identify dietary triggers of subjects. Question 2, 3, and 4 are follow up questions to assess bowel symptoms and dietary triggers. Question 5 that assess fear of eating, has a 6-point Likert scale, where the minimum point is 'Strongly Disagree' and the maximum point is 'Strongly Agree'.Question 6 assesses food avoidance behaviour using a 4-point Likert scale, where the minimum point is 'Never' and the maximum point is 'Always'. Questions 6,7,8,9 and 10 are used to assess patient's medical knowledge and medical history.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  5. Effect of 2 week FODMAP restrictions on Anthropometry

    The anthropometry parameters such as weight (in kilograms), height (in centimetres), and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m\^2) will be assessed using standard protocols. To measure changes in body composition, weight, and BMI, the Body Impedance Analysis (BIA) will be used. Parameters such as percentage of body fat (%), visceral fat, muscle mass (kg) and total body water (%) will be measured.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  6. FODMAP Intake Before and After Intervention

    FODMAP intake will be estimated from the 4-day food diary (3 weekdays, 1 weekend) given to subjects both before intervention and after following 2-week intervention. FODMAP intake will be estimated using the Monash University Database

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

  7. Effect of 2-week FODMAP restrictions on Symptom Severity (GSRS questionnaire)

    The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) will be filled out by subjects during baseline and post-intervention to assess symptom severity. GSRS is 13 item questionnaire that are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with the minimum point being 'no discomfort at all' and maximum value being 'very severe discomfort'.

    Time frame: Measurement before (Day 1) and after the diet (Day 22)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak
    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zia JK, Lenhart A, Yang PL, Heitkemper MM, Baker J, Keefer L, Saps M, Cuff C, Hungria G, Videlock EJ, Chang L. Risk Factors for Abdominal Pain-Related Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology. 2022 Oct;163(4):995-1023.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 16. PubMed 35716771 ↗
  • Murray K, Wilkinson-Smith V, Hoad C, Costigan C, Cox E, Lam C, Marciani L, Gowland P, Spiller RC. Differential effects of FODMAPs (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols) on small and large intestinal contents in healthy subjects shown by MRI. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;109(1):110-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.386. Epub 2013 Nov 19. PubMed 24247211 ↗
  • Melchior C, Desprez C, Riachi G, Leroi AM, Dechelotte P, Achamrah N, Ducrotte P, Tavolacci MP, Gourcerol G. Anxiety and Depression Profile Is Associated With Eating Disorders in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 8;10:928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00928. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31969841 ↗
  • MacIntosh A, Heenan PE, Wright-McNaughton M, Frampton C, Skidmore P, Wall CL, Muir J, Talley NJ, Roy NC, Gearry RB. The relationship between fermentable carbohydrates and post-prandial bowel symptoms in patients with functional bowel disorders. Front Nutr. 2023 Feb 2;10:1060928. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1060928. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36819701 ↗
  • Jang SH, Choi SC, Kim YS, Ryu HS, Lee SY, Bahk WM. Psychological Characteristics and Quality of Life of Patients with Upper and Lower Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 23;12(1):124. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010124. PubMed 36614925 ↗
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9. PubMed 21479777 ↗
  • Ghoshal UC, Gwee KA, Chen M, Gong XR, Pratap N, Hou X, Syam AF, Abdullah M, Bak YT, Choi MG, Gonlachanvit S, Chua AS, Chong KM, Siah KT, Lu CL, Xiong L, Whitehead WE. Development, Translation and Validation of Enhanced Asian Rome III Questionnaires for Diagnosis of Functional Bowel Diseases in Major Asian Languages: A Rome Foundation-Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association Working Team Report. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jan 1;21(1):83-92. doi: 10.5056/jnm14045. PubMed 25537673 ↗
  • Chuah KH, Beh KH, Mahamad Rappek NA, Mahadeva S. The epidemiology and quality of life of functional gastrointestinal disorders according to Rome III vs Rome IV criteria: A cross-sectional study in primary care. J Dig Dis. 2021 Mar;22(3):159-166. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12975. PubMed 33595169 ↗
  • Burton Murray H, Riddle M, Rao F, McCann B, Staller K, Heitkemper M, Zia J. Eating disorder symptoms, including avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Aug;34(8):e14258. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14258. Epub 2021 Oct 24. PubMed 34693609 ↗
  • Black CJ, Drossman DA, Talley NJ, Ruddy J, Ford AC. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: advances in understanding and management. Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1664-1674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32115-2. Epub 2020 Oct 10. PubMed 33049221 ↗
  • Biesiekierski JR, Rosella O, Rose R, Liels K, Barrett JS, Shepherd SJ, Gibson PR, Muir JG. Quantification of fructans, galacto-oligosacharides and other short-chain carbohydrates in processed grains and cereals. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Apr;24(2):154-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01139.x. Epub 2011 Feb 21. PubMed 21332832 ↗
  • Bellini M, Tonarelli S, Nagy AG, Pancetti A, Costa F, Ricchiuti A, de Bortoli N, Mosca M, Marchi S, Rossi A. Low FODMAP Diet: Evidence, Doubts, and Hopes. Nutrients. 2020 Jan 4;12(1):148. doi: 10.3390/nu12010148. PubMed 31947991 ↗
  • Barrett JS, Gearry RB, Muir JG, Irving PM, Rose R, Rosella O, Haines ML, Shepherd SJ, Gibson PR. Dietary poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates increase delivery of water and fermentable substrates to the proximal colon. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Apr;31(8):874-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04237.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22. PubMed 20102355 ↗
  • Atkins M, Zar-Kessler C, Madva EN, Staller K, Eddy KT, Thomas JJ, Kuo B, Burton Murray H. History of trying exclusion diets and association with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in neurogastroenterology patients: A retrospective chart review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Mar;35(3):e14513. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14513. Epub 2023 Jan 4. PubMed 36600490 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We will not be sharing individual patient data to the trial registry to protect participant confidentiality, as institutional policies restrict such disclosure.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2025 to primary completion in Sep 2026, 14 months.

Of 305 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Irritable Bowel Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 40. This study's 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 357 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Sep 25, 2026: primary completion Jun 2026 → Sep 2026 and completion Sep 2026 → Oct 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2025
First posted
Jun 2, 2025
StartActual
Jul 20, 2025
Primary completionActual
Sep 24, 2026was Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2026was Sep 2026
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026→Sep 24, 2026 (actual)
Sep 25, 2026
Study completion
Sep 30, 2026→Oct 30, 2026
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Primary completion Jun 30, 2026→Sep 24, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Sep 30, 2026→Oct 30, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07000227
Lead sponsor
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Responsible party
Dr Shanthi Krishnasamy (Assistant Professor, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 2, 2025
Start date
Jul 20, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 24, 2026
Completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Shanthi Krishnasamy, Dr
Contact
shanthikrishnasamy@ukm.edu.my
+60182017116
Jaysrina Mahalinga Moorthy
Contact
P153921@siswa.ukm.edu.my
+60138372089
Neoh Hui-Min, Assc. Prf
study chair · National University of Malaysia
Vanitha Mariappan, Dr
study chair · National University of Malaysia
Deborah Chia Hsin Chew, Dr
study chair · National University of Malaysia
Syaratul Dalina Yusoff, Dr
study chair · National University of Malaysia
Yee Xing You, Dr
study chair · National University of Malaysia
Yeong Yeh Lee, Prof
study chair · Universiti Sains Malaysia
Jaysrina Mahalinga Moorthy, Ms
study director · National University of Malaysia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion